Wade Frazier

Hi: This post will cover territory that I have written about before, here and there, but this will be more comprehensive and is a segue from my previous post. I have seen about a dozen alternative physics hypotheses over the years, usually comprehensive ones that end up with some kind of unified field theory. It is like watching aspirants chase after Moby-Dick, seeking to be the one to finally plant the deadly harpoon. The unified field theory is the Holy Grail of physics, so it is understandable to see so many go after it. Some have interesting evidence for them, while others are on the speculative end, with little evidence in their favor, and they often make the scientist’s plea: money to fund experiments to test their hypotheses. They are not all going to be right, if any of them are. Every theory is wrong; that is the nature of what we call science. The best scientists try to never get too attached to a theory, as any of them can fall with the next experiment. I am regularly approached about this or that hypothesis promoted by this or that scientist. For me, none of that is very important. What is important, to me, is that today’s corpus of mainstream theory is a rickety house of cards that already has plenty of evidence supporting its unstable nature, but it is suppressed in the name of global control. The mainstream theories are even admitted by their adherents to be shaky. The quantum paradox calls into question the entire foundation of today’s physics, and it has been admitted to be quantum physics’s “skeleton in the closet.” Almost all mainstream scientists who witnessed what my friend saw would have staggered away from the demonstration, with their minds blown. When I see scientists invoke “the laws of physics” to deny free energy’s possibility, they are merely parroting their catechisms, and this is far from a new phenomenon. As Brian O often said, there are no “laws of physics,” only theories. To even say “law” is to invoke religious faith. Every generation of intellectuals had its self-satisfied members who “knew” that they had it all figured out, or nearly so. The “skeptics” are notorious for making those religious pronouncements. The fact is that there are many technologies extant today, and publicly available, which mainstream physics cannot explain, such as how Naessens’s and Rife’s microscopes attain their “impossible” resolutions, or how Brown’s Gas causes transmutation. A graduate student performed recent work on Brown’s Gas and proposed a new orbital configuration to explain it, the kind of hypothesis that they hand out Nobel prizes for, but the kid ran into science’s political establishment, so his work languishes on the margins, as usual. Invoking the “laws of physics” to buttress denial is not only naïve, but also ignorant. Many of the greatest breakthroughs in technology had no theoretic basis for them when invented, and two of the most famous were Edison’s incandescent lighting and the Wright brothers’ powered flight. Edison was the world’s most famous scientist when his teams perfected electric lighting and lit up Menlo Park with it, while scientists who could not leave their easy chairs to go see for themselves ridiculed Edison, called him a criminal for making such claims, and said that electric lighting was an “idiotic” idea. Not only were theorists decrying man-powered flight to be “impossible” before the Wright brothers flew, but the scientific establishment ignored their flights for five years, while the house organ of science ridiculed persistent reports of their flights. That kind of insanity is alive and well today in the halls of science, and soon before he died, Brian O told me that the situation is worse today in science than it was when the Wright brothers flew. On a more mundane level, when Dennis got involved with the heat pump that changed his life, the inventors were cutting their performance data in half so they would not stop being laughed out of engineering offices, who ridiculed such “impossible” performance. That kind of stupidity usually prevails when dealing with technological breakthroughs. One of Dennis’s assailants even testified to the “impossibility” of his heat pump’s performance, and then Dennis produced test data that the very witness produced. Not even doing the “impossible” work himself prevented him from continuing to parrot his textbooks. Just like with the ideas of democracy, a free press, an objective history, free markets, and the like, while the ideal can be noble, reality often falls far short, and it is that way, in spades, with today’s science. A big problem that free energy efforts have is the assumption that today’s science is somehow democratic, free, and endlessly inquisitive. Nothing could be further from the truth. It is a very close cousin to Uncle Noam’s critiques of establishment political ideology, the “free press,” and the like. Within a very narrow band, bounded by rigid framing assumptions, the establishment encourages vigorous debate, such as how the so-called political left and right debated the looming invasion of Iraq. It was taken as a given that we had a right to intervene. The only debate was about how to do it. Science is very similar. Scientists are relatively free when they deal with “safe” topics, but once their work begins treading on powerful toes, such as challenging the “attack the tumor” paradigm of cancer treatment, or inventing, for God’s sake, a working free energy prototype, with some theory to explain it, then there is hell to pay. It has amazed me how naïve the so-called radical left is to that reality, for all of their worldliness on other issues. The entire free energy milieu is dismissed, and the more honest of them admit their objection to the idea of some global effort of conspiring elites. They find the very idea of such people and their efforts too frightening and depressing to even contemplate. I eventually realized that the idea of free energy and its organized suppression ran counter to their religion – materialism – which is the Fourth Epoch’s religion. Best, Wade

