Jump to content
The Education Forum
Douglas Caddy

Sirhan Sirhan: In His Own Words

Recommended Posts

thepeoplesvoice.org

Sirhan Sirhan: In His Own Words

06/26/10

05:11:58 am

by Stephen Lendman

Shortly after midnight on June 5, 1968, Robert Kennedy was shot, The New York Times headlining:

"Kennedy is Dead, Victim of Assassin; Suspect, Arab Immigrant, Arraigned; Johnson Appoints Panel on Violence"

Sirhan Sirhan was the alleged assassin, convicted, and serving a life sentence at (no pun intended) Pleasant Valley State Prison, CA, despite convincing evidence of his innocence.

In his October 17, 2008 article "The Assassinations of the 1960s as 'Deep Events,' " Peter Dale Scott discussed the killings of both Kennedy brothers and Martin Luther King, saying:

"The more that I look at these deep events comparatively, ranging over the past five decades, the more similarities I see between them, and the more I understand them in the light of each other."

With respect to both Kennedys and King, official accounts obscured the events, suppressed key facts, enough to question the guilt of the alleged suspects, concealing the real culprits and why men of this stature were assassinated - what Scott called "some continuing and hostile force within our society..."

In his June 13, 2010 article titled, "JFK and RFK: The Plots that Killed Them, The Patsies that Didn't," James Fetzer debunked the official accounts, saying:

"we are looking at staged events that fit into a recurrent pattern in US and world history where innocent individuals (or 'patsies') are baited and framed for cover-up purposes," RFK's killing "in part intended to prevent a reinvestigation into his brother's death....The assassinations of RFK and JFK were both conspiracies. Both involved the destruction of evidence. Both involved the fabrication of evidence. Both involved framing their patsies. Both involved complicity by local officials. Both involved planning by the CIA. Both were used to deny the American people (their) right to be governed by leaders of their own choosing." Both put a myth to the rule of law, judicial fairness, and democratic freedoms.

Both crimes and MLK's assassination eliminated figures dark American forces wanted silenced, blaming innocent "patsies" for the killings, Sirhan Sirhan for RFK's. Fetzer's article explains numerous important facts:

-- multiple shots targeted him, more "than could have come from Sirhan Sirhan's gun" that was also the wrong caliber;

-- "RFK was shot behind the right ear from about 1.5 inches, but Sirhan was never that close and always in front of him;"

-- the coroner and LAPD reports were contradictory;

-- LAPD "engaged in massive destruction of evidence from the pantry of the hotel because 'it would not fit into a card file,' " as part of an official cover-up to blame Sirhan for a state-sponsored assassination, evidence suggesting CIA involvement in both Kennedy brothers and MLK killings;

-- Sirhan's gun was a ".22 caliber, eight-round revolver (serial number H-53725);"

-- he "emptied his weapon from a location in front of Bobby Kennedy;"

-- Dr. Thomas Hoguchi's autopsy "showed RFK was hit by four bullets, all of which were fired from behind at upward angles;

-- five others were wounded by separate shots;"

-- as many as 13 shots were fired;

-- Dr. Noguchi's autopsy "did not point to Sirhan as the killer;"

-- an eyewitness, DeWayne Wofler, "testified that the bullets fired at RFK had come from an entirely different gun," not Sirhan's;

-- a security guard, Eugene Cesar, standing right behind RFK, had a drawn gun of the same caliber as the murder weapon; it was never examined nor was he charged; and

-- "a woman in a polka dot dress" left the scene hurriedly, "shouting, "We shot him! We shot him! We shot Kennedy!"

In their book, "The Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy," Jonn Christian and William Turner made a convincing case "indicting Cesar for the crime," concluding "that Sirhan may have been firing blanks."

Fetzer's article has detailed information on both JFK and RFK assassinations, accessed through the following link:

http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2010/06/jfk-and-rfk-plots-that-killed-them.html

Below, Sirhan gives his own account of what happened that night and why he was at the Ambassador Hotel.

"My Morning with Sirhan"

On January 21, 2010, Academic Prison Teacher, Gerald B. Reynolds, spent time with Sirhan and wrote it up in detail. An account below follows.

At the Delta Facility library, a prison guard let him in. His ID said Sirhan Sirhan. "He looked at me in a calm way with a half-smile. I looked at him....There was an eerie, prolonged silence." He's now 66 years old, 42 of them in prison for a crime he didn't commit.

After another "calm silence....I swiveled in my chair to face Sirhan Sirhan and asked, 'Did you do it?' "

"Did I do what," he responded.

Reynolds: "You know."

Sirhan: "What do you want to know?"

Reynolds: "Did you kill Robert F. Kennedy?"

Sirhan: "No, I did NOT kill Robert F. Kennedy!"

Reynolds: "I know you didn't."

Sirhan: "How do you know?"

Reynolds explained that he studied the details of his case, learned that RFK was killed at point blank range by a bullet to the back of his head.

"The real assassin appears to be Kennedy's 26 year old Ace Security Company bodyguard....Thane Eugene Cesar. At least one eye witness claims to have seen Cesar with a smoking gun in his hand immediately after Kennedy fell to the floor. An audio recording made during the assassination indicates that there were at least 11 shots fired (perhaps more) from possibly three different guns."

"The conclusion is that Kennedy was shot three times from behind with a fourth bullet passing through his suit coat. The fact that you (Sirhan) were standing in front of Kennedy is undisputed and yet according to the coroner's report not one bullet entered Robert F. Kennedy from the front of his body."

