US/NATO/EU and the desperate subversion of Ukraine

[John Dolva]

From her, I'm sure we'll see many more revelations "of the Russian regime" and confessions of fighters with him. Like this:

Last week were not appeased and 100,000 Kadyrovites who continue to "commit atrocities" in the Donbas with "separatists, terrorists"

Well, what else to expect from the "Tatar-moskalskih hordes" who flooded prosperous civilized "Tse Europe"?
After all, even the newly uncovered facts graves tortured and raped dozens of people - the handiwork of "klyatyh separatists."

[John Dolva]

True, Mr. Tymchuk does not specify who exactly killed "for lying Putin", but his colleague in the information war lifts the veil of secrecy us - some "other siloviki"

As is well known throughout the civilized world, a peace-loving tolerant Ukraine responds to "aggression Russian terrorists" exclusively peaceful, economic methods. One decree, order one, and the hordes will be defeated, and Russia will disappear from the world map. So Ukraine will save the galaxy.

But the worst blow to Russia have where least expected. And it will be the greatest victory of Ukraine, Peremoga of Peremoga:

From such an attack Mordor will not recover ever. After Ukrainian smartphones in Russia - our all!
I have always believed that laughter is never too much. Turns out, it happens. Therefore, all this extravaganza svidomye common man responds to his wise folk art and folklore.

"A girl listening to the radio. And suddenly on the radio:
"Girl-girl, Separatist shutters went from Rostov, your street looking for. Roy antitank ditch! "
Girl in horror, rushing around the apartment, wants to report on the radio Cemёnu Sementchenko. And in the radio say:
"Girl-girl, Separatist shutters find your street, it's your house looking for!"
Come on you know. Mom comes home, and the girl was dead, and just next to the corpse of a piece of St. George ribbons lies. "

PS Judging by the latest messages in the network, "Factory of scoundrels" in Ukraine does not stop for a minute and then very soon you will find a new piece of propaganda revelations fakes. Follow our publications.
Komsomolskaya Pravda


Alexander Nikishin
Central News Agency Novorossia
Novorus.info

[John Dolva]

Today, October 1, in the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republic officially begin the school year in schools. Starting School has been postponed for a month due to fighting.

In Donetsk, the shelling did not stop, however, and today not all schools will open.

According to the Minister of Education DNR Igor Kostenko in the zone of the shelling of the school will be opened only by an individual decision of the teachers and students' parents.

"The school year we will begin October 1, most schools will be opened, but in areas that are exposed to shelling, the decision will take teachers and parents," - said Kostenok.

The Minister explained that Donetsk is divided into red and green zones. For example, the central area of ​​the city belongs to the Green Zone, and Kiev, adjacent to the airport, where carried out shelling - the red.

The academic year in the Donbas began on September 1, only in schools located in the territories under the control of Kiev.

Help.

More than 170 kindergartens, schools and universities buildings in the Donetsk region have received some or other damage caused by the bombing.

Of the 150 schools of Donetsk seriously injured four, "pretty much" - 16 schools, and 46 - in part. Some of them are completely destroyed.

The greatest damage occurred in the city Shahtersk, Gorlivka and snowy.

According to the Minister of Education and Science of the self-proclaimed republic in Donetsk at the beginning of September, there were about 10% of the students. In 5% of the students parents took documents from schools, 11% went to other regions of Ukraine, 20% - went to Russia, 54% of students are in the Donetsk region, but in the quieter towns controlled by Kiev.

Moreover, almost half of the schools (47%) do not have shelters.

Sergey Volodin
Central News Agency Novorossia
Novorus.info

[John Dolva]

A missile launched from Ukrainian army positions has reportedly hit a school in Donetsk on the first day of lessons. Several people are dead, the DNR Education Minister Igor Kostenok stated.

“A few hours ago, a Donetsk school was hit by a missile. Two people have been killed, and three locals wounded. They are neither children nor teachers. Just locals who were nearby at that moment,” Kostenok told journalists.

No Ukrainian sources have confirmed the information yet.

One hundred and forty-six schools in the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic had commenced classes out of 150, Kostenok said.

[John Dolva]

How did you do it?

How did you manage to make me, a Ukrainian to the bone, hatred of all things Ukrainian?

Ukrainian I, without any mixture of blood. In the genus only Ukrainians. Such
people like me, bitch Fahrion, has called titular nation.
It was my two grandmothers. The house was one of the grandmothers handbook - poems of Taras Shevchenko. Grandmother taught me poems and I must say successfully. In the first class, I knew half of the poems in this book. Teacher to arrange a fun. Put me on the table in the staff room, on the reverse, and I read KATERYNU. Read with the tragedy in his voice, with an expression. Probably, it was funny, because the teachers were crying with laughter.

Second grandmother was intelligent, quiet. Total embroidered, made carpets on Verstat, which was at least a hundred years. At the wedding grandmother gave me embroidered towel and embroidery. Parents played in amateur Ukrainian theater. All rehearsals and performances I spent behind the scenes. With first-class knew by heart "Kaydasheva sіm * I", "Chomu will roar, yak Jasło povnі."
My family was in compliance with Ukrainian traditions, sang Ukrainian songs on all holidays, at home talking only in Ukrainian. She graduated from the Ukrainian school. During his studies at the institute was in St. Petersburg. The first visited the Academy of Arts, Shevchenko looked course, was in the room, where he lived at the Academy. About Shevchenko know everything, at least not less than the current shevchenkovedov. Material collected bit by bit.
Love Ukrainian literature no less than Russian. We were taught. It was a shame not to read. It was a shame not to know two languages. Home library I have a small, about 300 books, but only ... I read. Half of them are in Russian, the second half of the Ukrainian language.

Why am I so much detail to tell?

I want to ask the Nazis, who came to power after amerikosovsky Maidan:
How did you, in such a short time, after all the movements that were aimed at raising the national idea, the national spirit of patriotism, cause I'm allergic to the Ukrainian flag, anthem, embroidery?
How did you manage to make me, a Ukrainian to the bone, hatred of all things Ukrainian?
Not even hatred, more precisely, a xxxxing shame for the country?
How did you manage to destroy all life, national, and that was in it?
How did you, in a few months to turn Ukraine into my camp zaturkanny, the disenfranchised, the poor, angry people?
Who gave you the right to decide the fate of the country's Independence, rather than on the election?
Who are you, bitch? Remove the mask!

This Ukrainian will not do something that will bring harm to his homeland. This will not be happy Ukrainian deaths of thousands of civilians.
Lord, You - animals, gentlemen! You'll be damned his country!
Ukrainka. Brovchenko Irina.
Central News Agency Novorossia
Novorus.info

Previously voiced smile about reincarnation "Hitler Youth" in Ukraine, may not be as far from the truth as it might seem at first glance, but first things first.

Currently, youth Square, in particular, the moral qualities of children are at dramatically low. Crisis and turmoil not aroused patriotic feelings hoped for in Kiev. As a result, increasing the level of juvenile crime, violence, guys do not take anyone as an authority. In general, the younger generation is gradually taking shape marginals. Naturally, the Ukraine, especially its adequate part, concerned about such trends.

One possible way of solving the problem is considered combat training students, as stated Skripnichuk Basil - Head of the Ivano-Frankivsk Regional Council. According to him, it is necessary to carry out the education of children in military affairs, since the sixth grade. Discipline plan to be called "Defender of the Fatherland", a mandatory program will appeal to arms, the basics of first aid, high school students will be able to master the strategic military planning and intelligence.

Skripnichuk believes that military training will increase the tendency of adolescents to learn, form an image worthy of a warrior, will instill in children respect for the older generation and discipline.

Thus, it looks as if a training bench will educate young fascists who imbibe the ideals of the killers and looters in his youth. Ideological program has not been disclosed, but is likely to adjust the youth will be specifically against the "enemy number one in Ukraine" - the Russian Federation. So that the information war going on, how many more generations will be ruined before once brotherly country recovers from his schizophrenia?

Sergey Lyzhin
Central News Agency Novorossia
Novorus.info

Raging battles in the region of Donetsk airport take the lives of a large number of security forces APU, in spite of this, the Germans are not going to leave their positions. It is known that due to the stubbornness of their management directives.

Initially, a strategically important facility was occupied eight hundred of the best fighters of the generated Kolomoiskiy units. In addition, it is reported that in the territory of a strategically important point is a large number of foreign mercenaries. Surrender militias occupants can not for the reason that the command gave them the order to stand up to the latter to the defenders of Donbass could not get their hands on armored vehicles, which the invaders have airport. Otherwise, the militants junta threatens court with all the consequences that makes them resist a last effort.

It is reported that the total number of militants that deter the onslaught of the army of New Russia, remained in the ranks is not more than 350 people. At the same time, they regularly receive food and ammunition, thanks to an extensive network of underground tunnels that were created during the construction of the airport. In addition, with the help of this advanced network invaders hide from artillery strikes.

According to experts, the strength at the moment are approximately equal, the Nazis and militia used heavy weapons systems "Grad" and "Tochka-U".

Analysts say that the capture of a strategically important militias have about a month. In the future, if it comes to power in Ukraine "party of war", the Nazis may receive reinforcements and combat vehicles. At the same time, militias have advantages that are associated with the possibility of obtaining new forces virtually anytime.