Hi: This will be a post on what my experience has been with my readers over the years. For those happily slumbering in the cradles of their conditioning, my work is like a bucket of ice water poured over one’s head. I have watched peers – white, educated, American men – go berserk after reading only a few pages of my work, such as this section of it. They quickly lost all semblance of rationality as they launched into their tirades. My work takes on the innumerable lies and deceits of my great nation’s indoctrination and conditioning. Most of it is very easy to see through, such as the idolatry of worshipping a flag. The lies begin in our cradles. The “news” is a pack of lies, and history is written by the winners. Industrial waste is added to our water supply as compulsory “medicine,” which “coincidentally” damages our brains and prematurely ages us. We have disease “treatments” that kill the patients but are extremely lucrative, and the masses line up for it. Our governments are hopelessly corrupt, and virtually every official investigation into the corruption, including the murder of the sitting president, is a sham. This is what a world of zero-integrity looks like, and it can get worse, far worse. I regularly get new readers to my work who immediately want to use it to “wake up” their social circles. That is a good way to get ostracized. I regularly get “progressives” who might like what I write about the news and history, but when I get into the conspiratorial aspects of the situation, and they are many and important, they go scurrying away, calling my work a “conspiracy theory,” when I am reporting facts, not theories. I have had so-called free energy activists dismiss me as a “conspiracy theorist,” in the height of naïveté and irrationality. I know that there are technologies on Earth today that turn the physics textbooks into doorstops. But try to engage a scientist on that reality and watch what happens. The Brookings Institute warned NASA about making just those kinds of revelations to scientists, as their heads could explode. What often happens is that new readers will be enthusiastic about my work until it comes to where they get their ox gored, and it is often over trivial matters, and usually on issues where they have some cherished belief that is obviously false. One recent example that I have seen repeatedly is on human-induced climate change. You can see a tirade or two on my Avalon thread and elsewhere, as scientifically illiterate people challenge me, but have no idea what they are writing about. One pal was kicked out of Avalon for stating that Global Warming was a reality. The science around the issue is very simple. Humanity is mining and burning Earth’s hydrocarbons at a mind-boggling rate – so fast that all of the easy hydrocarbon deposits will be burned up by the end of this century, especially conventional oil, which is humanity’s most lucrative energy source (leaving out those that are suppressed). Those deposits were amassed over hundreds of millions of years (1, 2), and will all be mined and burned in hundreds of years. Over Earth’s history, there have been hot periods and cold periods, and the atmosphere’s carbon dioxide content has been the primary driver. The carbon cycle’s additions have always come from volcanism, and the subtractions from deposition and burial. It has been that way for billions of years, except for right now, as humanity’s activities are venting a hundred times more carbon to the atmosphere than volcanoes are. Carbon dioxide traps infrared radiation, and that will warm the atmosphere. That is incontrovertible, denied by no scientist that I know of, even the Global Warming deniers. The Global Warming deniers are mostly scientists who sold their souls to the hydrocarbon lobby. Brian O knew one of the most prominent deniers, who tried to get Brian to sell his soul, too. But the scientifically illiterate, who don’t even know the basics, have taken me to task for admitting the obvious. Why? Because Global Warming Denial is somehow attractive to them, probably because they don’t trust scientists and believe that the issue has been politicized, which it most certainly has (and they likely don’t have the will or mental horsepower to become scientifically literate). However, the Global Warming Denial arguments are intentionally distracting from the important issues, like a man playing the shell game with his “customers.” A little scientific literacy can go a long way. So, the scientifically illiterate get hoodwinked by oil company mouthpieces, and anybody disputing that transparent propaganda has a screw loose. And those people believe that they are free thinkers! That is just one example of many where people encounter something about my work that challenges one of their sacred beliefs, and they then go running away, usually heaving insults and the like as they flee. And that is OK. My work is not for them, but for the awake and awakening. I don’t mind criticisms, if the critics have some idea of what they are writing about and not parroting somebody else’s propaganda. I am sure that some of my work is wrong, but I don’t know what it might be. My big essay update will correct for some small errors and introduce new scientific findings, and that is standard textbook updating. I have written what I think is most important about my work, and what my confidence levels are. My best students don’t “buy” everything that I write about, and that is good. I don’t want anybody to blindly accept what I write about. Knowledge comes from experience. They need to do their homework, get out in the world and find out for themselves, and only accept things into their reality window that they have tested to the extent they are able. I have not had an NDE or OOB, but I have seen and participated in enough “paranormal” events that I don’t doubt the reality of the experiences of those who report NDEs and OOBs, even though they may be subject to interpretation. Similarly, the kinds of experiences that I have had you can’t buy. Even I sometimes have a hard time believing that they happened, and I lived them. I would not recommend finding out the reality of free energy and its organized suppression how I and my little circle did. Like an NDE, it is not easy to survive the experience. One reason why I state that the people I seek have to already be awake is that if they are, they have had experiences that showed them the lies of their conditioning. They will have had experiences enough like mine that my reporting it is not going to make their heads explode as they take it in. Not many can do that. I am going to give an example of Darren. When he first encountered my work, and I wrote about those “austere environmentalists,” he got indignant, as he was one of them, but didn’t think of himself that way. After chewing on it for a year, he realized that I was right. Like virtually all free energy newcomers, he thought that his social circle was hip, and to an extent they were, with some knowing who Dennis was and were even involved with him. But after a sobering period of trying to interest somebody in my work, he had to ruefully admit how alone he was regarding my work. That is normal. It can be very good work to do that, as it helps “seat” my information, and people like Darren eventually approach me, ready to learn. He is far from alone, at least on a global scale. I have thousands of regular readers scattered across Earth. Darren told me that when I wrote of the prosecution making faces and laughing at me as I testified, it rang the bell of authenticity with him. He was not surprised that that would happen. That is the kind of mentality that I seek. They don’t have to immediately believe me, but be worldly enough to be able to handle the revelations of my journey, and those of my close circle. I am not at liberty to reveal all the names, but to the degree that I can, I have, and if people do just a little homework, the identities of nearly everybody is revealed. They have to dig into subjects on their own and sharpen their tools of discernment. After taking those deep dives, they can then come back to my work on those subjects and see how it holds up. Until they do that, either before or after encountering my work, they are not going to have a solid foundation of their awareness. I don’t need parrots, but colleagues. I have more to write, but time to begin my busy day. Best, Wade

Hi: This post will be on another theme of mine that I have written on before. While I may seem to ask a lot of my readers, for the task I am attempting, it really is trivial. The biggest event in the human journey, that saves Earth’s ecosystems as a side-effect, and people today get a chance to be involved with it. At no other time in the human journey has this opportunity existed. Big stuff, to put it mildly, and nobody needs to play the hero, and they don’t need any money. All they need to do is devote some of the time that they put into watching TV and surfing the Internet, and be willing to lay aside their conditioning and indoctrination. But very few on Earth are willing to do that. They need to develop some scientific literacy, but no more than is needed to digest my big essay, which is really not such a heavy lift. They also need to be a real person, not hiding in the shadows. Truly, for the task at hand, I am asking for almost nothing at all. I never expected this to begin quickly. Nothing like this ever has. Hardly anybody can even conceive of what I am doing, and that is normal, for something as radical as what I am attempting. Best, Wade

Hi: I was talking with my dentist yesterday about the fluoride and free radical relationship to programmed cell death, and he knew John Yiamouyiannis. Yiamouyiannis is going to receive posthumous vindication, if it is not stolen. My dentist said that the scientific issue is settled, and that fluoridation is now a purely political issue. It will not take much for me to update my fluoride essay with this new information, so I’ll do it soon. Best, Wade

Hi: Reactions to my biography draft from my pals have been nice to see. I couldn’t have done my work without my pals. Nobody can do this alone. My big essay is the fruit of the effort of truly countless scientists, scholars, and others, going back thousands of years. I would like to bring up a theme that is in my big essay plenty, but needs reiteration: the Fifth Epoch is only going to be possible with abundant and clean energy. Without that, the Fifth Epoch won’t happen. It can’t happen. I cannot overemphasize that, and it usually takes some scientific literacy to understand. Aspects of today’s humanity that will vanish in the Fifth Epoch include: Nations Races Cities as we know them Money and other exchange tools and ideas Different languages – everybody can understand everybody else in the Fifth Epoch Poverty Warfare The arrival of the Fifth Epoch means the end of the world as we know it, and it won’t be missed. Again, the above list is not New Agey wishful thinking, but those are easily predictable outcomes of abundance and the end of humanity’s geographic isolation, and with a little scientific literacy, they are not hard to understand at all. And I know that the technology to usher in the Fifth Epoch is already on the planet and likely is older than I am. Technology is not the issue: integrity and sentience, is. So, arguing that some race or nation is hopelessly screwed up today is merely an assessment of what we see in this Epoch, like arguing in Third Epoch civilizations that a woman’s place was to be barefoot and pregnant, or that some people were natural slaves. In the Fifth Epoch, those Fourth Epoch assessments become meaningless. Human nature will also change. Perhaps not dramatically at first, but it doesn’t need to. But take away fear and survival concerns, and new horizons of the human potential are going to come into view, and human nature will even change. This world begins becoming feasible. If the drumbeat of scarcity and fear prevails, if humanity survives long enough, this kind of world becomes increasingly possible. Which do you prefer? The masses are not going to begin to wake up until the Fifth Epoch arrives, and that is normal. Judging the situation is counterproductive. It is just what it is. It won’t take many of us to usher in the Fifth Epoch, but it takes hard work to raise our awareness past the mind-and-heart-traps of this Epoch. To jettison scarcity and fear, and embrace abundance and love, in today’s world, is a very heavy lift. Not many can even begin to do it, but I believe that enough can, and I have devoted all of my “spare” time over the past quarter-century and more to that idea, and I might have another 30 good years in me. If not my effort, then another, but my approach will work, if enough people with the right stuff come together, keep their eyes on the ball, and combine their efforts. Best, Wade

