Jon G. Tidd Posted November 15, 2015 Share Posted November 15, 2015 (edited) The central question for me: What was the cause of death? According to the Dallas Death Certificate, the proximate cause was cardiac arrest. The cause of cardiac arrest? "Multiple gunshot wounds" of the head and neck. So what caused death, precisely? I can't blame the Dallas docs or coroner for lack of precision. I can blame Humes, Boswell, and Finck. And with them, the U.S. Government, for whom they worked and from whom they took and followed orders. No dissection of the perceived head, back, and neck wounds says it all. So here's the deal, plain for all to see. We have no better description of the cause of JFK's death other than he got shot, and his heart stopped. That's all we've got for the President of the United States. DVP's problem isn't that he's abandoned this thread. It's that he can't tell us precisely how JFK was killed. And he's got the WC and the HSCA (that's a joke) on his side. Edited November 15, 2015 by Jon G. Tidd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Von Pein Posted November 15, 2015 Share Posted November 15, 2015 (edited) DVP's problem isn't that he's abandoned this thread. It's that he can't tell us precisely how JFK was killed. You're joking, right Jon? Big hint coming up..... Edited November 15, 2015 by David Von Pein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Prudhomme Posted November 16, 2015 Share Posted November 16, 2015 The central question for me: What was the cause of death? According to the Dallas Death Certificate, the proximate cause was cardiac arrest. The cause of cardiac arrest? "Multiple gunshot wounds" of the head and neck. So what caused death, precisely? I can't blame the Dallas docs or coroner for lack of precision. I can blame Humes, Boswell, and Finck. And with them, the U.S. Government, for whom they worked and from whom they took and followed orders. No dissection of the perceived head, back, and neck wounds says it all. So here's the deal, plain for all to see. We have no better description of the cause of JFK's death other than he got shot, and his heart stopped. That's all we've got for the President of the United States. DVP's problem isn't that he's abandoned this thread. It's that he can't tell us precisely how JFK was killed. And he's got the WC and the HSCA (that's a joke) on his side. As one doctor put it, everyone dies from cardiac arrest, ultimately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted November 16, 2015 Share Posted November 16, 2015 (edited) The central question for me: What was the cause of death? According to the Dallas Death Certificate, the proximate cause was cardiac arrest. The cause of cardiac arrest? "Multiple gunshot wounds" of the head and neck. So what caused death, precisely? I can't blame the Dallas docs or coroner for lack of precision. I can blame Humes, Boswell, and Finck. And with them, the U.S. Government, for whom they worked and from whom they took and followed orders. No dissection of the perceived head, back, and neck wounds says it all. So here's the deal, plain for all to see. We have no better description of the cause of JFK's death other than he got shot, and his heart stopped. That's all we've got for the President of the United States. DVP's problem isn't that he's abandoned this thread. It's that he can't tell us precisely how JFK was killed. And he's got the WC and the HSCA (that's a joke) on his side. As one doctor put it, everyone dies from cardiac arrest, ultimately. Excellent point. --Tommy Edited November 16, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon G. Tidd Posted November 16, 2015 Share Posted November 16, 2015 DVP, Your sense of humor is impressive. A forged film is a substitute for a decent autopsy. You're joking...right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted November 16, 2015 Share Posted November 16, 2015 (edited) DVP, Your sense of humor is impressive. A forged film is a substitute for a decent autopsy. You're joking...right? Jon, Can you prove it was forged? Was the whole thing forged, or just parts of it? Which parts? --Tommy PS In your highly-anticipated response, please don't use words like "obviously" and "clearly" and certainly." Those words just don't "cut it" (pardon the pun) with me when it comes to the JFK assassination and "film / photo alteration." Edited November 16, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon G. Tidd Posted November 16, 2015 Share Posted November 16, 2015 Tommy, I can't prove it was forged. I just think it was. DVP, by his post, asserts it is genuine. He may be correct, but he can't prove it. In any event, a film is no substitute for an autopsy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted November 16, 2015 Share Posted November 16, 2015 Tommy, I can't prove it was forged. I just think it was. DVP, by his post, asserts it is genuine. He may be correct, but he can't prove it. In any event, a film is no substitute for an autopsy. Jon, Regarding this "Z-film forgery" issue, upon whom is the burden of proof -- DVP (not forged) or you (forged)? --Tommy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon G. Tidd Posted November 16, 2015 Share Posted November 16, 2015 Tommy, In a trial court, the burden of proof is upon the person offering an item into evidence. DVP, as proponent of the Z-film, would have the burden in court of establishing its genuineness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted November 16, 2015 Share Posted November 16, 2015 (edited) Tommy, In a trial court, the burden of proof is upon the person offering an item into evidence. DVP, as proponent of the Z-film, would have the burden in court of establishing its genuineness. And how does one go about "proving" the genuineness of an historical, "home movie" film like this? Gotta come up with the original? I.e., not a copy? If a copy, gotta fend off and "disprove" all the alterationists' objections, point by point? --Tommy Edited November 16, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now