Sergey Lyzhin
Central News Agency Novorossia
Novorus.info

[John Dolva]

Sharp conflict that broke out in Ukraine, came as a surprise to many. The intrinsic heterogeneity of Ukraine and its inherent cultural and linguistic antagonism between regions talked a long time. In the political arena Ukrainian domestic antagonism first openly declared himself in 2004 during the so-called "Orange Revolution". At the same theme was articulated federalization of the country as a means of settling inter antagonizma1). However, obviously, no one expected that this regional antagonism may go into a "hot" stage, in fact, a civil war.
It is easy to see that the conflict in Ukraine - is not only a conflict of national linguistic identities, but also geopolitical orientations. Ukraine - a classic buffer, LIMITROPHE education that exists in the area of ​​overlapping interests of the major geopolitical players. Conflict "east-west" in Ukraine is a projection of a large centuries-old confrontation between Russia and the various Western players (Poland, Austria and the German Empire, the EU, United States), at different times aspired to geopolitical hegemony in Eastern Europe. It is this confrontation in many wondered the logic of the cultural, ethnic, linguistic processes on the territory of Ukraine and has determined their conflicting, contradictory.
External forms of confrontation Russia and the West in Ukraine have changed, but the essence remained alone. For Russia, Ukraine has never been a geopolitically important bridgehead. Russian political tradition is typical to think Ukraine as a part of Russian historical, cultural and national space. The idea that Ukrainians (in the terminology, the Little Russians) on a par with Russian (Great Russians) and Belarusians are great "triune Russian people," was the official national doctrine in the Russian Empire. During the Soviet period the basis of national relations between the Eastern Slavs was the model of the "three fraternal peoples", where Russian, Belarusians and Ukrainians were recognized even separate, yet related particularly close historical and cultural ties peoples who had grown out of a total of Old Russian cradle. In fact, this model has become a kind of surrogate for pre-revolutionary idea of ​​"Russian trinity", which has not been pushed out of the unconscious majority of the population of Ukraine. It is no coincidence protests in the Donbas and other south-eastern regions of Ukraine took place not just by pro-Russian slogans - they publicly declared Russian identity.
Accordingly, the separation of Ukraine from Russia always seemed strategically important factor in easing the last for its geopolitical rivals. Promoting pro-Western and anti-Russian ideologies simultaneously and identities in Ukraine is an integral part of this strategy.
Competition divergent geopolitical orientations and identities naturally prevented national consolidation of the Ukrainian society. Moreover, in the twentieth century, this ideological split has found a pronounced geographical dimension, creating antagonism between the south-eastern and western regions of the country. All these factors inevitably worked to destabilize and disintegrate Ukraine.
Ukrainian experience is extremely important for Belarus. Belarus, like Ukraine, is in the geopolitical buffer between Russia and the West, and is experiencing a powerful disturbing influences due to their competition for spheres of influence in Eastern Europe.
Avoiding Belarus scenario similar to the Ukrainian tragedy is impossible without an analysis of the events taking place and taking place in Ukraine.

Imagining the nation: integration and separatism
B. Anderson defined the nation as "imagined community" that exists as a product of the collective "imagination" of their members2). Any nation, even a relatively small numerically, is a non-contacting social group, the majority of whose members do not personally know and will never know each other. Therefore, such a community can exist only as an imaginary, ie through the reproduction of images representing this community as well integrated integrity - the nation. These images can be varied - presentation of common origin and history, national symbols, maps indicating the national territory, some informal symbols, etc. An important element of this imaginative series is the national language. It should be noted that most of the national movements in Europe were of exactly the nature of language. This Europe is different, for example, America (both North and South), where the formation of nations took place on the basis of civil confrontation colonies and the metropolitan, who spoke the same language (English, French, Spanish or Portuguese). In Europe, where are concentrated in a small space a large variety of ethnic groups, language naturally became a symbol of national singularity.
Speaking of the nation as a product of "imagination", the same can be said with regard to the national language. Obviously, one should distinguish between the language as a living speech, means of direct communication between specific people, and the image of language as an attribute of a national community. The national language is not some objective reality - it is a product of the conceptual processing of this reality. Indeed, in some cases, it is quite difficult to draw the boundaries between closely related dialects and dialects, as well as to justify an accessory of certain adverbs to one language, or their linguistic isolation. In addition, the national activists often have to resist the trends of linguistic assimilation, when the population whose language for one reason or another turned out to social non-prestigious, gradually moving to a more "prestigious" language. In all these cases we are talking about creating an image of the language that is used for national consolidation and mobilization, as well as separation from the adjacent, often closely related ethnic groups.
In European history, were not uncommon when define the boundaries of "imaginary" and their respective linguistic communities turned out quite difficult. In such situations, it usually went about ethnically and linguistically closely related groups that are closely related to each other historically. Consequently, to determine the status of such groups is often difficult. As a result, there are competing national projects involving the same territory and population of the various "imagined communities." In very general terms, these projects can be divided into two types: the integration and separatist.
Integration projects require the inclusion of the single "imagined community" of several closely related ethno-linguistic groups. At the same ethno-linguistic differences between them are treated as local historical, cultural, ethnographic and dialectal identity. Such a model involves the formation of a unified literary language, which is either "artificial" naddialektnoe Koine or literary dialect processed form an ethnic group, "dominant" in the national community. The existence of other dialects and languages ​​are also allowed (and they can also get a degree of literary processing and applications in the public sphere), but they occupy a subordinate position in relation to the "national" locale. An interesting case was an integration project "Czechoslovak nation", where the Czech and Slovak literary language accepted as the norm of two variants of a single "Czechoslovak language."
Separatist projects, by contrast, tend to the national isolation of such ethno-linguistic groups. In this case, all ethnographic, linguistic, historical and cultural features are seen as signs of national differences, and on the basis of local languages ​​and dialects are formed separate national languages, and, as a rule, the formation of these languages ​​is such a way as to alienate them from the most closely related neighboring languages .
A classic example of the integration project can be considered an example of the German nation, which emerged as a result of the consolidation of several ethnic groups of the Germanic tribes. Likewise, there was the French nation, which was formed as a result of the integration on a single francophone culture several historically and ethnically diverse enough regions. Examples could be multiplied, and further, since virtually every major European nation is the result of "gathering" together multiple regions with a greater or lesser degree of ethno-cultural and historical differences.
Nation is usually regarded as a phenomenon of modern times, appeared no earlier than the 17-18 centuries. (Western Europe) and the 19-20 centuries. (Central and Eastern Europe). However, it is clear that in modern times there is not a nation on the "from scratch" - their appearance in many ways to prepare the previous historical development of a given territory. The historical and cultural coherence of certain territories formed long before the most "national idea" and is a prerequisite for the emergence of the latter. Thus, the emergence of a unified German nation would have been impossible without the close historical and cultural coherence of the German states, established in previous historical periods. This connectivity is not always involves political unity - the German states (as well as Italian) until the mid-19th century. existed in the form of separate entities, which, however, is not "abolished" integrative tendencies that give rise to the idea of ​​a unified Germany and the Italian nation. France, by contrast, is already in pre-national period has been merged into a single state in the form of an absolute monarchy, which greatly facilitate and accelerate national integration is very ethnically diverse areas. In any case, historical and cultural connection, in one form or another appeared in the pre-national period, is a prerequisite for the emergence of the national idea in modern times.
This lack of historical relatedness may lead to the formation of different ethnic communities on the basis of ethnically closely related material. Thus, the formation of two competing political centers of the Iberian Peninsula has led to the appearance of the closely related dialect based on two languages ​​- Spanish and Portuguese - and two national communities. Likewise, there was a division of so-called Low German ethnolinguistic classification space. Implementation of a successful political, economic and cultural project in the Netherlands led to the formation of an independent nation, and here the development of the Dutch locale, while the rest of the band entered the Low German obschenemetsky national project and linguistic space with domination High German literary norm.
Uncommon for the distinction between the two situations described above is quite difficult to carry out, ie certain historical and cultural cohesion is accompanied by the presence of regional "separatist" projects, and the victory of integration or disintegration tendencies depends on the particular historical circumstances, the intervention of external forces concerned, etc.
Thus, the area of ​​residence of Serbs, Croats and Bosniaks is a single dialect continuum and historically related space. However, interspersed with political, cultural and religious influences led to konfessinonalnomu separation and the formation of a sufficiently deep cultural differences that contributed to conflict relations between closely related ethnic groups. However, in the 19-20 centuries. an attempt is made to remove these contradictions and to form a united Yugoslav cultural and political project. However, the internal contradictions in combination with unfavorable external environment led to the tragic and bloody collapse of the project. The result was not only a political disintegration of Yugoslavia, but also attempts to dismantle the cultural and linguistic connectedness of the space. Instead of a unified Serbo-Croatian language rules (based on the Cyrillic and Latin script) today formed separate Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian and Montenegrin standards even, with the obvious purpose of these linguistic innovations is the maximum distance the new languages ​​from each other.
In something similar, though without such experience of tragedy, the situation took place in the Czech-Slovak relations. The existence of the ancient Great Moravian Empire, which included the land of present Czech Republic and Slovakia, in the modern era has given rise to chehoslovakizma ideology, according to which the Czechs and Slovaks are one people - chehoslovakami3). "Keep" this ideology has played not only a common historical past, but also an objective linguistic proximity of the Czech and Slovak dialects. However, the long historical isolation of the Czech and Slovak lands (after the fall of the Moravian Czech state was closely linked with the German world, and Slovakia was ruled by Hungary) complicated the national integration of the Czechs and Slovaks. In parallel, the formation of two literary norms - Czech and Slovak - Slovak national movement developed, not sharing ideas chehoslovakizma. Nevertheless, chehoslovakizm becomes the official ideology of the creation of the first Czechoslovak state; Czech and Slovak recognized two variants of a single Czechoslovak language. However interwar Czechoslovakia is too weak to implement the policy of full-scale Czechoslovak national integration; intervention of outside powers (Germany, Hungary) contributes to a worsening of relations between the two parts of the state. All this leads to a decline in chehoslovakizma ideas; postwar Czechoslovakia organized not as a state of the Czechoslovak people, and as a federation of two national republics. A natural result of this process is the final "divorce" of the Czech Republic and Slovakia in 1993
Another example of this "game" of integration and disintegration tendencies can serve as the Bulgarian-Macedonian relations. Macedonia, linguistically gravitating to the Bulgarian dialect area, historically has been closely linked with Serbia, which strongly hindered the implementation of the idea of ​​"big" of the Bulgarian nation, including the Macedonians as one of the ethno-linguistic groups. The result of these efforts was the creation of a Macedonian republic within Yugoslavia and the codification of the individual from the Bulgarian Macedonian language, which is the youngest literary Slavic language, apart from modern attempts to create a new Slavic languages ​​instead of one Serbo-Croatian.