Hi: In my previous post, I mentioned John Yiamouyiannis’s increasing posthumous vindication, but don’t expect to see it come from the quackbuster operation, run by a real quack who took on Yiamouyiannis regularly and gave him a “eulogy.” Yiamouyiannis fired back. Similar to organized skepticism, I consider such “quack-busting” efforts to be criminal enterprises, working on behalf of their patrons. The Columbus Day traffic to my site was odd. It was up, but there was actually relatively little traffic to my Columbus essay. The Columbus debate is heating up these days, and I read an Ayn-Rand-ish economic essay on what Columbus wrought. It glosses over the greatest genocide in the human journey to focus on what the author found more important: the economic aftermath of Columbus’s effort. I have not weighed in on the issue for a long time, letting my essay speak for itself, but this year, I will a little. Unlike that author who minimized the genocide of the Western Hemisphere’s natives, I consider Europe’s conquest of humanity to be history’s greatest crime. Of course, when you wipe out all of the people on a landmass and “settle” it for yourself, it will be a great economic windfall. Hitler was merely following our example. The dregs of European society eagerly “settled” such exploitable lands, from New England to Australia, as the natives were removed from it. My own ancestors happily “settled” lands that had recently been shorn of their native population while marveling at what “providence” gave them. My grandfather’s conscience eventually awoke on the issue. Just yesterday, I was reading of the humane feats of my great nation, as it tortured people to death. In a way, it is fitting that the “settlers” of this “virgin” continent reached such lofty heights, while being fed industrial waste each day as “medicine.” In the Fifth Epoch, such evil insanity will go the way of the dinosaurs. Best, Wade

Hi: I finished the heavy lifting on my biography project, but am working long hours at the office. The big essay update is next on my plate, but I may wait until 2018 to start on it, as I take a little “leisure” time for the rest of the year. That update will be quite a chore. I literally have a three-foot tall stack of books and magazines next to my desk, which I will use for that update. That stack reflects that past couple of years of big-essay-related reading, plus plenty of links to scientific papers, etc. While nothing will dramatically change about my big essay, quite a few of the revisions will be important, and will largely go deeper into numerous areas, making my epochal framework even clearer. This less-than-daily posting is working for me just fine. I likely won’t slow down that much, but discussing my big essay is the kind of posting that I look forward to. That is how the choir is going to form. Today is Columbus Day in the USA, and while the controversy is now big news, this year, I have not seen the usual spike in traffic to my Columbus essay. My big essay is far and away the “winner” on my site anymore, and I can’t complain, but the past two years have been relatively modest on the Columbus Day traffic spike to my Columbus essay. I am going to update my fluoride essay when I update my big essay. I find it very interesting that one of the early anti-fluoride books was Fluoride and the Aging Factor. My fluoride essay update will be about how the fluoride ion has a “free radical” effect on cellular structures, how recent research (1, 2, 3) shows that the fluoride ion “gums up the works” of subcellular machinery and brings on programmed cell death. In Nick Lane’s latest, he formulates his hypothesis for why birds live ten times as long as mammals do, pound-for-pound, and his example is a pigeon and a rat. Lane’s hypothesis is that free radical production triggers programmed cell death, and that is what ages rats ten times as fast as pigeons, although they weigh the same. That same dynamic is why fluoride artificially ages us. It looks like John Yiamouyiannis was right, and was way ahead of his time. My fluoride and Columbus essays are two of the oldest on my site, along with my Julian Simon essay. They were all first published in 1998, as I recall. In the Fifth Epoch, these kinds of “conflict of interest disasters,” such as fluoridation, as greed trumps all, will no longer happen. But the masses are not going to begin to awaken until the Fifth Epoch arrives, not before. They are not going to awaken to work like mine or anybody’s talk. They will only awaken through experience. But for my task, I seek the awakened and awakening, not the sleeping. The Level 10 approach is not going to work. Been there, done that. Best, Wade

Hi Krishna: I am about four chapters into Suzana’s book. It is a good read. I already cited some of her findings in my big essay, but will update it a little for her book. I’ll buy fruit and larger brains, both that fruit is energy dense, and it takes more brainpower to live off of fruit. What I read about foraging parties was 2-9 for chimps and a stable 15-20 for bonobos. Your 1 and 5 may be for what it is on certain trees. Chimps will generally only murder lone foraging males in their raids. Bonobo foraging parties made that impossible. I saw your earlier bonobo references, and will do a little more homework. But the gist is the same. When females joined the large parties south of the Congo, after gorillas left the area, that set the stage for those isolated chimps to become bonobos. As far you your perspective goes, it looks like you made it to here, or close, which on one hand is extraordinary, and on the other, your journey into the material shows me that my work is understandable if somebody devotes effort to the task. It is an honor for you to have done what you have, and important. I appreciate it. As far as the mystical side goes, I have always said that I am not sure that it is a requirement. I get people who think that I am trying for some kind of hundredth monkey effect (which is a New Age fraud in of itself), and while I am not against Sheldrake’s formative causation idea, I am shooting for something far more mundane. I have experienced the power of what a few people of high integrity are capable of if they combine their efforts. The whole point of my site, and my big essay in particular, is to get the people I seek on the same page. If I can build that choir, making free energy happen is going to be easy. That your words fall on deaf ears is normal. Your pals are not going to begin to understand until free energy is delivered into their lives, and that is normal. They are trapped in their Epoch, as virtually all people in the history of humanity have been. To look out beyond one’s Epoch, and actually understand what made each Epoch happen, is highly unusual. That is partly because knowledge of the other Epochs, the rise of science, and the like are very recent features of the human journey. I am not kidding: many of the key understandings reflected in my big essay are only a generation or so old, if that, in scientific/scholarly circles, and nobody yet has put it all together like I have, as I have the advantage of my preposterous journey, which even I have a hard time believing happened at times. It is definitely a race between education and catastrophe. Best, Wade

