John Bockmon

Please help

In Dick Russell's "The Man Who Knew Too Much", it states that Bishop had been in Mexico City two or three times in 1963. But when asked for what purpose he stated, " I'd rather make no comment on that. It was National Security. Has anyone ever been able to determine why Bishop was in Mexico City and was he working for David Phillip's at that time? Thanks, John

Larry, When and where is the conference? Thanks

Thanks Jack, If I remember correctly, his brother's name was Edwin Phillips. I don't have my Fonzi book handy but I believe Fonzi met Edwin in Fort Worth when he was investigating for the HSCA. Also, I remember something to the effect, that Edwin was shown the photo that Veciana had made and Edwin believed it look alot like his brother, David. I tried looking up info on the internet about Edwin and got no info. Thanks Jack and Bill

William, Thanks for the response. I understand what you are saying. I also, have only just begun looking into the total story behind James Files. I do have some concerns, but with joining this forum, I hope to educate myself on all aspects of the assassination. I do appreciate your time and the time of all researchers on this forum. So the truth is now in our crosshairs. Lets roll!!!!

William, I have been reading this site for about a year and a half. I have read alot of your posts and feel very honored to receive all of your informative research. Having said that, when push comes to shove on asking you to present facts about James Files, you seem to be combative. All we are trying to do(speaking only for myself) is to get to the truth. Would you please give Files service number and lets lay this to rest. William, again I thank you in advance for your help in regards to this matter. John

William, I have been reading this site for about a year and a half. I have read alot of your posts and feel very honored to receive all of your informative research. Having said that, when push comes to shove on asking you to present facts about James Files, you seem to be combative. All we are trying to do(speaking only for myself) is to get to the truth. Would you please give Files service number and lets lay this to rest. William, again I thank you in advance for your help in regards to this matter. John

John, I have read the book, though I don't have it handy at the moment. I remember however, that through the course of the book, recounting the murders and trial, DAP takes these leasurely strolls with the "Judge," whose sage advice tries to explain "Texas Justice." DAP's use of fictional composites, like Ian Fleming's, are thinly disguised and not difficult to decipher. If anyone in Texas figures it out - and I would venture that if Jack White read the book, he could possibly pin the tail on the donkey, I too would like to know who this person might be. Bill Kelly If Jack wants to read this book, I have an extra copy. Jack let me know if you have time to read it. Thanks, John

[Wim: I hope the other documents you have are not written on the same typewriter. You document (1) dated on Sept. 16, 1983 and document (2) dated on Feb. 23, 1984 (five months later) were both written on the same dirty typewriter. If the Director was C Kelly or Hoover of the FBI, then the sign off as director was done by a W.C whoever that was. The first dirty typewriter must not have been used much after the first letter was written... the same microscopic hairs and lent is still embedded in the O's and E's and the spacing shifts as the manual bar has excessive play. The line spacing shifts and does not hold and drifts. This would never be accepted in any government of for that matter private office. I think is was done on a manual typewritter. The Government used IBM Select in those days. One other area of interest. (ask any law enforcement or lawer) Four people are going to Grand Jury to name J. Files. And this information is sent inter-office before going to Grand Jury? All parties are named The subjects are named by name and not referenced as CI' and their given ID numbers are not in the document. This would never be sent inter office in that manner. The subject they are going to ID is also not shilded for protection of information before going to the Grand Jury.....Wim. It does not work that way. Sorry. Why do you want me to go back into my cage? I am just trying to help. Mr. Plumlee. I see the same smudges on both letters and on both documents. William needs to understand that if a question is asked about these docs, doesn't mean someone is debunking a theory, but asking to prove these individual documents. Thanks for your service Mr. Plumlee

Jack thanks for the response. The book was first published in 1979 by MacMillan Publishing out of New York. In the beginning of the book, Phillips stated that the fictional chacacter Judge Willard, was based on a real person. Just thought you might have an idea who he was talking about. I have always believed that Phillips had something to do with the assassination. Thanks again 0Not having read the book, I am in no position to speculate. Was the judge connected to the murder case? I don't believe so. In the forward of the book he just referenced it as, "Judge Matthew Willard is in a sense a fictional character, that is based on a real person, who, though knowledgeable of the law, is not a judge."

Jack thanks for the response. The book was first published in 1979 by MacMillan Publishing out of New York. In the beginning of the book, Phillips stated that the fictional chacacter Judge Willard, was based on a real person. Just thought you might have an idea who he was talking about. I have always believed that Phillips had something to do with the assassination. Thanks again

In David Atlee Phillips book "The Great Texas Murder Trials", he uses a fictional character named "Judge Matthew Willard. He stated, "Though in a sense a fictional character, he is based on a real person, who, though knowledgeable of the law, is not a judge". Anyone have any ideas who this person might be? Thanks

In David Atlee Phillips book "The Great Texas Murder Trials", he uses a fictional character named "Judge Matthew Willard. He stated, "Though in a sense a fictional character, he is based on a real person, who, though knowledgeable of the law, is not a judge". Anyone have any ideas who this person might be? Thanks

I also agree. Think we need to stay on why we are here in the first place.

I own a collection agency in Mt. Pleasant, Texas. I am intrested in the JFK assassination and have read over thirty books about the assassination. I am forever thirsty for more information. Please allow me to ask questions to your informed members. I have been reading this forum for more than two years.