Micah Mileto Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Robert Prudhomme said: It's possible. I've always found the autopsy photos very difficult to decipher; possibly intentionally so. If that spot in the open-cranium photographs is the EOP wound, like it definitely looks, and the EOP wound was exactly where the autopsy report places it, then that would place the hypothetical fist-sized rear blowout extending into and above the level of the ears. Still not traditionally where this hypothetical wound would be placed, but there appears to be just enough room for a piece of cerebellum to stick out. The Z Film just has enough blackness in that area, too. BTW, still not convinced such a wound existed. If it existed, I'd think it would have to co-exist with the temporal wound seen by the Dealey Plaza witnesses and the Z film. A Coup In Camelot suggested that a temporal wound did exist, but it was pushed back in and sealed like glue (by Jackie?). Edited December 11, 2016 by Micah Mileto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Prudhomme Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 The wound was described by Dr. Marion Jenkins as being occipital-temporal. Look where that would place the wound. While the temporal bone extends up quite high into the parietal bone, the only place the occipital and temporal bones touch each other is at about the level of the ear; slightly higher than the EOP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micah Mileto Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 2 minutes ago, Robert Prudhomme said: The wound was described by Dr. Marion Jenkins as being occipital-temporal. Look where that would place the wound. While the temporal bone extends up quite high into the parietal bone, the only place the occipital and temporal bones touch each other is at about the level of the ear; slightly higher than the EOP. Dealey Plaza witnesses more or less saw what was is in the Z film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Prudhomme Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 Know what I saw in the Z film? A great flap of pink something or other that hung down onto JFK's right cheek. What became of it? Regarding Dealey Plaza witnesses and what they saw, why not share some of their statements with us and let us see how they compare to the Z film. Would you consider Clint Hill a Dealey Plaza witness? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micah Mileto Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Robert Prudhomme said: Know what I saw in the Z film? A great flap of pink something or other that hung down onto JFK's right cheek. What became of it? Regarding Dealey Plaza witnesses and what they saw, why not share some of their statements with us and let us see how they compare to the Z film. Would you consider Clint Hill a Dealey Plaza witness? http://www.patspeer.com/chapter18b%3Areasontobelieve At the section "the invisible hole" and under it. There doesn't seem to be any casual bystander that anybody could claim is a supreme BOH witness. They all suggest the would was on the side of the head. We have Emmett Hudson saying "it looked like it hit him somewhere along a little bit behind the ear and a little bit above the ear", but that's about as good as it gets. Edited December 11, 2016 by Micah Mileto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Prudhomme Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 Well, show us their statements or testimony, and let us be the judge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Prudhomme Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 Do you think a large wound in the right rear of the head would be visible from the side? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Prudhomme Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 The head is not a cube you know. The right rear section is quite curved as it transitions from the rear of the head to the side of the head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micah Mileto Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 1 minute ago, Robert Prudhomme said: Do you think a large wound in the right rear of the head would be visible from the side? A wound on the side would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Prudhomme Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 You didn't answer the question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micah Mileto Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 1 minute ago, Robert Prudhomme said: You didn't answer the question. No. So where are the bystanders who saw a BOH wound? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Prudhomme Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 Goodbye, I've had enough of your childishness. Do not continue to waste my time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micah Mileto Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 And how could a BOH wound like it's traditionally interpreted co-exist with the open cranium photos? Those show something basically the same as the Rydberg drawings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Prudhomme Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 Go away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Prudhomme Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 You bother me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now