Thanks Krishna! Very interesting paper. It aligns more with this part of my big essay. That paper was more suggestive than conclusive, and I am sure that the social hypothesis is not done yet. I’ll follow this issue with great interest. Thanks again for the heads up. Yes, my essay will mention that paper when I get that revision done. I can already tell that it is not going to happen until next year. My stack of books and magazines next to my desk for that revision is three feet tall. Your sugar observation is an apt one, and it harkens back to a recent post of mine that mentions how our biological proclivities get abused in our world. In that heavenly Roads world, I am sure that there is no refined sugar. No drugs, and sex is practiced very differently than it is here. I actually bought her book. It is in my stack to read, and I just looked at that graph. Yes, that will go into my book update too. For me, what is most important about these debates, as far as my work goes, is that they are all energy debates. Interesting on the hip development. Sediba is certainly the latest early human evolution rock star. So, what is all of this study teaching you? My goal for my pupils is developing a comprehensive perspective, and energy is going to be front and center, to the degree that the Epochal impact of free energy is going to be obvious. Then, it is going to be a lot easier for them to keep their eyes on the ball. It would be interesting to hear how your journey into this stuff has gone. You definitely do your homework. I would like to think that you have developed an abiding interest in these subjects that will continue, free energy or not, Uncle Wade or not. For me, this stuff is brain food. Best, Wade

Hi: A number of recent events spurred this post, on what is it like to do what I do. First of all, my personal life is a joyous one, but has had its fair share of tragedy and sorrow over the long years. I take many people in “my” mountains, all the time, and while all are appreciative, for some, it is life-changing. I have had to let family members and friends go over the years, as they were parasites/attackers, and almost all of them received great assistance from me, even life-saving, but those you help are often those who attack you, as bizarre as that might seem. I just take it when they do that, but then I am done with them, and in my advancing years, I am very particular about whom I let into my life and who gets my time. Some are entitled to it, such as my wife, employer, cat, and some relatives, and my best students are always highly respectful of my time, which is why they are my students. But also, nobody who has played at my level of the free energy game puts himself out there like I do, interacting with the public like I do, and even I need a cloistered environment, as all-comers venues are full of trolls, some of whom are professionals. Bill and team keep them at bay at Avalon. Even at forums where I have been invited in, it has never ended well, which is partly why I began my own forum, in which nobody gets in unless I invite them. Looking for needles... I fully understand why my relatively few peers will not subject themselves to public interaction, but I need the patience-training. I am approached all the time, and usually it is privately, but you can also see people regularly coming and leaving my Avalon thread, at more than 7,000 posts to date. This year is probably a typical one, as far as my interactions go, and in the past year, I have been approached on: Mass movement efforts, including intentional communities; Inventor approaches; Plenty of New Age/conspiracist “advice”; Trying to enlist me in this or that “Band-Aid” approach (hacking at branches); All manner of distraction on the Internet, which they think will help enlighten me; Trying to turn me on to various political or mystical flavors. In short, none of those are things that I have time or interest in. Once in a great while, I will see something new, interesting, and potentially useful, but that is very rare. I am interested in students who will do the work so that they can competently discuss the subject matter in my big essay, develop a comprehensive perspective, and sing the song of abundance with me, which is going to attract the people I seek. I am not interested in much else. I also heard from people like me this year, too, who played at various levels of the game, and we always have great mutual respect. We know what we have been through. The advent of free energy will be the biggest event in the human journey, by far, and I am the only person on Earth trying what I am, and it is worth one man’s life to try an approach that might make a dent and avoid the many tried-and-true paths of disaster. My plate is overflowing, all the time, and I need to stay focused on my mission, while juggling my life. I sometimes sit back and wonder how I do it, and I am not getting any younger. Back to work. Best, Wade

Hi Foxie and Limor: I woke up the hard way thirty years ago, more than a decade after my mystical awakening, and if you had tried to tell me what was in store for me, I wouldn’t have believed it. This, I know: the learning never ends. However, that moment of awakening, when you realize that you have been drinking somebody else’s Kool-Aid, is the most important step of the journey. So, if you have had your awakening moment, the hard part is over. Almost nobody ever wakes up. That is just the nature of being here. There are also false awakenings, when somebody thinks they woke up, but they just trade one set of beliefs for another. That is not what waking up means. Changing the flavor of the Kool-Aid is not the answer. Waking up is a matter of integrity and sentience, and few ever achieve it, in our world of scarcity and fear. They sell out their sentience for the promise of security. When fear is not the constant drumbeat of our societies, a lot will change, and so much that this world will end, and it won’t be missed. Best, Wade

Hi: Today I was home sick, for the first day in years. I always know when I will (salty or sugary foods, season changes), and I always get sick the same way (sore throat, sinus infection, flu symptoms). I should be coming out of the woods tomorrow. So, my down day (still did some office work from home, in these high-tech days) coincided with the aftermath of yesterday’s shooting in Las Vegas. I have vacationed on the Strip about ten times, mostly with family, and have been to Mandalay Bay, so this one hits closer to home than usual. Of course, Trump called it “pure evil,” the Democrats renewed their calls for gun control, and the Republicans called for silent prayer, as they will rarely vote to limit weaponry in my great nation. How many have to be slaughtered before they change their stance? On the fringes, YouTube gets flooded with “false flag” clips for every mass shooting in the USA, within hours of the events, led by the dean of conspiracists, Alex Jones, and today was no exception. Evidence? Ha! They have their ideology, which gives them all that they need. ISIL took credit for the slaughter, and the apparent shooter’s brother had no warning at all that his brother, a multimillionaire high-rolling visitor to Vegas, was capable of such an act. Is the USA capable of the introspection necessary to begin to come to grips with our endemic and escalating violence? I am not counting on it. We are a nation of gun nuts. Today, I was reading some of Uncle Ed’s work on the USA’s awesome imperial hypocrisy, which is so great that Ed had to come up with a new word to describe it: chutzpah. I am not sure what is more mind-boggling; the hypocrisy of our political system, or how the blatant lies are swallowed as truth by most. Ed and Noam’s propaganda model explicitly did not deal with the media’s effectiveness in brainwashing the population – it only described how it worked – but Ed has remarked about how easy it is to bamboozle the American public to support any war. How hard can it be to see the connection between our imperial violence and the escalating violence at home? Most video games are first-person shooters, and violence is nearly an obligatory feature of most movies. I find it a little ironic that the NFL is where the current protests against police brutality began, when the sport is the modern equivalent of the gladiatorial “games.” Maybe the nature of their sport helped them make a stand, although I don’t think that I ever heard one of them say a word about our imperial behavior – our predatory military is universally revered in those circles. In 1970 in The New Republic, Orville Schell wrote about the USA’s activities in Vietnam: “One Newsweek correspondent told me on returning from Quang Ngai that he was shocked by what was going on in the countryside. Having had experience in Europe during World War II, he said that what he had seen was ‘much worse than what the Nazis had done to Europe.’” One scholar remarked that the primary cause of the Jewish Holocaust was likely World War I, as a generation of men in a formerly peaceful (relative, of course, for Europe) nation became professional killers, and German society became far more violent in the wake of World War I. There has never been any accountability for the USA for its evil crimes in Indochina that killed millions, no Nuremburg equivalent for our crimes there, much less anyplace else where we invaded, such as Iraq and Afghanistan. Again, I am not counting on it. Germany and Japan only came to grips with their imperial behavior when forced into it by defeat. The British and Americans have never had that moment of truth, and likely won’t. But if the means of abundance were delivered to humanity, Americans just might grow a conscience, like the rise of machines meant the end of slavery, because people could afford more of a conscience. I don’t expect Americans to wake up before then. A few will, but it will only be a relative few. Best, Wade

