Jump to content
The Education Forum

DEPOPULATION - what elites want -


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 379
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Vaccination

VACCINE CONTROVERSY

New evidence of a causal link between childhood vaccination and allergies, asthma, Type I diabetes, and more

by Susan Fletcher, B.Sc.

Sept12_babyWEB.jpg

Slideshow

North American children are the most vaccinated on earth. From the age of two months to 18 months alone, Canadian infants and toddlers can receive up to 41 doses of 13 to 16 taxpayer-funded vaccines. Yet the infant mortality rate in Canada (and the US) is about twice as high as that in Sweden and Japan. The latter two countries recommend fewer than half the infant vaccines recommended by the first two.

Is it possible that vaccines are contributing to ill health? The logical way to find out is through rigorously scientific long-term studies that compare the overall health of vaccinated populations with that of the unvaccinated. Yet public health authorities have refused to sponsor these studies based on their unscientific presumption that vaccine benefits outweigh their risks, therefore withholding vaccination from study control groups would be unethical.

The public health mantras, “vaccines are safe and effective,” and “vaccines are cost effective,” belie the facts. Prior to vaccination, it’s impossible to know that no injury will be induced immediately or some time in the future when it will be more difficult to conclude an association. Acknow­ledgement of vaccine-adverse events necessitates an ability to detect them plus objectivity; even in provinces requiring reports of all possible events, those omitting to do so are not held accountable; and even when reports are made, conflicts of interest may result in pruning of incidents, which should truly be recorded as vaccine adverse events. Calculations that find vaccines to be “cost effective” don’t reflect costs of taxpayer-funded remedial health care for the vaccine injured or related personal expenses of the families involved.

Pressure to Vaccinate

Reluctant parents are often coerced to accept vaccinations for their children. They’re told that serious vaccine injury is “extremely rare” but infectious diseases are “deadly,” and it’s implied they have an obligation to accept vaccines not only for their children’s safety but also in order to protect others for whom “vaccines don’t work.” They’re told that a high percentage of the population must be vaccinated in order to maintain immunity for everyone, a condition named “herd immunity.”

The term ‘herd immunity’ was coined by researcher A.W. Hedrich, after he’d studied the epidemiology of measles in the U.S. between 1900 and 1931. His study, published in the May 1933 American Journal of Epidemiology, concluded that once 68% of children younger than 15 years old had become immune to measles via infection, measles epidemics ceased.

This natural, pre-vaccine herd immunity differs greatly from the present vaccine herd immunity. Today we’re told that vaccines must be injected into 85-95% or more of infants/children and re-injected every couple of months or every few years in order to protect the whole “herd” of us. But disease-conferred immunity usually lasted a lifetime. As each new generation of children contracted the infection, the immunity of those previously infected was renewed due to their continual cyclical re-exposure to the disease; except for newly infected children and the few individuals who’d never had the disease or been exposed to it, the herd immunity of the entire population was maintained at all times.

Today when an infectious disease outbreak occurs, we’re told that everyone born after its vaccine was introduced needs to be vaccinated if they haven’t kept up to date with “immunizations”. In the pre-vaccine era, newborns could receive antibodies against infectious diseases from their mothers who had themselves been infected as children and re-exposed to the diseases later in life.

Today’s babies born to mothers who were vaccinated and never exposed to these diseases do not receive these antibodies. In direct contrast to fear mongering disease “facts” and “herd immunity” theories related by Public Health, most of today’s newborns are more vulnerable than those of the pre-vaccine era.

Vaccines Disrupt the Body’s Immune System

The basic premise of vaccination is that symptomatic illness can be avoided, and enduring immunity maintained, by injecting pathogens into the body (killed bacteria, weakened live viruses, or parts of them). But live viruses, even when weakened, can produce symptoms given the right conditions; efficacy requires that killed pathogens or their parts be accompanied by risky immune stimulants called ‘adjuvants’. Furthermore, the immune system has first responder (Th1) and second responder (Th2) phases that must be kept in balance in order for health to be maintained. Evidence shows that multiple and repeat injections of vaccines skew the immune system to favour the Th2 phase, which produces antibodies. While these may help prevent disease, when Th2 is overactive they may also give rise to allergies and autoimmune disease. World-renowned immunologist Hugh Fudenberg stated: “One vaccine decreases cell-mediated [Th1] immunity by 50%, two vaccines by 70%... all triple vaccines (MMR, DTaP) markedly impair cell-mediated immunity, which predisposes to recurrent viral infections, especially otitis media [ear ache], as well as yeast and fungi infections.”

All vaccines contain proteins, some in the lab-altered pathogens deliberately included, some in other ingredients, and some as contaminants remaining from the manufacturing process. The injection of protein unfiltered by the body’s external defences (skin and linings of the intestine and respiratory system) and unfamiliar to the internal defences, especially when accompanied by an adjuvant or involving live virus, is a recipe for immune system dysfunction. Retired neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock MD, CCN wrote that a number of studies have shown that live viruses from vaccines can enter the brain, mutate to their former potency (or stronger) via the action of free radicals, and produce chronic brain inflammation. Commonly used aluminum adjuvant can sustain inflammation for years. The aluminum in vaccines injected along with those containing mercury can dramatically increase mercury’s toxicity (which, by itself, is toxic at any concentration no matter how low). Mercury in vaccines acts as a preservative. Among other things, it suppresses the immune system, creates massive oxidative stress, and causes protective membranes to become leaky.

But even without live viruses or adjuvants, protein injection alone could lead to future development of allergies. Paediatrician Lawrence Palevsky wrote that ingestion of a food protein that’s previously been injected (eg. drinking milk after being injected with the milk protein in DPT vaccine) leads to inflammation of any body tissue to which the ingested protein is transported. And non-food proteins can cause cross-reactive hypersensitivity to food proteins of the same molecular weight. This is the mechanism which vaccine researcher Rita Hoffman suggests as the cause of the upsurge in food-linked anaphylaxis after 1987’s introduction of Hib vaccine which contains proteins potentially cross-reactive with proteins in peanuts, almonds, soybeans, and mango. On the other hand, injection of a protein already existing in human body tissue could cause autoimmunity.

More Risks from Ingredients

Some other vaccine ingredients may sound harmless but are not. For example, gelatin is not only a food but also may contain aluminum; when injected, it can cause hives or even life-threatening anaphylaxis. Monosodium glutamate, a flavour-enhancer present in many processed foods can be allergenic, especially in children who regularly consume large amounts. If injected MSG enters the brain due to a weak blood/brain barrier (as in children up to two or three years old) it can cause brain cell death. And although we were once told that smoking is harmless, cigarettes contain formaldehyde; formaldehyde is a known carcinogen and it’s used as a preservative in some vaccines.

Aluminum is ubiquitous in our environment and common in drinking water, foods, and other products. It’s been linked to cancer, chronic fatigue syndrome, multiple sclerosis, ALS, epilepsy, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, and macrophagic myofasciitis. Just as for mercury and MSG, aluminum’s harmful effects are amplified by injection. Recent studies have shown a high correlation between Autism Spectrum Disorders and the aluminum adjuvants common in childhood vaccines.

Oil-based adjuvants have recently been approved for use in vaccines despite the fact that it’s been known since the 1930s that they’re especially dangerous. Previously, they were restricted to use in animals; oil-injected animals developed autoimmunity against which possibly therapeutic drugs could be tested. An adjuvant containing the oil squalene was used in making some of the H1N1 ‘pandemic’ vaccine injected into children and pregnant women during the 2009/2010 flu season.

