Jump to content
The Education Forum

LHO role

Recommended Posts

Hard to pin down with the available evidence.

1. Maybe he had no role.

2. Maybe he brought the rifle to work, and someone else does the deed:

A) with no foreknowledge, Oswald is a patsy, but unwittingly complicit.

B) with foreknowledge, Oswald is a willing co-conspirator.

3. Maybe he never brought the rifle to work

4. Maybe he never owned the rifle, and the so-called evidence of him ordering the rifle is a part of his patsification (if that's even a word).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in

Sign In Now
  • Create New...