Sirhan: "Oh my! I knew this morning when I woke up that God was telling me he had something great in store for me today and this is it! God has sent you to me!....I was beginning to lose hope so you were sent to lift my spirits. Now I can be hopeful again. Thank goodness somebody else knows."

Reynolds: "Have you ever talked to anybody else in prison that knows the truth of your case?"

Sirhan: "Yes. One person, that's all....He was one who drives a truck around and empties the dumpsters....I had a job where I had to take the garbage out of the kitchen....to the dumpster....once in a while he would talk to me. He told me he believed I was innocent."

Reynolds: "Did you talk to this guy often?"

Sirhan: "Actually no. He and I only talked maybe about three times and each time it was only for about five minutes or so."

He explained that he never met anyone in prison, besides him, who knows. He said friends on the outside set up a web site for him - rfkmustdie.com, with information about him, RFK, and whether CIA operatives killed him, framing Sirhan for the crime.

Reynolds: "Do you have an appeal on file right now?"

Sirhan: "Not now. Everything has run its course. I had a great attorney named Lawrence Teeter....He was a wonderful man and a great attorney. He tried several times to win me an appeal and even just to get a new evidentiary hearing but the courts seemed biased against me. The judges wouldn't budge....Teeter died in 2005, and I haven't really tried to work on any appeal since then."

Yet he feels, one day, he can be cleared and set free. "The truth will win out," he believes. Earlier he was on San Quentin's death row for three years. "They thought they were rid of me but then something happened they didn't plan on."

Led by Chief Justice Rose Bird, "the California Supreme Court intervened and ruled that the death penalty was unconstitutional. The ruling was retroactive and my sentence was commuted to life in prison. They thought I was dead and yet after 41 and a half years I'm still alive!" Now it's over 42.

But "they stole my life!....I've been rotting in that stinking prison for (over four decades) for nothing!....The bastards stole my life....I have been denied parole 13 times. I am scheduled for another parole hearing in 2011. (Against long odds), Maybe if there was a grassroots movement, like perhaps millions of people finding out how the authorities have buried me unjustly, and coming together in demonstrations all over the country they would have to reconsider and let me go."

Saying to Reynolds, "You do it for me. Become a guest speaker at colleges and universities and speak on my behalf....I hereby give you my permission....I will notify the press of your name and mission."

Reynolds: "Ah, no, not my name. My name can't be attached to this. I could get in big trouble. You know the monsters that run this place."

Sirhan: "OK, I understand. We will keep you anonymous."

Reynolds offered to make this conversation available to anyone "responsible enough to appreciate it." Sirhan suggested sending to magazines and newspapers. Reynolds said he'd try, sent it to one on the progressive left that wouldn't publish it, one reason for discussing it here.

Sirhan also explained he's Palestinian, born in Jerusalem in 1944, "alive during the turmoil that erupted when the United Nations stole our country and gave it to the Jews."

In fact, its 1947 Partition Plan (General Assembly Resolution 181) gave them 56% of historic Palestine, placing Jerusalem (declared a corpus separatum, a separate body) under UN trusteeship as an international city, binding to this day. At the time, Palestinians comprised two-thirds of the population, owning 93% of the land, most of it now stolen. All of it occupied illegally.

Ever since, Israelis treated "my people....like dogs. (They) shoot rockets and tank fire into the West Bank (and Gaza) killing everyone, including women and children. They drop bombs and spray machine gun fire into crowded marketplaces. They are treating my people the same way they were treated by the Nazis....It breaks my heart to see how my people are suffering."

Reynolds: "So, then, you're a Muslim?"

Sirhan: "No....I am a Christian. My whole family is Christian....We have been Christians for at least 800 years. We are Palestinian Christians."

He came to America at age 11, moved to Los Angeles, and settled in Pasadena, attending Altadena's Eliot Junior High School, graduating from John Muir High School, then completing two years of junior college..."

Reynolds asked if he had any connections to Middle East or organized terrorists?

Sirhan: "No. No way! I am alone. I am by myself. I do have a few people in the West Bank that I correspond with but they are just regular people. I have a brother in Los Angeles. But I definitely do not have any terrorist connections and I am not a member of any groups, any groups at all."

Spurious prison information circulated that on 9/11, he "gleefully clapped (his) hands and (was) delighted" to see the twin towers collapse, adding that he had confidential information of the impending attack "by a Middle Eastern terrorist organization whose members revere you as an icon and a hero and do everything they can to honor you."

Sirhan: "Oh my God, that's ridiculous. I've never had anything to do with any terrorist groups. Who said this about me?"

Reynolds: "It was Chief Deputy Warden James Mattingly."

Sirhan said he'll sue him for libel and slander, adding he wants to see his evidence. Reynolds asked what he thought of the incident, Sirhan explaining that he cried because his country was attacked and "felt sadness and anger and wanted to punish the people responsible...."

Reynolds: "Sirhan, what were the events that led up to you being in the pantry of the Ambassador Hotel on the night" JFK was shot there?

Sirhan: "In the evening, I had something to eat at Bob's Big Boy. Then later in the evening, I decided to drive downtown....The Jews were going to be having a big party to celebrate the one-year anniversary of Israel's" Six Day War victory."

Reynolds: "What did you intend to do once your got there?"

Sirhan: " I don't know exactly but I wanted to protest. The Jews should not have been allowed to fill the streets in celebration of stealing more of our land. I can remember driving down Highway 5 with my 22 caliber hand gun lying next to me on the passenger seat."

Reynolds: "Why did you have a gun with you in the car?"

Sirhan: "I had been shooting at the range earlier that day."

Reynolds: "Was the gun....out in the open?"

