Denis Pointing

Jack, These photos are not new to me, I've seen them a thousand times before and YES, IMO they do indeed show the same man. I could show you many photos of myself were I look totally differant in each, as I'm sure many here could. Besides, if one followed your take on the photo's, there wouldn't just be 2 LHO's but at least SIX, as ALL the photo's APPEAR differant. Denis. Now we are getting somewhere; you say "there wouldn't just be 2 LHO's but at least SIX, as ALL the photo's APPEAR differant." Now you are beginning to see the problem. It is apparent that in addition to Harvey and Lee, there were at least three LHOs in Russia; plus, there were others in the US who were different from Harvey and Lee. I agree with you that SIX is a good number to start with. Check on whether it is possible for the human calvarium to change size, shape, dimensions. If the skulls are different sizes and shapes, the photos are NOT of the same persons. Jack Jack, Am I understanding you correctly? Are you seriously suggesting that in the 9 photo composite you showed of LHO, at least SIX of them are alternate Oswald's!! Surly you cant be saying that. Denis.

Thanks Duncan, yeah I can certainly see why your posting this. Am I right in assuming you've presented this before? If so I dont understand why its not more acclaimed. It seems just as relevant as Badge man. Denis.

Duncan, could you show me the right hand image without the color please. Denis.

Thanks for your honest reply Duncan. And I agree, this was CERTAINLY worthwhile putting forward. Perhaps one of our forum photography experts could expand on this. Thanks. Denis

Very interesting Duncan, but for the benefit of someone who knows next to nothing about photography, e.g. me, just how reliable is this process of adding colour to blank spaces to form an image? Sorry for the lack of technical jargon. I belive there was a lot of controversy in its reliability when the same was done with Badge man. Denis.

Bigfoot! I should of known..... ROTFLMFAO! you Bill's gopher these days, Kathy? Or is he at his maximum, if so why is the forum giving him a break. No David, thats not a cast of Bigfoot, its a cast of YOUR foot.....you know, the one you always put in your own mouth. ROTFLMFAO!

Truly exelent post Bill, the most sincere and meaningful one I've read here for a LONG time. Thanks for your perspective. Denis.

Jack, These photos are not new to me, I've seen them a thousand times before and YES, IMO they do indeed show the same man. I could show you many photos of myself were I look totally differant in each, as I'm sure many here could. Besides, if one followed your take on the photo's, there wouldn't just be 2 LHO's but at least SIX, as ALL the photo's APPEAR differant. Denis.

So, according to Jack White, we have 2 Zapruder film's, 2 Lee Oswald's, 2 Margarita Oswald's and now...2 Bill Miller's. Oh well, could be worse, at least we dont have 2 Jack White's and 2 Healy's. God forbid!!! LOL wasn't for the likes of researchers like Jack White, you and the rest of the "LHO did it all by his lonesome Lone Nut crowd" would have no place to ply your disinfo-mania. So be grateful Pointing, we give you something to do with all that spare-time you have.... better than a real job, eh? p.s. where is your profile btw? You really do shoot yourself in the foot every time dont you Healy? It doesn't take great research skills to check out my personal information page. Had you have bothered, or should that be if you were capable, you would have found enough info about my job and personal life to satisfy even a person as nosy as you. Also, a quick look at my previous post's would clearly show I am no LNuter. What I am is somebody vehemently opposed to the lunatic fringe on this forum, who constantly present ludicrous theories combined with piss poor research, thereby causing nothing but embarrassment to real researchers. And to make sure there is no confusion here, THIS MEANS YOU!!! PS Where is my profile?......mind your own damn business, I dont answer to YOU.

So, according to Jack White, we have 2 Zapruder film's, 2 Lee Oswald's, 2 Margarita Oswald's and now...2 Bill Miller's. Oh well, could be worse, at least we dont have 2 Jack White's and 2 Healy's. God forbid!!! LOL

David, The Royal Family may be descended from Mohammed, but they're really not British. They're Germans. They made up a name: Windsor. The only true British Royal was Princess Diana. On some geneology site regarding her, she was descended from the Stuarts, who were descendants of the Merovingian Kings, who were descended from the union of Jesus Christ and Mary Magdaline. Kathy Your referring to "Holy blood and Holy grail" of course, but do you really take the claims in that book seriously Kathy?

I hear ya, Denis. The puzzling thing about Healy is that he has never pointed out to Jack that he (Jack) is making erroneous claims from poor quality images. After all, David has posted that he has seen no proof of alteration and yet he had seen all Jack's silly claims in the book David participated in. It's too bad that David didn't try to prevent Jack from going forward with his claims and maybe saved us all some embarrassment as CTs. And that's the real shame, they dont just embarrass themselves, but ALL of us too. No wonder so many of the general public think were all a load of nuts. How can anyone take us seriously after reading Jacks posts on this thread, even our own members are laughing at him. That guy should do us all a favour and go back to the Apollo moon hoax board.

