Jump to content
The Education Forum

Duane Daman

Members
  • Posts

    1,910
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Duane Daman

  1. Colby ... It looks as though Mr. Simkin may be more fair than I first assumed .... I didn't come here to insult anyone .. and if you don't believe me just read my first posts here .... I was hoping to discuss Apollo with people who could act like adults about this , not schoolyard bullies ... and I tried everything I knew to get all of you to stop insulting Jack White . Lamson did not insult me because I don't know much about photography or physics .. He personally insulted me and continuously attacked me because I know that Apollo was a haox ... He knows it too , and that's why he will do everything in his power to shut me up ... It's the same reason he attacks Jack White and his Apollo studies .... Jack's post to me about who may be working for nasa was very informative but really not surprising at all .... Anyone who spends their lives on internet forums defendings nasa's lie of landing men on moon must have very good reasons to do so .... The internet is full of nasa disinformation agents and their main job is to suppress the conspiracy information and stop the hoax believers by any means necessary .... So maybe John Simkin feels differently about what is really defamatory and what isn't ....and what may be the truth also ... and maybe he is not like the typical moderators of other forums , who are obviously working for nasa to stop the hoax evidence from spreading any further than it already has . I called Lamson a Nazi because he acts like one and because he is lying about working for nasa .... I called you a xxxxx because that's what you are .... And all of you can call me whatever you please because it doesn't matter anymore ... It won't stop me from posting about the Apollo hoax . Do you know what the main reason is that I still believe Apollo was a hoax ? .... It's because the one's who claim otherwise protest just a bit too much and they lie about this .... and when people protest too much and tell lies and will stop at nothing to shut up their opponets , and will stoop to any low life level to do it , then something is obviously very wrong and the truth is obviously being covered up .... It's people like you and Lamson and Burton and Greer and Waspie_ Dwarf and MID and Phil Plaitt and Jay windley , who prove to me that there is much to hide when it comes to nasa and their bogus Apollo Program .
  2. Dave ... Your "smudge" not only changes position and size in the visor reflection as the astronot turns his head , but it also changes shape ... That is NOT something that a smudge ON a visor can do , but only a solid object being reflected IN a convex visor will do ..... Plus this 'artifact' obviously has four blades which casts a shadow of the same shape on the ground beneath it .... A smudge would not cast a shadow on the ground , nor would it look exactly like a ceiling fan or a stage light either . You know what the most annoying aspect of a typical nasa defender is ? ... It's the fact that none of them can admit it when they are wrong about something ... They NEVER conceded any point and NEVER admit when they don't have a pat little answer for everything ..... I have no idea why you defend nasa's lies about Apollo and I don't care ... I just know that it is completley frustrating to try to discuss any of hoax evidence with those who aren't even honest enough to admit when they are wrong . Evan .... I doubt the straps hanging off the side of the PLSS are for carrying tools ... but more like the straps for the fly system that quality control forgot to air brush out of this anomalous photograph .
  3. Thanks for posting the other photos but what is your point ? .... The "artifact" looks a bit different in each photo because of the convex shape of the visor ... It's clearly an ANOMALY which is reflected IN the visor and looks very much like a ceiling fan or stage light ... Certainly NOT something which would be hanging around on the moon .... I see that Waspie and MID have completely derailed the thread on the UM about this photo ... Do they really think they are fooling anyone with their ridiculous explanations of this artifact ? .... I actually laughed out loud when I read MID's pitiful post about his astronot buddies and the silly way they acted on the 'moon' .... It's called DISTRACTION TACTICS , and your friend MID is a pro at that ... Then he dared to call this artifact with four blades and a shadow , a "smudge" on the visor ... Oh please ... Is that the standard lie that the nasa defenders always come up with for every anomaly they can't explain away ? .... Spotlights , stagelights and ceiling fans do NOT look like smudges or smears on visors ... It's time to face the facts Dave .... Apollo was a hoax and the Apollo photos are studio fakes shot on moon sets . By the way ... What are those loose straps hanging out of the side of the PLSS packs in photos 7071 and 7074 ? .... Part of the fly system ?
