Don Roberdeau Posted September 7, 2004 Share Posted September 7, 2004 (edited) ....Good Day.... BRENNAN's body position atop the reflecting pool wall is precisely pinpointed here: http://members.aol.com/DRoberdeau/JFK/BRENNAN202zapLOS.gif BRENNAN's sitting location atop the wall as seen in the DORMAN and ZAPRUDER films is about only 5'-6' different than where he sat for the warrenatti camera to recreate his location in CE478. His actual attack body facing position seen in DORMAN & ZAP is approximately facing towards the center of the Houston/Elm intersection. His head facing direction changes. At Zf-207 just before ZAPRUDER panned him out of the film sprocket area his head is facing LEVEL, and his face is turned hard to his left, facing over his left shoulder, towards the limousine, and he is simultaneously facing approximately 90 degrees away from the warrenatti apologists "snipers lair" at Zf-207. At Zf-206/207 the pyracantha tree a few feet northwest of the reflecting pool steps would have started to block BRENNAN's view of President KENNEDY (whose headtop was then some 7' to 8' lower than BRENNAN's headtop by just Zf-206/207). From Zf-252/253 and completely AFTER Zf-252/253, BRENNAN's view of the president was completely obstructed by the tall cement monument that borders the west side of the north reflecting pool's northside steps (near the same pyracantha tree). Additionally, at Zf-313 --and not supporting, at all, what BRENNAN chose to write in his book-- BRENNAN's view of the limousine was still completely obstructed by the tall monument that borders the west side of the north reflecting pool's northside steps.... in other words --despite what he wrote in his book-- BRENNAN lied and could not have possibly have seen the President's head explode nor could BRENNAN have possibly seen the bloody remnants of the head explosion because the tall monument completely hid his Zf-313 view of the president.... ....Looking at it another way.... if (as he warrenatti testified in 1964) BRENNAN did see an assassin in the TSBD sixth floor easternmost window trigger a shot, and, if (as he warrenatti testified) after watching an assassin in the TSBD sixth floor easternmost "snipers lair" window fire a shot BRENNAN did immediately turn back to his left towards the president after the "snipers lair" gunman fired, and if BRENNAN could still see the president (as he warrenatti testified), and since BRENNAN could have only seen President KENNEDY before Zf-252/253, it means that the TSBD sixth floor easternmost window "snipers lair" assassin fired the LAST shot that BRENNAN saw the TSBD sixth floor easternmost window "snipers lair" assassin fire BEFORE timestamp Zf-252/253. Don CV-67, "Big John," USS John F. Kennedy Plank Walker Sooner, or later, the Truth emerges Clearly http://members.aol.com/DRoberdeau/JFK/DP.jpg http://members.aol.com/DRoberdeau/JFK/ROSE...NOUNCEMENT.html http://members.aol.com/DRoberdeau/JFK/BOND...PINGarnold.html http://members.aol.com/DRoberdeau/JFK/GHOS...update2001.html T ogether E veryone A chieves M ore "Based on the statements of these witnesses, if the smoke they reported was in fact the result of gunfire, it would have originated in the area of the top of the grassy knoll. There is no way of determining what type of ammunition was used in that "gunfire" so that is can be stated conclusively whether the smoke seen by the witnesses is consistent with smoke produced by the type of ammunition used in any gunfire from the knoll. Nevertheless, a firearms expert engaged by the committee explained that irrespective of the exact type of ammunition used, it would be possible for witnesses to have seen smoke if a gun had been fired from that arena. According to the expert, both "smokeless" and smoke-producing ammunition may leave a trace of smoke that would be visible to the eye in sunlight.(371) That is because even with smokeless ammunition, when the weapon was fired, nitrocellulose bases in the powder which are impregnated with nitroglycerin may give off smoke, albeit less smoke than black or smoke- producing ammunition.(372) In addition, residue remaining in the weapon from previous firings, as well as cleaning solution which might have been used on the weapon, could cause even more smoke to be discharged in subsequent firings of the weapon.(373)" ----SURELL BRADY, H.S.C.A. Staff Counsel Report Edited September 7, 2004 by Don Roberdeau Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Speer Posted September 7, 2004 Share Posted September 7, 2004 Good work. Thanks for posting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Miller Posted September 8, 2004 Share Posted September 8, 2004 Interesting observation, Don. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now