Little Russia or Ukraine?
The situation in relations between Ukraine and Russia is also a lot like the above examples of the struggle of integration and disintegration, or separatist trends. Integration trend here personified the idea of ​​Russian nation, which includes all the ethnic groups of the Eastern Slavs, and the "big" the Russian language as the set of all East Slavic dialects, united by a common literary form (which, as in the case with the Czechoslovak language allows existing of regional literary options on the basis of local dialects). In this case, the definition of "Russian" acts as a cumulative, collective designation of the Eastern Slavs (in fact, the concept of "Eastern Slavs" and it was put into circulation for the displacement of the collective meaning of the word "Russian"). Accordingly, the "separatist" represents the beginning of the Ukrainian national project, who plays for the formation of the Ukrainian nation with its own literary language and opposed the idea of ​​an all-Russian.
All-Russian idea was based on a long historical and cultural tradition, provides the connectivity of the eastern Slavic lands, which is an important prerequisite for the formation of the integration of the national project. It refers to the historical memory of the Eastern Slavs associated with Old heritage. All-Russian idea is based on the assertion that the Eastern Slavic ethno-political community that has developed in the ancient period, fell apart after the death of ancient Russia and continued existence over the new political boundaries that divided the Eastern Slavs politically, but spiritually and culturally. Accordingly, all the Eastern Slavs are united by the Russian people, who must reside in a single gosudarstve4).
Indeed, the self-name "Rus", "Russia" and its derivatives were used in the 13-18 centuries. on the whole of the historical ancient Russia, part of Muscovy, Lithuania and Polshi5). No wonder, therefore, that the accession of Belarusian and Ukrainian lands after the partition of Poland in the Russian Empire sought to be interpreted as the release of Russian brothers from the power of non-Christian Poland. In particular, the policy of the Governor-General, MN Muraveva in the Belarusian-Lithuanian provinces after the suppression of the Polish uprising of 1863 was defined as "the restoration of Russian began in the province."
It is important to emphasize that the idea of ​​an all-Russian unity was not a product of Russian officialdom, but found support in the lands of Belarus and Ukraine. In Belarus it is manifested in motion zapadnorusizma that developed among the local Orthodox intellectuals and clergy. The reunification of the Belarusian Uniates with the Orthodox Church in 1839 and was carried out in the first place on the initiative of the Russophile minded wing of the Uniate clergy. Moreover, the main initiator of this major event, Metropolitan Joseph Semashko in his memoirs pointed out that in the elimination of the union had to overcome opposition polonofilski minded bureaucracy Peterburga6).
Similar intellectual flow, which can be defined as the "Little Russian", developed in Ukraine. And the support it has received in the historical region of Galicia, then part of the Austrian Empire and perceived today as the main stronghold of Ukrainian nationalism (so-called "Ukrainian Piedmont"). The main carriers of Russophile ideas in Galicia were Uniate priests, among which in the 19th century. were popular idea of ​​rapprochement with the Orthodox, and even direct conversion to Orthodoxy. As noted in this regard modern Russian historian A. Miller, "in the XIX century as a significant part of the Uniate priests were in the camp russophiles that Vienna and the Vatican in the early 1880s were forced to organize a total cleaning of the Uniate clergy and reform of local seminaries" 7). Such behavior of Vienna and the Vatican says that they saw Russian movement in Galicia as a serious problem for themselves. On the domestic sources of the Russian movement in Galicia and the importance of this process for the Uniate Church, wrote one of the active OA Galician Russophile Monchalovsky: "It is in the Russian church, although Unitarian, and among its faithful, with thatched roofs, smoldering spark of national thought; Church separated the Russian people not only from the church, but also on the Polish nationality, the church retained the Russian language and Russian letter and protected the national tradition. In church services St. Vladimir, St.. Olga St. Boris and Gleb, and our other national saints and priests, and the people have read and heard about the "Russian way", and it is with living legends and stories of the people who went out of Kiev, about Pochaiv and other Russian cities and places of pious pilgrimage to the Cossack wars with Poland, and so on. n. created in the minds of the Galicians image of Russia and argued about their tribal affiliation to it "8).
Thus, the request for an all-Russian ideology formed primarily internal laws of Ukraine and Belarus. Russia's policy could contribute to the development of this movement, but it was not the primary source, and "creator". This suggests that the historical and cultural connectedness East Slavic lands, the current in the ancient period, and remained after the fall of Kievan Rus and the occurrence of its parts in different public education. Cultural and information exchange between parts of Russia continued, despite centuries of political division. Long tradition of historical and cultural connectedness, have stood the test of time and politics, naturally formed a request for a unifying national idea in modern times.
However, over the centuries of separate existence among the various groups of the Eastern Slavs have accumulated a lot of differences and contradictions that have become a prerequisite for the emergence of Ukrainian, Belarusian and then national projects, opposing the idea of ​​an all-Russian and towards national isolation Ukrainians and Belarusians from the Russian. During his stay in the part of the Commonwealth Ruthenian (Belarusian-Ukrainian) population was subjected to a strong impact of the social prestige of Polish culture. This ultimately led to the total polonization local aristocracy. But those layers from western society that resisted polonization involuntarily perceived as an example of Polish culture. As a result, even many Orthodox hierarchs, including sympathizers of Moscow, mostly owned by the Polish than Church Slavonic; Polish everyday habits, clothing, etc. entered into a massive vocabulary. Polonized and spoken language, and this process is affected and grassroots social group, the peasantry, which anyway has been in contact with the higher classes and the more they adopt.
Naturally, for the residents of Great these features often seemed strange, alien and suspect, as a result of "heretical" Western influence. But exactly the same prejudices against the "Muscovites" were formed and the "Russian" population of the Commonwealth, and largely under Polish influence. Poles in their geopolitical and civilizational confrontation with Russia formed the image of Russian as a wild, barbaric people subjected to "aziatiziruyuschemu" Effects Tatars. Similar notions of "Moskal" Rzeczpospolita intended to develop and among the Orthodox population from western, that block the growth of pro-Moscow sympathies. Admittedly, the Poles succeeded in this lot, as evidenced by throwing and betrayal Ukrainian hetman and from western part of the Orthodox clergy during the Moscow-Polish war of 1654-67 biennium. Obviously, certain prejudices against the "Muscovites" persisted after the final joining of the territory of Ukraine to Russia.
As a result, different groups of the Eastern Slavs, who continued to identify themselves as "Russia", "Russian", was formed narrowed notion of "Russia", which was identified only with "their" space. For the Great "hohlatskoe" as opposed to the beginning of their own "Russian-ness" was identified with "suspicious" Polish Catholic influence. Do Ukrainians opposition of "Russia", "Moscow" was evolved largely under Polish influence, with the negative perception of "Moscow" was associated with the alleged varvariziruyuschim Tatar influence.
This Little Russian-Great-antagonism in the early 19th century. very aptly described the historian and ethnographer Venelin Yu, a native of the Carpathians, a long time lived in Russia and who knew the situation in different parts of the historical Russia: "You can not fail to mention the importance of the dispute between southerners and northerners about their rossizma (mean opinion here rabble prostolyudiya). According to the Muscovites, for example, that only a true Russian, who can Ghawar pas present, ie pa-Russian, and that means in the north. But woe Southerner; you can know perfectly the northern Russian dialect, or the so-called Russian; can even masquerade as almost entirely north reprimand; but woe to you if you stumble in the slightest shading in pronunciation - you say: "You get back from the Germans?" or "You are not from around here is true?" and then, my dear southerner, termed as you please, - a Spaniard, a Prussian, Chaldeans or tarapantsem - still, everything you believe and how you may fidget or bozhis, all you are not Russian! But you say that you Little Russian - all the same, all you're not Russian, because Moscow commoner alien word ross; and whether this ross big or small, for him anyway, but he was convinced that he was not Russian, and Polish, or crest, or Lithuania, or Cossack, or Ukrainian, or something similar; in short, that he is not his own. And, in fact, possible to honor your person, who does not wear a red shirt or color, called borscht soup and Ghawar Harashi and goodness! But southerners and, in turn, do not allow northerners to participate in rossizme; no matter how he call himself a Russian, yet he did not Ruthenian and Muscovite, Lipovans and katsap. According to the southerners, the real Russia extends only up to the point of which live up to the southerners, and all other Moskovschina. In the same opinion, and some of the Carpatho-Russia living on the banks of the Tisza; his Book of Hours or Menaion Kievan Rus print remind him, but not Moscow, although Moscow press it is not uncommon. He took Russian grenadier, a native of the northern, a Czech, but only Gluhovskij or Voronezh, or Chernigov grenadier seem to him the present Russian; uniformly Earthman Lublin province in the Kingdom of Poland is ready to bet that it is cleaner hare than
Yaroslavl and Volodymyr's Moskal "9).
In fact, this "dispute about rossizme" discernible contours of the national political demarcation between the Great Russians and Little Russians as between related but different and somewhat antagonistic nations. And the momentum of this disengagement comes not only from the Ukrainians, but also from the Great. The modern historian Sergeev results are evidence of this: "For example, the well-known journalist NA Field (despite the name, is not Ukrainian, and Siberian with Kurdish roots) wrote in 1830 that although "Little Russians until now only profess the Greek faith, say a special dialect of Russian language and belong to the political structure of Russia, but nationality is not Russian. " The eminent historian, MP Pogodin in 1845 allowed himself the following argument: "Great Russians living near the Little Russians, profess the same faith, have the same fate, long a story. But as there are differences between the Great Russians and Little Russians! If we have more similarities in some qualities even with the French than with them? What is the similarity? - This question is much more difficult to ". Definitely separated from the Ukrainians in the text of the Great 1850 one of the leaders of the Slavophile YF Samarin. Prone to hobbies and extremes Apollon Grigoriev in the mid-1850s. expressed suspicion of "hohlatskomu beginning," along with "lyahitskim", and in the early 1860s, has praised the poetry of Shevchenko as the new phenomenon of great literature of the Slavic world, ie in both cases the thought of Ukrainians as a separate people, "10).
However, in the Great environment, this "separatism" has not received serious development, as the idea of ​​an all-Russian unity was based in the first place on the Great samples. Despite the fact that the development of an all-Russian ideas was attended by many people from Southern and Western Russia (ie the future of Ukraine and Belarus), namely Great Russia in modern times has become the leading political and cultural center of the East Slavic world. Actually, many all-n-minded people from southern Russia had to settle in Great migrants who consciously guided by the Great-samples and leveled the southern Russian features that were perceived in Great as "wrong."
In Little Russia the national language processes and acquire dual mixed. On the one hand, there was a systematic expansion of Russian language and culture: a large number of Ukrainians were integrated into the Russian cultural, political elite, became ardent Russian patriots and treated ethno-linguistic characteristics of their homeland no more than a provincial identity. Urban culture left bank of Little Russia was almost exclusively Russian-speaking; in the cities of the right bank of the Russian language is slowly but surely supplanted Polish. Common people are also guided by the Russian culture as a socially prestigious; began the process of leveling of dialectal and ethnic differences, particularly in the areas of border and mixed accommodation Great Russians.
In this folksy South Russian culture was still largely a hybrid subjected to strong Polish influence. In particular this applies to language. Moreover, in the right-bank Ukraine until the end of the Russian Empire continued to dominate the Polish land tenure, and thus preserved the prevalence and nature of the prestigious Polish culture, one way or another affect the whole way home in the region. Retains many vestiges of Polish cultural influences and on the left bank of Little Russia. Polish sometimes so "alloy" with southern Russian that was beginning to be perceived as something "original", the former always.
Thus, there is a certain antagonism between the "high" Russian culture and grassroots, vernacular culture Ruthenia. Gradually drawn desire to develop on the basis of this vernacular culture independent "high" national tradition (that O. Nemensky described as "rural nationalism" 11)).
Primarily, this was due to the attempts of literary creativity in the Little Russian dialect, inspired by an interest in folklore heritage Little Russians (primarily associated with the Cossack romance). These experiments, however, a long time is not taken seriously, and many writers malorossiyskie combined experiences in the Little Russian dialect with the work of the literary Russian. Talk about the prospects of Ukrainian as an independent literary language made creativity Shevchenko, which not only became widely popular in itself, but also generated a lot of copycats and imitators. Since emerging linguistic confrontation. In contrast, supporters of the all-Russian unity, focused on the Church Slavonic and Old Russian samples and is considered a modern Russian language (despite its "Great Russian accent"), the direct heir of the ancient Russian linguistic tradition, "conscious" Ukrainians are mostly modeled after spoken dialects have undergone a strong Polish influence. At the same time in order to maximize the differentiation from Russian Polish language lexical component deliberately intensified, often caused condemnation, even within themselves supporters of the "Ukrainian ideas" 12).
Conceptually Ukrainian movement actualizes those centrifugal tendencies of Great-Little-Russian relations, which are described Yu Venelin. It is based on a narrowed understanding of "Russia" ("Ukraine-Rus'), as contrasted with" Moscow ", which are projected borrowed Poles phobias and prejudices (Tatar influence" Asiatic ", etc.) In this context," Ukraine-Rus "regarded as a carrier cleaner" Slavo-of Rus "and" European "cultural foundations.
The widening of the Ukrainian movement also contributed to the transition of the right-bank opolyachennoy gentry to "Ukrainian" position. This gentry, being in origin mainly from opolyachennyh Little Russians, often kept borderline dual identity: Remember your "Russian" origin, in the home was not talking so much on the "right" Polish, but on much opolyachennyh Little Russian dialect. The death of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and depolonizatorskie measures of the Russian Empire was not allowed to finish polonization this layer. The failure of the Polish uprisings did hope of recovery Rzeczpospolita more elusive, which contributed to the disappointment of the "Ukrainian" in the Polish gentry idea and pushed it into the ranks of the already declared themselves "Ukrainophiles." In addition, the "Ukrainian" nobles often encountered in the Polish environment with exactly the same arrogant and contemptuous attitude to himself as a "wrong" provincials, with what is often encountered in Great Little Russians. Obviously, it's also been challenging motive to the isolation of the "big" of Polish culture. Similar processes were also among the "Litvinsky" gentry, of which at the turn of 19-20 centuries. attempt to re-encode the provincial Polish-Lithuanian tradition in terms of Belarusian nationalism.
Fueled separatist sentiment in Ruthenia and objective flawed social and political structure of the Russian Empire, which she never fully could not be overcome; first of all it concerns the position of the oppressed peasants. At the same Shevchenko became the leitmotif of creativity opposition freestyle Cossack Ukraine tyrannical mores of tsarist Russia. Social, emancipatory character of Ukrainian ideology contributed to the growth of its popularity among the different ranks of socialist ideas fascinated intellectuals Ruthenia.
Of course, an important role in the development of Ukrainian ideology played and external forces interested in rocking the Russian statehood. The first violin is played Austria, within which was one of the Little Russian provinces - Galicia. As noted above, there are also focused on developing Russia All-Russian movement (or, as it is called, "Old Russian", "tverdorusskoe"), but since the 1860s. begins to develop during the Ukrainian, largely under the influence of migrated here from Russia Ukrainophiles. It was here, in Austrian Galicia, for the Ukrainian movement formed the most favorable conditions for the development, which will eventually and turned this region into a bastion of Ukrainian nationalism. Austria has made every effort to create favorable conditions for the development of Ukrainian flow and suppression of Russian - so Galicia into a "Ukrainian Piedmont". This solves a number of Austrians as intra-and foreign policy objectives. On the foreign policy direction of the Ukrainian movement worked as a battering ram against Russia, destabilizing and swinging Little Russian region. In domestic policy, the Austrian authorities have used the Ukrainians as allies against the Russian movement as a potential "fifth column" of Russia, as well as playing on the contradictions between Ukrainians and Poles, strengthening their power in Galicia by the classical imperial principle of "divide and rule".
By the early twentieth century to split Ukrainians "tverdorusov" and "Ukrainians" was already evident, and the "Ukrainian question" assumes a nationwide outcry.

