Jump to content
The Education Forum

Mark Stevens

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mark Stevens

  1. Yes it has, and always has been. What site can I download the file that shows me what candidate Robert Wheeler voted for in every election? You keep dodging all my questions while trying to make zingers that don't stick. Maybe you could address the points instead of constantly deflecting.
  2. Sorry for the massive multi-quote... I'm not sure what your beef with Caddy or with whatever he posts is, but maybe you should take that up with him. In the meantime, it might help you to be familiar with what you're posting. For instance from your link... So this isn't some shakeup of the establishment, this is a Congressionally ordered mandate which he...followed. Ah man, he zung it to the Deep State by following their wishes..hyuck..he shore did. Could you share with any of us where we can get classified voter information to "sift" through?
  3. Well first...lmao. Who is this person to "confirm" anything? How would she ever have verifiable first hand knowledge? Second, what the person said was she "heard" servers were confiscated. Hardly a "confirmation." Considering the company has no servers in Germany and the fact the Army has said it is bullshit is just....the reach of the Deep State? You thinking Biden will ever give a concession speech or will not be the 46th President is fairly textbook... https://www.webmd.com/schizophrenia/guide/delusional-disorder#1 I might stare at my feet, but it will be to
  4. Why do you keep saying this? Wyman Howard is the commander. I guess this is probably stupid of me because you never post evidence for any of your other paranoid delusions, but do you have anything to back this up?
  5. I don't really disagree. I do believe though that in this instance he really is doing it for "the sake of others." Not so much for them, but at the end of the day Trump is tied to his base. If they give up on him, he's done. He has to do actions like this which on the surface are "for the sake of others" but are really cons meant to bolster his own stature. By fighting "for them" it raises his stature in their eyes. It also drives home the stolen election idea (Trump's stabbed in the back myth) and allows him to cultivate this crop of lunacy for eventual harvest in 2024. Just like ch
  6. I read an article earlier, no link sorry, but it stated Trump knows he lost and will not be re-elected, but is putting up the fight for the sake of his supporters. I think this ties well into what I stated earlier and with Stewart's observations. Unlike most politicians, Trump listens to his base and gives them what they want. ETA: I believe this tactic will work quite well from Trump and allow him to run again in 2024 and use this as a rallying point for his supporters. It will be his own "poopoo stabbed in the back myth." Additional ETA: lmao @ "poopoo" Seriously, we
  7. I'm honestly a little more disturbed that people just don't seem to get it or see it until afterwards. Just like the first election when a good portion of people sat around scratching their heads wondering how this could have happened when all the polls said something different....When general sentiment said something different...When logic, common sense and the basic human decency we all expect most others to have said something different...America still elected Donald Trump as President. While, without the exception of some extraordinary events, he will not go on to be President again,
  8. I said who's gonna tell the youth about the drugs about the drugs, mugs, bugs, and the police thugs about the rotten stinkin' rackets and the fantasies around the nation, around the nations....
  9. http://www.allgov.com/news/top-stories/commissioner-of-the-food-and-drug-administration-who-is-scott-gottlieb-170424?news=860154
  10. So you're saying the below is not true then, the Aspen person does exist, does live in Switzerland and did work for the firm which was claimed. That firm is lying, as is Christopher Balding?
  11. Thanks! I was exposed to a co-worker. He flew down and could have gotten on the flight, or in the hotel he was staying in. We were both pretty diligent about mask wearing and only removed them when we went out to lunch. I'm not sure what his diligence was like after-hours though. He worked closely with me and two others, neither of those have developed any symptoms. One had a test last week and was negative.
  12. You definitely don't owe me an apology, but appreciated nonetheless. I do believe that with Prouty many have indeed put him on a pedestal (I actually wrote that in an earlier reply and deleted it) and as such do not question his statements as thoroughly as they have others. My sentiments regarding Prouty are best summarized by the ARRB and his position is best described by them... (any emphasis is mine) I agree with Prouty on many things, but we diverge on the details. For instance I also believe in a high level cabal, but unlike Prouty I do not believe it is contro
