Duane Daman

I already answered your question ... I use nasa sites to show that the Apollo Program was a 30 billion dollar scam and swindle .....When I use conspiracy sites to prove this sad fact , everyone complains that it is just ignorant , incorrect information which can be easily debunked .... If ONE thing is shown to be incorrect on any conspiracy site , then the nasa defenders claim that the entire site is wrong and that ALL of the evidence on it can not be trusted or used as a source for proving that Apollo was a hoax ... So I decided if you really want to uncover a lie ( the Apollo manned moon missions ) you need to go to the source of that lie ( nasa ) .... and that is where you can discover how they not only faked the Apollo photography but also the entire Apollo Program . On the other hand, you and the other nasa defenders use nasa sites to try to prove that the manned moon landings were real events .... and there in lies the problem.... nasa has made some very extraordinary claims when it comes to their alleged technical abilities of landing six manned missions on the moon from 1969 to 1972 .... and has been stated before , extraordinary claims call for extraordinary proof .... but sadly, nasa doesn't have any technical proof of ever landing men on the moon , except for the self serving , uncorrorborated information on their own web sites ..... Unless there is outside verification of these alleged technical accomplishments , then unsubstantiated nasa sources can not be used as proof of their claims of landing manned missions on the moon .

"a person arguing a subject from a position of abject ingnorance" .... "You make the CT club look oh so silly." .... "you are just being stupid." ... "You play the victim very well.." .... "you are a victim of your own ignorance of the subject matter you have chosen to argue." .... and ... "You have shucked and jived for quite a few posts... " And all of this 'amazing insight' in only ONE post from you !?!... Yes sir , I can just feel the love ... I could have sworn that you recently posted an apology to the forum owner here and even told him that you would ... watch those fingers of yours from posting any more insults to me in the future .... Yeah , right !

Well , it's not exactly any kind of tradition bio , but I will post verbatum what he wrote in his book about his education , scientific qualifications and current research ... He mentions several schools , so maybe someone can at least verify his education ... He does seem to be one elusive fellow though and I believe he has been confused with other people at times .... Possibly Stephen Hawkings . I am on my way out for dinner in a few minutes , so I will post this info in the next couple of days when I have a bit more time .

Duane...can you post images of some of his best discoveries? Jack Jack ... I plan to post a lot of Hawkins' discoveries here .. and if it's not breaking any copyright laws I will scan some of the book pages to show some the the photos he put in his book and also the text about the lunar buggy debacle. I'm only half was through his book , but so far what has impressed me the most is his showing real Clementine photos of what the solar corona , Venus, Earth and the stars really look like from lunar orbit ( they are very different from the Apollo fakes ) ..... Also his scientific evidence of how the lunar buggy couldn't have possibly functioned or performed as nasa claimed it did on the 'moon' .... The photos which apparently show a fly harness leaning againt the LM on the 'moon' , and photos of astronauts showing the fly system straps hanging out from the sides of their PLSS packs . ( it looks like nasa forgot to air brush them out ) Of course the nasa defenders always have clever little answers for all of these anomalies because nasa has had plenty of time to correct their mistakes .... I have already found where nasa has changed the ID numbers or possibly altered or even pulled some of these photos from their web sites ... but there are still some intact in high defination which show the evidence of the fly system straps . If I can't find some of the important photos on the nasa sites , I will scan some of the book pages to send to you in URL form via your e-mail .... Hope you have a great holiday Jack !

Like I posted to Evan .... all you know how to post to me and every other conspiracy believer is insults and ridicule .... But then that's so typical of someone of your caliber . You can insult me all you like but that won't stop me from posting here or on any other forum about how nasa faked the official Apollo record . Not everyone was fooled by nasa's hoax .... And not everyone has to agree with you or your opinions either ... but for some reason when they don't , it really seems to piss you off . But enough of this nonsence ... Not only did I promise the web site owner that I wouldn't mix it up with you anymore , it's Christmas ... and I would like to believe that there are still some nice people in the world somewhere ... even if not here on this forum ...

BAH HUMBUG !! ... Well, that's my "worldview" on it anyway ! Just kidding .... Happy Holidays everybody ! ..... ....