Thanks Foxie, yes indeed, most Americans have no idea that the USA is an empire, even though Karl Rove openly admitted it, because Americans are history’s most brainwashed people. We live in the land of Hollywood and Madison Avenue, where form prevails over substance, and where reality can be turned upside-down. Orwell knew what he was writing about. Americans as a group have not been my target audience since about 2004. As Darren noted, most Americans would “go into convulsions” if they read my site. They aren’t going to awaken via work like mine. Only experience can do that, which also applies to the free energy issue. They can keep sleeping. When the next Epoch is delivered into their lives, then they will begin to awaken, and probably not before that. Best, Wade

Hi: This will be on current events… I awoke to the news of the latest mass shooting in the USA. I really can’t keep track of them all. This one apparently broke the “record” of a shooting last year. My life has been touched more than once by mass shootings in the USA. I am nearing the end of my biography project, or, at least its first draft, and when people see who it was, and my readers will not be surprised, the following statement may make more sense. Since the heinous way that the USA comported itself in defeating Germany and Japan in 1945, capped off with nuclear weapons, the USA has been the greatest purveyor of international violence, by far, of any nation on Earth. My great nation has slaughtered millions, in the name of freedom, of all things. Today, black NFL players are protesting police brutality and how this nation is failing to live up to its rhetoric. What nobody seems to be discussing is that the national anthem ceremonies are acts of religion in the first place, and we supposedly have freedom of religion. When I read comments on Internet boards on the NFL protests, I see what I always see when such events happen, comments that state that the protestors are disrespecting those brave soldiers who fight for our freedom. What a Big Lie. Any American soldiers serving in America’s imperial archipelago of foreign bases and who participate in foreign invasions, who think that their efforts have anything to do with protecting American freedoms, are deeply deluded. Sometimes, returning soldiers will begin to wake up to the evil that they participated in, but they are few and far between. The last time that any American soldiers fought for the USA’s freedom was the War of 1812, when we were just a sideshow for the British, who were busy fighting the Napoleonic Wars, as they drubbed the USA and burned Washington D.C. All American wars since then have been imperial ones, as we expanded our territory and influence, which is now global in nature, although the Empire is in swift decline these days. Our endless imperial crimes, while we fervently worship the symbols of our national religion, have everything to do with the increasing waves of violence in the USA. The USA exports more weapons than any other nation on Earth, and our military budget is far and away the highest on Earth, at nearly ten times Russia’s, which is the demon of the moment in American ideology. There is no way that our prodigious international violence can fail to come back to haunt us (called “blowback,” “chickens coming home to roost,” and the like), and until the USA begins to face up to the reality of the evil that we endlessly inflict on the world’s peoples, this domestic violence will continue to escalate. It obviously does not need to be this way. Back to work. The next six weeks will be very busy one in my daily life, so I may get relatively quiet on the posting front. We’ll see. Best, Wade

Hi: To briefly revisit those understandings needed for the choir, a key understanding is the power of integrity, sentience, and combined positive intention. The people I seek are going to understand that the choir can make a dent. Nothing like it is has ever been seen or heard on Earth before, and who is to say what its harmonic effects might be? Doing the work to learn the song and sing it is most certainly “doing something.” And it can easily lead to manifesting the Fifth Epoch. On Third Epoch peoples helping out, they have big issues, and this may not be initially easy to understand. In 1500 England, only about 5% of the population was literate, much less scientifically literate (scientific literacy did not really exist at the time). Women were subservient, everybody spent all of their time making sure that they could eat, strangers were legally enslaved, the odds of surviving to adulthood were about 50%, and if you walked down a street in London without a weapon at your side, you were asking to be robbed or murdered. There was a period of Neolithic bliss in horticultural societies, when women had high status and broke up the male gangs, but it did not last long. Agrarian societies today, for all the influence of industrial societies, are relatively primitive, with agrarian religions dominating, women have low status, and scientific literacy among them is almost non-existent. Leaving school early to begin one’s “career” on the farm is typical in agrarian societies. While my inner circle was raised on farms, they all escaped them, too, lived in history’s richest and most powerful nation, and took advantage of the postwar boom, which was the most prosperous period in the human journey. Agrarian societies might produce some choir members, but it is going to be a long haul for such people, leaving behind their natal Epoch, living in the next one, imagining the one after that and helping it manifest. My grandfather lived in a sod hut, his son helped put men on the Moon, and his son chased the Fifth Epoch. In many ways, we live in truly extraordinary times. So, can people raised in agrarian societies learn the song of abundance and sing it? Maybe, but theirs might be the longest journeys of all, to get there. This is my last planned post on this subject for now. Back to my biography project. Best, Wade

Hi: Some of Ilie’s comments show how other groups besides materialists have their challenges. People raised or living in the Third Epoch, in agrarian societies, also have strikes against them, but as with materialists, does their conditioning automatically disqualify them from choir consideration? One thing that I hope that my big essay gets across, and it will more so with my essay update, is that while energy forms each Epoch’s foundation, what is built on that foundation looked a lot different each time, while retaining some similarities. We all need to eat. We are social animals. We have been behaviorally modern since before our ancestors conquered Earth. Ilie mentioned being pressed for time. In agrarian societies, everybody is pressed for time, trying to get enough to eat. From the earliest civilizations, they were always collapsing as they ran out of energy, which meant wood and food for agrarian civilizations. Hungry, time-pressed people, living on the edge, are not going to be very helpful in imagining the coming Epoch as a way to help it manifest. Desperate people are going to be more harm than good. Similar to how materialism is a straightjacket that prevents true sentience from manifesting, so are the ideologies of the Third Epoch. In ways, it is amazing how far Dennis got dragging his religious and nationalist baggage with him, and he still tries the businessman’s route. But there can also be a charming, naïve honesty that can come from people raised on farms, which my inner circle largely did. There is something to that. But the stories of organized religion read like bedtime stories, as if their adherents took Grimm’s Fairy Tales literally or still believed in Santa Claus. It is understandable that materialists entirely reject the agrarian religions, but they also miss the boat. It is like they rejected a hypothesis that can’t be falsified, but then erected a similar hypothesis, kind of like a mirror image of what they rejected. Instead of being met by Saint Peter and given a harp to strum, their story is that there is no story, and only oblivion awaits our consciousness when our bodies die. A mountain of evidence suggests otherwise, and I am uniformly unimpressed by the debunkers, which comes from adherents to both Third and Fourth Epoch religions. And like I state about awakenings, people can only awaken through experience, not beliefs that they were fed. If anybody, no matter what their backgrounds are, can achieve these understandings, I think that they can be choir material. Is it harder for Third or Fourth Epoch people to achieve them? Both have their challenges. Materialists are often the most entrenched against to the idea of free energy. Yet the credulousness of those adhering to the primary population management ideologies is a big problem going the other way. I don’t need people who believe, but people who know, people who can think. And you can’t get there by sitting in your easy chair. Best, Wade

