Guest James H. Fetzer Posted March 18, 2012 Share Posted March 18, 2012 9/11: Planes/No Planes and ‘Video Fakery’” http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/20/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/ “9/11: The official account of the Pentagon attach is a fantasy” (with Dennis Cimino) http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/03/13/911-the-official-account-of-the-pentagon-attack-is-a-fantasy/ “The 9/11 Passenger Paradox: What happened to Flight 93?” (with Dean Hartwell) http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/03/15/the-911-passenger-paradox-what-happened-to-flight-93/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted March 19, 2012 Share Posted March 19, 2012 It wuz done by sharks wearing frikkin' laser beams. That makes as much sense as that theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David G. Healy Posted March 19, 2012 Share Posted March 19, 2012 It wuz done by sharks wearing frikkin' laser beams. That makes as much sense as that theory. boy that leaves a little to be desired... admin? WOW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Sherwood Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 I'm not going to waste my time looking at Feltzer's links, but suffice to say they will be somewhere between quite silly and pure fantasy. There is the fact that the debris from the airliners was found on each of the crash sites, thousands of people saw the airliners do what they did, the airliners that were used are now missing (apart from being a pile of parts), and hundreds of missing passengers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Stop bringing logic and reason into a Jim Fetzer claim! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 It wuz done by sharks wearing frikkin' laser beams. That makes as much sense as that theory. boy that leaves a little to be desired... admin? WOW! And don't you think promoting 'space beams', "dustified" buildings and holograms theories that sound like rejected plot material from C sci-fi movie scripts 'leaves a little to be desired' coming from a retired university professor who repeatedly touts his decades "teaching critical thinking"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now