Evan ... My post was not directed to you ... It was written to the king of insults himself , the despicable Craig Lamson ... That is unless you are the same person using different names . I don't insult people until they have stepped all over me with thier condescending insults first ... It's rather difficult to have a discussion about any of this with these types of tactics being used all the time ... The purpose is to frustrate the conspiracy researchers to the point where they are so disgusted by this crap that they all just give up and go away .... Calling us ignornant , uninformed , dishonest etc. etc. is done with the sole purpose of trying to make us all look stupid and also used to get us to insult you back ... This is such a waste of time ... The old program of ridicule , ad homs and vilifying the opposition is utterly ridiculous , but unfortunately continues to be used repeatedly on every forum where the Apollo discussions take place . ... I was hoping on this forum at least , that this type of behavior wouldn't take place and that things would be different ... But obviously not .

Well the fact that the number I gave you came up with the wrong photo is not a good thing .... Either Charlie got the number wrong or nasa has changed the numbers or deleted certain photos from their sites , just as Hawkins claimed would happen after his book came out . In a few days I will scan a couple of the pages from his book about the lunar buggy and Hawkins' scientic proof of how it could not possibly have done what nasa claimed it did on the moon .... I don't think I would be abusing any copyright laws in doing that ... It's not like I'm claiming it to be my work or making money off of it . I will also do some hunting for the ID numbers I think I might be able to find and also use the Wayback machine . Please tell me exactly how you found the photo you did by the number I gave you , so I can do some of investigating on my own .... Did you just put the number into a google search ? ... It's not that I don't trust you Dave , but think about it like this ... If you should find a photo that nasa claims was taken on the moon , and in the photo was a black dog sitting on the lunar buggy or a chickadee perched on one of the spacecraft while suppossedly in LEO , or perhaps a fly system harness leaning up against the side of the LM while suppossedly sitting on the moon , would you really post those photos here for me to say .... I told you the Apollo photography was faked ! .. I don't think so .

You believe that your posts are over my head ? .... Hardly . What they are is beneath my even answering them any longer . I don't know why it is that most nasa defenders feel the need to be so nasty .... Insecure about the lie they continue to defend , possibly ? .. The only nasa evidence I need to use will be the evidence which will prove they faked the moon landings .... And I was so hoping that we could be friends .

More open minded than you will ever be ... What about your "worldview" ? ... It seems pretty closed minded to me ... So now you are accusing me of intellectual dis- honesty also ? ... On what grounds ? ....Because I don't trust nasa and their many ways of providing .... Never A Straight Answer ? And before making anymore condescending statements about that "red Georgia clay " , maybe you should know that I was born and raised and educated in New York and have only moved to Georgia recently ... So now maybe you will stop making the "Georgia cracker " implications in your unnecessary comments .... I have never seen any real discussions coming from you or proper rebuttals either , but rather only personal insults ... But then I suppose that's very typical of someone with your closed minded "worldview" .

Dave ... Thanks for the info on the Wayback Machine ... That might be helpful in trying to track down some of Charlie's photo evidence ... A lot of the ID numbers look like this .... ID# 10074212 ... In this particular photo the "whiz kids" think they see a chicadee bird on the back wall of the Gemini 8 spacecraft being photographed in LEO ( according to nasa ) ... I'm not sure what the object is , but it doesn't look much like a bird to me .... Maybe you can find this photo and see what you think . How do I go about finding these kind of numbers ? ... Will the wayback macine site link me to nasa photos with these type of numbers or is there another way I should go about finding them ? I do have a scanner , so for the photos I can't find by number ( not all of them are numbered ) , I can post the book pages here , and we could go from there ... I could also scan some of the other pages as well , so there is no confusion as to what his claims really are about the such things as the moon rocks being faked . Now I see why the ID numbers are so important ... and if Charlie had really done his homework properly , he would have written ALL of them down .... The AS numbers I will try track down myself , as these are some of the most interesting ... but if I need help I will let you know ....Then I will post the high resolution photos here for any that might show what Charlie and his kids believe to be amomalous ... Would this Wayback machine be able to track down any earlier versions of the Apollo photos before they were possibly altered and any suppossed anomalies air brushed out ?

It's when you both have nothing to offer but insults , that I know I have hit a nerve . I am open minded enough to change my mind about Apollo if I am shown real proof of nasa landing six manned missions on the moon almost 40 years ago ... but so far no one , not even nasa , has offered any real proof of these alleged accomplishments . Are you both open minded enough to change your minds about Apollo if you were shown proof that it was all just a PR stunt for the gullible public ? The Apollo Program was a program alright ... as in : ONE BIG MOVIE PRODUCTION !