Research Studies Confirm Vaccine Risks

A 2006 study of European children published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (JACI) found that the MMR vaccine was associated with increased risk of hay fever, whereas measles infection was associated with a reduced risk of allergic eczema. It also found that use of fever suppressants for very young children was associated with increased risk of both allergic eczema and asthma. Please note that fever suppressants (e.g. Tylenol) are often recommended when vaccines are administered.

A 2008 study published in the same journal analyzed medical records of Manitoba children. It found that, “Among 11,531 children who received at least four doses of DPT, the risk of asthma was reduced to half in children whose first dose of DPT was delayed by more than two months… the association was greater with delays in all of the first three doses.” And a 2011 JACI study suggests that milk protein contamination from culture mediums caused anaphylaxis in highly milk-allergic children following booster doses of DTaP vaccines.

It’s difficult to prove that vaccinations cause autoimmune disease, since the latter often takes many years to develop. However, immunologist Dr. Bart Classen has built a strong case with his research. Since 1998, he’s produced numerous studies which provide evidence of a causal link between most childhood vaccines and Type I diabetes.

As the number of childhood vaccines has increased, Autism Spectrum Disorders have skyrocketed. By 2008, neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock noted dozens of peer-reviewed studies demonstrating clinical and scientific links between the two. These demonstrate the mechanism by which the damage is done and include studies of cell cultures, tissues, animals, and humans.

Discovering the Truth

Mayer Eisenstein MD, JD, MPH is medical director of the Chicago-based Homefirst Medical Clinic. Since 1973, this clinic has cared for 35,000 children, most of whom have received no vaccines, the others only a few. Eisenstein can recall no cases of autism amongst these patients and virtually none of them have had asthma, allergies, respiratory illnesses, or diabetes. Autism is also absent amongst the unvaccinated Amish communities of Pennsylvania and Ohio. And, according to two studies done in New Zealand in 1992 and 1995, unvaccinated children had fewer allergies and runny noses, and less otitis, tonsillitis, epilepsy, and ADHD.

Specialist in internal medicine and nephrology Suzanne Humphries MD, wrote, “Up until two years ago I was content to work as a medical doctor caring for very sick people with kidney failure [but] with several undeniable cases of kidney-associated vaccine injury in previously healthy people, I started to look deeper into information that I had previously held as factual and not worthy of debate.” She asks that health care practitioners “understand that the peer review process has censored intelligent doubt on vaccine safety and driven it into the alternative press,” and pleads with practitioners and parents to “do your homework. The minds and bodies of future generations depend upon it.”

Maria Radatus, RMT, agrees. In her 2004 letter to the Vaccination Risk Awareness Network (VRAN), she explains: “By the time I had Jade I was overwhelmed with new motherhood… I followed ‘The Rules’… of course, the doctor assured me she had never had problems with vaccinating thousands of children… I didn’t know enough about the subject to refute the standard of practice. Although my daughter seemed fine, my intuition felt wrongly about it. I knew I had to research more, so I did. At this point Jade had two shots in total, then I ended the vaccination process… I feel fortunate that she is only suffering from allergies… She got off easier than many.”

There are many factors which can cause illness; vaccination is one over which parents have control. Of paramount importance is that you do your own research, preferably prior to the birth of your first child, even before conception. Next in importance is learning about breastfeeding; it’s what protects best during the transition from maternal protection in the womb to protection by competent immunity in the young child. Moreover, it establishes a strong, integrated immune foundation for life.

As well as risks of vaccines, you should also be aware of risks from drugs commonly used to treat infections. For instance, Tylenol suppresses the immune enhancing effects of fevers and reduces the body’s supply of the powerful antioxidant, glutathione. Your choice of a doctor is critical: some will have a paternalistic attitude, others will listen to and respect your concerns and wishes. Home birth is less likely to be associated with pressure to vaccinate. Consultation with naturopaths or other health practitioners well versed in healthful lifestyle choices can help. And the experiences of friends who are seasoned parents may forewarn of pitfalls to avoid.

Canadian parents cannot be forced to have their children vaccinated. Even when vaccine laws exist for entry into public schools (as in Ontario, Manitoba, and New Brunswick), exemptions are allowed for medical, religious, and philosophical reasons. VRAN’s website, http://vran.org, headlined “Your Child. Your Choice. Your Future”, is Canada’s only national independent online source of vaccine information; its excellent science-based articles have helped many parents in their struggle to make wise vaccine decisions. (VRAN is a volunteer-managed organization. For more info, email: info@vran.org , or call 1-250-355-2525)

References

• Multiple Vaccination Effects on Atopy [allergy]; http://vran.org/heal...fects-on-atopy/

• Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses given; Human and Experimental Toxicology; 2011; http://thinktwice.com/HET_study.pdf

• ‘Herd Immunity’: the misplaced driver of universal vaccination; http://vran.org/abou...al-vaccination/

• Vaccines and Genetic Mutation (immune imbalance and Dr Hugh Fudenberg quote); http://vran.org/abou...netic-mutation/

• Long-term persistence of vaccine-derived aluminum hydroxide is associated with chronic cognitive dysfunction; Journal of Inorganic Chemistry; 2009; http://www.ncbi.nlm....9?dopt=Abstract

• How Vaccines Can Damage Your Brain by Russell Blaylock MD, CCN; http://whale.to/b/blaylock.html

Vaccine Epidemic, edited by L.K. Habakus, MA and M. Holland, JD; chapter 19; ‘Mercury toxicity and Vaccine Injury’ by Boyd Haley PhD

• Kids May React to Milk Proteins in DPT Shot by paediatrician Lawrence Palevsky, MD; http://therefusers.c...ns-in-dpt-shot/

• Provincial and Territorial web sites and immunization schedules; Public Health Agency of Canada; http://www.phac-aspc...m/is-pi-eng.php

• Anaphylactic Children – Canaries in the Public Health Mine Shaft? http://vran.org/heal...lth-mine-shaft/

The Peanut Allergy Epidemic by Heather Fraser

• Chemical Ingredients; http://vran.org/abou...al-ingredients/

• Aluminum, Autism and Alzheimer’s; http://vran.org/in-t...-alzheimerâ€s/

• A Glimpse Into the Scary World of Vaccine Adjuvants; http://vran.org/abou...cine-adjuvants/

Allergic disease and sensitization in Steiner school children; Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology; 2006

Delay in diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus vaccination is associated with a reduced risk of childhood asthma. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology; 2008

Anaphylaxis to diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccines among children with cow’s milk allergy; Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology; 2011

• Vaccine Safety website of Dr Bart Classen; http://vaccines.net/newpage11.htm

• The danger of excessive vaccination during brain development by Russell Blaylock MD; http://vran.org/wp-c...development.doc

• The Marvellous Health of Unvaccinated Children by paediatrician Francoise Berthoud; http://www.vaccinati...nated-children/

Vaccine Epidemic, pg 217.

A Few Things I Know by Suzanne Humphries MD; http://www.vaccinati...ow/#comment-752

• Letter by Maria Radatus RMT; VRA Newsletter; summer/fall 2004; pg 26.