Sirhan: "No, it was in the plastic box it came in, you know, with the cloth, the cleaning rod, and oil."

Reynolds: "and what did you do when you got downtown?"

Sirhan: "I realized that I was a day early and that the event was to take place the next night. So I just drove back up the freeway."

Reynolds: "Why did you stop at the Ambassador Hotel?"

Sirhan: "I don't know. I can't remember parking and going in there but I must have because I was there."

Reynolds: "What did you do when you got there?"

Sirhan: "It was hot that night and I was very thirsty. I remember that....I went to the bar and had four drinks within about 15 minutes. I couldn't seem to get enough to drink....They were Tom Collins's....(but) I wasn't drunk. I felt drugged. I think somebody slipped something into my drinks. My legs and arms became rubbery. I remember standing by my car but I couldn't drive so I went back inside and got some coffee."

Reynolds: "How did you get downstairs to the pantry?"

Sirhan: "Somebody guided me. I don't know who."

Reynolds: "Did you have your gun with you?"

Sirhan: "Yes. When I was in the pantry, the gun was in my hand."

Reynolds: "Did you know Robert Kennedy was going to be walking toward you?"

Sirhan: "No. I didn't know where I was and I don't know how I got there. I was in a state of blackout."

Reynolds: "You were a Manchurian candidate....It's something the CIA uses. They assassinate a president, or senator, or anyone they wish, and make it look like some crazed, lone-nut assassin did it. But he has been heavily drugged, possibly with LSD, and undergone intense brainwashing followed by reprogramming. Everything you're saying about yourself follows the established pattern of the drugged, duped, CIA patsy."

Sirhan: "They used me, framed me, and they set me up to die."

Reynolds: "Do you remember firing the gun that was in your hand?"

Sirhan: "I can't remember. I was blacked out. I remember feeling woozy and it felt like I was falling down....I don't remember the things that happened that night."

Reynolds: "Do you remember being led in handcuffs out of the Ambassador Hotel and made to sit in the back seat of a police car?"

Sirhan: "I remember being led away but I didn't know why they were doing this to me. Nobody told me anything."

He was interrogated by the police for about 24 hours, detectives telling him he murdered JFK. "They yelled at me. They kept shoving papers at me demanding that I sign...They were documents saying I killed Kennedy. Confession. They insisted I had murdered Robert F. Kennedy and they demanded I confess and sign the papers....At first I resisted, but later I confessed and signed the papers. They broke me down and I told them I would do anything they wanted me to do. I just wanted it to stop."

After he confessed, he was taken to a cell and allowed to sleep. A court trial followed where his "interrogators convinced me to plead guilty and ask for the death penalty....I told the judge I was guilty and wanted the death penalty," explaining he was ashamed.

"They made me believe I had murdered Robert Kennedy in cold blood and I was remorseful and ashamed. Everyone said I was guilty. They said I would get the death penalty....no matter what I said or did. They said it was an open and shut case and that I might as well give up. I just wanted to get the whole thing over with and if it meant me being dead, so be it. I didn't have anything left to live for anyway."

A trial followed, Sirhan represented by attorney Grant Cooper, a man he called "crooked. He had mafia and CIA connections," Sirhan explaining what he knew and his mob involvement. "He was (picked) to make sure I was convicted and sent to my death, and Cooper complied because they were planning to kill him" otherwise.

Reynolds asked him to portray what he remembered doing at the Ambassador Hotel. Sirhan stood up, swayed, his arms gently rising, looked straight ahead, then made a gun shape with his right hand, his arm parallel to the ground pretending to shoot, saying:

"At a specific moment, and I can't remember when or why, I shot my 22 caliber pistol three times. My arms were unsteady but level with the ground. Two of the shots missed. I saw them miss. One of the shots may have bounced off him like a BB. All of a sudden people were grabbing me. They were forcing me down....Did anybody say I reached around behind and shot Robert Kennedy in the back of the head?"

Reynolds: "Nobody."

Sirhan: "But that's what I would've had to do" to kill him....So, what do you think of me now? Do you think I am crazy like they say?"

Not at all, said Reynolds, Sirhan adding "I am just a man. I am a man just like you. I am trained never to allow an inmate to touch me."

In parting, he embraced Reynolds, both of them now "secret friends in a desolate place."

A Final Comment

Evidence strongly suggests that Lee Harvey Oswald, James Earl Ray, and Sirhan Sirhan were patsies, blamed for state-sponsored assassinations, likely carried out by CIA operatives or hired guns they enlisted.

Jack Ruby, with known mob and police connections, fatally shot Oswald on November 22, 1963. Incarcerated without trial, James Earl Ray died in prison on April 23, 1998, proclaiming his innocence. Sirhan Sirhan has been imprisoned since 1968, despite no evidence proving his guilt.

In these and hundreds more cases in US courts, justice was denied, revealing the myth of the rule of law, under a system absolving high-level crime, getting patsies punished for offenses they didn't commit, the major media always going along, supporting official accounts without question.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thepeoplesvoice.org

Sirhan Sirhan: In His Own Words

06/26/10

05:11:58 am

by Stephen Lendman

Shortly after midnight on June 5, 1968, Robert Kennedy was shot, The New York Times headlining:

"Kennedy is Dead, Victim of Assassin; Suspect, Arab Immigrant, Arraigned; Johnson Appoints Panel on Violence"

Sirhan Sirhan was the alleged assassin, convicted, and serving a life sentence at (no pun intended) Pleasant Valley State Prison, CA, despite convincing evidence of his innocence.