"These are also backed up by the pictures and videos of them being collected as well as the ALSJ. " Sorry , but nasa web sites , photos and vidoes are not proof of anything .... There would need to be outside corroboration of nasa's allleged accomplishments , including how the moon rocks were gatherd , during the Apollo missions ... and unfortunately for nasa , no one else was on the 'moon' to back up their claims of going where no man has gone before ! ... or since , for obvious reasons .

I now have Charlie's book ... He obviously is not the same guy who wrote that disertation but he is a very real person with some pretty impressive credentials , and not someone else pretending to be him ... He wrote his book after spending two years of investigating the Apollo Program , mostly online with a team of what he calls his "whiz kids " .... The book is a hoot ! ... It's mostly written for this team of kids for all the hard work they put into investigating the Apollo hoax ... The story goes like this ... He came home from work one day to find his son and some of his friends online discussing some of the moon hoax info and exclaiming that the Apollo astronauts never really went to he moon ! ... Charlie told them that they had to be kidding ? ... Of course the Apollo astronausts went to the moon ! ... Why would they think they hadn't ? .... Then the kids preceeded to show him some of the evidence they had found online showing that Apollo was a hoax .... Well, Charlie wasn't buying any of it , but he asked the kids if they would be interested in doing a project about it ... He told them if they really believed this wild claim to investigate it in depth and see what evidence they could come up with which would prove the Apollo photographs were not really taken on the moon or that the astronauts never really went there ... So they started to look through hundreds of Apollo photos to see what anomalies they could find ... and boy did they find them ! ... But here is where Charlie's book gets pretty wild and silly , because the photos the kids came up with showed various different animals on the 'lunar' surface in the form of what are obvioulsy rocks and probably other misidentified objects ... The "bunnies in the clouds " thing ..... But here's where it gets better .... Charlie was so fascinated by what the kids were finding that he started to conduct his own investigation ... He studied thousands of Apollo photos , and didn't find animals but rather other anomalies such as torn spacesuits, astronaut dummies straped to lunar ladders and buggies , evidence of fly system harnesses ( like the one's they used in the practice sims ) propped up against the LM , fly system harness plugs and partial straps attached to the PLSS backpacks , which were not air brushed out of the photos , cryptic messages written in the 'lunar' soil, astronauts with open helmets ( Jack's "Mystery Image" is one of them ) and much more .... The frustrating part is that the pictures in his book are very small and difficult at times to see these anomalies very clearly ... and even though he gives most of the photo numbers , they are numbers I don't recognize from the Apollo Image Gallery and some of them he warns would most likely be pulled from the nasa sites after the publication of his book .... I have looked at enough Apollo photos to know that they are all official nasa's Apollo photos though and apparently some do contain anomalous objects .... But what some of these objects are , is hard to tell . There was one photo which he misidentified in his book though ... He claims that nasa claims it was taken on the moon , when in fact it was a photo taken during a training session .... The appparent confusion was that this photo was produced in color showing the studio background and then at some point was produced and posted on a nasa site in black and white with a black curtain dropped in the background to cover the back wall of the studio .... and then was somehow misidentified as having been taken on the moon ... He thought that nasa was trying to pass off a studio photo as a moon photo .... and from looking at his other evidence, I doubt this was any slight of hand done by him intentionally. He also goes into much more than the amomalies in the Apollo photos and discusses different aspects of the Apollo hoax evidence that other conspiracy researchers have never gone into before .... He explains and even shows nasa training pictures of how 1/6 gravity was faked for the film footage by using fly systems rigged on walls ( not overhead ) and then the 'moon' was superimposed using blue screen imaging , how the LM really 'flew' , how early grid blue screen imaging was used to shoot some of the astronaut's still photos on the 'moon' ( and has pictures to prove this ) ... and that's as far as I've gotten so far .... I will admit that a lot of what he put in his book was because his "whiz kids" found it .... but even with the silliness aside , Hawkins has brought up serious subjects and has put forth some very interesting hoax evidence .... But because of some of the adolescent 'evidence' , I can see why his book got such mixed reviews . I plan to check out these photos in high resolution ... Even the one's where the kids think they saw dogs and cats and birds ( if I can find them ) and also see what I can turn up concerning some of his other hoax claims .... What fascinated me the most about the anomalous photos so far , were the two showing the fly system harnesses leaning up against the LM .... If he included the photo numbers in his book and if I can find them on the Apollo Image Gallery site , that would be quite a find indeed ! But then as Charlies wrote in the beginning of his book .... "I doubt you will able to find some of these photos on the nasa sites after my book is published " .... I bet he's right about that !

