Bernice Moore

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-05-05-nuclear-football_x.htm

According to Manchester, Gearhart had the football, and he was not left behind at Parkland. Johnson and his men paid no attention to him (I'm sure Johnson knew exactly what was going on and that the Russians had nothing to do with it), but Gearhart took it upon himself to sit on a policeman's lap from Parkland to Love Field.

Manchester says that eyeglasses seen reflecting light from the rear in the photo of Johnson being sworn in are Gearhart's glasses.

Ron

''Manchester says that eyeglasses seen reflecting light from the rear in the photo of Johnson being sworn in are Gearhart's glasses.''...in back on the right..b

Some Gearhart information...b

the football

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=3833&st=0

Thanks Allan..b

News Coverage FOR JFK JR MISSING PLANE.. http://scottmyers63.com/jfk2/media.html

Thanks so much Bernice, sorry to trouble you so. I know I've seen shape drawings made by Oswald someplace, shape drawings like the ones I'm making right now. I suppose his many wallets are photographed and inventoried somewhere - I'll do some more looking.

I can see already that I can come up with quite a few names, but some of the words and names were clearly forefront on the creators mind - "Gabaldon", "Win Scott", and "Assassinate(s)". "Western Oil" (or West Oil, or N.West Oil, or S. West Oil) seems to be intended too. Wherein others, "Ed Collins", "Roselli", "Indio, E. Santana, the shapes get a little more complicated. We have such a lousy photograph of the package, that looking for information there becomes a Rorschach Test, but there are clearly pencil-type markings on the package, and a better photo might reveal what the maker had in mind for us to know - I think Bill Kelly had a line on the original at one time.

Thanks again,

Tom

Your very welcome Tom, it does take some time but is also very interesting, and found were a great many new sites out there, surprised by the number.i hope Harry was able to help you with Gabby as he is about the only on here now that would know, from his contact with him. and no wallet lists were found, though i do believe i have photos somewhere of what were inside, of at least one...will look into that..yes you have your very own Rorschach Test developed...for now take care..best b

http://jfkassassination.net/russ/jfkinfo/jfk8/hand.htm#evidence

THE EXAMINATION OF THE HANDWRITING AND FINGERPRINT EVIDENCE

Thank you Josh, appreciate your effort and your report on your interview with Beverly, good work, kudos..b

Hi Tom; I have spent the day searching, and have found nothing relating to a few pieces of paper with markings on them, nothing in the collections, nor on the evidence sites, nor through the google photos re evidence, but mighty interesting just the same, and some added to the collection....here are the two main sites, i do believe to see what they did save or register of what was gathered....thanks again for your work, very interesting..best for now, will continue to have a look..sorry .. ..b

Warren Commission Exhibits

http://jfkassassinat.../wcexhibits.htm

11/22/63 Paine search list DPD

http://jfkassassinat...s/DPDlist22.htm

Baylor University Libraries Digital Collections http://digitalcollec...ld/order/nosort

JFK Assssination Documents etc

https://www.maryferr...ation_Documents

Stovall Report on items taken from Paine Home

http://www.jfklancer.com/kacspr02/stovall.html

Inside Older Air Force One Plane, Kennedy, JFK, LBJ, Pima Air Museum - YouTube#at=14#!..b

#!

hi joe; the one above,the one of af 1 with the coffin loaded, is from the web, i had a much smaller one, so i went looking

to see what was available at google photos, and i borrowed it... is something wrong with it...??is it yours ???there was no copyright associated with it...not that i saw... or do you mean the autopsy painting ugh photo, that was from rich's years ago, someone posted it there and it ended up in the collection......if that;s the one you mean... thanks b

No, nothing wrong with it, and, no, it's not mine. I was just wondering where it came from. The AF1 painting one with it in flight showing the interior and the coffin.