Hi: I would like to make a post on something that rears its head occasionally, spurred by my previous post. I truly wish nobody any harm, not even Godzilla and friends. What I sometimes hear is people savoring the day when the “bad guys” who have suppressed free energy and related technologies get their “just desserts.” I don’t want to see them suffer. When it clearly becomes “game over” for their evil plans, I would happily just have them slink away, and some might even be redeemed. I would never approach Bill the BPA Hit Man, Mr. Deputy, or Ken Hodgell. Unrepentant dark pathers are highly dangerous for anybody to approach, particularly if they are going to be taken to task about their crimes. If their consciences finally awoke and I heard from them, all that they could do, as far as I would be concerned, would be to publicly discuss their crimes and seek to repair their damage, even though they were merely soldiers following orders, in a way (although they had to demonstrate their capacity for evil to even be on the team). I would not trust anything less from them. They don’t owe me anything. Their debt is to Earth and humanity, and ultimately, themselves. Focusing on the GCs and friends, and particularly wishing them ill, falls far short of the mentality needed to help along my effort. No need to settle any scores or hope for retribution. Leave that to wiser minds than ours to sort out. Best, Wade

Hi: To Ilie’s comment on whether Godzilla is a materialist or not, he definitely is not. He possesses the technologies that render today’s physics meaningless, he is all over the ET issue, and knows that there is far more to existence than the physical plane. As Ilie noted, Godzilla is quite mystically inclined, but firmly on the dark path. Oh, the stories I have heard over the years. All are plausible and many are likely true. The scientific might describe Godzilla’s actions as psychopathy on a global scale. But his orientation is not materialist. He has an idea about the other planes of existence, but without love in his awareness, or as Ra says, only love of self, he really cannot comprehend dimensions where love is the basis for them, and far more obviously than it is in physical reality. I don’t want to dip too far into Godzilla’s darkness, but he knows something about karma, but thinks that he can beat the system. He thinks that he can trick others into bearing his karma. It is the height of delusion, but self-servers are the most deluded of all, even though they can seem quite clever. Take the psychotronic equipment that was used to give Greer’s team those advanced cancer cases; the equipment operators get the diseases, too, but they aren’t told that. They are among the disposable assets that Godzilla uses. Godzilla may think that he can orchestrate the mayhem and not pay the price of his machinations, but that is the most foolish of all positions that one can have, particularly for those who think that they understand what lies beyond the physical plane. And as I can’t stress too much, no lofty entity on the other side of the veil sits in judgment and punishes anybody on the other side, but beings go to where they are attracted. Those who play evil games on Earth get every chance to keep playing them when they pass over, but they only get to interact with beings who share their delight, and the stray being who tries to help them wake up and leave their “heaven.” Those who play at the highest levels of evil on Earth will “graduate” to a “heaven” that makes Max’s hell seem like a playground. As Road’s mentor said, those gray beings in that hellish world may think that they are the “winners” of that reality, but actually, they are the biggest losers. All that we take with us is our awareness, and the patterns of thought and action that we develop while we are here is what we take with us. Wherever we go, there we are, and those patterns of our thoughts and actions are by far the easiest to change while we are here, and harder to change on the other side (such as addictive behaviors). But if you seek love, on the other side you will find it at levels that are not comprehensible in this cruel little dimension called physical reality. The greatest challenge that we have here is choosing love, when fear is such a normal state, as we live in a reality of scarcity and survival. There is nothing easy about being here, and for my part, Godzilla has my forgiveness. I don’t wish him ill. I don’t seek to interact with him, either. He can go his own way, and if my little choir idea reaches its potential, Godzilla is just going to slink away, looking for easier meat, and he can go with my blessings. The dark path is not forever, and some of his clique might even be redeemed in the Fifth Epoch. That would be my ideal outcome. Best, Wade

Hi Ilie: Yes indeed, we might see the complete end of materialism quickly, but I doubt that free energy alone will do it, as it will only operate under a new physics, or at least seem to. Today, we have the quantum paradox, and while it can lead people to mystical ideas, it does not put much of a dent in today’s materialist ideas. The ET issue is entwined with the FE issue, and I doubt that one will come without the other. I have this feeling that when ETs come into general awareness (or interdimensionals, and as Greer says, it is not either/or, but both/and), that they will definitely not be materialists, and materialism will quickly be seen as an obsolete ideology, as will all organized religions. But we have the Flat Earth society, (with their numbers growing daily! ), so I imagine that there will still be some stubborn materialist holdouts. It is a passing phase in a soul’s journey through the physical plane. I think that we all go through it, somewhere in our journeys, and likely in the Young Soul stage, when we are the most outward-focused. I know materialism’s seductions. It is kind of funny, but with the rise of the idea of antimatter, among the astute, “materialism” is an obsolete term, and has been replaced with “physicalism.” Call me old-fashioned, but I still go with “materialism.” That idea that the ZPF is divine in nature is just something that slowly dawned on me over the years. It was a cousin to my lessons on integrity. When I saw how so many efforts failed, what they all had in common was a lack of integrity, and not only from within the efforts, but from within the organized suppression, too, obviously. I began getting the idea that none of the efforts were divinely intended enough to get there. It definitely had something to do with my choir idea. I suppose that my notion was related to the healing work that I did, experiments with subtle energy, hearing about Level 19s, and the like. I have been in arguments whether that Level 19 energy is the same as the ZPF. I don’t know, but I strongly suspect that they are close cousins. In the end, it all comes from the godhead. Many years after that realization began to dawn on me, I read as much in a channeled magazine, which stated that not only was that source divine, but when a society finally tapped it, all other societies in the universe that have tapped it will immediately know it. It is apparently akin to jumping into a lake, and everybody else in the lake will feel the ripples and immediately know who jumped in. Mr. Professor was not really religious and never went to church, and while we never discussed it, he was likely somewhere along the materialist spectrum (but not today! ), and he is one of the greatest humans that I ever met. I just don’t see that attaining the qualities needed for the choir must preclude materialism. I completely agree how hard it would be for a materialist, but, like you, meeting a materialist who operated at such an enlightened level would be quite an experience. As I have written plenty, somebody who can become choir material while still dragging along their materialist baggage would be a mighty soul (although they would deny that they have a soul ). Much more to come, but back to my biography project. Best, Wade