• Tylenol (Acetaminophen) depletes Glutathione (necessary for removal of mercury); http://www.whale.to/...lutathione.html

• Exemptions from vaccinations; http://vran.org/exemptions/

More reading:

Vaccine Epidemic edited by L.K. Habakus, MA and M. Holland JD

Vaccine Safety Manual by Neil Z Miller

Immunization: History, Ethics, Law and Health by Catherine Diodati (available from VRAN)

• Breastfeeding Media Reviews; http://mothering.com...g-media-reviews

• When vaccine theology clashes with nature’s blueprint; VRA Newsletter; Autumn 2011

• Preventing Autism ; http://www.ageofauti...hesis.html#more

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yawn an article from a computer scientist with scant citations of qualified experts. // END COLBY

=========================================================================

SHE FOUND WHAT BLAYLOCK was talking about.

• Vaccines and Genetic Mutation (immune imbalance and Dr Hugh Fudenberg quote); http://vran.org/abou...netic-mutation/

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The basic premise of vaccination is that symptomatic illness can be avoided, and enduring immunity maintained, by injecting pathogens into the body (killed bacteria, weakened live viruses, or parts of them). But live viruses, even when weakened, can produce symptoms given the right conditions; efficacy requires that killed pathogens or their parts be accompanied by risky immune stimulants called ‘adjuvants’. Furthermore, the immune system has first responder (Th1) and second responder (Th2) phases that must be kept in balance in order for health to be maintained. Evidence shows that multiple and repeat injections of vaccines skew the immune system to favour the Th2 phase, which produces antibodies. While these may help prevent disease, when Th2 is overactive they may also give rise to allergies and autoimmune disease. World-renowned immunologist Hugh Fudenberg stated: “One vaccine decreases cell-mediated [Th1] immunity by 50%, two vaccines by 70%... all triple vaccines (MMR, DTaP) markedly impair cell-mediated immunity, which predisposes to recurrent viral infections, especially otitis media [ear ache], as well as yeast and fungi infections.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yawn an article from a computer scientist with scant citations of qualified experts. // END COLBY

=========================================================================

SHE FOUND WHAT BLAYLOCK was talking about.

Blaylock is a neurosurgon and thus not really qualified concerning vacinations his views contradict the overwhelming consensus of qualified experts.

http://www.nejm.org/...6/NEJMoa0907413

http://web.archive.o...tory_89221.html

http://www.jpsbr.org...htm_files/2.pdf

• Vaccines and Genetic Mutation (immune imbalance and Dr Hugh Fudenberg quote); http://vran.org/abou...netic-mutation/

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

LOL Dr Fudenberg!!

In November 1995, the South Carolina medical board found Fudenberg "guilty of engaging in dishonorable, unethical, or unprofessional conduct," fined him $10,000, ordered him to surrender his license to prescribe controlled substances (narcotic drugs), and placed his license on indefinite suspension. The Board's order, shown below, said that he could apply for probationary status if he underwent a neuropsychiatric examination and was judged capable of practicing medicine safely. In March 1996, he was permitted to resume practice under terms of probation that did not permit him to prescribe any drugs. His license expired in January 2004; and in March 2004, he applied to have it reinstated. However, after a hearing in which the Board considered a neuropsychatric report issued in 2003, Fudenberg agreed to remain in a "retired" status and withdrew his application for reactivation of his license. The South Carolina board's Web site lists his license as "lapsed."

See also his entry in "The Encyclopedia of American Loons":

http://americanloons...-fudenberg.html

The authors you cited above are an 87 year-old family practitioner, a nurse and a man "convicted...of killing his two-and-a-half month old baby, by vigorously shaking his head"

The basic premise of vaccination is that symptomatic illness can be avoided, and enduring immunity maintained, by injecting pathogens into the body (killed bacteria, weakened live viruses, or parts of them). But live viruses, even when weakened, can produce symptoms given the right conditions; efficacy requires that killed pathogens or their parts be accompanied by risky immune stimulants called ‘adjuvants’. Furthermore, the immune system has first responder (Th1) and second responder (Th2) phases that must be kept in balance in order for health to be maintained. Evidence shows that multiple and repeat injections of vaccines skew the immune system to favour the Th2 phase, which produces antibodies. While these may help prevent disease, when Th2 is overactive they may also give rise to allergies and autoimmune disease. World-renowned immunologist Hugh Fudenberg stated: “One vaccine decreases cell-mediated [Th1] immunity by 50%, two vaccines by 70%... all triple vaccines (MMR, DTaP) markedly impair cell-mediated immunity, which predisposes to recurrent viral infections, especially otitis media [ear ache], as well as yeast and fungi infections.”

As I said above, "Yawn an article from a computer scientist with scant citations of qualified experts."

Edited by Len Colby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As with many drug-related findings, sides have been drawn and are well established with regard to this issue. Dr. William Sears, a leading author on the Sears Parenting Library, states it best in his book "The Vaccine Book" when he explains that "it seems as if anyone who even tries to question why mercury used to be in vaccines is immediately shot down by a barrage of medical experts and politicians claiming that there is no evidence that mercury causes any harm." (See Resources)

The Mayo Clinic is one of the organizations refusing to acknowledge any causal connection between flu shots and Alzheimer's disease. In an article published on her website, Angela Lund a dementia specialist states, "There is absolutely no evidence that flu vaccines contribute in any way to Alzheimer's disease."

There are, however, many physicians and scientists who prefer to approach the issue with caution and say that more research is needed. As Dr. Sears explains, "I think no one has proven that mercury was safe, and the studies showing some harmful effects from vaccines containing mercury are thought-provoking."

Flu Shots & Alzheimer's Disease

Flu Shots & Alzheimer's Disease

Multiple studies have called into question the safety of mercury in vaccines. While most vaccines have eliminated this hazardous substance, 10-count flu shots still contain 25 micrograms per dose of mercury. This ingredient has created a controversy that has caused many citizens to avoid obtaining a flu shot annually.

Other People Are Reading


  1. History

    • Influenza was discovered in the 1930s after the Spanish flu pandemic that spread to almost all the corners of the world. This epidemic especially affected American soldiers who were returning from WWI. The first working vaccine was administered to soldiers in 1947 to aid those being sent off to fight during WWII. In 1976, a sudden outbreak of the swine flu led President Ford to order all Americans to be vaccinated. While the vaccination order was under effect, several hundred people developed Guillain-Barré syndrome as a result of the vaccine, and the American public refused to cooperate with the government order.