  4. Jack .... I believe the Australian outback , Area 51 and Langley, Virginia were probably the main places where phony Apollo photos were taken ... I don't know why you think the images are excellent though, when it's so obvious that none of them were really taken on the moon .... They are nothing but crude studio fakes ... But I guess by 1960's and early 70's standards, they were not too bad ....Why nasa thought everyone would fall for them being real just amazes me though ... Especially with those silly looking painted mountain backdrops only a few feet away from the foreground in almost all of the Apollo photos ... Since lamson is a professional photographer , I wondered why he defended these pathetic photos ... but now it's obvious that he is just another paid nasa flunky and only doing his job by defending nasa, in trying to discredit you and your work .... I wonder if burton works for nasa also? ...Cuz he seems to be just about as obsessed as lamson is in trying to prove you wrong all the time .... I doubt colby works for nasa , but probably just goes along for the ride with his friends here .... Most cowards do stick together ... and in packs they are known as bullies ... It's too bad that someone erased my original title to this thread ... The part that craig didn't get to see , under "Craig Lamson Works for NASA ", was " Another NASA Moon Nazi " ... Isn't that right Herr lamson ? ... and you are "ROFLMAO! " ... I doubt it . I almost left this forum because of your constant insults to me ... but then it occured to me that being insulted by cowardly bullies like you and colby is completely meaningless .... and no reason for me to stop exercising my freedom of speech here ... My membership was banned from the UM site because of what I posted here .... How about that ? .... So the disingenuous nasa defenders here are not only cowards and bullies but like to run to other forums and tattle to the moderators .... Now THAT is what I would call sorry human beings .
  5. I never could quite understand why Craig Lamson treats the Apollo hoax believers and conspiracy researchers , such as Jack White , with such utter contempt and intense and unreasonable hatred ... Then in one of my last posts to him I accused him of treating us this way because he probably worked on the phony Apollo photos himself .... As a big shot photographer with the mentality and manners of sociopath , he has constantly ripped apart me and the other conspiracy researchers on this forum with despicable intensity because of our beliefs and opinions about Apollo .... I have encountered some mean spirited , narrow minded , hateful creeps when discussing the Apollo hoax evidence before , but none quite as nasty as this guy is . So on a hunch , I googled his name and found that in fact he does work for nasa .... and in some capacity even took part in working on the bogus Apollo Lunar Surface Journal .... and that is when I realized why he acts the way he does ... He IS a nasa stooge . Here's the title of the web site where his name is included in working for nasa . .......................................................... ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Karstein Lomundal, Todd Tucker, Frederic Artner, Craig Lamson, ... However, we believe that, on the whole, the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal is an accurate ... www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/apollo.acknoldg.html
  6. I find it unbelievable that the debate over these two Apollo 12 photos is still taking place on the UM site .... I posted this evidence months ago , which proved that the Apollo 12 photos are studio fakes .... One of the moderators and several of the members there , who continue to defend nasa's bogus Apollo missions and the phony Apollo photos , are still making the silly claim that this artifact is nothing but a "smudge" on the astronot's visor ..... Are these people blind , stupid or just plain dishonest ? Smudges don't create SHADOWS on the moon set floor ... Only solid objects do , such as ceiling fans and stage lights ... Nor do "smudges " ever have the semetrical designs of what looks exactly like four blades of a ceiling fan . What will it take for the disingenuous nasa defenders and the dishonest Apollo apoligists to stop lying for nasa ? Here's the proof that there is indeed an anomalous object being reflected in the Apollo 12 astronot's visor , along with it's four bladed shadow .... The object's reflection even moves more to the center of the visor because of the visors convex shape, as the astronot changes his head postion in the second photo ...