I found one of the articles which states that the Apollo astronauts only picked up a couple of pounds of rocks by hand and that the rest were collected "automatically" .... This web site attempts to refute all of the conspiracy information and this was one of it's 'rebuttals' to the hoax proponent's belief that the moon rocks really come for the Antarctic . "3. ( hoax claim) The rocks brought back from the Moon are identical to rocks collected by scientific expeditions to Antarctica. " ( rebuttal ) Chemical analysis of the rocks confirms a different oxygen isotopic composition and a surprising lack of volatile elements. There are only a few 'identical' rocks, and those few fell as meteorites after being ejected from the Moon during impact cratering events. The total quantity of these 'Lunar Meteorites' is small compared to the more than 840 lb (380 kg) of lunar samples returned by Apollo (although NASA states that only a couple of pounds were actually picked up by astronauts, the rest being collected automatically). Also the Apollo lunar soil samples chemically matched the Russian luna space probe's lunar soil samples. http://experts.about.com/e/a/ap/apollo_moo...accusations.htm

Where is there any evidence that any of the Apollo astronauts ever measured the radiation levels on the lunar surface ? .... I can't find any ... And if you have this evidence, what were the levels ? ... According this article , it hasn't been measured before and considering the fact that the entire lunar surface is RADIOACTIVE , I think scientists are going to find that the moon is extremely dangerous for humans to walk upon. Here is an excerpt from an article called ... 'Radioactive Moon' To carefully measure and map the Moon's radiation environment, NASA is developing a robotic probe to orbit the Moon beginning in 2008. Called the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), this scout will pave the way for future human missions not only by measuring space radiation, but also by hunting for frozen water and mapping the Moon's surface in unprecedented detail. LRO is a key part of NASA's Robotic Lunar Exploration Program, managed by the Goddard Space Flight Center. One of the instruments onboard LRO is the Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER). "Not only will we measure the radiation, we will use plastics that mimic human tissue to look at how these highly energetic particles penetrate and interact with the human body," says Spence, who is the Principal Investigator for CRaTER. By placing the radiation detectors in CRaTER behind various thicknesses of a special plastic that has similar density and composition to human tissue, Spence and his colleagues will provide much-needed data: Except for quick trips to the Moon during the Apollo program, most human spaceflight has occurred near Earth where our planet's magnetic field provides a natural shield. In low-Earth orbit, the most dangerous forms of space radiation are relatively rare. That's good for astronauts, but it leaves researchers with many unanswered questions about what radiation does to human tissue. CRaTER will help fill in the gaps. Right: The CRaTER telescope consists of silicon radiation detectors (red) mounted on detector boards (green), separated by pieces of "tissue-equivalent" plastic (tan). [More] Out in deep space, radiation comes from all directions. On the Moon, you might expect the ground, at least, to provide some relief, with the solid body of the Moon blocking radiation from below. Not so. When galactic cosmic rays collide with particles in the lunar surface, they trigger little nuclear reactions that release yet more radiation in the form of neutrons. The lunar surface itself is radioactive! So which is worse for astronauts: cosmic rays from above or neutrons from below? Igor Mitrofanov, a scientist at the Institute for Space Research and the Russian Federal Space Agency, Moscow, offers a grim answer: "Both are worse." Mitrofanov is Principle Investigator for the other radiation-sensing instrument on LRO, the Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector (LEND), which is partially funded by the Russian Federal Space Agency. By using an isotope of helium that's missing one neutron, LEND will be able to detect neutron radiation emanating from the lunar surface and measure how energetic those neutrons are. http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/08...oactivemoon.htm ................................................... I will see if I can find the articles again claiming that the moon rocks were gathered mechanically, except for a few lbs. which nasa claims were picked up by the astronauts .... But with all that the astronauts had to do , including singing, romping, cavorting around in their lunar buggies and taking litterly THOUSANDS of fascinating photos, did they really have time to pick up 840 lbs. of moon rocks by hand during their short stints on the 'lunar' surface ? ... I highly doubt it . .......................................................... And here is part of another article written by a scientist who doesn't believe that astronauts ever walked on the moon or that nasa ever measured the radiation levels on the moon during the Apollo missions . NASA wants to measure radiation on the moon NASA is planning to send astronauts to the moon by the year 2020. However, before they send people to the moon, they want to measure the radiation levels on the moon with an unmanned probe named CRaTER: http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/08...oactivemoon.htm Didn't NASA measure radiation levels in the 1960s? NASA sent several Surveyor probes to the moon during the 1960s before sending the Apollo astronauts: http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/lunar/surveyor.html NASA claims the purpose of the probes was to analyze the moon's surface. At the time those probes landed on the moon, nobody knew whether the moon's surface was hard enough for people to walk on. Some people wondered if areas on the moon were covered with such a thick layer of powder that the Apollo spacecraft would sink into it. The surveyor probes showed that it was possible to land a spacecraft on the moon because the surface was crushed rocks, not deep, soft powder. NASA admits that the Surveyor 6 measured solar protons and cosmic rays: http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/Master...7-112A&ex=2 What did the probe determine? Were the solar protons and cosmic rays at such a low level that the astronauts would be safe? Why is NASA so secretive about radiation levels in outer space? After discovering that the moon was safe to walk on, NASA claims to have sent six teams of astronauts to the moon. They landed in six different locations. However, none of them bothered to measure the radiation. NASA claims that the Apollo astronauts never bothered to measure radiation levels because they were on the moon for only a couple days. A more likely explanation for why the astronauts never measured radiation levels on the moon is because they never went to the moon. Furthermore, it is possible that the surveyor probe discovered that radiation levels on the moon were so high that no astronaut could possibly survive in those thin spacesuits and that lousy lunar lander. Perhaps NASA classified all the radiation measurements as “Top Secret” so that we do not realize that outer space is dangerous. http://www.erichufschmid.net/MoreInfoForSc...eChallenge.html