The Facts


  • The flu vaccine and the scope and seriousness of its side effects are hotly debated among physicians and scientists alike. The flu vaccine is the only vaccine that is updated yearly and completely untested before being administered to the general public (See Resources). In fact, the FDA does not require long-term studies of any vaccine before their public release, but rather short-term human studies where immediate side affects are recorded on a questionnaire. One particular ingredient in the flu vaccine has caused concern to some physicians and scientists as its long-term detrimental effects have been proven.
    Controversial Ingredients


  • Thimerosal--a mercury-based preservative present in all 10-dose vials of the flu vaccine--has been linked in multiple studies to serious side effects, the most controversial of which is autism. Thimerosal was banned from being used in vaccines in the early 21st century, but it is still used in the manufacture of bulk flu vaccines. A limited quantity of flu vaccines that do not contain Thimerosal is released annually, however these are difficult to obtain and are used up quickly by the public. (See Resources)

Primary Studies


  • The primary study linking Alzheimer's with the flu vaccine was conducted by Dr. Hugh Fudenberg, MD, an immunogeneticist and biologist with nearly 850 papers published in peer review journals. According to his findings, individuals who received "Five consecutive flu shots between 1970 and 1980 (the years studied), his/her chances of getting Alzheimer's disease is 10 times higher than if they had zero, one, or two shots."
    In other words, an accumulation of Thimerosal in a person's system might increase her overall risk of Alzheimer's disease, said Dr. Fudenberg at an international vaccine conference, in Arlington, Virginia in 1997.
    More questions on the safety of the vaccine's ingredient were raised in a study published by Dr. Boyd Haley in collaboration with researchers at the University of Calgary. Dr. Haley stated that "seven of the characteristic markers that we look for to distinguish Alzheimer's disease can be produced in normal brain tissues, or cultures of neurons, by the addition of extremely low levels of mercury." (See Resources)

Arguments


  • As with many drug-related findings, sides have been drawn and are well established with regard to this issue. Dr. William Sears, a leading author on the Sears Parenting Library, states it best in his book "The Vaccine Book" when he explains that "it seems as if anyone who even tries to question why mercury used to be in vaccines is immediately shot down by a barrage of medical experts and politicians claiming that there is no evidence that mercury causes any harm." (See Resources)
    The Mayo Clinic is one of the organizations refusing to acknowledge any causal connection between flu shots and Alzheimer's disease. In an article published on her website, Angela Lund a dementia specialist states, "There is absolutely no evidence that flu vaccines contribute in any way to Alzheimer's disease."
    There are, however, many physicians and scientists who prefer to approach the issue with caution and say that more research is needed. As Dr. Sears explains, "I think no one has proven that mercury was safe, and the studies showing some harmful effects from vaccines containing mercury are thought-provoking."

Related Searches

References

Resources

Read more: Flu Shots & Alzheimer's Disease | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/about_5409913_flu-shots-alzheimers-disease.html#ixzz2JZjFrg7h

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As with many drug-related findings, sides have been drawn and are well established with regard to this issue. Dr. William Sears, a leading author on the Sears Parenting Library, states it best in his book "The Vaccine Book" when he explains that "it seems as if anyone who even tries to question why mercury used to be in vaccines is immediately shot down by a barrage of medical experts and politicians claiming that there is no evidence that mercury causes any harm." (See Resources)

The Mayo Clinic is one of the organizations refusing to acknowledge any causal connection between flu shots and Alzheimer's disease. In an article published on her website, Angela Lund a dementia specialist states, "There is absolutely no evidence that flu vaccines contribute in any way to Alzheimer's disease."

Dr. Sears is right the overwhelming consensus among qualified experts is that vaccines are safe and that the risks of taking them are much smaller than the risks of not taking them. Dr. Sears. whose main claim to fame (other than the book) is being the son of more well known physician, seems to have a poor understanding of the science involved.

http://www.salon.com/2010/10/13/vaccine_book_sears/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THREE TOP ANTI-VACCINE SITES IN RED

http://thinktwice.com/

Studies: Authorities often claim that "anti-vaccine" websites do not provide valid documentation. We provide hundreds of peer-reviewed studies from scientific and medical journals. Many of these studies link vaccines to the onset of new diseases.

MEDICAL VERITAS is the preeminent journal that serves as an interface between academics, scientists, researchers, medical practitioners, and concerned patients and parents. Relevant topics range from basic research, general medical practice, vaccines, treatments, bias and other conflicts of interest in research, to immunology, vaccine injury, and infectious diseases.

http://www.nvic.org/

http://www.vaclib.org/

#######################################

BIG VACCINE PHARMA = FRAUD

Merck vaccine fraud exposed by two Merck virologists; company faked mumps vaccine efficacy results for over a decade, says lawsuit

MikeAdams.jpgThursday, June 28, 2012

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)

http://www.naturalne...Claims_Act.html

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

BIG VACCINE PHARMA = FRAUD

Flu Vaccine Fraud: WHO 'Mr Flu' Under Investigation For Gross Conflicts of Interest

Thursday, 10 December 2009

One after another of the recently proclaimed Flu “pandemics” has turned out to be a fraudulent marketing hoax to promote flu vaccines.

Each hoax was cooked up by Big Pharma and their paid, highly placed scientists who have penetrated both national and international health organizations.

Nationally and internationally, healthcare policies are being shaped by those who have gross conflicts of interest. Vaccines are being promoted (even mandated) in the absence of scientific evidence to support mass vaccinations.

Last month, CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, blew the lid on the swine flu pandemic hoax and the US Center for Disease. ee her two part interview with Dr. Mercola:

See: CBS Reporter Blows the Lid Off Swine Flu Hysteria and CBS Reveals Cases Overestimated

CBS News and the CDC contradict each other completely.

In her three-month U.S. investigation that included state-by-state flu test results, Attkisson uncovered facts that contradict the Centers for Disease Control policy statements:

CBS News Finds H1N1 Tests were "Overwhelmingly Negative."

Indeed, H1N1 flu cases are NOT as prevalent as feared:

"If you've been diagnosed "probable" or "presumed" 2009 H1N1 or "swine flu" in recent months, you may be surprised to know this: odds are you didn't have H1N1 flu. In fact, you probably didn't have flu at all."

For example, Attkisson discovered that:

* In Florida, 83% of specimens that were presumed to be swine flu were negative for all flu when tested!

* In California, 86% of suspected H1N1 specimens were not swine flu or any flu; only 2% were confirmed swine flu.

* In Alaska, 93% of suspected swine flu specimens were negative for all flu types; only 1 percent was H1N1 flu.

CBS reports that in late July 2009 the CDC advised states to STOP testing for H1N1 flu, and they also stopped counting individual cases. Their rationale for this, according to CBS News, was that it was a waste of resources to test for H1N1 flu because it was already confirmed as an epidemic.

What evidence of an epidemic?

"of the vast majority of the presumed swine flu cases recognized by trained physicians, the vast majority were not flu at all. They weren’t swine flu or regular flu; they were some other sort of upper respiratory infection.” That is what the CDC doesn’t want the American public to know.

“The CDC explained that one of the reasons they quit counting was because of all the flu that’s out there, most are swine flu. Well, that’s true. Most of the flu that was out there was indeed swine flu, but they failed to say that most of the suspected flu was nothing at all. And I think that’s the caveat the public just didn’t know,” Attkisson explains.

Especially disturbing is the stonewalling and obfuscation by the Obama Administration:

Attkisson says, "This may be the first time I was denied that expedited processing from Freedom of Information that we’re entitled to as members of the press; a letter from HHS or Health and Human Services (the CDC is under HHS) said to me that one of the reasons they’re denying my expedited processing is because this is not a matter of “widespread and exceptional media or public interest.”

In other words, even as the President declared the swine flu a "national public health emergency" the CDC doesn’t think that questions about swine flu prevalence "are a matter of widespread and exceptional media or public interest...”

As is the case genrally in healthcare fraud, conflicts of interest are rampant in the vaccination infrastructure. CBS reported that:

"The same people who are regulating and promoting vaccines are also evaluating vaccine safety. For instance,
Dr. Paul Offit
of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
earned at least $29 million
as part of a $182-million sale by the hospital of its worldwide royalty interest in the Merck Rotateq vaccine. He also formerly sat on the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to help create the market for rotavirus vaccine"

A riveting, insightful article, by F. William Engdahl , author of “Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order,” documents how gross conflicts of interest have corrupted the World Health Organization and international vaccine policy. The article is posted the website of Financial Sense Editorials, (which is geared toward investors).

