Peter McGuire

Oswald was no loner, and that poor soul lived his 24 years full of adventure and around numerous friends from around the world. "CIA" disinformation --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwCcNjD8peQ&feature=related Peter, I didn't say that, actually. Paul Trejo said it at 10:24 pm on June the 23rd. (I only wish I could write as well as Paul.) --Tommy Sorry Tommy - get these things mixed up when I try to shorten the posts. To me, the topic of this thread is as plain as night as day, considering the volumes of information on this so called "loner." Even suggesting that Oswald was some simpleton in 2012 after all the documentation available seems silly. Obviously, the man who was used as a patsy in the murder of John F. Kennedy, was a very complicated young man and far from how he was portrayed. Actually, even those with an open mind in 1964 should have caught that.

Title should read, "Texas Woman Arrested for Kindness Toward Strangers" because the reality of the situation is she was trying to be kind to her fellow man not acting maliciously towards the police. And ultimately it was left to a judgement call of the officer to arrest her or just ask her to leave. It's more about seeing kindness and being able or willing to pass it on.

In my case ever since I heard eyewitness testimony. So much. So much alike. The conspirators only countermeasure is to claim "how unreliable" eyewitness testimony is. Sure, things like hair color, clothing and such - but the head of the POTUS exploding and his brains, blood and matter hitting motorcycle cops in the rear? No. If several people saw that , that is what they saw. And if they also recall the limousine stopping at that very important time, that is what they saw. PERIOD. This is what happened - the government issued its fictitious report on the assassination. First generation researchers interviewed eyewitnesses and came up with a completely different set of events. Then the government took the time to "debunk" these witnesses - sometimes in a very harsh way. Then researchers had to rehabilitate these witness and argue about them for decades now. You are right. The time to believe them is NOW. Good catch, Ron. It has been demonstrated by the Ford glass worker, the intern (Ganges) and a photograph that there was a bullet hole (" through and through" ), although both sides will spend decades arguing this despite the credible witnesses. Once that bullet crashed through the windshield from the front, lunkhead Greer was in quite the spot. However, Kellerman still could have, and should have leapt into the back as he was trained to do. And the aforementioned having been said, Greer was trained to take some evasive action. Danger ahead - alright - I am going to cut him some slack, but he sure took off fast after Kennedy was finally finished off. And what were his TWO glances back for? And how did he have so much time and frame of mind to do so. A little slack is all Greer gets from me.

Knopfler played the leads on Layla? That sounded wrong to and based on my quick research untrue Clapton played the leads and Allman played the slide parts. You hero did play with "Slowhand" live though. Knopfler did in this concert. I agree. That is the staying power and true musical genius of Mark Knopfer. Dylan is still around though, and I like his tune "My Back Pages, " but I never was a big fan. The Stones were just a fad. Lennon and McCartney were decent songwriters and their act is legend, but they did not continue to write anything worthwhile after their breakup. Is this Mark Knopfler in the vest and white shirt? It sounds like his playing but I don't recognize him. His appearance has changed a lot over the years - even from one year to the next. If you look closely, the man playing the lead in Slow Hand is using a pick, therefore, definately not Mark Knopfer.

DON'T LET THE FOX GUARD THE HENHOUSE "Don't assign a job to someone who will then be in a position to exploit it for his own ends."

Witt the Twit was manufactured after the fact. No one but a fool , considering JFK WAS killed that moment, would think some man would be there with an umbrella as the POTUS drove by. He ( and Radio Man ) as seen in the Zapruder film are obvious spotters and signal men. Why are there always fools and conspirators peddling this nonsense? You guys also do know that Cyril Wecht believes simultaneous shots front the front and behind. However, no bullets from that antique gun used to frame Mr. Lee Oswald ever reached the president. Another gun was found and had been fired from behind. The gun found shortly after was shown in a film and is a fact. You can see policeman raising the gun. I also believe that the man you call "Radio Man" was also an innocent bystander but that is a subject for a different thread. Then you are "double dumb." And I believe it part of the same old tired balony. Nonsense. A dark skinned man with something in his hand then back pocket EXACTLY in the place where the POTUS was shot. Dream on and tell your story walking. Peter, FWIW, I agree with you on this, If it was Witt, he lied during his testimony when he said he couldn't see JFK because he was trying to get his umbrella open and it was blocking his view of the Prez! Also lied about his movements on the sidewalk/grassy knoll as the President was approaching... --Tommy It is hard to sort out ones movements when you were not even there. Very bad preparation on Twit's part. Did he live long after that? I say that because he was not helpful to their cause. And then after being caught in these lies, talking about an implausible scenerio, they still march on. Is there nothing that will put these liars in their place?