In his October 17, 2008 article "The Assassinations of the 1960s as 'Deep Events,' " Peter Dale Scott discussed the killings of both Kennedy brothers and Martin Luther King, saying:

"The more that I look at these deep events comparatively, ranging over the past five decades, the more similarities I see between them, and the more I understand them in the light of each other."

With respect to both Kennedys and King, official accounts obscured the events, suppressed key facts, enough to question the guilt of the alleged suspects, concealing the real culprits and why men of this stature were assassinated - what Scott called "some continuing and hostile force within our society..."

In his June 13, 2010 article titled, "JFK and RFK: The Plots that Killed Them, The Patsies that Didn't," James Fetzer debunked the official accounts, saying:

"we are looking at staged events that fit into a recurrent pattern in US and world history where innocent individuals (or 'patsies') are baited and framed for cover-up purposes," RFK's killing "in part intended to prevent a reinvestigation into his brother's death....The assassinations of RFK and JFK were both conspiracies. Both involved the destruction of evidence. Both involved the fabrication of evidence. Both involved framing their patsies. Both involved complicity by local officials. Both involved planning by the CIA. Both were used to deny the American people (their) right to be governed by leaders of their own choosing." Both put a myth to the rule of law, judicial fairness, and democratic freedoms.

Both crimes and MLK's assassination eliminated figures dark American forces wanted silenced, blaming innocent "patsies" for the killings, Sirhan Sirhan for RFK's. Fetzer's article explains numerous important facts:

-- multiple shots targeted him, more "than could have come from Sirhan Sirhan's gun" that was also the wrong caliber;

-- "RFK was shot behind the right ear from about 1.5 inches, but Sirhan was never that close and always in front of him;"

-- the coroner and LAPD reports were contradictory;

-- LAPD "engaged in massive destruction of evidence from the pantry of the hotel because 'it would not fit into a card file,' " as part of an official cover-up to blame Sirhan for a state-sponsored assassination, evidence suggesting CIA involvement in both Kennedy brothers and MLK killings;

-- Sirhan's gun was a ".22 caliber, eight-round revolver (serial number H-53725);"

-- he "emptied his weapon from a location in front of Bobby Kennedy;"

-- Dr. Thomas Hoguchi's autopsy "showed RFK was hit by four bullets, all of which were fired from behind at upward angles;

-- five others were wounded by separate shots;"

-- as many as 13 shots were fired;

-- Dr. Noguchi's autopsy "did not point to Sirhan as the killer;"

-- an eyewitness, DeWayne Wofler, "testified that the bullets fired at RFK had come from an entirely different gun," not Sirhan's;

-- a security guard, Eugene Cesar, standing right behind RFK, had a drawn gun of the same caliber as the murder weapon; it was never examined nor was he charged; and

-- "a woman in a polka dot dress" left the scene hurriedly, "shouting, "We shot him! We shot him! We shot Kennedy!"

In their book, "The Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy," Jonn Christian and William Turner made a convincing case "indicting Cesar for the crime," concluding "that Sirhan may have been firing blanks."

Fetzer's article has detailed information on both JFK and RFK assassinations, accessed through the following link:

http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2010/06/jfk-and-rfk-plots-that-killed-them.html

Below, Sirhan gives his own account of what happened that night and why he was at the Ambassador Hotel.

"My Morning with Sirhan"

On January 21, 2010, Academic Prison Teacher, Gerald B. Reynolds, spent time with Sirhan and wrote it up in detail. An account below follows.

At the Delta Facility library, a prison guard let him in. His ID said Sirhan Sirhan. "He looked at me in a calm way with a half-smile. I looked at him....There was an eerie, prolonged silence." He's now 66 years old, 42 of them in prison for a crime he didn't commit.

After another "calm silence....I swiveled in my chair to face Sirhan Sirhan and asked, 'Did you do it?' "

"Did I do what," he responded.

Reynolds: "You know."

Sirhan: "What do you want to know?"

Reynolds: "Did you kill Robert F. Kennedy?"

Sirhan: "No, I did NOT kill Robert F. Kennedy!"

Reynolds: "I know you didn't."

Sirhan: "How do you know?"

Reynolds explained that he studied the details of his case, learned that RFK was killed at point blank range by a bullet to the back of his head.

"The real assassin appears to be Kennedy's 26 year old Ace Security Company bodyguard....Thane Eugene Cesar. At least one eye witness claims to have seen Cesar with a smoking gun in his hand immediately after Kennedy fell to the floor. An audio recording made during the assassination indicates that there were at least 11 shots fired (perhaps more) from possibly three different guns."

"The conclusion is that Kennedy was shot three times from behind with a fourth bullet passing through his suit coat. The fact that you (Sirhan) were standing in front of Kennedy is undisputed and yet according to the coroner's report not one bullet entered Robert F. Kennedy from the front of his body."

Sirhan: "Oh my! I knew this morning when I woke up that God was telling me he had something great in store for me today and this is it! God has sent you to me!....I was beginning to lose hope so you were sent to lift my spirits. Now I can be hopeful again. Thank goodness somebody else knows."

Reynolds: "Have you ever talked to anybody else in prison that knows the truth of your case?"

Sirhan: "Yes. One person, that's all....He was one who drives a truck around and empties the dumpsters....I had a job where I had to take the garbage out of the kitchen....to the dumpster....once in a while he would talk to me. He told me he believed I was innocent."

Reynolds: "Did you talk to this guy often?"

Sirhan: "Actually no. He and I only talked maybe about three times and each time it was only for about five minutes or so."

He explained that he never met anyone in prison, besides him, who knows. He said friends on the outside set up a web site for him - rfkmustdie.com, with information about him, RFK, and whether CIA operatives killed him, framing Sirhan for the crime.