No , I believe the question was ... Did you (Armstrong ) see any stars in the solar corona while looking up from the lunar surface ?..... And Armstrong answered that he couldn't see any stars by eye but only by looking through the optics ..... The press was not directing this question to Collins and there was never any mention of what Collins might have been photographing from lunar orbit . The question was to Armstrong and he was answering it when Colling interrupted him and blurted out that he didn't remember seeing any stars at all .... And that is when Armstrong looked extremely uncomfortable and nervous about what Collins was saying ... I was looking for this clip about the stars discussion but only found the clip before they were asked any questions by the press , and looked as if they were absolutely miserable about having to discuss their trip to the moon . I will see if I can find the other clip so we can get the direct quote about seeing stars.

Damn ... That's too bad .... I hadn't tried to call him yet ... What about his e-mail address ? .... It is posted on this site also .... I will try to call and then see if I can get an e-mail to him ... If none of that works, maybe there will be some information in his book on how to reach him . Oh and TV talk shows come and go , so that might be why some of them can't be found ... Or maybe some of them could be European ? .... Good Morning America is still on the air ... Maybe that would be a resource. “The person you are trying to reach is not accepting calls " ....Well , this would show that it is still a valid phone number , but for whatever reason he just might not want to talk to anymore Apollo moon hoax "nuts" or nasa geeks ?? LOL

Evan .... You have posted where several astronauts had conversations about seeing stars while allegedly in lunar orbit , but are there any conversations between the Apollo 11 astronauts about seeing them ? .... Because in their post flight press conference , Armstrong said that he couldn't see any stars unless he used the optics and Mike Collins claimed to have never seen any stars at all, during any part of their mission ( that was the part where it looked like Neil wanted to box him ! ) So don't you think it's quite possible that after some of the mistakes and ommisions made by the first mission to the 'moon' , that nasa convienantly covered some of these mistakes later by including conversations about the stars ?

I'm not talking about the confrontation with Aldren .... I'm talking about the interviews with Ed Mitchell , Alan Bean and Gene Cernan , where none of them managed to get their stories straight about what happened while going to , landing and then strolling around on the moon .... Sibrel never called any of these men liars until Mitchell literally kicked him , then shoved him and then accused him of being a dishonset xxxx who conducted shoddy journalism ... It was AFTER Sibrel caught them in their lies and complete contradictions and was kicked and then shoved and accused of being a xxxx , that he then turned around and told Mitchell that pretending to walk on the moon when he really hadn't , was a Satanic lie . I don't think that it was right of Sibrel to interview these guys under false pretenses , but there was no other way he could have ever gotten an interview with any of them ... and then exposed them for the liars they obviously are .