Soviet and post-Soviet Ukraine: contradictions of nation-building
In the Soviet period Ukrainian question was decided ambiguous, and it zigzags and contradictions of Soviet nationality policy that created the potential for conflict that plagues today's Ukraine. In the 1920s. Soviet authorities, guided by the idea of ​​self-determination "oppressed" nations, launched a strict policy ukrainizatsii13). Ukraine receives the status of a union republic, all-Russian ideology condemned as "chauvinist", begins an intense literary treatment and massive introduction of the Ukrainian language in all spheres of life, instead of Russian. In 1930., However, aware of the threat of centrifugal forces generated by the policy of indigenization, the Soviet leadership dramatically changes the vector. Ukrainian humanitarian intelligentsia undergoes massive repression, again taking a course on strengthening the role of the Russian language as the "language of interethnic communication." In the postwar period, relations Russian and Ukrainians in the official ideology of self-described as the relationship, but the fraternal peoples, going back to a common ancestor - Old Russian nationality - and with close historical and cultural ties. In 1954, pompously celebrated the 300th anniversary of the Council of Pereyaslav, supplied by official propaganda as a "reunification of Russia and Ukraine." Thus, the late Soviet national doctrine in relation to the Eastern Slavs partially returned to many of the provisions of the pre-revolutionary concept of "triune Russian people."
Soviet nation-building gave very contradictory internal results. On the one hand, the independent Ukrainian language and culture were finally institutionalized, there was an extensive layer of "conscious" Ukrainian humanitarian intelligentsia. At the same time, the national consciousness of Ukrainians at the grassroots level remained fairly vague, hard language, cultural, and identification of the barrier between the Russian and Ukrainians have not arisen. At the household level, the very border between Russian and Ukrainian languages ​​has been blurred, as evidenced by the widespread mixed Ukrainian-Russian vernacular - "surzhik" (similar to the Belarusian denominated "trasianka"). Furthermore, in fact, Russian and Ukrainian perceived as different stylistic registers of one language: Russian - as a prestigious "urban" language, Ukrainian - as "simple", rural. Therefore, in the course of industrialization and urbanization, which caused a massive migration of Ukrainian peasants to the cities, the transition from "rural" Ukrainian negotiations on the "urban" Russian language flowed quite smoothly and naturally.
In particular this applies to the eastern and southern regions of Ukraine, historically more closely related to Russian and where Russian cultural influence has always been strong. South-eastern regions of Ukraine in the 19th century. known as the New Russia, developed as a result of development of the Russian empire of the steppes north of the Black Sea. Self-awareness in these regions always was connected with the Russian nation and state building, cities like Kharkov and Odessa became a powerful center of Russian-speaking culture, and the Ukrainian national idea broad support did not use, despite the fact that the majority of the local population were descendants of migrants from historical Ukraine (which determined the inclusion of these areas in the Ukrainian SSR).
Of course, the "national consciousness" Ukrainians perceived this situation is painful, as a consequence of ill-intentioned policy of Russification. This laid the preconditions for that tension in the national linguistic grounds that there is already in the independent Ukraine.
Additional confrontational potential created accession to Ukraine Galicia. As already noted, the transformation of Galicia into a stronghold of the Ukrainian nationalist radicalism began in the 19th century. under the protection of Austria, which then comprised the province. Influence of German political thought in the Western nationalists apparently caused the spread in their midst fascist and Nazi ideas: in 1920-30. develops the well-known "Bandera" nationalism, based on the ideas of racially pure Ukraine free from strangers - "Poles, Jews and Muscovites." Western Ukrainian nationalists in the interwar period were in close contact with the German secret services, who tried to use them as a battering ram against the Polish, in which then comprised the western Ukraine, and against the Soviet Union.
It should be noted, however, that on the eve of World War II pro-fascist nationalism has not yet had an ideological monopoly in western Ukraine. In the western Ukrainian national movement was strong and focused on the Soviet Union during the communist; population in 1939 as a whole met the Red Army as a liberator. Furthermore, it was alive and old Russophile movement: in the interwar Lviv persisted organization Galician Russophile, published Russian newspapers and magazines.
However, short-sighted Soviet policy that has ended mass repressions, deportations, collectivisation, destruction of the church, has played into the hands of radical pro-fascist groups. That is why during the war, Ukrainian nationalists managed to create a powerful militant network, which ultimately eliminate possible only in the 1950s.
In the post-war USSR "Bandera" topic was taboo: western Ukrainian nationalism did not fit into the formal scheme of "three fraternal East Slavic peoples." Many activists nationalist underground, serving time in Stalin's camps (if not avoid punishment) were the lives of ordinary Soviet citizens. Suffice it to recall Khatyn executioner Gregory Vasyura, crimes which were revealed only in the 1980s., As well as long-term silencing of "Ukrainian trail" in the Nazi punitive actions in Belarus.
Despite the violent suppression of the paramilitary Western nationalist ideology itself has continued to live and grow. It was in the late Soviet Union in the circles of nationalist intellectuals gradually formed the cult of "Bandera" as national heroes - independence fighters. Received Ukrainian nationalism and recharge from the outside during the Cold War against the Soviet Union Ukrainian card already played the United States, where he formed a strong diaspora Ukrainian nationalist emigration and a network of relevant organizations.
Crisis and the collapse of the USSR regularly accompanied by a surge of Ukrainian nationalism. Nationalist intelligentsia had a monopoly on the formation of the ideology of the Ukrainian state, which from the beginning has acquired a pronounced anti-Russian character. Ukrainian society sequentially inoculated victim complex permanent Russian aggression. Russia and the Soviet Union recalled all perceived or real grievances: the restrictions of the Ukrainian language in the 19th century. "Executed Renaissance" of the 1930s., Hunger 1932 represented Ukrainian propaganda as planned genocide of Ukrainians. Occurred and cautious, but consistent rehabilitation of Western pro-fascist forces during the Second World War. In this respect, revealing the evolution of the two Ukrainian "Maidan". At the first "Independence" 2004 black and red symbols of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army practically not used, and the main character was a "neutral" color orange. During "evromaydana" in 2013-2014. black and red symbols, portraits of Bandera and other Western leaders used very widely. Similarly, in the public space has become widely used Bandera greeting "Glory to Ukraine! - Heroes of the glory! ", Which he had tried to avoid. It appears that the radicalization is linked including access to the political arena of the first generation of post-Soviet Ukraine, from birth brought up in this kind of ideological product.
However, it is the radicalization of Ukrainian nationalism as the ideological foundations of statehood provoked an increase in tensions between the regions of the country, which resulted in a full-scale armed conflict in 2014, Russian-speaking south-eastern regions since independence occupied a cautious stance and sought to develop some-Ukrainian compromise. This line, in particular, tried to hold presidential vote won by predominantly south-eastern regions - Leonid Kuchma and Viktor Yanukovych. However, the logic of Ukrainian nationalism, who shared the country's population to "correct, conscious" Ukrainians and "wrong, omoskovlennyh" requiring national reforging, let such a compromise. Defamatory image of the inhabitants of south-eastern regions as "Ukrainians second class" has become very popular in nationalist circles in Kiev and Lviv. Especially indicative baiting residents of Donbass in the presidency of Viktor Yanukovych, Ukrainian media deployed by many when the word "Donetsk" has gained almost abusive tone.
The result was growing discontent south-eastern regions of the current format of Ukrainian statehood. Creeping escalation of inter-regional tension, the first publicly identified in the course of the "orange evolution" has turned into open civil conflict, when the political limelight came open nationalist radicals, ready to be used not only slogans and symbols, but also, as the events in Kharkov, Odessa, Mariupol methods "Bandera".
This, in turn, led to the radicalization of sentiment in the south-east of Ukraine. The massive use of Russian symbolism during protests in Kharkov, Odessa, Donetsk, spring 2014 was unprecedented in the history of post-Soviet Ukraine. The escalation of violence in the south-east has put forward radical political forces that require separation from Ukraine and a direct entry into Russia, or the creation of Allied her public entities. Indicative in this respect resuscitation of the term "New Russia" as a special designation of the regional community in the "Russian world".
Thus, radical Ukrainian nationalism has become a major factor in the Ukraine confrontational, promoting division and fragmentation of the Ukrainian society and provoking a wave of retaliatory radicalism in Russian-speaking regions of the country.
As so often in the history of Ukraine, an important role in the unfolding drama of the current played an external factor. After the collapse of the USSR the Western powers continued the policy of strategic containment of Russia and Ukraine is a key element of this strategy. Therefore, the support of the Ukrainian nationalists in order to prevent the participation of Ukraine in integration projects around Russia, has always been the hallmark of the policy of both the EU and the United States. For its part, Russia has sought to avoid leaving the nearest neighbor in the sphere of influence of the West, and to find support in the south-eastern regions, actualizing the subject status of the Russian language and the rights of the Russian-speaking population. Competition of external players also contributed to conflict and confrontation in Ukraine. Thus, the current conflict in Ukraine has both internal and external causes, and further configuration of Ukraine will be determined not only by the internal balance of power, but also the agreements between external interested players.
Central News Agency Novorossia
Novorus.info