Hi Ilie: Responding to your latest is a pleasure. We should do this more often. Just those two posts give me a lot to discuss, and they give me a chance to cover important concepts in my big essay. Those will take a week or so of posts to reply to. You are saying that when materialists begin to lift the lid on free energy and the milieu around it, they won’t remain materialists for long. I agree, but I think that they can still come to the party as materialists, and even help start the party. Almost nobody can come to my work without having their beliefs challenged. Materialism is just one of many ideologies that my work takes a meat ax to. In the Fifth Epoch, there likely won’t be any materialists, or they will exist only at the very beginning of it, like at the beginnings of the other Epochs. Materialism is the religion of the Fourth Epoch, but it did not begin to become dominant until more than 150 years into it (about the time of Darwin). It took centuries for the professional urban priesthood to stamp out the hunter-gatherer religion, with its singing and dancing rituals, and bring the agrarian religions into dominance, but the agrarian priesthood has been fighting a rearguard action against the ecstatic (Second Epoch) religions to this day. Heck, rock concerts are throwbacks to the Second Epoch religion. Even chimps engage in ritualistic behavior. The Fourth Epoch, based on fossil fuels, cannot last much longer, but if it could, it might take centuries for the agrarian religions to finally die out and be practiced only in “primitive” corners, and even they will die out. However, it will not be through coercion, but because they will no longer make any sense. Many practices of the Third and Fourth Epochs will no longer make any sense in the Fifth, and will die out. I expect that the nuclear family will likely die out. The USA has its Bible bangers because we were an agrarian society until recently (my grandfather lived in a sod hut, Dennis was raised as a migrant farmworker (some of his homes had dirt floors), and my father and Mr. Professor were raised on farms), and Christianity is largely a phenomenon of rural America (those Red States), with muted influence in cities. I can see some materialist holdouts at the beginning of the Fifth Epoch, but they are going to be few and far between. It is going to be hard to stay stuck in materialism (or the Second and Third Epoch religions) with the daily reality of the Fifth Epoch. You and I were raised to be materialists, but here we are. I completely agree how hard it will be for a materialist to meet these qualifications, but I don’t want to say that they can’t. At what stage of your development could you meet those qualifications? Was it before meeting me? The Epochal significance of free energy did not begin to become clear to me until about 2010, when I read an oil company book. If I had not heard of Sparky Sweet, and if a close friend had not received his exotic technology show, free energy technology might still be on my mental shelf someplace, in the realm of, “maybe it is possible.” Some of my best students today are still materialists. But they realize that they are, are not trying to defend their faith, and look forward to one day moving beyond it, but again, that can really only be done by experience and knowledge, not by trading one set of beliefs for another. Unfortunately, the Silva course is a nepotistic shadow of its former self. But, if a person is diligent, a mystical awakening is attainable. There is also the issue of soul age. Older souls will achieve mystical awakenings easier than younger ones will, and younger souls still comprise a huge fraction of humanity today. But I think that anybody who is attracted to my work can have a mystical awakening, if they are diligent. There is no denying that I seek needles in haystacks, and can some of them come to me as materialists? Some already have. Back to my biography project. Best, Wade

Hi: Materialism is a pretty sterile, dreary philosophy, IMO. Most scientists are functional materialists. There is a great deal of scientific evidence that materialism is a false faith, but when you have your own dramatic and undeniable experiences, it does not matter what the scientists say; you know. Theories mean nothing when compared to knowledge. For the scientifically minded, plenty of sturdy works provide grist for the mill of the idea that death is not end of our consciousness. There is an intermediate view that does not deny psi but states that consciousness’s surviving physical death is an illusion. Is There An Afterlife? deals at length with that idea, but the author decisively favors survival over illusion. I strongly agree with Ilie that acting with integrity while living in fear is almost impossible. I’ll agree with the “almost” part. I have had the “pleasure” of studying many dark events in the human journey, and while it was largely a horror story, such as the Holocaust, the biggest demographic catastrophe in the human journey (so far), Transatlantic slavery, today’s holocausts inflicted by my great nation, and so on, there were often dots of light in the blackness, acts of selflessness and heroism in the face of the blackest evil. If I had not had my own experiences with how evil works, I wonder who much I would have understood. My pantheon has people in it whom we would call materialists. Uncle Noam is one, and many prominent leftists are. And I have to admit that their materialism has sent them down the path of justified violence. Noam has said that when reason fails, he recommends violence. Uncle Howard would not rule out violence in activism. Michael Albert has long been one of the left’s most enlightened voices, but he advocates coercion and his reason for not advocating violence is that activists could never out-do the state in violence. He does not support violence for strategic reasons, not on principle. The left’s materialistic blinders really hamper them as a force of change. I regard their advocacy of violence as reflecting the limits of their integrity, and one of the hazards of materialism. Materialists really don’t understand what love is: the energy of creation, and that is a big handicap to their acting with integrity. However, some of the greatest humans that I know of were materialists. I agree that a mystical perspective far more readily allows an awareness that puts love front and center, which opens up the intuition and paths to enlightenment. And that is why I say that materialists that operate with high integrity just may be the most advanced souls on Earth, as they are not thinking of heavenly rewards, avoiding hell or the lower astral plane, or racking up karma points (or avoiding them). That is why I state that if materialists can hit all the marks needed for the choir, I think that I will welcome them in. But materialism handicaps people in many ways. Materialists make up the bulk of Level 3s, I have seen Michael Albert disparage the ET situation with the classic “little green men” retort, seen secular saints such as Richard Stallman unable to get over the Level 3 hump, and I have never really been able to interest a prominent leftist in free energy (we have some lefties at Avalon, such as Krishna and Serg, so not all is lost). I have only met one environmentalist who was hip to free energy, and I watched his travails in trying to interest his brethren. There are most posts to make in this subject. Back to work. Best, Wade

Thanks Ilie: Brilliant little post. Big subject. This will take a few posts. With materialists and the choir, my point is asking whether a mystical awakening is a “have to have” or a “nice to have” for the choir. In my professional life, I have been in situations where standard “have to haves” were not only not “have to haves,” they weren’t even “nice to haves,” but were: “why the heck do you want that?” It was insane. I fully admit that materialists have a huge handicap for what I am doing, but can any of them reach these understandings? At least free energy’s possibility, if not its reality; That organized suppression exists; Free energy’s Epochal significance; That only a high-integrity effort has a prayer of overcoming the pitfalls and avoiding the failed approaches; Coercion will not work, as the means become the ends, and only a loving approach might work; A comprehensive awareness, which will help them stay focused on what is important. If they can, I think that they can be choir material. Is materialism incompatible with those above understandings? I don’t see how, other than the pervasive fear that materialists often operate from, but materialists can operate with high integrity, too. I was on my way to becoming a materialist before my mystical awakening, and Brian was a materialist, even though he was raised Catholic, until his mystical awakening. Anybody with a scientific bent has been fed the Kool-Aid, and materialism is seductive, especially for the “smart.” But it is really little different from religious Kool-Aid, nationalist Kool-Aid, capitalist Kool-Aid, etc. It is abdicating one’s sentience and responsibility to be in some “club,” AKA in-group. In Brian’s materialist days, his Nobel-prize-winning colleagues would sip their sherry and ridicule the paranormal, and Brian smugly sipped his sherry, too. Anybody can wake up. Anybody can express love. If materialists wake up to the Kool-Aid that they have been drinking, do they immediately become mystics? I doubt it, and a mystical awakening can only come through experience, not received teachings and study. Drinking New Age Kool-Aid is not how you get a mystical awakening. A disillusioned materialist does not immediately become a mystic, just like a disillusioned capitalist does not immediately become a communist. Among disillusioned idealists are where I am going to find the most fertile ground. Yes, good scientists are going to always couch their statements in uncertainly, as the guiding principle of science is doubt, not faith. But are the “skeptics” ever cocksure. They are religious zealots who perform criminal acts on behalf of their faith. A mystical awakening is one thing what my fellow travelers mostly had in common, but so were our Boy Scout natures. This is going to be a crazily busy week at my day job (it looks like it will not let up for a couple of months now), so this series of posts will take some time, while I also juggle my biography project. Thanks again for that great post. It is a lot of grist for the mill. Back to work. Best, Wade