Joe

hi, good, thought i tripped again, i am very careful with the photos i borrow or collect...cause once some time ago, i got you know what, when i did not ask, and i was suppose to, it is a larger copy, the newest one.there were no instructions along with it at all, and no copyright either....take care b..

hi joe; the one above,the one of af 1 with the coffin loaded, is from the web, i had a much smaller one, so i went looking

to see what was available at google photos, and i borrowed it... is something wrong with it...??is it yours ???there was no copyright associated with it...not that i saw... or do you mean the autopsy painting ugh photo, that was from rich's years ago, someone posted it there and it ended up in the collection......if that;s the one you mean... thanks b

Hi Joe; Your welcome, imo also, there certainly is , was something wrong, also keep in the back of your mind the effort by some to go to Walter Reed HOSPITAL, SOME YEARS BACK SOME TRIED TO CONNECT BETHESDA AND w/r BUT NOTHING CAME UP WITHIN THE RESEARCH ..sorry caps....except there was a back road from one to the other to get there rather quickly, but that's another go around, imo David Lifton, nailed these beggars years ago and now his research has again been confirmed by Doug Horne, two OF THE GREAT RESEARCHERS imo within this continuing morass...here is A/F 1 showing where the coffin was situated on the flight back to Andrews..fyi....take care b..

The Air Force One at the Reagan Library is nearly identical to the one used on 11-22-63. It's quite confined inside. It's hard to imagine any significant movement of any type in the front or the back or the plane that people in the middle of the plane wouldn't know about. My two cents.

http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?absPageId=226788

A Visit to SAM 26000, by James Sawa.......b

Thanks David; a couple of thoughts, mentioned in the study of the tapes is a extra time span not accounted for i believe during the Bethesda activities,an hour and more ?? is it possible that a pre autopsy could have taken place at Walter Reed Hospital, they were connected the two hospitals by a back road at the time, and W/R being the larger teaching hospital did have a camera filming taping hook up, that Betheda did not have, thinking here about the Dennis David info about seeing a film of the autopsy in Pitzer's possession ,...a couple of thoughts, thanks best b

Tommy here is the lbj leaving Parkland,with a man that some thought to be Pash,and there was a resemblance, this as well as others that show Sorrels on the day of the assassination , was cleared up by Vince Palamara, they were and are of SS Vincent Sorrels..if you feel the need, you and or whomever could contact Vince for verification, this photo btw is from Groden's jfk assassination coffee sized book.The Killing Of A President.....where he also ids Sorrels.I believe ..PS Here he is also behind Marina leaving Parkland, top left...thanks b

GOOD, BUT FOR OTHERS THAT DO NOT, THE TWO ARE POSTED....excuse caps, having trouble with it, darn..take care b

Bill in Off The Tapes, i found this bit interesting...''Death of a President, Manchester. (Footnote 9 - p. 371). "That Friday Lyndon Johnson did not know that John Kennedy had ordered the taping of all Angel conversations while the plane was in flight. On April 21, 1964, this writer learned that the Love-to-Andrews tape still existed. Since security was not involved, it was first thought that a complete transcript of it would serve as a useful appendix to this book. Presidential consent was withheld, however. On May 5, 1965, the author was permitted to read an edited transcript at the White House. Doubtless the tape will be available to future historians."

4) William Manchester, Death of the President. ''

Just A THOUGHT BUT I WONDER WHO DID AND DID NOT KNOW.....??? SEEMS SOME DID KNOW SEEING THAT INFO IS MISSING, OR THEY DID NOT AND SOMEONE BLEW THE WHISTLE TO THE OTHERS,,,THEN DELETIONS WERE MADE... THANKS AGAIN FOR ALL YOUR GREAT EFFORT THAT YOU HAVE AND DO MAKE WITH YOUR CONTINUAL RESEARCH WITHIN THE JFK ASSASSINATION...YOUR ONE OF OUR BEST..take care, excuse caps please...b

Joe fyi...Here is the sign or else threat, document that those present were coersed into putting their john henry on...b

Hi Joe; Your welcome, imo also, there certainly is , was something wrong, also keep in the back of your mind the effort by some to go to Walter Reed HOSPITAL, SOME YEARS BACK SOME TRIED TO CONNECT BETHESDA AND w/r BUT NOTHING CAME UP WITHIN THE RESEARCH ..sorry caps....except there was a back road from one to the other to get there rather quickly, but that's another go around, imo David Lifton, nailed these beggars years ago and now his research has again been confirmed by Doug Horne, two OF THE GREAT RESEARCHERS imo within this continuing morass...here is A/F 1 showing where the coffin was situated on the flight back to Andrews..fyi....take care b..

