Jump to content
The Education Forum

Sandy Hook conspiracy theory


Ron Ecker
 Share

Recommended Posts

Wounded adult survivor Natalie Hammond surfaced at a get-together with the Boston Bruins hockey team in Newtown. She is going to drop the first puck at a Bruins game in March.

She appears to be in good health. It will be interesting to see if anyone from the media is going to interview her about her encounter with the Sandy Hook shooter, presumably Adam Lanza.

It will also be interesting to see if the other wounded adult survivor, still unidentified, is ever going to surface anywhere.

http://nesn.com/2013/02/bruins-players-play-street-hockey-with-kids-sign-autographs-during-trip-to-newtown-conn-video/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Newtown Tragedy: PBS Defies Basic Journalistic Standards to Push the Sandy Hook Official Narrative

By James F. Tracy

Global Research, February 24, 2013

This past week the Public Broadcasting Service presented its viewership with a flurry of reportage and commentary on the Newtown tragedy, taking special care to closely associate the incident with the issues of gun control, mental health, and school safety. Specific programs have included Washington Week, PBS NewsHour, NOVA, and FRONTLINE. This degree of coverage from an outlet with significant credibility among the educated professional class is especially unusual.

Yet even more bizarre is the dubious assumption by PBS’s programming directors that the event has taken place as described by their often untrustworthy and sensationalistic commercial peers at CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC. Instead of providing a genuine news alternative by acting as a corrective to such slipshod reporting PBS has wholeheartedly run with the “official story” of the event—that Adam Lanza was the sole perpetrator. With this the publicly-funded network has moved beyond a much-needed interrogation of the incident to evaluating what social control measures should be introduced or the extent to which existing ones should be ratcheted up.

The FRONTLINE special, “Raising Adam Lanza,” which aired on Tuesday, February 19, is a case in point. Profiling an investigation into Adam and Nancy Lanza by veteran Hartford Courant reporters Alaine Griffin and Josh Kovner, the news magazine proceeds to “lead the witness-viewer” in the court of public opinion by driving home the narrative already well-established in the public mind by corporate media.

Not only are the Hartford Courant and PBS asking the wrong questions and far afield from what might help in better understanding the tragic event, they appear to be knowingly misinforming their readers and viewership because the investigation—like almost all of the corporate coverage—proceeds in the absence of proof that Lanza committed the crime. Indeed, Mr. Kovner acknowledged such in a brief email exchange.

On Feb 23, 2013, at 10:23 AM, “James Tracy” wrote:

—– Forwarded Message —–

From:
James Tracy

To:
Alaine Griffin, Josh Kovner

Sent:
Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:04 PM

Subject:
“Raising Adam Lanza” Query on Prior Evidence

Greetings.

As you may know I have taken a special interest in researching the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting and am thus most interested in your work. I recently viewed the PBS Frontline special profiling your work aired on February 19.

I am curious to know if you have heretofore accessed and examined forensically viable postmortem, video, and/or photographic evidence of the Sandy Hook shooting itself (e.g. autopsies of the suspect and victims, and documentation of the crime scenes) that can confirm specifics of the incident and its genuine occurrence. It would appear to me that such information would be appropriate for journalists such as yourselves to interrogate prior to an in-depth biographical investigation of the suspect Adam Lanza.

The courtesy of a response would be most appreciated.

Thank you for your time

Sincerely,

James Tracy, Ph.D.

561-

Mr. Kovner responded with the following:

From:
“Kovner, Josh”

To:
James Tracy

Sent:
Saturday, February 23, 2013 10:48 AM

Subject:
Re: “Raising Adam Lanza” Query on Prior Evidence

The forensic evidence, including autopsy/toxicology reports and crime-scene photos, has not been available to us.

The Public Broadcasting Act passed by the US Congress in 1967 mandates PBS and its parent corporation, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, to carry out a public service where the commercial sector has failed. In the Act Congress declared that

it furthers the general welfare to encourage public telecommunications services which will be responsive to the interests of people both in particular localities and throughout the United States, which will constitute an expression of diversity and excellence, and which will constitute a source of alternative telecommunications services for all the citizens of the Nation

The Hartford Courant and PBS particularly should provide a reasonable explanation as to why they have chosen to place basic journalistic standards attending to evidence and truth in abeyance and instead serve as an outlet for furthering the Obama Administration’s open agenda of heightened gun control, psychiatric surveillance, and school safety protocols. Without such they offer virtually no worthwhile alternative in terms of news and perspective aside from providing taxpayer and foundation-subsidized publicity to an audience that considers itself too sophisticated to be fooled by cable news claptrap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To anyone other than a very small handful for fellow Sandy Hooker kooks, Tracy is a total loon, at least on this issue. "Forensic evidence" is normally not released while an investigation is on going.