  13. In other coronavirus news... I had a positive test today. I have had mild symptoms at best, but I lost my taste and smell and felt that was something to check on. So far I haven't felt bad other than a headache. Here's to hoping the next 10 days pass without any real excitement.
  14. If his accurate claims are so innumerable, you should have no problem listing at least a few. Again, I'm aware of the claims Prouty has made and I'm aware of the claims in this book. I'm asking again for you to explain what JFKA specific claims he has made which were in fact truthful? You've asked me a lot of questions and I have faithfully answered all of them (whether you agree with them or not). Could you answer this one for me? I don't feel like I'm asking much. It shouldn't be hard for you to state what you feel he has stated that was accurate or otherwise factual.
  15. Well, could either of you tell me which JFKA specific claims Prouty made which were in fact true?
  16. Did Prouty state this? If I understand it all correctly, the orders would have come from Rear Adm. James Reedy.
  17. This is an impossible question to answer. I can't tell you why he lied, but the fact that he did lie, or at the best mislead through his statements is evident. Why did Files lie? Why did Rachel Dolezal pretend to be black? Why do people tell all the lies they do? There is no answer for those questions (actually their often are...money..mental illness..etc) but just because we can't fathom the "why" someone would do something doesn't mean they actually didn't do it. Maybe the psychiatrist can help us understand what motivates a person to lie or to embellish stories with facts that aren't..
  18. The only thing misleading is Prouty. It matters that when given the opportunity to support his claims he instead backtracked from them. There is no shortage of people associated with the JFKA changing their stories over the years and no shortage of people taking them to task for it. Why does Prouty get a free pass? It's not "lingo" about routine..These are Prouty's own words. Why do you all ignore his own words which negate his past comments? This isn't some outside attack on his statements, this is him negating them with his own words. This is him refusing to defend his commen
  19. That's not waiting 30 years to speak out, that's waiting 30 year to write your book. He's been speaking out in some degree since the late 60's. In the article I posted from 1971 he basically blames the CIA for JFK's death and says JFK's actions against the CIA created hatred in the agency which culminated in JFK's death.
  20. I still think there's some confusion, and I'll try to better explain. I'm not saying the sunlight is coming through at the angle you think I am. The sun is hitting at a similar angle to this... You can see only the left side of his face is illuminated by the sun and the sun ends just to the left of his noseline. The "graphic" shows the direction the sun is hitting the man's face in the tramp photo (and basically in the photo above) as well as the area the sun hits and the only area of glasses I am referring to. Due to the angle of the man's head, the sun does not trave
  21. Noone said the purpose was to get opinions or set the records straight. Setting the record straight very much occurred though, numerous times. The point I was making is that instead of providing statements or any evidence whatsoever which supported what he was saying over the years, he said the exact opposite. That matters. I'm curious to what exactly you read that gave you the impression he "clearly said it was unusual to be sent to Antartica.." His actual word are "it was routine" and "it was my job." How does routine = unusual? So after speaking out for 30 years and even
  22. I don't believe I'm misunderstanding the context, I'm quite familiar with Prouty. While his 1992 book may have the statements you quote above, in 1996 when given the opportunity to put this on the record he instead stated "It was so routine for them to call me, I didn’t give it a second thought" Why didn't he tell them "it was strange, I should have been involved with protecting the President. Sending me to Antartica was an obvious (fill in the blank)?" Why did he say it was routine? He then goes on to state "And even afterwards, when I heard people extrapolating in that sense
  23. With work and the weather being overcast most days I just had a chance to take a few more pictures and can post them if you'd still like. I think we just have a confusion regarding the glasses though. I'm not referring to this area... As you mentioned, there is almost no area for the sunlight to travel through in this area. While some shadow/light could be cast from this area, it would be difficult and it wouldn't create the shadow we see in the tramp photo. I'm referring to this area... This is the area the light is traveling through and the area which is cr
  24. Prouty himself said it was routine... (Same link on page one) http://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/jfk/NARA-Oct2017/ARRB/CBARGER/WP-DOCS/PROUTY11.WPD.pdf
  • Create New...