I got the help I was looking for. He rented the P.O. Box in October of 1962, and allegedly ordered the rifle in March of 1963; so that is that. Steve Thomas Steve, just how big are these P.O. boxes, do you know? Stupid question maybe, but presumably they are physically large enough to hold a rifle? Denis.

David, I have had autistic people try to say something and make more sense. I'm not sure what your remark had to do with Jack's error and why you addressed it to me. It's the usual alterationist ploy, make ridiculous claims, present shoddy research, then when their mistakes are brought to light they deflect their embarrassment by hurling insults at YOU. Just ignore them Bill, their pathetic. Denis.

If that is Kellerman THEN HE IS KISSING CONNALLY ON THE LIPS, as Connally's head can be seen on the other side of Jackie's pink hat. Jack Yes Jack, but you must admit, Connally was quite an attractive man for his age. LOL

It gets better. In one frame the person you mention standing close to Nix becomes TRANSPARENT, and the trunk of the Queen Mary is seen through the person! Jack And in that same frame, A LITTLE GIRL APPEARS AS IF BY MAGIC! PS...I should not have said "LESS THAN ONE SECOND" because I did not actually time it or count frames. It is the amount of time it took the QM to move about 20 feet. Jack Jack, I'm not totally convinced that there actually is a little girl in the color photo. But IF there is, she may have been standing behind the policeman in the black/white photo, then simply stepped forward. Langley are not very impressed with this Jack.

QUICK, give one of em Dragos place....before he wants to come back!!!!

Wim Dankbar denies that there were TWO MARGUERITES when the photo evidence shows otherwise. Jack We all know the W.C. made many mistakes, some deliberately, some by accident. It seems more logical that's what we have here...a mistake, than the sensationalist claim of two Marguerite's. Denis.

You shouldn't direct this post at everyone Tosh. Most here are good solid researchers. If only the crazes would stop using this board to get publicity for their radio shows and D.V.D.'s etc this could be a really productive place. Denis.

This is part of a post I recently wrote on another thread, I think it equally apt here: I belive Fetzer an Co to be members of what I regard to be the lunatic fringe of this case. I belive their paranoid ravings to be an embarrassment to serious researchers. I belive their sensationalist rantings do nothing but damage to our cause. Bluntly, these NUTTERS are the reason why so many of the general public laugh at us and more importantly refuse to even listen to our arguments or take us seriously. Oh yeah, I also dislike them because I'm secretly a top level operative for the C.I.A. planted here as a disinformation agent. Just thought I'd add the last bit before they did. Denis.

The writing style the Tosh here now and the Tosh who was recently reported killed in a plane crash differ significantly. I am not the only one who has noted this. Jack LOL, This place gets more like the Twilight Zone every day. S'cuse me while I go an cancel my subscription to the SI -FI CHANNEL. Who needs it when I can come here for free. LOL

Jack I have to disagree. My wife works at the Pentagon for the Joint Chif of Staff J-2. I was there shortly after the crash and I saw the tail and the numbers in all the smoke and confussion AND DEATH. I watched as parts of the airliner was removed and firefighters fought the blaze while many were removing bodies. To tell me I did not see an airliner is a disservice to those who were killed. They were NOT killed my our goverment. I think some want to believe we would do something like that are real sick people. I think their motive is to sell stories and write books and add height to their lack of stature. At a time when we should rally together and stand firm as a solid nation, we have some who like to walk with lies and untruths to perhaps drawn attention to themselves and stroke their own egos. I had respect for you as a researcher and as an American... that is now gone. I'm sure you do not give a crap what I think... But I am an American and I am damn proud of it. And in my own way I have fought hard for her and her flag. We are not perfect, but we are getting closer and you Sir are a real POS in my opinion. James; With respect. I will not be drawn into a debat on this. All I know is what I saw and too, what I saw on the "certified, time logged" radar tapes from Air Traffic Control. I talked to three people who escaped with their lives and spend days in a burn ward. I know what they told me. I talked to a Sargent who pulled people from burning Jet fuel and others who were still in shock days after.., and I know what they told me they saw and did after the impact. And I know what I saw. Now if you want to call me a xxxx, then that is O.K. by me. I have been there before. I do not care to become involved in a "special interest conspiercy", regardless of the motives. I do believe in little green men bouncing around in space; laughing their ARSE off at us. Its no wonder they do not want anything to do with earthlings after reading somethings we put in print. You have a good day and leave me out of this. I did apoliges to Jack for the POS comment. Now I go in peace and I wish you the same. Just log me down as "disinformation" agent and be done with it. Well how about it Jack and Jill...oops, sorry I meant Jack and Jim, are you ready to admit your mistaken, that after all is what this thread is about, admitting mistakes, or are you saying Tosh Plumlee is a xxxx? No real room for middle ground here...its gotta be one or the other.