Reynolds: "Do you have an appeal on file right now?"

Sirhan: "Not now. Everything has run its course. I had a great attorney named Lawrence Teeter....He was a wonderful man and a great attorney. He tried several times to win me an appeal and even just to get a new evidentiary hearing but the courts seemed biased against me. The judges wouldn't budge....Teeter died in 2005, and I haven't really tried to work on any appeal since then."

Yet he feels, one day, he can be cleared and set free. "The truth will win out," he believes. Earlier he was on San Quentin's death row for three years. "They thought they were rid of me but then something happened they didn't plan on."

Led by Chief Justice Rose Bird, "the California Supreme Court intervened and ruled that the death penalty was unconstitutional. The ruling was retroactive and my sentence was commuted to life in prison. They thought I was dead and yet after 41 and a half years I'm still alive!" Now it's over 42.

But "they stole my life!....I've been rotting in that stinking prison for (over four decades) for nothing!....The bastards stole my life....I have been denied parole 13 times. I am scheduled for another parole hearing in 2011. (Against long odds), Maybe if there was a grassroots movement, like perhaps millions of people finding out how the authorities have buried me unjustly, and coming together in demonstrations all over the country they would have to reconsider and let me go."

Saying to Reynolds, "You do it for me. Become a guest speaker at colleges and universities and speak on my behalf....I hereby give you my permission....I will notify the press of your name and mission."

Reynolds: "Ah, no, not my name. My name can't be attached to this. I could get in big trouble. You know the monsters that run this place."

Sirhan: "OK, I understand. We will keep you anonymous."

Reynolds offered to make this conversation available to anyone "responsible enough to appreciate it." Sirhan suggested sending to magazines and newspapers. Reynolds said he'd try, sent it to one on the progressive left that wouldn't publish it, one reason for discussing it here.

Sirhan also explained he's Palestinian, born in Jerusalem in 1944, "alive during the turmoil that erupted when the United Nations stole our country and gave it to the Jews."

In fact, its 1947 Partition Plan (General Assembly Resolution 181) gave them 56% of historic Palestine, placing Jerusalem (declared a corpus separatum, a separate body) under UN trusteeship as an international city, binding to this day. At the time, Palestinians comprised two-thirds of the population, owning 93% of the land, most of it now stolen. All of it occupied illegally.

Ever since, Israelis treated "my people....like dogs. (They) shoot rockets and tank fire into the West Bank (and Gaza) killing everyone, including women and children. They drop bombs and spray machine gun fire into crowded marketplaces. They are treating my people the same way they were treated by the Nazis....It breaks my heart to see how my people are suffering."

Reynolds: "So, then, you're a Muslim?"

Sirhan: "No....I am a Christian. My whole family is Christian....We have been Christians for at least 800 years. We are Palestinian Christians."

He came to America at age 11, moved to Los Angeles, and settled in Pasadena, attending Altadena's Eliot Junior High School, graduating from John Muir High School, then completing two years of junior college..."

Reynolds asked if he had any connections to Middle East or organized terrorists?

Sirhan: "No. No way! I am alone. I am by myself. I do have a few people in the West Bank that I correspond with but they are just regular people. I have a brother in Los Angeles. But I definitely do not have any terrorist connections and I am not a member of any groups, any groups at all."

Spurious prison information circulated that on 9/11, he "gleefully clapped (his) hands and (was) delighted" to see the twin towers collapse, adding that he had confidential information of the impending attack "by a Middle Eastern terrorist organization whose members revere you as an icon and a hero and do everything they can to honor you."

Sirhan: "Oh my God, that's ridiculous. I've never had anything to do with any terrorist groups. Who said this about me?"

Reynolds: "It was Chief Deputy Warden James Mattingly."

Sirhan said he'll sue him for libel and slander, adding he wants to see his evidence. Reynolds asked what he thought of the incident, Sirhan explaining that he cried because his country was attacked and "felt sadness and anger and wanted to punish the people responsible...."

Reynolds: "Sirhan, what were the events that led up to you being in the pantry of the Ambassador Hotel on the night" JFK was shot there?

Sirhan: "In the evening, I had something to eat at Bob's Big Boy. Then later in the evening, I decided to drive downtown....The Jews were going to be having a big party to celebrate the one-year anniversary of Israel's" Six Day War victory."

Reynolds: "What did you intend to do once your got there?"

Sirhan: " I don't know exactly but I wanted to protest. The Jews should not have been allowed to fill the streets in celebration of stealing more of our land. I can remember driving down Highway 5 with my 22 caliber hand gun lying next to me on the passenger seat."

Reynolds: "Why did you have a gun with you in the car?"

Sirhan: "I had been shooting at the range earlier that day."

Reynolds: "Was the gun....out in the open?"

Sirhan: "No, it was in the plastic box it came in, you know, with the cloth, the cleaning rod, and oil."

Reynolds: "and what did you do when you got downtown?"

Sirhan: "I realized that I was a day early and that the event was to take place the next night. So I just drove back up the freeway."

Reynolds: "Why did you stop at the Ambassador Hotel?"

Sirhan: "I don't know. I can't remember parking and going in there but I must have because I was there."

Reynolds: "What did you do when you got there?"

Sirhan: "It was hot that night and I was very thirsty. I remember that....I went to the bar and had four drinks within about 15 minutes. I couldn't seem to get enough to drink....They were Tom Collins's....(but) I wasn't drunk. I felt drugged. I think somebody slipped something into my drinks. My legs and arms became rubbery. I remember standing by my car but I couldn't drive so I went back inside and got some coffee."

