Robin Unger Posted December 13, 2016 Author Share Posted December 13, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Prudhomme Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 Strange that no one at Parkland mentioned such an obvious head wound. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted December 13, 2016 Author Share Posted December 13, 2016 Dr McClelland says he walked around behind the presidents head and looked into the wound. http://emuseum.jfk.org/view/objects/asitem/classification@Oral Histories/44/title-asc?t%3Astate%3Aflow=d437b3f9-5353-4930-a70b-739999ea6fab Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted December 13, 2016 Author Share Posted December 13, 2016 F8 Colorized Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Walton Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 Pat Speer did a really good analysis of that photo, which shows the back of the head, not the front. The beveled area is an exit wound. Also, that composite posted earlier is a fake - I agree with Sandy on that. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7Hr9Lrku-Cxdm9ZalJTSWU3cms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted December 14, 2016 Author Share Posted December 14, 2016 5 hours ago, Michael Walton said: Pat Speer did a really good analysis of that photo, which shows the back of the head, not the front. The beveled area is an exit wound. Also, that composite posted earlier is a fake - I agree with Sandy on that. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7Hr9Lrku-Cxdm9ZalJTSWU3cms That GIF shows the retracted scalp going right to left across the top of the head. That is not the way a scalp is retracted in a normal autopsy. The normal procedure is to cut across the scalp from ear to ear, and then pull the front portion down over the face, and pull the back portion back over the skull. Pat Speer has a photo showing this procedure on his website. Pat and myself have discussed this a number of times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Walton Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 You might want to read this again Robin. He has too many good points to show it's the back not front - the little hairs, the no need to retract the scalp because it was damaged and so on. http://www.patspeer.com/chapter14%3Ademystifyingthemysteryphoto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now