  7. After the war NASA hired Nazi scientists to work for their space program .... Werner Von Braun , one of NASA's top scientists and one of Adolph Hitler's best Nazi rocket engineers, was one of the Moon Nazi's responsible for orchestrating the Apollo hoax .... Now I understand why NASA got away with lying to the world about landing men on the moon .... Would you trust a Nazi to be honest about anything ? .... The CIA still suppresses most of the Operation Paperclip information today , along with the evidence which proves that Apollo was a hoax . .................................................. Operation Paperclip From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search For other uses of "Paperclip", see Paperclip (disambiguation). Operation Paperclip scientists pose together.Operation Paperclip was the codename under which the US intelligence and military services extricated Nazi scientists from Germany, during and after the final stages of World War II. The project was originally called Operation Overcast, and is sometimes also known as Project Paperclip. [1] When the Allies entered Germany in 1945 their scientific intelligence experts were astounded by the sheer scope of the German technical and scientific accomplishments. Beginning immediately after the German surrender and continuing for the next two years the U.S. pursued a vigorous program to harvest all technological and scientific know-how as well as all patents in Germany. John Gimbel comes to the conclusion, in his book Science Technology and Reparations: Exploitation and Plunder in Postwar Germany, that the "intellectual reparations" taken by the U.S. and the UK amounted to close to $10 Billion dollars, equivalent to around $100 Billion dollars 2006.[1] The program of acquiring German scientists and technicians for the U.S. was not only founded in profit interests, however; an equally strong motivator was the desire to deny the expertise of German scientists to the Soviet Union.[2] The case for finding and holding Nobel laurate Werner Heisenberg was summed up thus "…he was worth more to us than ten divisions of Germans. Heisenberg was in charge of the German secret atomic bomb program code-named "Virus House". Had he fallen into Russian hands, he would have proven invaluable to them."[3] A Horton Ho-229 stealth Fighter/Bomber was captured and sent to Northrop for evaluation, and several Ho-229 partial airframes from the assembly line were destroyed to avoid their capture by advancing Soviet troops. Of particular interest to the U.S. were scientists specialising in aerodynamics and rocketry (such as those involved in the V-1 and V-2 projects), chemical weapons, chemical reaction technology and medicine. These scientists and their families were secretly brought to the United States, without State Department review and approval; their service for Hitler's Third Reich, NSDAP and SS memberships as well as the classification of many as war criminals or security threats would have disqualified them from officially obtaining visas. An aim of the operation was capturing equipment before the Soviets came in. The US Army destroyed some of the German equipment to prevent it from being captured by the advancing Soviet Army. The majority of the scientists, numbering almost 500, were deployed at White Sands Proving Ground, New Mexico; Fort Bliss, Texas; and Huntsville, Alabama to work on guided missile and ballistic missile technology. THIS IN TURN LED TO THE FOUNDATION OF NASA AND THE US ICBM PROGRAM . Much of the information surrounding Operation Paperclip is still classified. Separate from Paperclip was an even more secret effort to capture German nuclear secrets, equipment and personnel (Operation Alsos). Another American project (TICOM) gathered German experts in cryptography. The United States Bureau of Mines employed seven German synthetic fuel scientists in a Fischer-Tropsch chemical plant in Louisiana, Missouri in 1946. [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip
  8. Geek is not a defamatory term .... but paraniod, delusional , ignorant , stupid , clueless etc. are ... and I have been called all of these things here and more , ever since I made the collosal mistake of joining and then posting on this forum ... and I have no idea what remark of mine was so "obnoxious" that it deserved to be deleted . I thought this being an Education Forum that it would be different from the other forums , where insulting the opposition is the only way to 'win' the debate ... but the insidious insults are the same here as on every other forum where Apollo is 'discussed' .... It's quite a game plan the nasa defenders have going all over the internet .... First gang up on and then push all the right buttons to piss off the hoax believers ... and if your do you job right , they will finally give up and go away .... Well, congrats ! ... You have all accomplished that .
  9. I said that I would no longer reply to any more off topic nonsense or personal insults but I can't allow your lies stand without a reply . I have never called anyone here "delusional" ... I have never posted that "I know the truth and the rest of you are blind ".... I have never called anyone a "shill" ... I have never personally insulted anyone except in self defense after they have ripped me apart for my opinions about Apollo .... I have never claimed that I am a "victim" or a "target" ... but only that I was tired of being personally insulted .... and I have never posted that I am "ignorant about photography" ... but admitted that I was not a professional photographer and didn't know the exposure time to photograph stars ... You have twisted my words around here and turned this 'discussion' into a despicable brawl .... and what amazes me the most is that Andy Walker and John Simkin won't do anything to stop you .... You may be a big shot photographer but it hardly matters what you do for a living when what you really are is an evil xxxx ...
  10. Don't you think it's kind of funny how you can use all the defamatory comments in your posts to me that you please , but one of my posts was edited for making defamatory comments that I don't even remember saying . If you want to believe that I'm delusional or paranoid or stupid or ignorant or a victim or anything else , then that's fine ... After all , we are all entitled to our own opinions , right ? .... I happen to think that you are a lot of things too ... The main one being something that is a four letter word which starts with an E and ends with an L ... and trust me , I would much rather be considered stupid or delusional to that . From now on I will not reply to any off topic nonsense or personal attacks ... Your insults to me have been reported to John Simkin and if you continue to post them , I will continue to report them .
  11. The Fox network almost lost it's licence for airing that program .... Fox was very daring in those days and decided to go not only go with the 'Conspiracy Theory : Did We Land on the Moon' program but also with the Roswell Alien Autopsy film footage , which they also got plenty of flack for . I remember quite well the false accusations made against Fox at the time ... Other networks tried to make them look as if the station was run by some kind of communist traitors ... and all kinds of hateful jokes were made about the network , saying that they should stick to cartoons like the Simson's because that's all they were good for .... I guess all the threats and the ensuing media circus paid off too , becasue Fox no longer shows anything controversal anymore ... At least nothing that our watch dog government would disaprove of anyway .