Scott why resign,?? why not just take a few weeks off, did you really comprehend what John said, ''''If I do delete your membership, you will not be able to rejoin. If that's what you want, I will do it.'' save your membership if at all possible, just do not give into the urge of signing in...

good luck with your book.b

the document of the metal casket.....fti b

Thanks for the latest Tom and very pleased to see you back, take care...best b

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7P_k2qGadFU&feature=player_embeddedwhen did reagan say this?

no288 1 month ago

@no288 The collection of radio addresses I'm told were done between 1975 and 1979

yes David... in for more ??

The page below comes from the Executive Session of the WC on =

January 27, 1964.=20

It was kept classified, though Harold Weisberg attempted to =

obtain a copy of

from the FOIA. After 6 years, with the help of

Jim Lesar, the transcript was finally given to him in 1974.

Specter sent this to J.Lee Rankin in April 1964......Specter =

I believe was aware of forseeing many problems.. MEMORANDUM

April 30, 1964

TO: Mr. J. Lee Rankin

FROM: Arlen Specter SUBJECT: Autopsy Photographs and X-rays of President John F. =

Kennedy In my opinion it is indispensable that we obtain the =

photographs and x-rays of President Kennedy's autopsy for the following =

reasons:=20

1. THE COMMISSION SHOULD DETERMINE WITH CERTAINTY WHETHER =

THE SHOTS CAME FROM THE REAR. Someone from the Commission should review =

the films to corroborate the autopsy surgeons' testimony that the holes =

on the President's back and head had the characteristics of points of =

entry. None of the doctors at Parkland Hospital in Dallas observed the =

hole in the President's back or the small hole in the lower portion of =

his head.=20

With all the outstanding controversy about the direction of =

the shots, there must be independent viewings of the films to verify =

testimony which has come only from Government doctors.=20

2. THE COMMISSION SHOULD DETERMINE WITH CERTAINTY WHETHER =

THE SHOTS CAME FROM ABOVE. It is essential for the Commission to know =

precisely the location of the bullet wound on the President's back so =

that the angle may be calculated. The artist's drawing prepared at =

Bethesda (Commission Exhibit #385) shows a slight angle of declination.=20

It is hard, if not impossible, to explain such a slight =

angle of decline unless the President was farther down Elm Street than =

we have heretofore believed.=20

Before coming to any conclusion on this, the angles will =

have to be calculated at the scene; and for this, the exact point of =

entry should be known.=20 3. THE COMMISSION SHOULD DETERMINE WITH CERTAINTY THAT THERE =

ARE NO MAJOR VARIATIONS BETWEEN THE FILMS AND THE ARTIST'S DRAWINGS.=20

Commission Exhibits Nos. 385, 386, and 388 were made from =

the recollections of the autopsy surgeons as told to the artist.=20

Some day someone may compare the films with the artist's =

drawings and find a significant error which might substantially affect =

the essential testimony and the Commission's conclusions.=20

In any event, the Commission should not rely on hazy =

recollections, especially in view of the statement in the autopsy report =

(Commission Exhibit #387) that:=20

"The complexity of those fractures and the fragments thus =

produced=20

tax safisfactory verbal description and are better =

appreciated in the photographs and roentgenograms which are prepared."=20

B....

The W/C didn't reach any final conclusion of three shots =

from the one shooter ( Oswald ) and from one location......TSBD....that =

was done for them... There was only one government agency responsible for the =

investigation of the murder of the President...and it was never the =

W/C..... The FBI produced 5 books re their investigation in less than =

three weeks....for the W/C.... See U.S Federal Bureau of Investigations ..Investigation of =

Assassination of President John F.Kennedy,Nov 22,1963.Washington =

D.C..Federal Bureau of Investigation, Dec.9 1962.....Five Volumes.. It was error prone, as well as deceptive let alone =

distorted..report......and it proceeded the formation of said W/C..and =

it became the basis for it's none investigation.... See...Warren Commission Document number CD 1.

