Cliff Varnell

Nobody gonna beat Biden. He’s seriously under-rated. Have any idea of the legislation the Quarter Loafers passed last year? Have any idea of the historic Dem performance in the ‘22 midterms? ?RFKjr? The biggest issues in the Quarter Loaf Party are abortion rights, voting rights, and gun control. He’ll never reach the most important constituency in the Quarter Loaf — black women — with all his anti-vaccine talk. The CIA records? Y’all make me laugh with this stuff. The autopsists seriously considered the possibility JFK was hit with the kind of weapon developed for CIA Operation MKNAOMI. This diagnosis is either pooh-poohed or ignored. Y’all can’t take “CIA Conspiracy” for an answer!

It wasn’t just “a” shot. FOX/CNN/MSNBC carried every Trump speech, covered his arrivals and his departures. They promoted him incessantly — until the last 11 days. Something like 70,000 over 3 states. More like: “I hate both these candidates, gonna stay home.”

How many cable news cycles did the Russia Link and the Steele Dossier make over the last 5 months of the ‘16 campaign? The Russia Link made two — June 14/15 and July 24/25. Nothing over the last 70 days of the campaign. On October 7 the Obama administration formally accused Russia of interfering in our election but a half hour later the Access Hollywood tape dropped, followed by the Podesta e-mails. Russian Interference was reported but not repeated. The Steele Dossier wasn’t reported on TV at all pre-election. Not at all. Due to certain life circumstances I binge-watched cable news at the time. There would be a camera on an empty podium in the lower right side corner of other news stories — “Trump to speak in 20 minutes.”

Aaron Mate, Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi are the 3 Stooges of the Anti-Anti-Trump Left.

Trump’s genius was to turn cable news into a reality TV show — The Donald J. Trump Show just entered into its 9th year. But I list this as only the 5th heaviest contributor to Trump’s victory. #1: Kris Kobach’s Crosscheck voter purge program in 29 states 2014-2016. 17 million mostly Democratic voters were purged from voting rolls, and only 10 million re-registered. #2: James Comey re-opened a phony investigation into Hillary’s e-mails 11 days before the election, depriving Clinton of a closing argument. #3: Hillary was a terrible candidate. #4: Bill Clinton had the bright idea to pay USAG Loretta Lynch a visit at an airport even though his wife was under investigation by the DOJ. Lynch had to recuse herself from anything related to that investigation, availing Comey the opportunity to pounce. #5: $5 billion in free TV advertising. #6: Russian hackers set up the DNC computers so that non-state actors could exfiltrate their e-mails and give them to Assange. All the other Russian Interference operations amounted to little more than a prank.

Did The Media Help Donald Trump Win? $5 Billion In Free Advertising Given To President-Elect https://www.ibtimes.com/did-media-help-donald-trump-win-5-billion-free-advertising-given-president-elect-2444115 Donald Trump spent much of his campaign claiming that the election was rigged in favor of Hillary Clinton, but cable news media is now being cited by some as the driving force behind the Republican candidate become president-elect. Attention has focused on the role of the media amid reports of record profits for cable news outlets and studies showing that Trump earned the equivalent of more than $5 billion in free advertising. </q>

The embarrassing epilogue to the media’s obsession with Hillary Clinton’s emails Maybe Clinton’s emails shouldn’t have been covered as if they were the single most important issue facing 2016 voters? https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/10/22/20924795/hillary-clinton-emails-new-york-times-state-department

Will you be mad if I’m acerbic? You don’t know wtf you’re talking about.

Why would you assume Trump acted in good faith? https://www.defenseone.com/policy/2021/08/trumps-pledge-exit-afghanistan-was-ruse-his-final-secdef-says/184660/ After the summer of 2021? Citation please. https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/07/politics/drone-strikes-counterterrorism-white-house-biden-new-rules/index.html So? You still haven’t explained why Hillary was relentlessly attacked by the people you claim supported her.

So the Deep State saw to it that their favored candidate got bashed on TV incessantly for a week and a half before the election? That makes sense to you? Out of 88,000 e-mails she received, 3 of them that had this designation embedded in the text: (c) That was the only indication the material was classified — none was marked “classified.” That’s why she was never charged. Nothing like that at all. Trump isn’t prosecuted for having 100s of documents — he’s charged for refusing to turn them over. And Biden voluntarily turned those over. The one Top Secret e-mail Hillary received involved material reported in the New York Times. Trump was waving around battle plans for an attack on Iran. The fact that HRC and Biden co-operated and Trump did not (which is why he was indicted) has yet to sink in with you, Ben. Biden pulled out of Afghanistan and curtailed the drone strikes.

If you make a better effort to inform yourself I’d have more respect for your views. Start with the 11 straight days of cable news Hillary-bashing prior to the ‘16 election. What does that tell you?