This well documented article sheds light on how a well positioned Dutch scientist and the World Health Organization helped Big Pharma (or as Engdahl refers to it, “the Pharma mafia”) generate a global hysteria about the avian flu and the swine flu—in order to generate a demand for flu vaccines.

Excerpts:

“The man with the nickname “Dr Flu”, Professor Albert Osterhaus, of the Erasmus University in Rotterdam Holland has been named by Dutch media researchers as the person at the center of the worldwide Swine Flu H1N1 Influenza A 2009 pandemic hysteria. Not only is Osterhaus the connecting person in an international network that has been described as the Pharma Mafia, he is THE key advisor to WHO on influenza and is intimately positioned to personally profit from the billions of euros in vaccines allegedly aimed at H1N1.”

“More careful investigation into the Osterhaus Affair suggests that the world-renowned Dutch Virologist may be at the very center of a multi-billion Euro pandemic fraud which has used human beings in effect as human guinea pigs with untested vaccines and in cases now emerging resulting in deaths or severe bodily paralysis or injury. “

Privatization (i.e., Big Pharma influence) has corrupted the World Health Organization:

“In the past decade the WHO, in order to boost funds at its disposal entered into what it calls “public private partnerships.” Instead of receiving its funds solely from member United Nations governments as its original purpose had been, WHO today receives almost double its normal UN budget in the form of grants and financial support from private industry. The industry? The very drug and vaccine makers who benefit from decisions like the June 2009 H1N1 Pandemic emergency declaration. As the main financiers of the WHO bureaucracy, naturally the Pharma Mafia and their friends receive what has been called “open door red carpet treatment” in Geneva."17

The ‘Bird xxxx Hoax’

“Albert Osterhaus is no small fish. He stands at the global nexus of every major virus panic of the past two decades from the mysterious SARS deaths in HongKong, where current WHO Director Margaret Chan got her start in her career as a local health official. According to his official bio at the European Commission, Osterhaus was engaged in April 2003, at the height of the panic over SARS (Severe Acquired Respiratory Syndrome) in Hong Kong. The EU report states, “he again showed his skill at moving fast to tackle a serious problem. Within three weeks he had proved that the disease was caused by a newly discovered coronavirus that resides in civet cats, other carnivorous animals or bats.” 5 <http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/engdahl/2009/1208.html#_edn5>

“Then Osterhaus moved on, this time publicizing dangers of what he claimed was H5N1 Avian Flu. In 1997 he already began sounding the alarm following the death in Hong Kong of a three-year-old who Osterhaus learned had had direct contact with birds. Osterhaus went into high gear lobbying across Holland and Europe claiming that a deadly new mutation of avian flu had jumped to humans and that drastic measures were required. He claimed to be the first scientist in the world to show that H5N1 could be transferred into humans.” 6 <http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/engdahl/2009/1208.html#_edn6

It never did manage to mutate, but, as Engdahl points out, Dr. Osterhaus was ready to “do the experiments,” presumably for a hefty fee.

The corruption of the WHO became most apparent when it declared the swine flu (H1N1) a pandemic emergency without a shred of substantiating evidence.

“When no mass wave of human deaths from Avian Flu materialized and after Roche, maker of Tamiflu and GlaxoSmithKline had banked billions of dollars in profits from worldwide government stockpiling of their dangerous and reportedly ineffective antiviral drugs, Tamiflu by Roche, and Relenza by GlaxoSmithKline, Osterhaus and other WHO advisers turned to other greener pastures.

By April 2009 their search seemed rewarded as a small Mexican village in Veracruz reported a case of a small child ill with what had been diagnosed as “Swine Flu” or H1N1. With indecent haste the propaganda apparatus of the World Health Organization in Geneva went into gear anth statements from the director-general Dr Margaret Chan, about a possible danger of a global pandemic. Chan made such irresponsible statements as declaring “a public health emergency of international concern.” 12

"In an interview with Der Spiegel magazine in Germany, epidemiologist Dr. Tom Jefferson of the Cochrane Collaboration, an organization of independent scientists evaluating all flu related studies, noted the implications of the privatization of WHO and the commercialization of health:

“…one of the extraordinary features of this influenza -- and the whole influenza saga -- is that there are some people who make predictions year after year, and they get worse and worse. None of them so far have come about, and these people are still there making these predictions. For example, what happened with the bird flu, which was supposed to kill us all? Nothing. But that doesn't stop these people from always making their predictions. Sometimes you get the feeling that there is a whole industry almost waiting for a pandemic to occur.”

SPIEGEL: Who do you mean? The World Health Organization (WHO)?

Jefferson: The WHO and public health officials, virologists and the pharmaceutical companies. They've built this machine around the impending pandemic. And there's a lot of money involved, and influence, and careers, and entire institutions! And all it took was one of these influenza viruses to mutate to start the machine grinding...18

When asked if the WHO had deliberately declared the Pandemic Emergency in order to create a huge market for H1N1 vaccines and drugs, Jefferson replied,

“Don't you think there's something noteworthy about the fact that the WHO has changed its definition of pandemic? The old definition was a new virus, which went around quickly, for which you didn't have immunity, and which created a high morbidity and mortality rate. Now the last two have been dropped, and that's how swine flu has been categorized as a pandemic.”19

Full documented article, WHO ‘Mr Flu’ under investigation for gross conflict of interest

by F. William Engdahl

December 8, 2009

F. William Engdahl: <mailto: info@engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Website <http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/>

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of huffing and puffing but little reliable data, yes there are a few people who take-up quite a bit of bandwidth on the Net who are hysterically paranoid about vaccinations, a very small number of them have medical training but the overwhelming consensus among qualified experts is that vaccines are safe the risks of not taking them is far greater than those of taking them. As for the CBS reporter's investigation her finding were disturbing one should read them without Mercola's spin. She gave indication she though there was a conspiracy or 'hoax'. Her concerns were that this would lead to UNDER not over vaccination; she wrote:

The ramifications of this finding are important. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Britain's National Health Service, once you have H1N1 flu, you're immune from future outbreaks of the same virus. Those who think they've had H1N1 flu -- but haven't -- might mistakenly presume they're immune. As a result, they might skip taking a vaccine that could help them, and expose themselves to others with H1N1 flu under the mistaken belief they won't catch it. Parents might not keep sick children home from school, mistakenly believing they've already had H1N1 flu
.

http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-500690_162-5404829.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Vaccine Hoax is Over

29Sep2012By coto2admin

By Andrew Baker

Food Freedom News

Freedom of Information Act in the UK filed by a doctor there has revealed 30 years of secret official documents showing that government experts have

1. Known the vaccines don’t work

2. Known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent

3. Known they are a hazard to children

4. Colluded to lie to the public

5. Worked to prevent safety studies

Those are the same vaccines that are mandated to children in the US.

Educated parents can either get their children out of harm’s way or continue living inside one of the largest most evil lies in history, that vaccines – full of heavy metals, viral diseases,

, fecal material, DNA fragments from other species, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80 (a sterilizing agent) – are a miracle of modern medicine.