Edited by Len Colby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see on his website that Tracy lists one person wounded, which would have to be Natalie Hammond.

It looks like even the "total loon" Tracy has accepted without question the disappearance of the second adult wounded survivor, still unidentified and now, I guess, a non-person.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tonight on her FoxNews show Gratin' Greta van Susteren (I can't stand her fingernails on blackboard voice) is asking, "Where are the survivors" of the Benghazi attack? Why don't we even know their names?

Why doesn't she, or anyone in the media, ask, "Where is the second Sandy Hook adult wounded survivor?"

How can she be so demandingly curious about the Benghazi survivors, and not give a damn about the Sandy Hook survivor?

I can tell you why. For months FoxNews and others have been having a field day asking questions about what happened at Benghazi. And for months (after the initial 24/7 media wallowing in the tragedy) none of them will touch Sandy Hook, to inquire about the identity of the second adult wounded survivor or ask anything about the official story. (Of course they are perfectly willing to discuss the psyche and motivation of Adam Lanza, because we all know he did it, acting alone, just like Lee Harvey Oswald.) The answer is that people like Greta with their cushy jobs in the controlled media are scared to death that the second adult wounded survivor might have seen a shooter other than Lanza.

That is why Gratin' Greta wants to know who the Benghazi survivors are, and at the same time won't touch the subject of the second Sandy Hook adult wounded survivor with a ten-foot pole. That's why the media is willing to let this person simply disappear into history. The mere possibility of what this person may have seen is too dangerous.

Edited by Ron Ecker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Google and VIDEO PLAYER DOWN FOR COLBY TSK TSK

===========

Video says only hand guns inside with shooter. Colby will say FOG of reporting. More like first reports good before idea to add to story.

No I saw the video, it proves nothing, we already new initial reports said the AR-15 was in the car. So you think the FoD executed this elaborate black op but made things up as they went along? Your 'thinking cap' needs new batteries.

COLBY

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

RECHARGE BUTTON SAVES GAAL FULL, THIS JUST IN

Mainstream Media: New Information ‘No Assault Riffle Used In Sandy Hook School Shooting’

http://intellihub.co...chool-shooting/

###############

BTW I NEVER SAID IT WAS A BLACK OP ,THATS COLBY SAYING I WAS SAYING THAT. HE ENJOYS PUTTING THINGS IN PEOPLES MOUTH'S I GUESS. I COMMENTED ON REPORTING,please reread anything I wrote in this post about black-op .YOU WONT FIND IT.

I WAS SUGGESTING A AR-15 wasnt used.....maybe I was write ehh??

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Google and VIDEO PLAYER DOWN FOR COLBY TSK TSK

===========

Video says only hand guns inside with shooter. Colby will say FOG of reporting. More like first reports good before idea to add to story.

No I saw the video, it proves nothing, we already new initial reports said the AR-15 was in the car. So you think the FoD executed this elaborate black op but made things up as they went along? Your 'thinking cap' needs new batteries.

COLBY

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

RECHARGE BUTTON SAVES GAAL FULL, THIS JUST IN

Mainstream Media: New Information ‘No Assault Riffle Used In Sandy Hook School Shooting’

http://intellihub.co...chool-shooting/

###############

BTW I NEVER SAID IT WAS A BLACK OP ,THATS COLBY SAYING I WAS SAYING THAT. HE ENJOYS PUTTING THINGS IN PEOPLES MOUTH'S I GUESS. I COMMENTED ON REPORTING,please reread anything I wrote in this post about black-op .YOU WONT FIND IT.

I WAS SUGGESTING A AR-15 wasnt used.....maybe I was write ehh??

No you weren't "write", you weren't even 'right' (or 'rite'), that was just another preliminary report for the 15th, no official source ever said the AR-15 was in the car. It was natural to assume based on your general world view that you believed it was a black op, and you even posted a link with the claims of that loon in FL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was natural to assume based on your general world view that you believed it was a black op, and you even posted a link with the claims of that loon in FL. // END COLBY

********************************************

GOLLY THE ASS -UME is certanly in the matter. WHATS MY WORLD VIEW ? Really a lot of ASS -ume on your part

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was natural to assume based on your general world view that you believed it was a black op, and you even posted a link with the claims of that loon in FL. // END COLBY

********************************************

GOLLY THE ASS -UME is certanly in the matter. WHATS MY WORLD VIEW ? Really a lot of ASS -ume on your part

So are you denying you believe or suspect “it was a black op”? If not why did you post a link to a webpage saying it was then post the text another pushing the same theory?

Edited by Len Colby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...