Hi: I am hard at work on many tasks, including my biography project. I have often written that my jury is still out on whether a mystical awakening is a choir requirement. A mystical awakening opens many doors of perception and possibility that can remain closed for those who have not had theirs, particularly those who have committed to an ideology such as materialism, and the numerous variations that it can be clothed in. In my experience, materialists almost uniformly deny free energy’s possibility, as well as its organized suppression. They often invoke the “laws of physics” to deny free energy’s possibility, and they deny evidence of organized suppression as a “conspiracy theory,” which I believe arises from the same well that is hostile to the idea of teleology. The universe is a big, meaningless accident, in the minds of most materialists. Denying free energy’s possibility on the “laws of physics” objection is both arrogant and naïve. Today, I was reading a new Scientific American special issue titled Wonders of the Cosmos, which is about galaxies, stars, black holes, the universe’s structure and history, etc. You can hardly turn a page of it in which scientists don’t admit how tenuous their theories are. Take dark energy, for instance. It has never been observed, but it supposedly makes up 70% of the universe, according to the current cosmological theories. Scientists have had to admit that dark energy may not exist at all, and is just an artifact of relativity theory, which may not be universally applicable. To rule out something that I actually know exists, because of rudimentary theories, is ignorant and flies in the face of what enlightened scientists know, which is how much we don’t know. The key is always keeping an open mind, and to especially avoid becoming prey to somebody else’s theories, which are often not based on experience. Most of the craziness that I have seen in intellectual and related circles is their thinking that they know something, when their “knowledge” is something that they were told, not something that they found out for themselves. Materialists also nearly uniformly fear death. A mystical awakening, and especially an NDE, puts a big dent in the idea that physical reality is all that there is, and a mystic’s fear of death can be quite muted, even though all organisms try their best to survive. The problems that surround manifesting free energy without exception revolve around fear. So, the fearful minds of materialists are a huge handicap. However, I believe that it is possible that a materialist can operate from the highest ethical level, because it is the right thing to do. Materialists who live by the Golden Rule, not because they are trying to earn heaven or karma points, but because it is the ethical thing to do, even a loving thing, might just be the most advanced beings on Earth. Have I ever met or heard of a materialist who reached that lofty level? No. But if one did, he/she would have reached the highest level of integrity attainable on Earth, in my opinion. The problems of making free energy happen are matters of integrity and sentience, and mystics have no monopoly on those qualities. Far from it. So, materialists who can act ethically, not deny realities and possibilities because of their adoptive ideologies, and put love and sentience front and center in their awareness, I think can definitely be choir material. They are also going to be needles in haystacks, but so it is with any group on Earth. This is a big subject, and I’ll likely write more on it later. Back to work. Best, Wade

Thanks Krishna: I regard TED as infotainment, but even Peter Ward has been on it, so it can be a good introduction to certain subjects. I write a little about mirror neutrons, and your pal de Waal has studied the subject. My essay update will go a little deeper into them and the human journey. Yes, Lamarck is making a comeback. Suzana Herculano-Houzel is from Wrangham’s side of the house, and I cite her work a bit. Yes indeed, the development of the human brain is a big issue. Thanks for the tips. Best, Wade

Hi Ortiz: No harm done. Yes indeed, I have patience issues, but I am also spread very thin these days. There are days when I have to literally fight for the time to do my public work. I have to stay focused on my mission, and I seek pupils who do their homework, and I have plenty of it for them. My best students don’t come up for air for months and years. I also faced my death in the mountains recently, and am still recovering from it. I’ll write about it one day. I have had to face it several times in the mountains over the years, and it is never fun, but it certainly can be a teaching tool. Something unexpected happened and I got into trouble. I was able to get myself out of it, but it took all that I had to do it. As we get older, our margin for error and getting out of trouble gets smaller. This last one was the beginning of my old age in the mountains, and we’ll see how the rest of my hiking career goes. My goal since my 20s was doing it into my 80s, but I’ll have to make a serious regimen change to do it. Working long hours at my day job does not help. I leave you with one last reply, as you wonder about spirituality and religion. I have written at length about my mystical awakening and those of my fellow travelers. I have written about how my jury is still out on if a mystical awakening is a choir requirement. Even though it was critical to my journey and those of my fellow travelers, what is immensely more important is whether a person cares. What attracted me to Dennis and Brian was not their talent, genius, or fame, but their great hearts. What attracted me to Ralph McGehee, Uncles Noam, Ed, and Howard, and the few like them was the high personal integrity evident in their work, which they all confirmed during our relationships. Some were brief, and some have been extensive. When I heard from Peter Ward like I did, it only confirmed the sense that I had of his character, which I picked up from his writings. It takes one to know one, and we were all a bunch of over-grown Boy Scouts, naively trying to help this world become a better place to live in, and that is what led us on our journeys. Dennis was raised with fire-and-brimstone sermons while growing up but did not believe them. Only after his mystical awakening did he embrace the Old Tyme Religion that he was raised with. He still has not spit out all of the Kool-Aid of his first religion: American nationalism. His fervent embrace of those religions is part of who he is, and as I have written, I am on a different journey and never really drank the Kool-Aid that Dennis and Brian did, although I stand back in awe at their journeys, and their hearts led them on their odysseys, not their heads. I am likely a “gifted” psychic, and it runs in my family, but I have chosen to not develop those gifts in this lifetime. I have my reasons. I am likely an Old Artisan, but other than writing, I have zero artistic talent (although I have a high appreciation of it), and I think that my soul purposely blocked those avenues of expression so that I could focus on my mission in this lifetime. That is just a sense that I have. It is easy to fall down the mystical rabbit hole, and I have seen people get strung out, fall off the rails, etc. I may be speaking from experience about the hazards of abusing those abilities. I completely understand the conditioning statements in the Silva class, for instance, about not abusing those abilities. There can literally be hell to pay for those who do. Back to my biography project. Best wishes on your journey, Wade