Paz Marverde Posted April 11, 2018 Share Posted April 11, 2018 Assumed he was a patsy (IMHO, he absolutely was), what in your opinion exactly was the LHO's role in Dallas that November 22, before his arrest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Knight Posted April 11, 2018 Share Posted April 11, 2018 Hard to pin down with the available evidence. 1. Maybe he had no role. 2. Maybe he brought the rifle to work, and someone else does the deed: A) with no foreknowledge, Oswald is a patsy, but unwittingly complicit. with foreknowledge, Oswald is a willing co-conspirator. 3. Maybe he never brought the rifle to work 4. Maybe he never owned the rifle, and the so-called evidence of him ordering the rifle is a part of his patsification (if that's even a word). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paz Marverde Posted April 11, 2018 Author Share Posted April 11, 2018 1 minute ago, Mark Knight said: patsification Interesting neologism. Thanks a lot for your answer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted April 11, 2018 Share Posted April 11, 2018 I have him as a CIA asset, charged with infiltrating Pro-Cuban groups. I can't really place him in that role in the TSBD, but that is not surprising to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now