  12. I first read about the FBI ordering the LM and lunar buggy blueprints destroyed on the pro Apollo site called 'Who Mourns for Apollo ? ' ... It has also been mentioned on several hoax sites and even some guys were discussing this fact on either Bad Astronomy or clavius ( can't remember which) a couple of years ago ... So this is common knowledge on both sides of the Apollo fence .
  13. Dave ... My remark about some of the members here being insulting or condescending was not directed at you .
  14. Kevin .... All I know is that as soon as I hit submit , proof read my posts ( some of them were a bit long ) made any necessary corrections and then returned to the main screen , my posts were usually already answered by Waspie_ Dwarf .... He would often pick apart my posts line by line with involved replies but not always .... So if he managed to do all that AFTER I sumitted my posts then he is just really fast .... Must be that scientific brain of his . As for this reprimand in my post above here ... "Edited to remove defamatory comments. " .... I honestly don't remember making any ... I PMed Mr. Simkin and asked him about this , so hopefully he can remember what he found to be so defamatory .
  15. Steve ... You're welcome .... After trying to verify Hawkins photographic anomaly claims and not being able to ( I first thought maybe nasa had edited or pulled the damaging photos ), I realized that copying the "bio" would be a waste of my time . Evan ... No offense taken ... I reached conclusion number three because I find it impossible to believe that any authentic , intelligent conspiracy researcher would make the claims that this guy did which could so easily be discredited ... He makes his "whiz kids" look like Einstein ... If there ever were any kids involved in this to begin with , they came up with more meaningful information , theories and propositons for nasa than he did . Even using the Wayback Machine to look at the previous Moonbloopers site only turned up more of the same nonsense ... If I was reading hoax information for the first time and this drivil was presented to me , I would believe that Apollo really did go to the moon ... That's how bad it is .
  16. Steve ... There is no reason to post Hawkins bio here ... I'm pretty sure it's as bogus as he is ... Apparently we have all been had ... I received an e-mail this morning from a friend of mine who follows my forum posts here and he saw that everyone was stilll trying to find out who Charles T. Hawkins is .... He sent me a post article from clavius about Hawkins and said he thought the guy was really a nasa stooge .... And after reading his train wreck of a book , it finally became clear to me also that the book was a set up .... It was most likely written by a nasa flunky trying to make the conspiracy info look bogus .... That's why not many of the photos in his book could be found on any nasa sites and the few that could be found , didn't show the anomalies he pointed out .... I was stumped when I first started reading the book because some of what was written sounded very logical and scientific , while some of the other things sounded ridiculous .... Then when no one could find any proof of this guys existance and even the talk shows he was suppossed to have been on turned up as non existant also , I looked at his 'hoax evidence' more carefully and found it to be very lacking on all levels , to say the least .... After reading 'Dark Moon' by David Percy and Mary Bennett , it became even more clear that Hawkins book is major disinformation and nonsense .. Here's the clavius link about Hawkins .... ( Good grief ... I never thought I would be linking anyone to that horrible web site ! ) http://www.clavius.org/bibhawkins.html
  17. That's what the article said ... Vaporized .... As in ; burnt to a crisp from the intense deep space radiation . Here's what you said .... "Obviously the government doesn't control all the media, or you wouldn't be able to post. ..." News flash my friend .. The internet is not part of the media , and remains one of the few places where freedom of speech is still allowed .. but probably not for long if that idiot still in the White House has anything to do with it . The media would be the government controlled newspapers , radio and TV broadcasts ...
  18. Kevin ... I don't appreciate your personal insults to me ... I don't care what any of you choose to believe but I happen to know for a fact that my posts were rarely allowed to go unanswered for more than a few minutes at any given time and some were even answered seconds after I posted them .... I realize that some moderators have no life outside of the web site forums they moderate , but that still does not explain the lightening speed with which they copied parts of my posts and replied so quickly ... Not unless they were working right along with me. Edited to remove defamatory comments.
  19. Certain blueprints may still be available but not the one's for the LM and lunar buggy .... How would any space craft technician today be able to evaluate the Apollo crafts , when there are none around to examine ? ... I doubt that nasa would pull the LM from their museum , or dig up an old CSM and allow someone to test fly them to the moon ... and aside from that , I don't know how it could be proven that any Apollo lunar module would be able to fly , land and then launch again from the lunar surface .
