Richard Booth Posted December 2, 2023 Author Share Posted December 2, 2023 On 11/27/2023 at 10:34 AM, David Von Pein said: a lot of tiny fragments from the fatal head shot that were probably scattered all over the car Ah, the famous 6.5mm full metal jacket confetti bullets Amazing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Booth Posted December 2, 2023 Author Share Posted December 2, 2023 On 11/27/2023 at 10:34 AM, David Von Pein said: After all, more than half of the bullet that struck President Kennedy in the head was never found or recovered at all. It's almost as if someone cleaned out the head and removed all of the ballistic evidence from it, much like the car was immediately cleaned and any and all evidence was removed from it. But why would someone do that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Booth Posted December 2, 2023 Author Share Posted December 2, 2023 "the bullet that caused seven wounds in two different people was recovered almost intact" meanwhile "the bullet that hit his head blew up into 1,000 fragments that were strewn all over the limo" You see how this doesn't make any sense right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Cole Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 15 hours ago, Richard Booth said: "the bullet that caused seven wounds in two different people was recovered almost intact" meanwhile "the bullet that hit his head blew up into 1,000 fragments that were strewn all over the limo" You see how this doesn't make any sense right Excellent points. Yes, the Mannlicher-Carcano was said to have fired Western Cartridge Company copper-jacketed 6.5 rounds. Full copper jacket on lead slug. The "CIA assassination" manual mentions the use of under-charged or subsonic bullets in assassinations: https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB4/docs/doc02.pdf cleaner copy https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB4/ciaguat2.html If the rounds were undercharged, one would expect even less fragmenting. This undercharging of rounds may explain JFK's shallow back wound. A missile from another weapon may have struck JFK's head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Booth Posted December 3, 2023 Author Share Posted December 3, 2023 5 hours ago, Benjamin Cole said: Excellent points. Yes, the Mannlicher-Carcano was said to have fired Western Cartridge Company copper-jacketed 6.5 rounds. Full copper jacket on lead slug. The "CIA assassination" manual mentions the use of under-charged or subsonic bullets in assassinations: https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB4/docs/doc02.pdf cleaner copy https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB4/ciaguat2.html If the rounds were undercharged, one would expect even less fragmenting. This undercharging of rounds may explain JFK's shallow back wound. A missile from another weapon may have struck JFK's head. Well, I have actually fired rounds from weapons so when I read Chicken Man's assertion that there were probably fragments all over the limo I laughed out loud. Especially when you look at 6.5m Italian rounds. Those rounds are incredibly heavy, solid; obviously not responsible for the head shot Which is why all the pieces of brain and fragments had to be cleaned out of the head casing. Mass spectography would have revealed the fragments were not pieces of a 6.5mm Italian round and game over. Confetti bullet indeed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Speer Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 53 minutes ago, Richard Booth said: Well, I have actually fired rounds from weapons so when I read Chicken Man's assertion that there were probably fragments all over the limo I laughed out loud. Especially when you look at 6.5m Italian rounds. Those rounds are incredibly heavy, solid; obviously not responsible for the head shot Which is why all the pieces of brain and fragments had to be cleaned out of the head casing. Mass spectography would have revealed the fragments were not pieces of a 6.5mm Italian round and game over. Confetti bullet indeed If an M/C bullet struck the skull at a sharp angle as proposed by Dr. Clark, it would meet much more resistance than striking it straight on, and have to break through an inch of so of skull. Well, this would not only mutilate the skull, and create a wound like the one observed on Kennedy, but mutilate the bullet in the manner of the fragments found in the limousine...and found in and on Kennedy's skull. All the evidence points in this direction. Dr. Davis, the HSCA's radiology consultant, said he couldn't explain it but that it appears the so-called "trail of fragments" on the x-rays (which can be found in an area where there was no brain) are actually in the scalp. Well, that explains why none of these fragments were recovered at autopsy. Similarly, the non-metal material on the crumpled nose of the bullet found in the front section of the limo, was studied at the request of the ARRB, and found to be human skin. So, yes, an M/C bullet struck JFK at the supposed exit location and erupted on his skull, and exploded his skull in the process. This leaves the small entrance on the back of his skull unaccounted for, and this means JFK received two head wounds, not one. This is what the evidence suggests, and has always suggested. And this is what has been covered up, starting with the autopsy report, which pretended the entrance low on the skull led to the wound on top of the skull, and continuing through the Clark Panel, which simply moved the entrance to a location that no one saw which made more sense, and on to the HSCA and its Pathology Panel, which confirmed the Clark Panel's deception and harassed Dr. Humes into pretending he agreed with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Booth Posted December 3, 2023 Author Share Posted December 3, 2023 4 minutes ago, Pat Speer said: this means JFK received two head wounds, not one. This is what the evidence suggests, that is super interesting and it coincides with what S.M. Holland said about two shots being "almost simultaneous" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Odisio Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 10 minutes ago, Richard Booth said: that is super interesting and it coincides with what S.M. Holland said about two shots being "almost simultaneous" Two head shots Is also the main point made by Tink Thompson in "Last Second in Dallas" published last year. And the point of the presentation by Thompson, Aguilar, and Simpich at Duquesne last month. I've come to think two head shots within one second of each other maybe the best way to finally destroy the WR for the public and get people to start thinking about what really happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Cole Posted December 4, 2023 Share Posted December 4, 2023 5 hours ago, Pat Speer said: If an M/C bullet struck the skull at a sharp angle as proposed by Dr. Clark, it would meet much more resistance than striking it straight on, and have to break through an inch of so of skull. Well, this would not only mutilate the skull, and create a wound like the one observed on Kennedy, but mutilate the bullet in the manner of the fragments found in the limousine...and found in and on Kennedy's skull. All the evidence points in this direction. Dr. Davis, the HSCA's radiology consultant, said he couldn't explain it but that it appears the so-called "trail of fragments" on the x-rays (which can be found in an area where there was no brain) are actually in the scalp. Well, that explains why none of these fragments were recovered at autopsy. Similarly, the non-metal material on the crumpled nose of the bullet found in the front section of the limo, was studied at the request of the ARRB, and found to be human skin. So, yes, an M/C bullet struck JFK at the supposed exit location and erupted on his skull, and exploded his skull in the process. This leaves the small entrance on the back of his skull unaccounted for, and this means JFK received two head wounds, not one. This is what the evidence suggests, and has always suggested. And this is what has been covered up, starting with the autopsy report, which pretended the entrance low on the skull led to the wound on top of the skull, and continuing through the Clark Panel, which simply moved the entrance to a location that no one saw which made more sense, and on to the HSCA and its Pathology Panel, which confirmed the Clark Panel's deception and harassed Dr. Humes into pretending he agreed with them. PS- I still wonder if a WCC 6.5 copper-jacketed slug would explode, upon hitting a human skull, even an an angle. "Bone struck by bullets may not only fragment the bone, but also split the bullet. Lead round nose bullets can penetrate deeply and strike bone at relatively high velocity and can be cleanly cut in half or shaved vertically. Full metal jacketed round nose bullets are less affected, but are often irregularly flattened upon striking bone." https://webpath.med.utah.edu/TUTORIAL/GUNS/GUNLAB.html#:~:text=Full metal jacketed round nose,striking bone are often intact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now