Kiev, Oct 1 (Prensa Latina) Ukrainian Presidential Administration Deputy Head Dmitri Shimkiv asserted today this Slavic republic would multiply by five times the military expenditure to double the number of troops before the end of 2020.

Ukraine should be a military State. It is one of the main strategic tasks, said the Government top official during the public discussion of the Strategic reform bill 2020, announced recently by President Piotr Poroshenko.

The number of troops will increase from 2.8 to seven per 1,000 inhabitants in the next six-year period, said Shimkiv, who called essential the defensive-and-security sector reform.

In terms of numbers, the deputy head of the Presidential Administration reported that the military budget would increase from one percent of the Gross Domestic Product this year to five percent in 2020.

Without referring to the increase of the unbalance that these expenditures would represent to the already ruined economy of Kiev, Shimkiv defended this strategy and insisted that Ukraine would be one of the most militarized in the world.

Defense Ministry Finance Director Ivan Marko said that the equivalent of $3 billion USD are devoted to the needs of the Army in 2014 and budgetary financing of the defensive capacity will conclude this year at around $4.85 billion USD.

ef/iom/tgj/jpm Modificado el ( miércoles, 01 de octubre de 2014 )

[John Dolva]

Representatives of the Jewish community of Odessa say that the existence of such groups as "right sector", in Ukraine - it is a shame for the whole country. As a result, the leaders of the organization (the community) have made a letter, which collects all the offenses of the Nazis, according to them will receive a copy of it personally Poroshenko.

One of the leaders of the community of Odessa - Michael Maiman, reports that "pravoseki" in recent times more likely to commit an attack, including military, to the representatives of national minorities. After beating deputy Shufrych, the Jews decided to oppose the armed group, their goal is to complete disarmament and dispersal of the "right sector."

Most likely, the performance of the Jews of Odessa - is only the first step on the road to the destruction of volunteer marginalized groups in Ukraine. Such actions as letters to the president and the other - it is an alarming bell for the raging armed moral monsters. It is possible that in the near future we will hear about the beginning of the fight against "pravosekami" and set to reveal the facts of their crimes, which allegedly were not previously known to the authorities of Ukraine.

Sergey Lyzhin
Central News Agency Novorossia
Novorus.info

STRASBOURG, October 1 (RIA Novosti), Daria Chernyshova - Cyprus delegate to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) has warned the organization of the rise of neo-Nazi activities in Ukraine.

“We note that anti-communism has been accompanied with a rise of neo-Nazi activities in the country and the participation of extreme-right wing forces in the government,” George Loukaides, Cyprus delegate to PACE said Wednesday at the debate on the crisis in Ukraine.

“We have an obligation to address more carefully the dangers arising from tolerating or supporting such forces in Ukraine,” Loukaides noted.

He also expressed regret that the European Union and the United States had imposed sanctions against Russia at the time when there was an attempt to implement a ceasefire agreement.

Loukaides stressed that granting an autonomy status to Donbas and Luhansk regions “is a step in the right direction, although many challenges remain.”

Earlier on Wednesday, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Konstantin Dolgov said that Russia hoped that the use of Nazi symbols by battalions of Ukraine’s National Guard would receive appropriate international assessment.

Kiev has been denying any affiliations with neo-fascist movements despite apparent similarities between the symbols used by the Kiev-backed forces and those used by Nazi Germany during World War II.

Since mid-April the Ukrainian government has been conducting a military operation against independence supporters in eastern Ukraine who refused to acknowledge the new government that came to power after a coup in February. Kiev authorities and independence supporters of eastern Ukraine agreed on a ceasefire on September 5 at a Contact Group meeting in the Belarusian capital Minsk.

On Tuesday, PACE adopted a draft resolution to counter manifestations of neo-Nazism during the fall session underway in Strasbourg. The decision was taken amid a strong showing by far-right parties in the recent European Parliament elections, in what is believed to be aftermath of hard-hitting austerity measures.

Updated 02:02 a.m. Moscow Time

MOSCOW, October 2 (RIA Novosti) - Russian President Vladimir Putin stressed the need to exclude the opportunity for the Ukrainian government forces to shell civilians in the country's eastern regions, speaking with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Kremlin said in a press release Thursday.

"V.V. [Vladimir Vladimirovich] Putin has emphasized the need for further prevention of shelling of civilian objects by the Ukrainian [military] units in southeastern Ukraine," the statement reads.

According to the press release, Russian and German leaders also agreed on the importance of sticking to the agreements, reached during the meetings of the Contact Group on Ukraine in Minsk; first and foremost, on the clauses concerning the withdrawal of heavy weapons and the monitoring of the situation by the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE).

On Wednesday, the authorities of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic said the shelling of a school and a public transport stop in the eastern Ukrainian city of Donetsk had killed 11. A representative for a local hospital has told RIA Novosti some 40 had been wounded in the artillery fire. UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has condemned the shelling.

The stand-off between the Ukrainian government and pro-independence forces of southeastern Ukraine has killed over 3,200 since Kiev launched a military operation in April. The sides agreed on a ceasefire at a meeting of the Contact Group on Ukraine held in Minsk on September 5. Another meeting of the group resulted in a memorandum, specifying implementation of a ceasefire, which involves the creation of a 30-kilometer [18-mile] buffer zone, withdrawal of all heave weapons from residential areas and the deployment of the OSCE monitoring mission.

MOSCOW, October 1. /TASS/. Sergei Litvinov, a private of the Dnieper battalion has admitted killing women and children in the Luhansk region for remuneration offered by tycoon Ihor Kolomoyskyi, Russia’s Investigative Committee spokesman Vladimir Markin said on Wednesday.

The Russian Investigative Committee has brought official charges against Sergei Litvinov for murdering innocent civilians during the armed conflict in eastern Ukraine

“Litvinov has testified that he personally killed peaceful civilians, including women and children who were not linked to the military conflict, in the villages of Melovoye, Shirokiy, Makarovo and Kamyshnoye /in Ukraine’s Lugansk region/ on the basis of information provided by anonymous sources,” Vladimir Markin, the head of the Russian Investigative Committee, said, adding Litvinov had received remuneration from oligarch Igor Kolomoisky’s personal funds for committing the murders.

"I would like to calm those who are going to accuse us of bringing the man into Russia from the territory of another state: this man has entered the Russian territory himself disguised as a peaceful civilian in order to be admitted to hospital. At present, Litvinov has been arrested and will be escorted to Moscow soon to undergo a psychological examination,” Markin said.

A psychological examination is a standard procedure required when someone is suspected of committing grave crimes against human life and health.
Russian investigators know names of Ukrainian commanders performing criminal orders

Russia's Investigations Committee knows the names of commanders of Ukrainian Armed Forces units who perform criminal orders of the Ukrainian state leaders, Vladimir Markin, the official spokesman for the committee said on Wednesday.

"Today we have the names of many commanders of army units, as well as militants of the Right Sector and the National Guard who are performing criminal orders of the Ukrainian military and state leadership," he said.
Case against Ihor Kolomoyskyi

Basmanny district court of Moscow arrested in absentia the Governor of east-central Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk Region Ihor Kolomoyskyi in July. Russian law enforcement agencies accuse Kolomoyskyi of masterminding murders and use of banned ways and methods of warfare. He is suspected of initiating and financing military operations in south-eastern Ukraine, where over 3,000 people have been killed since April, according to the UN human rights office. Kolomoyskyi was put on international wanted list on June 21.

Kolomoyskyi, according to open sources, is one of the richest Ukrainian citizens, founder of the Privat financial and industrial group. Upon the decision of the Verkhovna Rada, Kolomoyskyi was appointed Governor of the Dnipropetrovsk region. In this office, he declared an active fight against the Donetsk and Luhansk people’s republics and proposed to form at his expense military units for a raid against them.