Reynolds: "How did you get downstairs to the pantry?"

Sirhan: "Somebody guided me. I don't know who."

Reynolds: "Did you have your gun with you?"

Sirhan: "Yes. When I was in the pantry, the gun was in my hand."

Reynolds: "Did you know Robert Kennedy was going to be walking toward you?"

Sirhan: "No. I didn't know where I was and I don't know how I got there. I was in a state of blackout."

Reynolds: "You were a Manchurian candidate....It's something the CIA uses. They assassinate a president, or senator, or anyone they wish, and make it look like some crazed, lone-nut assassin did it. But he has been heavily drugged, possibly with LSD, and undergone intense brainwashing followed by reprogramming. Everything you're saying about yourself follows the established pattern of the drugged, duped, CIA patsy."

Sirhan: "They used me, framed me, and they set me up to die."

Reynolds: "Do you remember firing the gun that was in your hand?"

Sirhan: "I can't remember. I was blacked out. I remember feeling woozy and it felt like I was falling down....I don't remember the things that happened that night."

Reynolds: "Do you remember being led in handcuffs out of the Ambassador Hotel and made to sit in the back seat of a police car?"

Sirhan: "I remember being led away but I didn't know why they were doing this to me. Nobody told me anything."

He was interrogated by the police for about 24 hours, detectives telling him he murdered JFK. "They yelled at me. They kept shoving papers at me demanding that I sign...They were documents saying I killed Kennedy. Confession. They insisted I had murdered Robert F. Kennedy and they demanded I confess and sign the papers....At first I resisted, but later I confessed and signed the papers. They broke me down and I told them I would do anything they wanted me to do. I just wanted it to stop."

After he confessed, he was taken to a cell and allowed to sleep. A court trial followed where his "interrogators convinced me to plead guilty and ask for the death penalty....I told the judge I was guilty and wanted the death penalty," explaining he was ashamed.

"They made me believe I had murdered Robert Kennedy in cold blood and I was remorseful and ashamed. Everyone said I was guilty. They said I would get the death penalty....no matter what I said or did. They said it was an open and shut case and that I might as well give up. I just wanted to get the whole thing over with and if it meant me being dead, so be it. I didn't have anything left to live for anyway."

A trial followed, Sirhan represented by attorney Grant Cooper, a man he called "crooked. He had mafia and CIA connections," Sirhan explaining what he knew and his mob involvement. "He was (picked) to make sure I was convicted and sent to my death, and Cooper complied because they were planning to kill him" otherwise.

Reynolds asked him to portray what he remembered doing at the Ambassador Hotel. Sirhan stood up, swayed, his arms gently rising, looked straight ahead, then made a gun shape with his right hand, his arm parallel to the ground pretending to shoot, saying:

"At a specific moment, and I can't remember when or why, I shot my 22 caliber pistol three times. My arms were unsteady but level with the ground. Two of the shots missed. I saw them miss. One of the shots may have bounced off him like a BB. All of a sudden people were grabbing me. They were forcing me down....Did anybody say I reached around behind and shot Robert Kennedy in the back of the head?"

Reynolds: "Nobody."

Sirhan: "But that's what I would've had to do" to kill him....So, what do you think of me now? Do you think I am crazy like they say?"

Not at all, said Reynolds, Sirhan adding "I am just a man. I am a man just like you. I am trained never to allow an inmate to touch me."

In parting, he embraced Reynolds, both of them now "secret friends in a desolate place."

A Final Comment

Evidence strongly suggests that Lee Harvey Oswald, James Earl Ray, and Sirhan Sirhan were patsies, blamed for state-sponsored assassinations, likely carried out by CIA operatives or hired guns they enlisted.

Jack Ruby, with known mob and police connections, fatally shot Oswald on November 22, 1963. Incarcerated without trial, James Earl Ray died in prison on April 23, 1998, proclaiming his innocence. Sirhan Sirhan has been imprisoned since 1968, despite no evidence proving his guilt.

In these and hundreds more cases in US courts, justice was denied, revealing the myth of the rule of law, under a system absolving high-level crime, getting patsies punished for offenses they didn't commit, the major media always going along, supporting official accounts without question.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

This article only makes Sirhan look guilty, IMO. It makes it sound like Sirhan, entirely on his own, showed up at the Ambassador, and that he, entirely on his own, decided to bring his pistol inside. If this is true, the whole "patsy" argument can be thrown out the window.

This doesn't preclude, of course, that Sirhan TRIED to kill RFK on his own, and that someone--such as Cesar--had been put in place to take advantage of such a situation should it develop.

P.S. The statement "One of the shots may have bounced off him like a BB" is curious, and may be an admission by Sirhan that he remembers firing the fatal shot. No shots bounced off RFK like a BB from in front. Perhaps, however, Sirhan is thinking of the bullet striking Paul Schrade in the head.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesnt make it seem like anything occurred "on its own" when he felt strongly that he was lead, when the evidence and/or testimony from witnesses mention other conspirators and when Sirhan felt that he was drugged. The stack of evidence in Sirhan's favor only begins to stack, did you also know that someone else signed some papers for Sirhan at a shooting range some days before the RFK hit? Sirhan never had a motive. Grant Cooper (I believe and according to the late Larry Teeter) created the fairytale we all know about Israel and fighter planes. One cannot possibly, in this world or the next, consider Sirhan as guilty when honestly looking at the evidence. The RFK assassination was a plot hatched by the very same complex intelligence services apparatus that murdered his brother (and King for that matter). This is not far fetched and only then when we realize that can we move further into "truthland".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesnt make it seem like anything occurred "on its own" when he felt strongly that he was lead, when the evidence and/or testimony from witnesses mention other conspirators and when Sirhan felt that he was drugged. The stack of evidence in Sirhan's favor only begins to stack, did you also know that someone else signed some papers for Sirhan at a shooting range some days before the RFK hit? Sirhan never had a motive. Grant Cooper (I believe and according to the late Larry Teeter) created the fairytale we all know about Israel and fighter planes. One cannot possibly, in this world or the next, consider Sirhan as guilty when honestly looking at the evidence. The RFK assassination was a plot hatched by the very same complex intelligence services apparatus that murdered his brother (and King for that matter). This is not far fetched and only then when we realize that can we move further into "truthland".