Denis, with respect, you intend none, so why employ the formulation? No, I'm just tired of reading a lot of inaccurate, unsourced nonsense masquerading as received wisdom. But I do wonder at the extent of your personal commitment to Thompson, and the concomitant hostility to Fetzer, Costella et al. Like, what gives? It is a measure of the blindness induced in you by this hostility to the anti-alterationists that you fail to comment on Thompson's proven "errors" regarding how and when the FBI learned of the Muchmore film; his reliance on a Mack newspaper clipping that almost certainly doesn't exist; and his mislocation of the Franzens in Six Seconds. Your "one-eyedness" is shocking. Are you a flat-earther? List them. There aren't. And any reasonably minded person content to settle for "Thompson said Mack says" as proof of anything is a fool or a charlatan. That's a very compelling argument, Denis: The agreed lie must be true. It ain't. Paul Paul, you wonder at the hostility I feel towards Fetzer, Costella et al? O.K. let me explain it. I belive Fetzer an Co to be members of what I regard to be the lunatic fringe of this case. I belive their paranoid ravings to be an embarrassment to serious researchers. I belive their sensationalist rantings do nothing but damage to our cause. Bluntly, these NUTTERS are the reason why so many of the general public laugh at us and more importantly refuse to even listen to our arguments or take us seriously. Oh yeah, I also dislike them because I'm secretly a top level operative for the C.I.A. planted here as a disinformation agent. Is that what you really want to hear Paul? If you want to see the references/citations I mentioned, just use "Google". Oh sorry, I forgot, you belive Google to be a tool of the C.I.A. dont you Paul. LOL I'm secretly a top level operative for the C.I.A. planted here as a disinformation agent. If true, then they have again lied, as they told me that I was the only one here! P.S. I thought that was you that I saw going into our phonebooth entrance. P.P.S. My compliments for the well written response. I tried it once but for some reason could not cease to continuously write "Garbage" and "BS" throughout it's body. That's because your from southern America Tom, we express our selves a lot much more beter in southern England. LOL

Jack I have to disagree. My wife works at the Pentagon for the Joint Chif of Staff J-2. I was there shortly after the crash and I saw the tail and the numbers in all the smoke and confussion AND DEATH. I watched as parts of the airliner was removed and firefighters fought the blaze while many were removing bodies. To tell me I did not see an airliner is a disservice to those who were killed. They were NOT killed my our goverment. I think some want to believe we would do something like that are real sick people. I think their motive is to sell stories and write books and add height to their lack of stature. At a time when we should rally together and stand firm as a solid nation, we have some who like to walk with lies and untruths to perhaps drawn attention to themselves and stroke their own egos. I had respect for you as a researcher and as an American... that is now gone. I'm sure you do not give a crap what I think... But I am an American and I am damn proud of it. And in my own way I have fought hard for her and her flag. We are not perfect, but we are getting closer and you Sir are a real POS in my opinion. Well said Tosh, but I suspect your wasting your breath, Jack will probably start insinuating you are a disinformation agent now. Oops, sorry, too late, I just read the post where he did. LOL. Seriously Tosh, well done sir. Denis.

Denis, with respect, you intend none, so why employ the formulation? No, I'm just tired of reading a lot of inaccurate, unsourced nonsense masquerading as received wisdom. But I do wonder at the extent of your personal commitment to Thompson, and the concomitant hostility to Fetzer, Costella et al. Like, what gives? It is a measure of the blindness induced in you by this hostility to the anti-alterationists that you fail to comment on Thompson's proven "errors" regarding how and when the FBI learned of the Muchmore film; his reliance on a Mack newspaper clipping that almost certainly doesn't exist; and his mislocation of the Franzens in Six Seconds. Your "one-eyedness" is shocking. Are you a flat-earther? List them. There aren't. And any reasonably minded person content to settle for "Thompson said Mack says" as proof of anything is a fool or a charlatan. That's a very compelling argument, Denis: The agreed lie must be true. It ain't. Paul Paul, you wonder at the hostility I feel towards Fetzer, Costella et al? O.K. let me explain it. I belive Fetzer an Co to be members of what I regard to be the lunatic fringe of this case. I belive their paranoid ravings to be an embarrassment to serious researchers. I belive their sensationalist rantings do nothing but damage to our cause. Bluntly, these NUTTERS are the reason why so many of the general public laugh at us and more importantly refuse to even listen to our arguments or take us seriously. Oh yeah, I also dislike them because I'm secretly a top level operative for the C.I.A. planted here as a disinformation agent. Is that what you really want to hear Paul? If you want to see the references/citations I mentioned, just use "Google". Oh sorry, I forgot, you belive Google to be a tool of the C.I.A. dont you Paul. LOL