Freedom of Information Act filed in the US with the CDC by a doctor with an autistic son, seeking information on what the CDC knows about the dangers of vaccines, had by law to be responded to in 20 days. Nearly 7 years later, the doctor went to court and the CDC argued it does not have to turn over documents. A judge ordered the CDC to turn over the documents on September 30th, 2011.

On October 26, 2011, a Denver Post editorial expressed shock that the Obama administration, after promising to be especially transparent, was proposing changes to the Freedom of Information Act that would allow it to go beyond declaring some documents secret and to actually allow government agencies (such as the CDC) to declare some document “non-existent.”

Simultaneous to this on-going massive CDC cover up involving its primary “health” not recommendation but MANDATE for American children, the CDC is in deep trouble over its decades of covering up the damaging effects of fluoride and affecting the lives of all Americans, especially children and the immune compromised. Lawsuits are being prepared. Children are ingesting 3-4 times more fluoride by body weight as adults and “[t]he sheer number of potentially harmed citizens — persons with dental fluorosis, kidney patients tipped into needing dialysis, diabetics, thyroid patients, etc — numbers in the millions.”

The CDC is obviously acting against the health of the American people. But the threat to the lives of the American people posed by the CDC’s behavior does not stop there. It participated in designed pandemic laws that are on the books in every state in the US, which arrange for the government to use military to force unknown, untested vaccines, drugs, chemicals, and “medical” treatments on the entire country if it declares a pandemic emergency.

The CDC’s credibility in declaring such a pandemic emergency is non-existent, again based on Freedom of Information Act. For in 2009, after the CDC had declared the H1N1 “pandemic,” the CDC refused to respond to Freedom of Information Act filed by CBS News and the CDC also attempted to block their investigation. What the CDC was hiding was its part in one of the largest medical scandals in history, putting out wildly exaggerated data on what it claimed were H1N1 cases, and by doing so, created the false impression of a “pandemic” in the US.

The CDC was also covering up e financial scandal to rival the bailout since the vaccines for the false pandemic cost the US billions. And worse, the CDC put pregnant women first in line for an untested vaccine with a sterilizing agent, polysorbate 80, in it. Thanks to the CDC, “the number of vaccine-related “fetal demise” reports increased by 2,440 percent in 2009 compared to previous years, which is even more shocking than the miscarriage statistic [700% increase].

The exposure of the vaccine hoax is running neck and neck with the much older hoax of a deadly 1918-19 flu. It was aspirin that killed people in 1918-19, not a pandemic flu. It was the greatest industrial catastrophe in human history with 20-50 million people dying but it was blamed on a flu. The beginning of the drug industry began with that success (and Monsanto was part of it). The flu myth was used by George Bush to threaten the world with “another pandemic flu that could kill millions” – a terror tactic to get pandemic laws on the books in every state and worldwide. Then the CDC used hoax of the pandemic hoax to create terror over H1N1 and to push deadly vaccines on the public, killing thousands of unborn children and others. (CDC will not release the data and continues to push the same vaccine.)

The hoax of the vaccine schedule is over, exposed by FOIAs in the UK.

The hoax of the CDC’s interest in children’s lives has been exposed by its refusal to respond to a doctor’s FOIAs around its knowledge of vaccine dangers.

The 1918-19 pandemic hoax has been exposed by Dr. Karen Starko’s work on aspirin’s role in killing people.

And despite refusing to respond to FOIAS, the CDC’s scandalous hoax of a 2009 flu pandemic and its part in creating it, was exposed by CBS NEWS.

And the Obama administration, in attempting to salvage the last vestige of secrecy around what is really happening with vaccines, by declaring agency documents non-existent, has made its claim of transparency, non-existent.

But pandemic laws arranging for unknown vaccines to be forced on the entire country are still in place with HHS creating a vaccine mixture that should never be used on anyone and all liability for vaccines having been removed. Meanwhile, a Canadian study has just proven that the flu vaccine containing the H1N1 vaccine which kills babies in utero, actually increases the risk of serious pandemic flu.

Americans who have been duped into submitting their children to the CDC’s deadly vaccines, have a means to respond now. People from every walk of life and every organization, must

1. take the information from the UK FOIAs exposing 30 years of vaccine lies, the refusal of the CDC to provide any information on what it knows about those lies, and the Obama Administration’s efforts to hide the CDC’s awareness of those lies, and go to their state legislatures, demand the immediate nullification of the CDC vaccine schedule and the pandemic laws.

2. inform every vet. active duty military person, law enforcement people, DHS agents and medical personnel they know, of the vaccine hoax, for their families are deeply threatened, too, but they may not be aware of it or that they have been folded into agency structures by the pharmaceutical industry (indistinguishable from the bankers and oil companies) that would make them agents of death for their country with the declaration of a “pandemic” emergency or “bio-terrorist” attack. It is completely clear now that the terrorism/bioterrorism structures are scams so that any actions taken to “protect” this country using those laws would in fact be what threatens the existence of Americans.

It was aspirin that killed millions in 1918-19. Now it is mandated and unknown, untested vaccines with banned adjuvants in them that threaten the country with millions of deaths. At the same time, the CDC is holding 500,000 mega-coffins, built to be incinerated, on its property outside Atlanta. Not to put to fine a point on this, but it’s clear now that the CDC should not be involved in any way with public health.

Thanks to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), we know that vaccines are not a miracle of modern medicine. Any medical or government authority which insists vaccines prevent diseases is either ignorant of government documents (and endless studies) revealing the exact opposite or of the CDC’s attempts to hide the truth about vaccines from the public, or means harm to the public.

Thanks to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), we know the vaccine schedule is a hoax.

The health danger to American children and adults are vaccines

==============================================

#############################################

Sir David Attenborough needn't worry: the future of humanity isn't as bleak as all that

By Tom Chivers Science Last updated: January 22nd, 2013

It's hard to write something criticising Sir David Attenborough. It feels like slapping your grandfather in the face. But I'm going to have to, today.

Sir David, returning to one of his favourite themes, has said that human population growth is threatening the species and the planet, describing us as a "plague on the Earth". He's a patron of the Optimum Population Trust, which campaigns for a reduced global population by encouraging people to have smaller families, and in the past has spoken of the “frightening explosion in human numbers”.

From his point of view, that of a naturalist and lover of wildlife, you can entirely see his point. A longer version of that last quote is: "I've seen wildlife under mounting human pressure all over the world and it's not just from human economy or technology – behind every threat is the frightening explosion in human numbers." It's true: as human population grows, there is simply less space for the wild habitats, the jungles and forests and plains.

But from a human point of view, it's far less bleak. You might not think that, listening to Sir David, who said: "It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so. It’s not just climate change; it’s sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde. Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now." But it's true, and Sir David is wrong.

For a start, it's worth remembering that the year before last, the world population rose above seven billion. That doesn't sound as though it should support my "don't panic" point, but it does. We reached our first human billion in 1804; depending on when you start counting, it took between 200,000 years and 4.5 billion years. We reached our second 123 years later in 1927. Our third took just 33 years: 1960. Billions four, five and six took 14, 13, and 12 years respectively. It's always been getting faster. But billion number seven, for the very first time, took longer than the billion before it: back up to 13 years. Billion number eight is expected to take 15 years; billion number nine 19. Our population growth is slowing – and may in my lifetime come to halt.