[John Dolva]

Thursday, October 2

08:44 GMT:

A fierce fire has started at Donetsk Airport, RIA Novosti reported. Huge plumes of smoke are rising above the facility, and the wind is carrying the smoke towards the city, even visible in the city center.

Self-defense fighters assume that the source is a storage facility for combustibles and lubricants.

The blaze comes after Ukrainian forces controlling the airport reportedly carried out missile strikes targeting Donetsk’s residential areas, with the self-defense forces forced to respond.

On Wednesday, at least nine people were killed in strikes on a school: six at a bus stop, and three in the school itself.

[John Dolva]

on Sunday, September 28, the participants of the meeting for the unity of Ukraine in Kharkov was demolished a statue of Lenin at Freedom Square in the city center. Interior Minister Arsen Avakov said that a criminal case about the damage the monument to Lenin in Kharkiv will be terminated.

In turn, the mayor of Kharkiv Gennady Kernes promised to rebuild destroyed in Kharkov Freedom Square monument to Vladimir Lenin. Kernes said that what happened - it is "a direct violation of the law regarding safety of peaceful assembly of citizens of Ukraine."

Source: City Watch
Central News Agency Novorossia
Novorus.info

Ukraine has swept a wave of real "leninopada." Hatred of Ukrainians to the "leader of the proletariat," it seems amazing. Their desire to destroy everything connected with his memory - incomprehensible! You may ask: why? Let's deal!

Say, is not that Lenin gave Ukraine statehood? Is not it expanded its territory, set boundaries? It is "on the precepts of Ilyich" Bolsheviks created "Ukrainian nation." On its recommendations formed the "Ukrainian culture." "Ukrainian language" went with a separate line. Have implemented it during the "fight against illiteracy." All books, all of the alphabet, all primers were printed on the Bolsheviks formed "newspeak."

People grumbled, the people resisted, but he managed to punitive measures to silence. And soon the "Move" already talked half of Ukraine. Half - because language policy agreed not to all. And even when Stalin had to give a "back up".

But "cultural-linguistic" experiments Communists were not satisfied. Decided to go even further. And (with the filing of Ilyich) gave the newly formed USSR almost as much land as occupied herself. The Odessa and Donetsk-Krivoy Rog republics of the Kursk and Voronezh regions, Taganrog and several other cities included in its composition.

However, the followers of Ulyanov-Lenin could not stop. And followed by a new "donation". Josef granted "sister republic" Western Ukraine, Bukovina and Bessarabia. After the war, hastened to join and Sub-Carpathian Russia. Completed a "gathering of Ukrainian land" Nikita Khrushchev. He, as you may remember, gave Ukraine Crimea.

Thus, it was the Bolsheviks gave Ukraine all that what she previously could not even dream of. This, incidentally, is understood Ukrainian nationalists, who, I must say, willingly settled in the Ukrainian SSR. Here they are, oddly enough, almost haunted, processes, if conducted, the sluggish, almost always ended in rehabilitation. Many of the "former" could even go into power!

"... I feel in the Ukrainian Republic, which we have started to build in 1917," - writes about the warm attitude of the Bolsheviks returned to Soviet Ukraine historian Grushevskii.

And it's all thanks to the "Grandpa Lenin", without which there would be neither Ukraine nor "Ukrainians".

As for Ukrainian nationalists, they should understand: aiming at the bloody Vozhdya- "ukrainizatora" they beat not Russia. Paradoxically, they fall into themselves!


AK
Central News Agency Novorossia
Novorus.info

Publicist Yegor Kholmogorov - about why "Echo of Moscow" does not respond to the news of the executions in the Donbas

Silence that kept the Russian liberal media at the opening of the mass graves of people killed in the Donbass, can not even be deathly. Coffin, Trisagion over the coffin, a cross with a well established name, perhaps a farewell salute - it is just what still needs unfortunate victims, buried haphazardly, with hands bound with wire, say, with remote internal organs.

And the main thing - an investigation into the monstrous atrocities against them.

No. Silence is not deafening. The silence of concealer. Silence partner. Silence emphasize demonstrative and sinister.

I open no matter how ambitious, so uncomfortable and the web page of "Echo of Moscow". What I see it? The arguments of Mr. Aleksashenko that Crimea is too expensive. Promises Mr. Belkovsky strangle for power - which is already there, it is better to be undermined by the atomic bomb. Next - reasoning Navalny, finally passed to the offensive use of the word "jacket" as a normal part of his vocabulary (recall that the term "jacket" and "Colorado" were introduced as part of the strategy of dehumanization residents of Donbass, which shall and led to mass murder).

And then the argument "minister" of the internal organs, sorry Affairs of Ukraine Mr. Avakova - constant zest ehovskogo site last six months. Avakov teaches radicals, rioters who beat Odessa deputy Shufrych that right away so that's really impossible. Lenin carry, as in Kharkiv - it's okay. But the beat on the street in broad daylight, in front of everyone, under the camera ... So can the United States and Europe do not stand so turn away.

I agree with the minister. Beat should be quiet at night, no cameras and witnesses. To death. Since the killing of his subordinate (to him, note) punitive battalions "Azov" and "Donbass" near Donetsk. Killed mostly women, previously raped and looted their homes. Since there is no video, and the victims - not personal friends of Yulia Tymoshenko, the United States and Europe will not be much to worry because of the smallness of such as massacres of civilians, do not turn away. Tea, not Srebrenica.

About the murder victim, opening graves, the initiation of an international investigation of genocide on the site "Echo of Moscow" no syllable.

However, one news was found.

Happily reported that "Vice Premier Andrei DNR Purgin embarrass the Russian Federation", explaining that the mass graves were found not 400, but only 9 bodies, and 400 - the total number of unidentified bodies in morgues republic. Behind all this sounds a triumphant: "You see! No mass graves, no! "Stylistics posts, by the way, one-to-one match with the intonation of the Ukrainian media.

By the way, it's a lie. Mr. Purgin said information on one burial. At the mine "Communar" where really found 9 bodies. However discovered and penetrated cemeteries in the area left by subordinates author of "Echo of Moscow" Mr. Avakov punitive battalions, much more. Near the village of Lower Jug they found a few more - with a total number of victims (including carved innards) 40.

Those 400 unidentified corpses, as specified Purgin also collected from the territory liberated from the Ukrainian forces, so that here in front of us is a victim of mass murder, mutilated and decomposed, have been found in different places.

If the "Echo of Moscow" was the Ukrainian media, I would not be surprised either this silence or this lie. Against the background of Ukrainian counterparts, it looks like one might even say, modest. Neither you stories about "completely destroyed by an elite battalion of Russian Marines" or fairy tales about "the pilot, who tried to hijack a Russian Su-24", or even stories that are buried in the mine and have cast people "themselves were shot and buried."

But that's a mystery - "Echo of Moscow" is not Ukrainian media. And do not even Russian private media. This radio station is actually on state funding to finance major public corporation. And what causes them to lie, distort, to remain silent, to give the floor to war criminals?

Even in the worst of times, in the 1990s, no Russian media did not provide on their premises column Shamil Basayev, from which strongly Avakov is no different. Basayev - if that - was also an official person, at one time Prime Minister of Chechnya.

Trying to imagine the BBC, giving the word in 1940 to Heinrich Himmler that he zhuril stormtroopers because they are someone that is not broke. And imagination, I confess, is denied.

It is clear that Russian liberals to the extreme is not interested in discussing the mass killings in the Donbass. Not so long ago, they marched through downtown Moscow "peace march", representing Ukraine innocent victim killed by the punitive children, women and the elderly - "random victims", and Russia with her (frankly, sluggish and inadequate) attempts to curb punitive - as the aggressor.

And then it turns out that it is necessary not to argue with the "snotty humanists" of the patriotic camp, which, as one put it considerably opposition lady, "decided to yell about the kiddies," not understanding the beneficence of infanticide for democracy. Have to argue, for example, with the OSCE, which experts now seeing the classic signs of fighter policy - the mass graves, the evidence of mass killings and massacres of civilians.

And behind it all is more menacing appear the signs of genocide. Enough to read Ukrainian authors (including the same Avakova) to make it absolutely clear: Ukraine formed a well-defined ideology against the civilian population of Donbass as "sub-humans", which can kill, rape, rob, humiliate, discriminate, destroy.

Together with the facts fighter policy this ideology gives it a holistic path of genocide - the extermination of the representatives of national, racial, religious, regional groups for the mere fact of belonging to it, and in order to reduce its size. Twice two gives four. Ideology "antivatnichestva" and "burn Colorado", multiplied by the mass killings, destruction of infrastructure and the open secret burial gives genocide.

At the same time, however, we must understand that the genocide - a double-edged weapon. In recent years, a large number of countries gained independence, precisely because of their people against acts of genocide had been committed - sometimes true, as against the people of East Timor and South Sudan, and sometimes, frankly, questionable, as against the people of Kosovo. But one thing remains unchanged - that genocide is a reliable basis for the recognition of the impossibility of coexistence of the victim and executioner in one state to recognize the independence.

With the opening of the facts of genocide recognition is unlikely Donetsk and Lugansk republics as independent entities - increases. However, now extremely popular theme of "sharing."

I personally would not mind if in exchange for freedom from terror for Donetsk and Luhansk Russia will give Ukraine "Echo of Moscow".
Central News Agency Novorossia
Novorus.info

For overthrown statue of Vladimir Lenin in Kharkiv stood a few hundred of Kharkiv. Apparently, the elderly, people of the Soviet warehouse.

They came out to beat them and suppress the young nationalist hooligans - is not so much the amount of several hundred dogs. But the young, of course, beat the old ones.

Meanwhile, two or three submachine emerging from the thickets of the park Shevchenko that fifty meters from the location of the base of the monument deposed, could put all the young men of courage to fight with the elderly in the paving and asphalt. A grinning death grimaces dozen of them signaled to all who finds itself once again, pulled on wet muzzle bandages, beat the elderly: "This is what awaits you, baby!"

To Kharkov from the Donbass go nothing at all. Well camouflaged commando squad would get per night.

Doing business, would dissolve in polutoramillionnom city is better than in the woods.

And what would be an inspiring example to the occupied Kharkov had such educational raid!

All very seriously.

Without a full-fledged state of Kharkov Novorossia will not. Kharkiv is absolutely essential. Small wonder that in 1918, he let the short, but hung around the capital of Donetsk-Krivoy Rog republic, and then another ten years was the capital of Ukraine.

