John Dugan Posted February 7, 2010 Share Posted February 7, 2010 Another study of the missing windows in the Moorman Polaroid.Jack are these white spots not part of the windows you say are missing? And why is your crop, where the windows begin, cutting off part of the person's right side? The entire right arm has been cropped off. John, I agree with you. I see white spots which certainly appear to be the windows behind Zapruder and Sitzman on the pedestal. Jack, every version of the Moorman picture available at Robin Unger's gallery on Duncan Macrae's forum has Zapruder and Sitzman on the pedestal. I'm not sure I understand what you are suggesting in terms of its alteration. Do you know of a copy of Moorman where Zapruder and Sitzman are NOT on the pedestal, or are you just pointing out that some versions of the photo were cropped in that area? There are versions of Moorman where the pedestal area was cropped off on the left. I doubt that I can find one, but as I recall, Weisberg1 was a version, complete with cutline, sent out by a wire service on 11-22. It was cropped just short of the pedestal. I have a slide version of it somewhere, but my scan of it was likely lost about three computers ago. Jack, for what reason would the moorman photo need to be altered? the alterers painted in Zap and Sitzman because they really weren't on the pedestal filming? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 7, 2010 Author Share Posted February 7, 2010 Another study of the missing windows in the Moorman Polaroid.Jack are these white spots not part of the windows you say are missing? And why is your crop, where the windows begin, cutting off part of the person's right side? The entire right arm has been cropped off. John, I agree with you. I see white spots which certainly appear to be the windows behind Zapruder and Sitzman on the pedestal. Jack, every version of the Moorman picture available at Robin Unger's gallery on Duncan Macrae's forum has Zapruder and Sitzman on the pedestal. I'm not sure I understand what you are suggesting in terms of its alteration. Do you know of a copy of Moorman where Zapruder and Sitzman are NOT on the pedestal, or are you just pointing out that some versions of the photo were cropped in that area? There are versions of Moorman where the pedestal area was cropped off on the left. I doubt that I can find one, but as I recall, Weisberg1 was a version, complete with cutline, sent out by a wire service on 11-22. It was cropped just short of the pedestal. I have a slide version of it somewhere, but my scan of it was likely lost about three computers ago. Jack, for what reason would the moorman photo need to be altered? the alterers painted in Zap and Sitzman because they really weren't on the pedestal filming? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 7, 2010 Author Share Posted February 7, 2010 (edited) I told John Costella the various claims here and he said he is too busy to make a reply, but he said to tell any of those who hold the FATPRUDER theory that the figure on the pedestal is too wide to draw an outline of where the FATPRUDER extends far enough to cover the windows, and then he will take time to look. Otherwise FATPRUDER is only another unproven theory. Jack Edited February 7, 2010 by Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Baker Posted February 7, 2010 Share Posted February 7, 2010 Everyone knows that Moorman's photo was taken by an automated camera. The Umbrella Man had the remote. Why was he standing on one leg? Jack - fart us an answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonathan Cohen Posted February 7, 2010 Share Posted February 7, 2010 >Jack, for what reason would the moorman photo need to be altered? the alterers painted in Zap and Sitzman because they really weren't on the pedestal filming? >Yes. Jack, don't "Zapruder" and "Sitzman" appear in the ORIGINAL Moorman polaroid? If so, I think you'll understand that some of us are incredulous that you claim they've been painted onto it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted February 7, 2010 Share Posted February 7, 2010 (edited) I told John Costella the various claims here and he said he is too busy tomake a reply, but he said to tell any of those who hold the FATPRUDER theory that the figure on the pedestal is too wide to draw an outline of where the FATPRUDER extends far enough to cover the windows, and then he will take time to look. Otherwise FATPRUDER is only another unproven theory. Jack Great then Costella will bring to us the EXACT LEFT EDGE of Zapruders clothing, so he can take HIS UNPROVEN THEORY to the next level. I eagerly await that one. It might rank right up there with this Costella classic: www.craiglamson.com/costella.htm Until then Jack, WHY DON'T YOU point out the exact left edge of Zapruders clothing, so you can move YOUR unproven theory forward? Edited February 8, 2010 by Evan Burton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now