Witt the Twit was manufactured after the fact. No one but a fool , considering JFK WAS killed that moment, would think some man would be there with an umbrella as the POTUS drove by. He ( and Radio Man ) as seen in the Zapruder film are obvious spotters and signal men. Why are there always fools and conspirators peddling this nonsense? You guys also do know that Cyril Wecht believes simultaneous shots front the front and behind. However, no bullets from that antique gun used to frame Mr. Lee Oswald every reached the president. Another gun was found and had been fired from behind. The gun found shortly after was shown in a film and is a fact. You can see policeman raising the gun. I also believe that the man you call "Radio Man" was also an innocent bystander but that is a subject for a different thread. Then you are "double dumb." And I believe it part of the same old tired balony. Nonsense. A dark skinned man with something in his hand then back pocket EXACTLY in the place where the POTUS was shot. Dream on and tell your story walking.

The book is waiting for me at the library - just made the waiting list. Will read and get back here. This is another - very fascinating part of the whole story that I have read about before. Kennedy was killed by his own government for some reason - it was bigger than Vietnam, although that was a small part of it , and a good cover story. Some kind of secret research going on? Opposition to Israel's nuclear ambitions? Simply no to three terms for the Kennedys.... I know it was an inside job - you can see the Secret Service inactions - but why? Even screwing around in broad daylight in the White House and making a mockery of the institution of the office of the President would have not caused an operation to take out the POTUS , with extreme prejudice. It had to be about something we do not know about which WAS a threat to national security.

Witt the Twit was manufactured after the fact. No one but a fool , considering JFK WAS killed that moment, would think some man would be there with an umbrella as the POTUS drove by. He ( and Radio Man ) as seen in the Zapruder film are obvious spotters and signal men. Why are there always fools and conspirators peddling this nonsense? You guys also do know that Cyril Wecht believes simultaneous shots front the front and behind. However, no bullets from that antique gun used to frame Mr. Lee Oswald every reached the president. Another gun was found and had been fired from behind. The gun found shortly after was shown in a film and is a fact. You can see policeman raising the gun.

Tommy - I don't have time to play games here. While playing Devil's Advocate can be a good way to smoke out the truth, there are also many here who sneakily come across as a so called "Conspiracy Theorists" yet think Oswald fired "some shots' or, are just pimping us, or are plants, for example. I have seen them all. I am not a Conspiracy Theorist, and that may be where my arrogance comes from. I see lots of facts. Have an "unsub" ( unidentified subject ) or two in mind. Put the facts in relation to their behavior and HAVE MADE my conclusion.

You are on the right track , Mark. The key to understanding what happened is the Smoking Gun - the verifiable behavior of the United States Secret Service while protecting the POTUS. There is no getting out of it for the Secret Service. What they did and did not do cannot be explained - and you will see that , unlike virtually every other aspect of this case, very little is done by the conspirators to try to justify what the Service did, and did not do. They simply cannot. But what many people have forgotten is that, when faced with the situation they were given, Warren and his group had NO CHOICE but to do what they did. They thought they were stopping a nuclear war with Russia and they helped heal the nation by covering up for the Secret Service, who enabled, therefore, killed the very man they were sworn to protect. The United Stated Secret Service will be shamed for centuries to come. If you are talking about the late night drinking session Jim, I believe so. I have known about the early morning drinking for a long time and it took awhile for me to understand how important this was in this complex plot. People do things when they are drunk OR hung over that they will not do otherwise. At about noon, these guys hangover was kicking in bad - and if their boss said don't move when the shots rang out or, what ever other commands were given, they would have been easier to follow-both psychologically and physically. It is easy to by apathetic when hung over and real easy not to react. Sad bunch - these plotters. They did not miss a thing. Some pretty fart smellers. Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters. - - - Albert Einstein

How about all the witnesses who put the death earlier, at 1:06? Or is that inconvienient for you? Peter, No, it isn't inconvenient for me at all. Believe it or not, I'm still learning. Some day I hope to be as well-informed as you are. --Thomas Michael Mahon (pre adoption biological name) P.S. So I guess the DPD dispatcher logs were fabricated, just like everything else in this case... Yep. If you are defending this case from fabricated "official" sources, you have nothing to go on. The government's case has already been shown to be a lie. How in the world could anyone continue to try to convince us based on the word of a xxxx? Your case has no credibility. My case? What case? Are you paranoid, or just arrogant? The case you are considering - the official version. If you are seriously trying to pawn off the tired old tale here in 2012 with so called evidence from the perpetrator of the crime, then I have a problem with that.

How about all the witnesses who put the death earlier, at 1:06? Or is that inconvienient for you? Peter, No, it isn't inconvenient for me at all. Believe it or not, I'm still learning. Some day I hope to be as well-informed as you are. --Thomas Michael Mahon (pre adoption biological name) P.S. So I guess the DPD dispatcher logs were fabricated, just like everything else in this case... Yep. If you are defending this case from fabricated "official" sources, you have nothing to go on. The government's case has already been shown to be a lie. How in the world could anyone continue to try to convince us based on the word of a xxxx? Your case has no credibility.