Sooner or later have to attach Kharkiv.

If not present, then the next jump, but it would be better in the present.

Donbass is important as an industrial industrial region, but without intellectual Kharkov Donbass will be impossible to exist as a strong body without ... How shall I put it, not to offend anyone? In general, a strong muscular body without mind.

We understand that the state interests of Russia, the truce and stuff, but still can not lose sight of the main strategic objectives, namely: Russia New Russia is unthinkable without a huge city with a long intellectual traditions of the Russian Empire and then the Soviet era. Without Kharkov.

Kiev propaganda tries to portray the situation as if the population of Kharkiv prokievski configured, but there is uncomplicated lie. Kharkiv occupied. Kharkiv did not have time to arm themselves and rise together with the Donbas. Kharkov had overrun zapadenskimi punishers. That's all.

In fact, even the occupation forces are weak in comparison with the potential of a great city, we just have to start, and it will revolt. Kharkov just to shake off the punishers.

Eduard Limonov
Central News Agency Novorossia
Novorus.info

Living in Sweden, coordinator of the "Left Front" Alexei Sakhnin came to an unexpected application for the former activist of "swamp" movement conclusion, he stated that on the basis of evromaydana in Ukraine grew real fascism.

This was the conclusion he came during the nine-day trip to Ukraine, as a correspondent of the influential Swedish publication.

Alexei Sakhnin about a year ago escaped from Russia to Sweden, received political asylum there. The authorities there, he said he feared the homeland charges of organizing riots May 6, 2012 at the Swamp area.

"Growing out of the Maidan called democratic political culture at least in some sense, is simply impossible. Blind eye to the hell that happens there, we can not "- he writes to his friend through the Internet.

"Control over the Maidan captured oligarchs and politicians and hold it through the use of nationalist rhetoric and incitement to war hysteria. In Russia, this threat has been overcome. At the same time, and strength, and the weakness of "swamp" of the movement was its independence from the establishment, its democratic structure. Yes, without the support of the elite this motion lost, but it has become a very real and valuable experience of democracy. And Independence won, but won due to the fact that he lost his emancipatory potential. "

Sakhnin writes that in Ukraine: "Big Party (closely associated with big business), create lists of speakers, and the texts of the resolutions and requirements. Yes, the square was full of people, who despised and hated Klitschko, Julia, Tyagniboka and co. But the feelings of these people were left with them, and politicians divided between portfolios and real power. "

"Growing out of the Maidan called democratic political culture at least in some sense, is simply impossible - sums Sakhnin. - Turning a blind eye to the hell that happens there, we can not. "

"The fact that there (in Ukraine) occurs - is a civil war. Without any intervention, "- writes Sakhnin.

He told us how to deal with the activists of the "right sector." "There's a 18-year-old enthusiasts. They think that the political patterns - this Mussolini and Franco - he writes. - They say, "Who does not like a new Ukraine - a suitcase, train station, Russia."

"This is no April Fool's fascist organization, which brings down the shaft of green youth."

In the Ukrainian province of Kiev are not under the control of the centers of power. "Picture this: a great office in the city center. At the gate - an armored car. In the yard of a bunch of bullies with guns. This - "social activists."

According to Sakhnin, "chuvachki of business" collect money for 'patriotic' needs. Enough money and ammunition, and to their own territorial defense battalion. "You wait for it - they have no official status they do not - wrote to his colleague Udaltsov. - But they - the real power: money, weapons and organization. "

He recounted his conversation with the essentially independent of the Kiev regional officials. "I ask them, they say, you have half the city of dissent, as you do with them will continue to live? And he said to me, word for word: "If they want to talk" about the junta, "they say in a whisper to the toilet. If they go to the street, we begin to shoot "- quoted by his companion Sakhnin.

"You know how, Alex, but it's real fascism. Without operetta clowns with swastikas. And these guys, and in Odessa and other cities - the darkness. And the capacity of civil dialogue is limited to "we'll shoot." And they have weapons, money, organization. These are not empty threats. They have already shot. And this is all seen, "- says Sakhnin.

Sergey Volodin
Central News Agency Novorossia
Novorus.info

[John Dolva]

Country - this is primarily a community of people, including, of different nationalities, with equal social and political rights in all spheres of life. If any of the national community or territorial unit of the country is subject to state discrimination, have discriminated community appears legitimate right to self-zhizneopredelenie within the boundaries of their territory.

Respected military and political leadership of New Russia, your fight for their social and political rights to their land, the land of your ancestors, our Russian world, causing the deepest respect for you. Novorossia people personally for all the Russian world, in a brutal fight with Ukrainian fascism for his life of self-determination shows strength of the Russian spirit and belief in their cause.

If it were not for his age, I personally would have been easier to be with you. And during these months the whole soul has vybolela in daily experiences for all New Russia - Russian, Ukrainians and other nationalities, which rallied solidarity in the struggle against the fascists.

With life and political experience in the past military training, on your news site put a few of their comments. Political-Military Affairs you will surely have professional support. Yet, given the many critical comments on your news information, especially on the situation of the airport in Donetsk, let me tell you the following.

In an emerging offensive army militia seemed to need to be in that situation, and go on the offensive, releasing Novorossia take Mariupol. Strategically, militarily it looked right. However, in view of the political strategy of the settlement agreement worked out in favor of the militia. To date, the defenders of New Russia learned from this due and fair political dividends. Finally, the international commission had personally make sure that the defenders of New Russia, defensively, are not terrorists, but the troops and gangs Kiev junta destroy the city and kill mass population of New Russia. Militia also managed to attract the attention of international bodies to the obvious and numerous facts of the Genocide executioners junta over the inhabitants of Lugansk and Donetsk HP.

Yes, of course, entrenched enclave the Nazis in the Donetsk airport is conducted from artillery, mortar fire and castles in the city, which has killed many civilians continue to be killed and to date, strongly undermines the military-political image of New Russia, whose management should be responsible for the deaths of civilians due to the fact that he can not or does not want to destroy these fascists in their own lair.

Also, why in terms of the armistice did not include items on the withdrawal of these fascists from the airport? After their withdrawal from the airport, that is, from the rear army Novorossia, in terms of the peace agreement had to be paid upon and executed carefully. As a matter of course.

In military terms, to guarantee the destruction of their lair in the militia has everything, including castles and fortifications destruction technology objects.

On one front at a safe distance from the object destruction (1,5-2.0 km can be more) are placed on the two batteries castles on one side and 90 degrees relative to each other on the other side of the front. Along with the 2 sides, one after another, providing continuity of burst phase, grads or the like do their job. After the hell of the affected area will turn into a pile of concrete rubble, mixed with the inhabitants of the object. About this perspective prepared hell should notify sentenced in this object. Psychologically, in 90% it works, and they will give up. If not immediately, then after the first precise volley.

Today, here I read again from this airport was the shelling of the city and new victims. And during the assault on the airport killed 6 soldiers militia. These fascists parliamentarians militia. But these men, as all the militia of New Russia, are noble gene pool for future generations, they would need to care of.

Do as they say in the comments, casemates that damned expensive airport has numerous militia fighters lives and the lives of the city's population, including the most innocent - the children.

Why not use the opportunity to securely remove the Nazis in their own lair Grad without sacrifice on their part? Is not clear.


Guran,
Central News Agency Novorossia
Novorus.info

According to sources in the units of the Armed Forces of the New Russia (BCH), to protect the Donbass arriving volunteers from the Chinese People's Republic.

We are talking about ex-servicemen and civil professions who took up arms for the defense of the Donets Basin from Nazi forces Kiev junta. First volunteers have already arrived at the location of the militia units in Donetsk.

In the near future we expect the arrival of a new batch of Chinese anti-fascists in the Donbass. At the moment, consider the possibility of deploying Chinese podrazedeniya in one of the units BCH.

Central News Agency Novorossia
Novorus.info

[John Dolva]

The press service of Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) state council said on Thursday that on October 1 at least nine people were killed and another 30 wounded after Donetsk was shelled from the area of the airport, which DPR self-defense forces had been trying to recapture from pro-Kiev troops as they continued shelling residential districts of the city.

DONETSK, October 2. /TASS/. The local history museum in Donetsk was completely destroyed when the eastern Ukrainian city - the capital of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) - was shelled, acting DPR Culture Minister Yury Lekstutes said Thursday.

Lekstutes said his department is pushing for creation of a big museum complex and a cultural center in the former building of Ukraine’s coal industry.

“Overall, we have 25 museums in the republic. Some of them could receive premises there,” he said.

16:11 GMT:

Several blasts were heard in the center of Donetsk as it was heavily shelled, RT Arabic correspondent Anna Knishenko reported from the eastern Ukrainian city.

Над центром #Донецк черный дым. Обстрел был очень сильный. 3 серии взрывов pic.twitter.com/y1oAbcbsFu

— RT Anna Knishenko (@A_Knishenko_RT) October 2, 2014

KIEV, October 2. /TASS/. Rabinovich-FM radio station was taken off air in Ukraine on Thursday without any warnings or legitimate grounds, the Opposition Bloc’s press service said. One of the bloc’s leaders is the radio station’s owner.

“The radio station broadcasts humour and bothers no-one,” it said. Although, “recently news has started appearing on the air - true and objective news about the situation in the country, economic forecasts and how average people evaluate the authorities’ actions.”

“Apparently, this very truth, even a little piece of it, has stood in the way of someone, to say nothing about Vadim Rabinovich, a leader of the Opposition Bloc and the owner of the radio station,” the press service said.

The Opposition Bloc said that the current authorities “in spite of all their statements about adherence to the truth and objectivity cannot stand another point of view except officially adopted.”

[John Dolva]

Militias Donetsk People's Republic argued that took control of the airport in Donetsk.

"Five months later, the airport Donetsk was taken Army New Russia", - stated in the People's Republic of Donetsk, which is placed in the "Twitter".

Eugene militia reports from the front: "And yes, the airport was taken. Glory to the living and eternal memory remains there forever. Sleep well, brothers "

From terminal to terminal fighters for intelligence DNR moved to the bunker, in which major forces of the occupying forces.

Journalists: "With the advanced report that in the old terminal of Donetsk airport collapsed ceiling 3 floors - many punishers were buried alive under the rubble. militias continue to sweep the remaining areas not exempt airport."

Earlier, the Ministry of Defence DNR reported that on Thursday, October 2 in the territory of Donetsk airport fighting continued. Militia forces managed to gain a foothold in some buildings air harbor.