While I have long suspected there was a conspiracy behind RFK's murder, no conspiracy theory outside the Manchurian Candidate theory accounts for an "innocent" Sirhan's showing up at the Ambassador with a gun and his consciously firing shots. Do you believe that theory? I've tried and it just seems silly.

Whether or not his shots killed Kennedy, Sirhan is guilty of murder. As long as he refuses to tell us the names of his co-conspirators, he deserves to rot in jail.

Larry Teeter, in an attempt to get Sirhan a new trial, put together an argument that Sirhan's lawyer, the mob, and Nixon all conspired to put Sirhan away without getting his day in court. Pretty much everyone was guilty but poor lil' Sirhan, who only went to the Ambassador with a gun and repeatedly pulled its trigger.

The only hope for Sirhan, IMO, is one raised by William Pepper at the 40th anniversary COPA conference. Put Sirhan under hypnosis and attempt to pry something new that will lead investigators elsewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe at one time that Sirhan was actually placed under hypnosis. It was a long time ago. If I remember correctly the results were inconclusive.

It doesnt make it seem like anything occurred "on its own" when he felt strongly that he was lead, when the evidence and/or testimony from witnesses mention other conspirators and when Sirhan felt that he was drugged. The stack of evidence in Sirhan's favor only begins to stack, did you also know that someone else signed some papers for Sirhan at a shooting range some days before the RFK hit? Sirhan never had a motive. Grant Cooper (I believe and according to the late Larry Teeter) created the fairytale we all know about Israel and fighter planes. One cannot possibly, in this world or the next, consider Sirhan as guilty when honestly looking at the evidence. The RFK assassination was a plot hatched by the very same complex intelligence services apparatus that murdered his brother (and King for that matter). This is not far fetched and only then when we realize that can we move further into "truthland".

While I have long suspected there was a conspiracy behind RFK's murder, no conspiracy theory outside the Manchurian Candidate theory accounts for an "innocent" Sirhan's showing up at the Ambassador with a gun and his consciously firing shots. Do you believe that theory? I've tried and it just seems silly.

Whether or not his shots killed Kennedy, Sirhan is guilty of murder. As long as he refuses to tell us the names of his co-conspirators, he deserves to rot in jail.

Larry Teeter, in an attempt to get Sirhan a new trial, put together an argument that Sirhan's lawyer, the mob, and Nixon all conspired to put Sirhan away without getting his day in court. Pretty much everyone was guilty but poor lil' Sirhan, who only went to the Ambassador with a gun and repeatedly pulled its trigger.

The only hope for Sirhan, IMO, is one raised by William Pepper at the 40th anniversary COPA conference. Put Sirhan under hypnosis and attempt to pry something new that will lead investigators elsewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pat:

Sirhan could not have killed RFK. And since RFK was the only one who died, he is not guilty of murder.

Every shot that hit RFK came in from behind, was within inches, and at an upward angle.

Sirhan was in front of RFK, always about 2-3 feet away, and firing on a level plane.

Further, Karl Uecker, the man escorting RFK through the hotel, grabbed Sirhan by his gunhand after the second shot. So he could not have fired with any accuracy beyond then.

The LAPD could never match any of the bullets from RFK to Sirhan's alleged revolver. So they had their ballistics guy DeWayne Wolfer lie his head off. They then faked Special Exhibit Ten to make it seem that they did. But SE 10 is a fraud.

There is almost no doubt that Sirhan was under hypnotic suggestion that night. How else does one explain the girl in the polka dot dress? And why did the LAPD want her to disappear and then lied about her when they could not make her go away?

And there is no doubt there was at least a second gunman, and probably a third. How else does one explain the Von Pragg tape? This shows both too many shots and shots that are bunched too close together.

Sirhan's original state prison psychiatrist, Simson-Kallas, was close to deprogramming him. He was then taken off the case.

I have little doubt that the programmer was W. J. Bryan.

The best book on that case is the one by Bill Turner and Jonn Christian.

Jim, if someone dies while you are committing a felony--such as shooting at them--you can be found guilty of murder. The get-away driver of a stick-up gone wrong can be found guilty of murder. The mugger who gives an old lady a heart attack can be found guilty of murder. Murderous intent is not necessary.

Whether or not Sirhan fired the fatal bullet, he is rightfully behind bars. He fired shots. People were injured. RFK died.

While Von Pragg's analysis of the tape is intriguing--I've seen his presentation--there needs to be corroboration from other experts before we can reasonably claim it conclusive. Unfortunately, the recollections of the closest witnesses are not consistent enough to say for certain that Sirhan never got behind RFK--AND that RFK never turned away from him. It is suggestive but not conclusive.

Even so, I suspect a conspiracy. Just not one in which po' lil' Sirhan was hypnotized to fire the shots.