Measuring the levels of radiation on the lunar surface is not the same thing as those personal skin dosage meters that the Apollo astronauts allegedy carried with them to make sure they weren't receiving lethal doses of radiation while strolling on the 'moon' one day ... Today's scientists are the first one's to admit that they don't know very much about the moon at all ... and also that they have no knowledge of the amounts of radiation on the lunar surface .... So no , it was not measured during the Apollo missions . I have been duped by no one .. Not the conspiracy researchers and more importantly not by nasa and their bogus Apollo Program .... Nor am I confusing the Russian unmanned missions with the Apollo missions and how the moon rocks were allegedy picked up .... I have read this same information several times now , on both pro and anti nasa sites , that only a few rocks were picked up by the astronauts and the rest were gathered by mechanical means .... I will see if I can find that web site again ... They defended Apollo and ripped apart all of the conspiracy information ... Then they made the claim about how most of the rocks were gathered by mechanical means , all the while disscussing how the moon rocks were the real physical proof of nasa landing men on the moon .... Yeah , right !

BINGO ! ... I just found him on the web site 'Authors and Experts' .... Here's the information on him .... Now I guess we can all ask him what his qualifications are and if he snagged the voice over from Reinert's documentary .... Charles T Hawkins Did the American Fake Sending Men to the Moon? Charles Hawkins, one of the greatest scientific minds of our time, believes NASA faked the moon landings. He has just published a 386-page book titled “How America Faked the Moon Landings”, which presents his evidence in a way everyone can understand. Charlie will one minute have your listeners laughing hysterically and the next minute arguing amongst themselves, if the moon landing could have been real. The nature of the subject creates a very exciting and energized program for listeners of all types. Charlie’s recent Media Appearances include: The Done Pace Show, The Roger Doyle Show, Dave Glover Show, Gary O’Brien Show, Greg Marshall Show, Tylor Morrison Show, Opinion Please Program, the Dave and Amy Show, Mike Donavon Show, the Pat Bullock show and even Ringside Politics, Charlie has also been on dozens of Morning News Shows including Good Morning America, The Coffee Talk Show and the Star 103 Morning Show. For more information, please contact Charles T Hawkins Tel: 612 801-2015 Fax: 612-801-2015 Email: Charles T Hawkins http://authorsandexperts.com/search_detail.php?recordid=612

Interesting you should ask that question , as I am having a discussion about him and his apparent credentials on another forum at this time .... The only person to turn up so far is a scientist from El Paso , Texas who wrote this disertation ... "A study of five galatic radio sources at 5 GHz " ... Other than that , there are just the book reviews to go by . I have ordered his book and will hopefully receive it in a few days ... Then maybe I can find out who he is and what his qualifications are ... and hopefully even find a way to contact him .

Dave ... As usual you need to have the last word on everything , so I will let you have it ... But the bottom line is this ... You don't have any proof that Reinart switched the voice over dubs in the "football rock" scene to the "house rock " scene .... You are only assuming this is the case because of the messy way he put together his documentary using "artistic license" .... Nor can you prove that Hawkins got his video clip from Reinert's documentary either .

Steve .... You may have worked in a "psychiatric setting" for more than 20 years , but you obviously are not a psychiatrist ... because if you were , you would be able to recognize the body language of a xxxx ... Or in the case of these interviews with the Apollo astronauts, many liars . Evan .... Bart Sibrel had not called anyone a xxxx ... Nor had he stalked anyone or broke into their homes to conduct these interviews .... His questions were not confrontational in any respect until AFTER they had all squirmed and stuttered and sweated , trying to answer his questions . Yes, he set up the interviews under false pretenses because if he admitted who he was and what his opinion was about Apollo , none of them would have ever granted him any of these interviews to begin with .... When it comes to being questioned by those who want proof that these men really walked on the moon , or even honest answers about anything concerning the Apollo missions , all of the Apollo astronauts run away like a pack of guilty criminals .... That is what I mean by being reclusive ... Not granting interviews to those who question the validity of the Apollo Program ....I wasn't saying that they didn't go on with their lives after the Apollo debacle . Have you even bothered to watch this documentary, or are you only going by what your dear friends at clavius have to say about this ? ....Which of course would be anything but the truth . The astronauts were twitching and squriming and sweating and stuttering and LYING , long before Sibrel even announced who he was or why he really wanted to interview them .... So your accusations about Sibrel in this context are patently untrue .