And you think these op-eds reached more people than Fox/CNN/MSNBC combined for 11 straight days?? Can you identify any CIA leaks of the Steele Dossier prior to January ‘17? Not a peep on TV. Because you paid no attention to the 24/7 coverage of Hillay’s e-mails heading into the 2016 election, Ben, doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. 11 straight days of Hillary bashing on cable news happened. I like the way you ignore anything and everything that doesn’t fit your theories. You’re very consistent in this regard.

Which is why, in the last 11 days of the 2016 campaign, cable news (Fox, CNN, MSNBC) gave wall-to-wall coverage to the re-opened FBI investigation into Hillary’s e-mails. When the same story totally dominates 11 consecutive cable news-cycles ahead of an election — that’s the Deep State working overtime. Trump was thus chosen by the powers that be. They could have broadcast the Steele Dossier pee-tape, but they didn’t until January. Why did they choose Trump? Tax cuts? Maybe. Or perhaps the Eugenicist wing of the ruling elite anticipated the appearance of a global pandemic and they wanted an idiot in charge?

Indeed. The Fox 5 “wound” is clearly above the shoulder blade.

So the top of your back is 4 inches below the bottom of your shirt collar? No, Pat. Sorry. You’ve been pitching this hooey for 20 years. T1 is just below the base of the neck. How can you deny that? Gas lighting us again? The mark Jenkins made with pencil is several inches below the base of the neck. The bullet holes in the clothes line up with T3, consistent with the witness testimony and the properly prepared medical evidence.

The bullet holes in the actual clothes are 4 inches below the bottoms of the collars. Is that the top of your back, Pat?

Factually incorrect. The chalk mark is well below the location in ONE photo, Fox 5. But those measurements were written pen — which means they were NOT taken at the autopsy. Jenkins filled out the face sheet in PENCIL as according to autopsy protocol. Jenkins marked the back wound well below that. So what? You’re obfuscating both the nature of Kennedy’s wounds and the elements of the cover-up. And it’s always been a big fat lie. No, such claims help establish the simple fact that autopsy material not prepared according to proper protocol is phony.

T2/T3. Because he wanted to look like an idiot holding a pointer two inches above the chalk mark? Are you sure there was no pressure from Hoover to put it in a location consistent with the Sibert-O’Neill report? The Cover-Up put the back wound in various locations, a by-the-seat-of-their-pants operation with wound locations from C5/6 to T2/3 including a T1 and a T2 in the final autopsy report.

I dispute your characterization of Fox 5 as a photo that is “now” regarded as fake by some. I’m pointing out that it’s authenticity has long been problematic — not a recent development as you imply. Pat, all you have to do is put the word “if” in front of your assertion of authenticity — “IF Fox 5 is authentic, THEN the Rydberg drawing is debunked.” But you insist on pushing misinformation which disregards the physical evidence, written contemporaneous accounts, properly prepared medical evidence, and consensus witness testimony. JFK’s back wound was at T3, Fox 5 depicts it at T1. When you present Fox 5 as authentic you posit a T1 wound, do you not?

No, it was the HSCA who first singled the Fox 5 photo out as problematic — “more confusing than informative.”

The CIA knew. The civilians working for the US Army within the CIA project MKNAOMI knew. One of those civilians briefed the FBI as to the existence of this technology and the possibility of its use in a foreign attack. http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/church/reports/vol1/pdf/ChurchV1_6_Senseney.pdf <quote on, emphasis added> Senseney: And the only thing that I can say is, I just have to suppose that, having been told to maintain the sort of show and tell display of hardware that we had on sort of stockpile for them, these were not items that could be used. They were display items like you would see in a museum, and they used those to show to the agents as well as to the FBI, to acquaint them with possible ways that other people could attack our own people. (pg 163) Baker: ...There are about 60 agencies of Government that do either intelligence or law enforcement work. Senseney: I am sure most all of those knew of what we were doing; yes... ...The FBI never used anything. They were only shown so they could be aware of what might be brought into the country. </q> It was ‘t meant to be disguised. It was meant to pin on the Soviets while the US bombed Cuba back into the Stone Age. Textbook false flag attack. It’s not my ice bullet theory. The wound was shallow. Conventional firearms don’t leave shallow wounds in soft tissue.

The SBT was conceived the night of the autopsy. The autopsists saw two wounds in soft tissue with no exits and no bullets. They flashed back to their youths in 1936 — a Dick Tracy strip in The Funnies which featured an “ice bullet” dissolving in the victim’s body. Humes asked Sibert and O’Neill if such technology existed. Sibert called the FBI Lab to find out. “We have the bullet—“ FBI SA Chuck Killion told Sibert, who told Humes. That bullet had to account for both wounds. That was the cover-up assignment. This was an ad hoc cover-up with different bites at the apple — the Rydberg drawing, Fox 5 autopsy photo, the FBI re-enactment with two different back locations and the final autopsy report with two different back wound locations. Ironically, it was the FBI who marked the wound in the correct T3 location.

My bad! I stand corrected. A thousand apologies Pat! It’s this episode at 3:08 for which you need to apologize.

You didn’t show Fox 5 in your BlackOp presentation?

A travesty which put the back wound at T1. Ahistorical nonsense.