Demographic predictions are tricky – less tricky than some other predictions, probably, but still complex. As I've written once or twice before, in 1930s Britain, the main fear was of total depopulation: it was thought it would happen by the 1980s. (They were wrong, for the record.) But nonetheless, the most likely outcome at the moment is that the world population will peak some time around 2050 and at a population between eight and 10 billion. Obviously that's more than we have now, but not so many more that we couldn't feed everyone.

And all this has happened not, in general, because of planned population measures, but because of things like improved female education, reduced child mortality (so families don't need to have five or six kids to make sure one or two survive), economic prosperity, and state provision for the elderly, so that children aren't seen as insurance against impoverished old age. As I say, we can't know the future, but at the moment it looks like the world's population explosion is naturally stopping: there seems to be no need to force the issue.

By all means be concerned about the impact of the human population on our planet: it is huge, and we are pressuring many species into extinction. But we do not, at the moment, seem to be in any danger of doing the same to ourselves.

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL when you're loosing the battle change the subject!

Slowing population growth is not the same as 'depopulation' and I've seen no signs that Attenborugh has advocated using involuntary means or coercion to achieve the former (or latter).

Edited by Len Colby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL when you're loosing the battle change the subject! // END COLBY

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

No,No , on topic. Please review a number of the first posts of this thread and you will find Attenborugh comments in line with said first postings in this thread.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As to the vaccine issue. Quoting my post #98.

Each hoax was cooked up by Big Pharma and their paid, highly placed scientists who have penetrated both national and international health organizations.

=========

You have your scientists and I have mine. The vaccine issue reminds me of the Tobacco issue of the late 1960s. Then you had total whore big tobacco scientists who help kill millions for a paycheck. This tobacco science super lying that killed is even part of the establishment history. Is it not ??

================

see section # 2 the big lie is human history/nature

http://whatreallyhap...climategate.php

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL when you're loosing the battle change the subject! // END COLBY

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

No,No , on topic. Please review a number of the first posts of this thread and you will find Attenborugh comments in line with said first postings in this thread.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Suddenly dragging up something that hasn't been discussed on the thread for months is a derail.

As to the vaccine issue. Quoting my post #98.

Each hoax was cooked up by Big Pharma and their paid, highly placed scientists who have penetrated both national and international health organizations.

=========

You have your scientists and I have mine. The vaccine issue reminds me of the Tobacco issue of the late 1960s. Then you had total whore big tobacco scientists who help kill millions for a paycheck. This tobacco science super lying that killed is even part of the establishment history. Is it not ??

================

Not analogous because few if any of the scientists warning about AGW have their paychecks signed by companies with a direct financial interest in their positions. Get back to us with evidence that there ever was an overwhelming consensus among qualified scientists that smoking was better for your health than not smoking.

see section # 2 the big lie is human history/nature

http://whatreallyhap...climategate.php

Funny how you keep citing that Holocaust denier, the climate change debate is not relevant to this one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not analogous because few if any of the scientists warning about AGW have their paychecks signed by companies with a direct financial interest in their positions. // END COLBY

------------------------------------------------

Gee 4 second of research .... I Googled , "cdc big pharma revolving door" (if you dont have a closed mind ...finding the truth can occur )

YES ITS A COINSPIRACY :news "cdc big pharma revolving door" $$$

Collusion Between Pharmaceutical Industry and Government ...

articles.mercola.com/.../merck-flu-vaccine-conflicts.aspx



by Joseph Mercola - in 427 Google+ circles - More by Joseph Mercola

Aug 2, 2012 – Here, I will review two important revolving-door cases, and while neither is recent ... Former CDC Director Now President of Merck's Vaccine Unit ... who pass through the revolving doors between government and Big Pharma, ...

More by Joseph Mercola

Former head of CDC lands lucrative job as president of Merck ...

www.naturalnews.com/027789_Dr_Julie_Gerberding_Merc...



by Mike Adams - in 358 Google+ circles - More by Mike Adams

Dec 22, 2009 – As long as the revolving door remains wide open between Big Pharma and Big Government, there will be a strong tendency towards corporate ...

More by Mike Adams

Former CDC Director exits via the revolving door – Effect Measure

scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/2009/.../former-cdc-director-exits-volving door

Dec 23, 2009 – Former CDC Director exits via the revolving door ... Yesterday we learned of another example when Big Pharma giant Merck & Company ...

CDC Director Gerberding Gives Green Light to Gardasil then Goes ...

corporategreedchronicles.com/.../cdc-director-gerberding-gives-gree...

Nov 13, 2011 – Before going through the BigPharma/CDC revolving door, however, her “Report to Congress 'Prevention of Genital Human Papillomavirus ...

Julie Gerberding Primed Big Pharma's Pump with Flu and HPV ...

vactruth.com/.../julie-gerberding-primed-big-pharmas-pump-with-flu...

Jan 4, 2010 – The revolving door between the Department of Health and Human ... Due to CDC's unwavering allegiance to the products of Big Pharma, ...

Owl: US CDC FDA DHS Conflicts of Interest & Impeachable Act that ...

www.phibetaiota.net/.../owl-us-cdc-fda-dhs-conflicts-of-interest-impe...

“Joining a parade of other high-ranking government officials who pass through the revolving doors between government and Big Pharma, [Julie] Gerberding ...

The Big Pharma/Big Government Revolving Door Still - 247WeReport

https://247wereport....es/?view...page...

Dec 31, 2009 – The Big Pharma/Big Government Revolving Door Still Swings. CDC Head Lands Lucrative Job With Merck. Crusador Staff ...

Excellent vaccine articles

www.vaccinetruth.org/excellent_vaccine_articles.htm

How can the risk of injuring 1 in 150 children for life be acceptable to Big Pharma and the revolving door CDC and FDA management? Any business would love ...

Merck Purchases Former "Public Servant" Dr. Julie Gerberding of ...

artsandpalaver.blogspot.com/.../merck-purchases-former-public-serv...

Mar 13, 2010 – Big Pharma Julie! Liz, are you just now catching on to the revolving door at CDC and FDA? Seriously, thanks for this. I'm sure Dr. Julie ...

The Revolving Door Between CDC, FDA, NIH and - Health Maven

healthmaven.blogspot.com/.../revolving-door-between-cdc-fda-nih-a...

The Revolving Door Between CDC, FDA, NIH and The Pharmaceutical Industry ... or law firms and lobbying firms that represent the pharmaceutical industry. ..... and clearing heat, operating through the channels of the stomach, large intestine, ...

######################

######################

The Revolving Door Between CDC, FDA, NIH and The Pharmaceutical Industry Is Disgusting --It's called FASCISM (CLICK THIS LINK)

dog+and+sheep.jpg

'Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.

http://healthmaven.b...da-nih-and.html

'Do you think that Dr. Gerberding was named president of Merc's Vaccine Division because she questions vaccines safety and effectiveness impartially?'

'She will try to revive the sinking sales of the dangerous Gardisal Vaccine and scare the public about other diseases. She is already doing national tv commercials promoting the H1N1 vaccine stating 'the shots do not cause swine flu'.'