The shelling of the school on October 1, and the sacrifices of civilians, spurred the army command DNR for a speedy resolution of the question of the elimination of the bridgehead on the Ukrainian territory of Donetsk airport where punishers currently deployed artillery terror against the inhabitants of the city.

Meanwhile, in Kiev stated that the territory of Donetsk Donetsk airport is under the control of the Ukrainian military.

West stubbornly resists Army Novorossia operations at the airport. Bloomberg agency gives information about what the European Union will extend sanctions against Russia if the militia or take the airport Donetsk Mariupol.

Sergey Volodin
Central News Agency Novorossia
Novorus.info

[John Dolva]

DONETSK, October 3. /TASS/. Self-defense forces of self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic have brought Donetsk airport under full control. However, there are still Ukrainian law enforcers in underground communication rooms of the airport, the information department of the Defense Ministry of the self-proclaimed republic told TASS.

"At present, communication facilities of the airport have been screened to establish if any explosive devices might have been planted," the source said.

On October 1 at least nine people were killed and another 30 wounded after Donetsk was shelled by the government forces from the area of the airport.

[John Dolva]

Airport taken. First surrendered mercenaries from Poland

Today, one past three p.m. | Category: Tape » Politics

• 20
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Views: 3931

In the Donetsk airport, where the locked part of the Ukrainian military, captured by the militia surrendered mercenaries from Poland.

This was announced by Acting Minister of State Security of the People's Republic of Donetsk Leonid Baranov: "Mercenaries works (on the Ukrainian military) a great many, especially significant in Donetsk airport, the longest-held.

There are only professionals, there is not only the Americans, there speak different languages. This information is confirmed, and now we can confidently say that there are foreigners. "

Recall that today militia Donetsk People's Republic stated that the cleanup of the Donetsk airport is still ongoing.

Now army DNR controls virtually all air harbor, except underground utilities designed in the Soviet era.

The commander of a separate battalion tactical group army DNR "Somalia" with the call Givi: "Now we are engaged in mopping up the defense and the airport. All our buildings, however, the Ukrainian military are hiding in the catacombs, as they can hide in the basement of the old terminal. "

Sergey Volodin

Central News Agency Novorossia

Novorus.info

[John Dolva]

At all times and in all wars, from ancient times to the second half of the 20th vekamediki life-saving wounded soldiers have always been respected by the warring parties, attempted to them was a crime and a disgrace, unworthy of a warrior. With the advent of fascism, this noble tradition has sunk into oblivion. Tens and hundreds of thousands "of people in white coats" lost their lives in carrying out their sacred duty of charity - were killed by shelling, were destroyed in the captivity of the enemy. Today, the infamous "baton" against those who did not spare the life, gives life to others, "worthy to carry the" last-fascist scoundrels (part - "svidomye warriors"). The capture, abuse of doctors from the dill this "strange war" occurring more frequently and affect its cynicism. One such episode - capture ukrovoyakami "First aid" in Donetsk republic - eyewitness, militia LC, Head Brigade, a member of the executive committee of the "Other Russia" Sergei Fomchenkov.

Central News Agency Novorossia
Novorus.info

edit add

Fear and Loathing in Kharkov. Intimidating East of Ukraine, Ukrainian radicals facilitate the work of New Russia.

Relative truce in Ukraine eventually stop - it is programmed not only by the temporary nature of the Minsk Agreement, but the situation in the Square. The main contribution to the preparation of a new phase of the civil war are making radical Russophobe forces make every effort to swing and so cocked South Vostok.Kogda it blows, they naturally begin to explain all the machinations of Moscow, but with eyes can see that radicals with their hands continue to destroy Ukraine.

War in the New Russia subsided, but did not stop - on Wednesday during shelling Donetsk again civilians were killed, fighting continues in the Donetsk airport. But in general, the rest of the front line both sides took a wait - a truce yet profitable and Kiev, and the New Russia. It can be broken in two ways - either by conscious decision of one of the parties (which considers that it is advantageous to break the truce and go on the offensive), or spontaneously, by chance, when a local collision will provoke renewed fighting in the entire line of contact.

And if the first option in the next month or two is unlikely - Kiev need to hold elections to the parliament, and the New Russia - to create a somehow running vertical of power, to rebuild the army and the minimum rebuild the infrastructure, then the second option, "accidental ignition", will become increasingly likely. And the reason for this may be some excess in one of the areas of the Southeast - for example, Kharkov. Especially because the course of events in Ukraine will inevitably exacerbate the situation in the first place, in most Russian regions of Ukraine. Not because there Novorossia engaged subversive activities (although it is, of course, is - still at the level of the underground, but soon you can expect and armed guerrilla and sabotage units), and due to the very logic of the development of the Ukrainian crisis.

Came to power in Kiev forces, as well as lost after the February revolution, all sorts of brakes "Ukrainian nationalists" with his own hands do everything for the collapse of Ukraine, in order to intimidate those who disagree with them and encourage them to protest. It is not just the desire to NATO and the EU, on the construction of the wall on the border with Russia and not even on the punitive action against the New Russia - the fact that the emissaries of the new government and its supporters are doing on the ground now, during the lull of the front.

One of these days all seen how badly beaten in Odessa deputy Nestor Shurficha - one of the most influential politicians domaydannoy period (spring also beaten deputy Oleg Tsarev, today became one of the leaders of New Russia). And in Kharkov initially dispersed meeting of communists, radicals and then demolished the monument to Lenin. The consequences of these events are clear - people from Odessa and Kharkov even more convinced of that Ukraine is heading into the abyss, recoil from Kiev, tougher to think about how to live in one state with those who create similar in their cities.

Actions radicals are certainly provocative, but not of great intelligence or cunning plan. Because provoke South East in a situation almost hushed war with Novorossia suicidal for Kiev. Kharkiv incite to revolt does not want to not only the Kiev government, but even radicals like Ljashko, Tyagniboka or Yarosh.

But then why radicals do? Just because they want to show the citizens of the South-East, they are power, intimidated, thinking that thereby prevent protest. Well, or at most provoke sluggish resistance, which immediately and extinguish, at the same time identifying the most dangerous troublemakers. Provoke fear.

Silly, it is not clear what the basis of belief, but nothing radical behavior can not be explained. They just do not realize that their actions only approximate and reinforce the future explosion of Kharkov, they realize even some Kiev politicians. But the radicals can not stay, including because they see that the country is really falling apart, and want to prevent this process. Not realizing that they are a major cause of the collapse, the radicals think that you just need to crush potential separatists, to eliminate potential "hot spots". Their task is the maximum - to demolish the current Kiev Maidan new government, accusing it, among other things, and the fact that it does not fight with separatists in the South East (including in Kharkiv). That's what they need "a little heated" Kharkiv.

For Novorossia like suicidal behavior Ukrainian radicals, of course, profitable - it should "just learn to wait," and most of the work for her to do Kiev activists. Elections to the parliament on October 26, will be another blow to the unity of Ukraine - Kharkiv turnout will be low.

So far Poroshenko tolerate current Kharkov power, but radicals have repeatedly pointed to the need to change the mayor Kernes, accusing him of separatism and that when the opportunity he will hand over the city of New Russia (which, by the way, there is a large element of truth - but not because that Kernes - a supporter of the "Russian world", and because of his cunning and unscrupulous). After the elections to the parliament when Poroshenko have to beat the Duma and street radicals attack (and they surely will only strengthen their position), the question of a change of government in Kharkov will be one of the most important. If part of the South-East is already under the control of Kolomoiskiy who have nowhere to retreat, and so it consistently anti-Russian and confident Kiev and Washington, the Kharkiv is in this sense that the weak link.

So before the end of the year fighting for Kharkov may be exacerbated among Ukrainian politicians and oligarchs, and this together with the provocative activities of radicals in the city, the economic collapse and underground work Novorossia can bring the former capital of Ukraine and the Donetsk-Krivoy Rog Republic explosion. Then Kharkiv People's Republic of virtual can become real, and the New Russia will begin to expand.

Peter Akopov
Central News Agency Novorossia
Novorus.info

MOSCOW, October 4. /TASS/. Russian-Israeli politician and journalist Avigdor Eskin has declared he is beginning a sign-up campaign to collect the signatures of religious figures of authority to an appeal addressed to the European Jewish Parliament and the European Jewish Union demanding the expulsion of Ukrainian big business tycoon Igor Kolomoisky.

“It would be just fair if the Jewish community stripped him of all posts and expelled him from its organizations. For this we shall address them together with those whom they cannot but listen to. It is intolerable that our coreligionist gives money to people wearing chevrons with swastikas,” Eskin told the daily Izvestia.

He believes that the Jewish organizations in Europe, Russia and Israel should pay more attention to events in Ukraine.

Kolomoisky is the founder of the financial-industrial group Privat and governor of Ukraine’s Dnepropetrovsk Region. The battalions on his payroll are suspected of killings of civilians in the south-east of Ukraine. Last June Russia’s Investigative Committee put Kolomoisky on the international wanted list on charges of masterminding murder, using prohibited means and methods of warfare, impairing the activity of journalists, and abductions.

Izvestia says that Kolomoisky is a member of a number of Jewish organizations and even leads some of them, such as the European Jewish Union. The election was held about five years ago, when the Ukrainian tycoon had not financed extremist organizations yet.

A member of the European Jewish Parliament, Igor Dabakarov, supports Eskin in his initiative and is prepared to press for Kolomoisky’s expulsion from the EJU leadership.

“I am one of the initiators of this message, and I believe that such people as Kolomoisky have no right to lead such communities. At the forthcoming meeting of the European Jewish Parliament I shall certainly raise the question of his removal from that post and of his expulsion. The representatives from the CIS countries share our position,” Izvestia quotes Dabakarov as saying.

The deputy president of the Congress of Jewish Religious Communities and Organizations of Russia, Rabbi Zinovy Kogan, believes it will be utterly impermissible to associate Kolomoisky’s name with the Jewish people. “We have our own rascals, just as any other people. Kolomoisky is precisely such a type,” Kogan said.

The collapse of traditional values in Ukraine has brought about chaos and conditions for the emergence of real neo-Nazism, he added.

A Moscow synagogue rabbi, Isaac Kogan, has remarked that “the swastika and the Jewish way of life are incompatible."

“The things I see in Ukraine these days - swastikas on the chevrons of Kolomoisky’s battalions - are certainly incompatible with Ukraine’s future,” he said.

At the end of September and the beginning of October the world remembers the victims of Nazi war crimes at Babi Yar in Kiev. The Babi Yar ravine in 1941 was a scene of mass executions of civilians, mostly Jews, and also Soviet prisoners of war.

Edited October 4, 2014 by John Dolva