I mean, have you ever heard the tapes made of Sirhan while hypnotised? He starts chanting "you Sonuvabitch" as Kennedy approaches him. There's no way someone can listen to such a tape and say the man is obviously innocent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pat:

If you study the Nielson-Hardrup case from Denmark you will see why Simson-Killas was taken off the case.

In that case, the court psychiatrist was very suspicious of the fact that Hardrup, the accused murderer who fired the shots, had absolutley no past history of violence.

THe court psychiatrist then went ahead and was allowed to deprogram Hardrup. Hardrup had been hypnotized by Nielson. The court convicted Nielson and acquitted Hardrup.

I have very little doubt that is Sirhan had been deprogrammed by Killas, adn had a lwyer who had not stipulated to the evidence as Cooper did, the result would have been the same.

The thing to remember about that case is that no one puts Sirhan behind RFK, not with that fire hydrant Uecker on top of him. And the Girl in the Polka Dot Dress said "We got him! We got him!" And two sets of witnesses hear her say it.

Finally, when the GIrl came up the stairs and entered the Ambasssador, she had two male accomplices. When she left she had one.

When Sandy Serrano saw Sirhan's photo on TV, she spilled her orange juice.

She saw the threesome as they went in. The guy who didn't come out was Sirhan.

Larry Hancock explored the possibility the polka dot dress girl was a right-wing terrorist affiliated with the Minutemen. It certainly seems possible that Sirhan came under the spell--perhaps even literally--of a right-wing group vehemently opposed to Kennedy that exploited his feelings about Palestine to their advantage.

The point I've been trying to make is not that Sirhan was a lone assassin-I suspect he was not--but that he is not "innocent" in this matter. He may very well have been a willing part of a conspiracy. Much as Jack Ruby was pressured by his lawyers to come up with the "I was trying to protect Jackie" defense, Sirhan was pressured by Teeter to embark upon his "I was set up by Cooper" defense, as a ploy to get a new trial. There may be nothing to it. In the climate of 1968, there was no chance in heck that Cooper or even Johnnie Cochran was gonna convince a jury that "the coroner says RFK was shot from behind, but my client was in front, and doesn't remember how many shots he fired, or even why he was firing them" defense.

Still, it's intriguing how Rosselli ends up pretty much everywhere, and how his shenanigans may have compromised Cooper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There seems to be evidence that strongly suggests Sirhan was hypnotized. It cannot be thrown out of court. If he was hypno. then by whom and why?, when even? Sirhan was practically dragged around to certain spots during the days and weeks leading up to the assassination, and a smoking gun of that fact is that someone registered their name at a shooting range for Sirhan. Even these few facts should prompt any honest investigator to consider a possibly sinister conclusion, especially given the context of his brother's murder, not to mention the plethora of incidents of the night in question. (Enyart phots, Special Unit Senator's CIA connection, etc). It seems to me that we when one even glances over such evidence, he/she would be within the realms of reason to conclude that a conspiracy more likely took place than not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Larry Hancock explored the possibility the polka dot dress girl was a right-wing terrorist affiliated with the Minutemen. It certainly seems possible that Sirhan came under the spell--perhaps even literally--of a right-wing group vehemently opposed to Kennedy that exploited his feelings about Palestine to their advantage.

What is not well known is at the time, the LAPD was interested in a woman named Sady Rossi. A few months later, Kathy Fulmer shows up saying that she was wearing a polka dot scalf. She also said she used the name Sady Rossi. Not long after that, Kathy Fulmer died of a drug overdose. An LA cop who I won't name (a family request) said that Fulmer was not Rossi and that Rossi had some interesting connections out of Miami. That cop was killed in a shoot out a few years later. Of course, during Sirhan's trial, Valerie Shulte was presented as the polka dot dress girl.

JK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wondering if anyone knows any more facts about Kathy Ainsworth, fingered as Polka Dot Dress in this website:

http://members.fortunecity.com/wernerhoff/rfk5.html

I gave the link for the middle page of several. No credence in the contents is implied.

David,that website is light on information. What it doesn't tell you is that Kathy Ainsworth's father in law was retired army Colonel Richard Ainsworth. Her mother was an ex circus follies dancer and a rabid anti Semite named Margaret Capomacchia. Her husband was Ralph Ainsworth who was a military police Sergeant in the National Guard. Kathy's close friends included the religious editor of the Miami Herald Adon Taft and Klan leader Sam Bowers. Kathy was also a member of the Americans for the preservation of the White Race.

Tom Tarrants and Sam Bowers were arrested in a stolen car in late 1967. In the car was a submachine gun that the FBI traced back to having been stolen from a National Guard armory in Mobile Alabama in 1958.

Ainsworth below. A photo not from that website.

JK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sirhan was pressured by Teeter to embark upon his "I was set up by Cooper" defense, as a ploy to get a new trial. There may be nothing to it. In the climate of 1968, there was no chance in heck that Cooper or even Johnnie Cochran was gonna convince a jury that "the coroner says RFK was shot from behind, but my client was in front, and doesn't remember how many shots he fired, or even why he was firing them" defense.

But this whole desire to reopen the case began much earlier than when Teeter became Sirhan's lawyer. It started way back in the seventies. The guy who really started it was ballistics expert Bill Harper. And the guy who started the Manchurian Candidate angle was Robert Kaiser when he mentioned the Nielson-Hardrup case in his book. Turner and Christian then fleshed out TMC aspect in their book which is also from the seventies.

Absolutely. There were questions about the trial, and of Sirhan's sole guilt, almost from the beginning. The biggest irony, perhaps, is that the L.A. "insider" working with Turner to get the evidence re-examined was a then newly-famous Assistant District Attorney, with eyes on the DA position...Vincent Bugliosi.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...