Phil Segrave

This highlights the revolving door between U.S. government agencies, the U.S. Congress, and the pharmaceutical industry. The following former government officials now work at IFPMA, PhRMA, or law firms and lobbying firms that represent the pharmaceutical industry. The information on clients represented by the following individuals is heavily indebted to View the de

Former CDC Director Is Now Merck's President

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Dr. Julie Gerberding, former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was named president of Merck & Co Inc's vaccine division, the company said on Monday. Gerberding, who led the CDC from 2002 to 2009, stepped down when President Barack Obama took office. She had led the agency from one crisis to another, including the investigation into the anthrax attacks that killed five people in 2001, the H5N1 avian influenza, the global outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, and various outbreaks of food poisoning. "As a preeminent authority in public health, infectious diseases and vaccines, Dr. Gerberding is the ideal choice to lead Merck's engagement with organizations around the world that share our commitment to the use of vaccines to prevent disease and save lives," Merck Chief Executive Officer Richard Clark said in a statement. "I am very excited to be joining Merck where I can help to expand access to vaccines around the world," added Gerberding, who will head up the company's $5 billion global vaccine business that includes shots to prevent chickenpox, cervical cancer and pneumonia. Source:

'The CDC has been running defense for Merck for many years, downplaying vaccine side effects and insisting that Merck's vaccines are safe. Now that the president of Merck's vaccine division and the former chief of the CDC are one and the same, it brings up obvious questions of whether there was some level of ongoing collusion between the CDC and Merck and how deeply Dr. Gerberding might have been involved. Dr. Gerberding has now allied herself with a company engaged in so many repeated acts of fraud (...)'

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

  • Monday, March 11, 2013
    Fertility Destroying Chemical Added To Tap, Milk, Salt
    fluoride_toxicity_fertility.jpg

    Sayer Ji
    Activist Post
    Fluoride is promoted above good nutrition as a 'therapeutic' chemical necessary to prevent cavities, but it lowers IQ, calcifies the pineal gland and harms fertility, among a wide range of other adverse health effects.
    There is no question remaining that fluoride lowers IQ, at least as far as high-quality epidemiological research published in peer-reviewed journals has shown.
    Take the conclusion of this systematic review of the literature published in the journal Biological and Trace Elements Research in 2008, which looked at whether fluoride exposure has increased the risk of low intelligence quotient (IQ) in China over the past 20 years:

    [C]hildren who live in a fluorosis area [high fluoride exposure] have five times higher odds of developing low IQ than those who live in a nonfluorosis area or a slight fluorosis area.
    [see our IQ and Fluoride research page for seven first-hand study abstracts on this connection]
    Arguably, those who do question this causal connection despite the research are already under fluoride's powerful spell, since they don't take sufficient care to reduce their exposure to this intellectually-disabling chemical. They've consumed the fluoride-contaminated Kool-Aid, and are unable to comprehend what is still obvious to those who have not.
    But fluoride's toxicity is not specific to only one type of tissue, i.e. neurological, but extends throughout the human body, having been linked to at least 30 distinct health problems stretching from calcification of soft tissue and endocrine glands (such as the pineal) to hypothyroidism, from hair loss to cancer. [see Fluoride Toxicity citations here]
    While lawmakers, regulators and the industry using it consider the public gullible enough to believe that the IQ-lowering effects of fluoride a worthwhile price to pay for 'healthy' and 'attractive' teeth (even though fluoride exposure leads to fluorosis, an irreversible spotting, often yellowing of the enamel of the teeth), a more serious health problem lurks beneath the propaganda that has converted an industrial byproduct and pollutant into a "therapeutic" water, salt and milk additive. That problem is fluoride's infertility and abortifacient properties.
    Back in 1994, a study was published in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health that found exposure to high fluoride concentrations in drinking water is associated with decreased birth rates. The researchers had reviewed the biomedical literature for fluoride toxicity and found decreased fertility in most animal species studied. This lead them to question whether fluoride would also affect human birth rates. They reported their method and results as follows:
    A U.S. database of drinking water systems was used to identify index counties with water systems reporting fluoride levels of at least 3 ppm. These and adjacent counties were grouped in 30 regions spread over 9 states. For each county, two conceptionally different exposure measures were defined, and the annual total fertility rate (TFR) for women in the age range 10-49 yr was calculated for the period 1970-1988. For each region separately, the annual TFR was regressed on the fluoride measure and sociodemographic covariables. Most regions showed an association of decreasing TFR with increasing fluoride levels. Meta-analysis of the region-specific results confirmed that the combined result was a negative TFR/fluoride association with a consensus combined p value of .0002-.0004, depending on the analytical scenario. There is no evidence that this outcome resulted from selection bias, inaccurate data, or improper analytical methods. However, the study is one that used population means rather than data on individual women. Whether or not the fluoride effect on the fertility rate found at the county level also applies to individual women remains to be investigated.
    Another study published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine in 1995 found that among fabrication workers fluoride compound exposure was associated with an increased risk of spontaneous abortion:
    Risk of spontaneous abortion (SAB) was examined in relation to chemical and physical agents in a retrospective study of employees of 14 seminconductor manufacturers: After screening over 6,000 employees, 506 current and 385 former workers were eligible. If a woman had multiple eligible pregnancies, one was selected at random. Telephone interviews provided data on demographics and occupational and other exposures during the first trimester. Two groups of chemicals accounted for the 45% excess risk of SAB among fabrication-room (fab) workers: photoresist and developed solvents (PDS), including glycol ethers, and fluoride compounds used in etching. Women exposed to high levels of both these agents were at greater risk (RR = 3.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.29-5.96). In fab workers without these exposures, SAB rates were not elevated (adjusted relative risk [RR] = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.55-1.69). An association was seen with workplace stress, which was not limited to women exposed to PDS or fluoride, nor did stress explain the associations between these chemicals and SAB.
    Considering these findings, now let us zoom down to the animal level of research, which is unequivocal as far as fluoride's anti-fertility/contraceptive/abortifacient properties.
    Here are the male studies

    Here are the female studies

    From the perspective of Life, interference with a biological systems' primary imperative (that is, the ability to reproduce via a healthy germline (ova/sperm)) is the ultimate sin. However, from the perspective of managing large numbers of human bodies – billions of them all dependent on limited resources – "side effects" such as contraception and infertility associated with the use of chemicals like fluoride could be considered beneficial collateral effects.

    Another convenient side effect is its mind-numbing and pineal gland calcifying effects, rendering exposed populations more docile and easily to manage and control. Interestingly, "antidepressant" drugs like Prozac contain fluoride, hence its chemical name fluoxetine. Those who have experienced this drug's effects know it can disassociate you from reality, or simply anesthetize your emotions in relation to it.

    The reality is that a massive, international industrial, medical and governmental system supports water and food fluoridation, and it will take many years of hard work, from the grassroots up, to reduce our continuous exposure to fluoride-based compounds. Until then, we have two clear paths to mitigate the damage: 1) Reduce our exposure. 2) Consume a diet rich in compounds that mitigate fluoride toxicity.

    There are a number of natural compounds that have been experimentally confirmed to reduce fluoride toxicity. Twenty-six of these are listed on our Fluoride Toxicity research page. This is not an exhaustive list, and tens of thousands of natural compounds, from spices to vitamins, nutrients to minerals, are likely to confer the same types of protections identified in those studies. The point is that simple dietary steps, especially incorporating into our diet organically-produced (better yet biodynamic) foods, can go a long way to protecting us from fluoride and thousands of other xenobiotic compounds we are exposed to on a regular basis.

    Learn more about the story of how Fluoride, a poison, was converted into a "therapeutic" compound via propaganda, watch Fluoridegate: An American Tragedy on GreenMedTV.

    RELATED ACTIVIST POST ARTICLE: POST BELOW

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...