Bill Miller Posted August 28, 2006 Share Posted August 28, 2006 THIS IS A COUNTER PRODUCTIVE THREADMembers are asked to review evidence not issue vituperative slanders........ LET THIS THREAD DIE A QUIET DEATH >...... Nice post, Shanet ... why was it not in response to Jack's original provocative post which contained the very insinuations that you speak of ??? Bill Miller What is this now pick on Jack White day? When any of you has contributed the amount of time, energy and dedicaton of Jack White, then chuck your wad but til then plese stay on topic.Dawn Dawn, many lawyers are thought of as nothing more than 'paid whores', so if you do not wish to be considered one of them, then you may wish to be critical of Jack from time to time as well. I suggest that you read his initial post where he used the names of four forum members for no other reason than to provoke a response and yet you didn't feel compelled to even open your mouth and speak up. I don't disagree with your position - I just find it disgustingly bias. Bill Miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanet Clark Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 ..............let.........it...........die..........!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 ..............let.........it...........die..........!!!!!!!!!!! Bump....Jack is such an honorable man so worthy of praise. /s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 ..............let.........it...........die..........!!!!!!!!!!! Bump....Jack is such an honorable man so worthy of praise. /s Let it drop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now