How about all the witnesses who put the death earlier, at 1:06? Or is that inconvienient for you?

Because the output of most Rock performers 20 or more years down the pike isn't as good as their early stuff. Most of the exceptions consist of albums that are mostly covers/re-recordings. Then Mark is an exception. Sultans of Swing came out in 1977 and Communiqué in 1979 ( some were written when they were a bar band in 1975 - 1977 ) All with the exception of a handful were written by Mark - a few were by his brother Dave before he left after Communiqué. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Knopfler#Solo_albums and Solo albums Solo albums Year Album details Peak chart positions Certifications 1996 Golden Heart 9 28 8 11 7 38 3 2 16 4 3 105 UK: Gold[70] CAN: Gold[71] NOR: Gold[72] 2000 Sailing to Philadelphia 4 16 2 19 3 7 2 1 11 2 1 60 UK: Gold[70] CAN: Gold[71] FIN: Gold[73] FRA: Platinum[74] GER: Platinum[75] NOR: 3× Platinum[72] US: Gold[76] 2002 The Ragpicker's Dream 7 47 9 18 7 4 2 1 8 5 5 38 UK: Silver[70] FRA: Gold[74] NOR: Platinum[72] 2004 Shangri-La 11 - 14 - 10 5 4 1 - 3 7 66 UK: Silver[70] GER: Gold[75] 2007 Kill to Get Crimson 9 41 10 - 15 9 4 2 - 4 3 26 2009 Get Lucky 9 43 10 16 17 10 3 1 5 6 5 17 GER: Gold[75] NOR: Platinum[72] The Best of Dire Straits & Mark Knopfler: Private Investigations (2005, compilation) The Trawlerman's Song EP (2005, EP) One Take Radio Sessions (2005, EP live) Mark also has a new album coming out this fall - we will see how this goes but considering the work that has been out his entire 37 year career, I am optimistic. 1975 - 2009 or 2012 with 1996 to 2009 ( so far being "solo" ) is noteworthy to say the least. This is why I love Mark Knopfler as a musician. Songwriter, Vocalist, Lead Guitar player, Scorewriter - Mark Knopfler is one of the best musicians in our time , in my opinion. He is the total opposite of the One Hit Wonder!

No. We could not ask for anything more. I believe Mrs. Higgins over criminals who killed the President of the United States. In reply to the post's title - of course he did not. He did not shoot Kennedy either. Making LHO a cop killer was part of this well orchestrated plot to take out the POTUS. Surprisingly, cooler heads prevailed when LHO was lured into the theatre by his handler. Hats off to those officers who wanted to "see what he was about," rather than kill him on the spot. The only problem I have with a 1:06 shooting of Tippit is that, according to the attached timeline, Tippit left the Gloco Gas Station at 1:06:30 and Benavides tried to contact the DPD dispatcher (a couple of minutes after Tippit was killed) via Tippit's radio, at 1:16. http://www.jdtippit....metable_nov.htm --Tommy Says who? This is manufactured, "evidence," and means nothing. The fox has been guarding the hen house for too long. Enough already. Mrs. Higgins simply proves, once again, that the story is false.

No. We could not ask for anything more. I believe Mrs. Higgins over criminals who killed the President of the United States. In reply to the post's title - of course he did not. He did not shoot Kennedy either. Making LHO a cop killer was part of this well orchestrated plot to take out the POTUS. Surprisingly, cooler heads prevailed when LHO was lured into the theatre by his handler. Hats off to those officers who wanted to "see what he was about," rather than kill him on the spot.

I also just signed. Didn't realize this one was through change.org. I am on their mailing list but never got an email about this petition. I get them all the time about other petitions.

http://gma.yahoo.com...topstories.html Texas Woman Arrested for Warning Drivers About Speed public.affairs@cityofhouston.net

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAAgtvMjYd8&NR=1 When the South Vietnam government abandoned the highlands in 1975 the end was near.

The Yards

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HdHrZSEPf4

From Redux

Oswald was no loner, and that poor soul lived his 24 years full of adventure and around numerous friends from around the world. "CIA" disinformation --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwCcNjD8peQ&feature=related

That is the issue, no doubt about that, but if the public at large knew what really happened, even the American Sheeple would be moved. Because of that, there is no way the government is going to care about anything but covering this up. They killed the sitting President of the United States, with predjudice, in public , next to his wife and eventually on film and in front of countless witnesses, none of whom witnessed anything similiar to the official version. They used a patsy, killed him, and silenced then killed the man who killed the patsy and countless other material witnesses for decades. They still control the media. I just don't think they care about following the law or public "pressure" at this point.