  20. Evan .... My apologies for using the word allegedy in referring to your military profession ... I believe you ... and I wouldn't appreciate anyone accusing me of not being a song writer , cuz I write some mighty fine songs ! I think we have all gone off on unnecessary tangents on these threads, which are completely unproductive .... I came here to discuss the various aspects of the Apollo hoax , yet constantly find myself forced to post about things which are not relevant to that topic ... It's never been a level playing field concerning this subject and it never will be on forums such as this one ... It would seem that even Steve Phillips may have been disgusted enough to leave ... I hope not because the guy has much to offer ... It's just not easy to keep posting conspiracy evidence here when obnoxious , condescending know it all's continue to pound away at you for daring to even post here ... I don't care much for moderators , as most of them don't know how to be objective or fair when they personally disagree with someone's opinion , but in this situation, this forum could use a bit of moderation to stop the off topic subjects and constant insults . Dave ... Was that an offer to write an Apollo moon hoax conspiracy book together ? ... How sweet ! ... I knew one day you would see it my way ....
  21. Craig Lamson , the almighty know it all professional photographer .... LOL .... Still attacking and insulting the messenger because you don't like the message , I see ... Why is that I wonder ? ... because you can't refute the message ? .... Your program of ridicule and ad homs is as old as you are ... not to mention boring , redundant and ridiculous .... I may not know a lot about taking photographs of stars and what the exposure time should be but I do know quite a bit about psychology and you are nothing but a typical nasty nasa defender with only one agenda .... To shut up the conspiracy researchers and Apollo hoax believers at any cost and by any insulting means necessary ... Your posts never have anything to do with discussing the evidence in the articles I post , but rather are nothing but a constant personal attack on me ... From the way you act I'm beginning to believe you may have even had a part in faking some those cheesy looking Apollo moon set photographs yourself ....
  22. Craig ... I'll tell you what you're a master of ... BS , disinformation , insulting those you disagree with and blowing your own horn with your self inflated ego .. That's what you're a master of ! .... This is the internet for godsake ... You can't prove any of your claims , even if they were true ... You could be a janitor of an elementary school for all we know . Instead of posting your typical nonsense , why not try 'refuting' the author's photographic evidence of superimposed , cut and pasted images , in those phony Apollo photographs , which in no way possible could have really been taken on the moon . I don't know the exposure time of photographing stars ... It would vary with the circumstances and the F stop positions involved ... My not being a professional photographer doesn't mean I don't understand anything about the subject of photography ... It's not very difficult to spot studio faked pictures with no depth perception to them , or superimposed images .... You see, there is a big difference between what planets look like and what studio sets look like ... and if you're really such a big shot professional photographer , then I can't understand why you can't see the difference .
  23. Very cute ... Try to make the "conspiracy nut " look paranoid ... How obvious of you ... Apparently you will stop at nothing and will stoop pretty low in trying to defend your position about Apollo ... That guy's post on the UM made perfect sense .... Otherwise there would be no way that his friend would have been banned before he finished his post and no way that my posts could have been copied and replied to the very second I hit submit .
  24. Matthew .... The photos in Hawkins book are obviously official nasa Apollo photos and he even provided the ID numbers to most of them .... It's possible that he altered the images himself , this is true ... but after what I read in his book , it is pretty obvious to me that it was nasa who has switched numbers , altered images , and has now pulled most of these photos off of their web sites .... He even went to the newspapers with the proof that Apollo was faked , but the people who worked in the offices of the various newspapers informed Hawkins that they couldn't print his Apollo hoax information even if they wanted to ... He was apparently told that all of the news that is printed in the papers and that goes out over the air on radio and TV , is government controlled ... So there was absolutley no way they would be allowed to print his Apollo hoax evidence ... He was also told that for National security reasons , they could never print his findings .... and that his only recourse was to write a book , which is one of the few things left that isn't government controlled .
  25. Sorry , I missed your question before .... Proof of the alleged technical accomplishments of the Apollo space craft would have to come from outside sources ( those other than nasa or the companies who designed the Apollo hardware ) which are not only qualified to recognize the alleged space flight capabilities of the Apollo equipment , but would also have access to study the actual LM's , CSM's and Saturn V rockets themselves , or at least the blueprints to these crafts , which would prove their flight capabilities .... and in the case of the LM's , their landing and launch capabilities also ... But of course no one has ever done this to my knowledge .. and unfortuantely the blueprints to all of these Apollo crafts , including the lunar buggy , have convienantly been destroyed by nasa under orders of the FBI.
×
×
  • Create New...