Only 450 words appear on the murder of the President =

within, excluding the shot that wounded citizen James Tague and the =

wound on=20

President Kennedy's throat......... From this lacking base =

the FBI asserted that Oswald was the lone, psycholologically disturbed =

assassin, which also was a conclusory statement.. In advance of the delivery to the W/C of the 5 FBI =

books...... Hoover secretly, released the findings to the press in a =

effort to mold the public's opinion... this in regarding both the =

validity of the FBI's finding and the presumption of Oswald's guilt is =

found in the W/C's executive session transcripts...they are available at =

the Mary Ferrel site...

The seven men were very busy officials, and they had little =

time nor any expertise for research. ...nor investigations....

They selected 84 men for their staff .......and they named =

as chief council Rankin, a former Solicitor General of the US.....

They did not select nor assembled a body of criminal law =

specialists, inspectors, or field investigators....they chose to rely =

entirely on several Gov agencies, mainly the FBI, to whom the others =

handed their information to........and they in turn witheld....... Their decisions doomed the W/C from the start, and on =

Dec.9/63 the W/C based it's inquiry on the FBI's five volume =

report...... The five volumes contain less than 450 pages on the murder =

of the President ....they are mainly on the psychological profile of LHO =

and biographical details of his Marine Corps youth.=20

On such a report and in so short a time, they closed the =

investigation and drew the pre- conclusion....Oswald.....3 shots from =

the 6th floor of the TSBD....he alone...was guilty....

They had shut down the Dallas Police Dept.inquiry, as well =

as the Texas Att.Gs office by Warren's personal ....interference...The =

SS as well were left to watch from the sidelines... The FBI took all of =

the evidence and such...and took full control.......and their man =

Gerald Ford a member of the W/C , reported to Hoover on the W/Cs =

information from their executive sessions.

On Jan 22 /1964.... Dulles.......Why would it be in their ( FBI) interest to say =

he ( Oswald) is clearly the only guilty one? Rankin..They would like us to fold up and quit.... Boggs....This closes the case, you see. Don't you see? Rankin...They found the man. There is nothing more to do. =

The commission supports their conclusions, and we can go on home and =

that is the end of it....... Boggs...I don't even like to see this being taken down...... Dulles...Yes.I think this record ought to be destroyed.... There was perhaps one could say a meeting of closed =

minds....within the Government agencies...... the SS handed their =

information over to the FBI..But the FBI only passed along to the W/C =

from any of the other agencies, what they felt would not damage their =

findings...Aside from all that, scullduggery , the CIA did not comply =

with handing over any information whatsoever.......when requested and =

never did...... Therefore the Commission by controlling it's own record did =

lead to a deliberate suppression, by all agencies that were involved... Keep in mind also the witnesses who stated that their info =

given to the FBI was recorded improperly....such as omitted or changed.. =

Also the investigation that the FBI was working on in New Orleans( see =

Weisberg... "LHO in N.O " ) ....... information found, statements

taken from witnesses to anything found within in that area, =

were at times not recorded till as long as ten days later....from memory =

and at times scribbled notes......Then they were told to close shop, by =

Hoover.... even though they had not completed their work, they did so =

and walked away... B......=20 "=85Secret Service men literally seized the body from local =

officials at Parkland Hospital, who were demanding that an autopsy be =

performed in accordance with Texas law. If the law had been observed, =

there might have been no controversy, and the Bethesda doctors, the FBI =

and the Secret Service would have escaped the heavy responsibility they =

now bear. Sadly and ironically, the report of the autopsy performed on =

the murdered Oswald in Dallas is a model of clarity and precision =

alongside the sloppy, ambiguous and incomplete record of the autopsy =

President Kennedy received=85the President's body remains the object of =

obscene speculation, and the country suffers needless, disruptive =

controversy. As matters stand, no single element of the (Warren) =

Commission's version of the assassination is more suspect than the =

official account of the President's autopsy."---"The Saturday Evening =

Post", January 14, 1967 The page below comes from the Executive Session of the WC on =

January 27, 1964.=20

It was kept classified, though Harold Weisberg attempted to =

obtain a copy of

from the FOIA. After 6 years, with the help of

Jim Lesar, the transcript was finally given to him in 1974.

Specter sent this to J.Lee Rankin in April 1964......Specter =

I believe was aware of forseeing many problems.. MEMORANDUM

April 30, 1964

TO: Mr. J. Lee Rankin

FROM: Arlen Specter SUBJECT: Autopsy Photographs and X-rays of President John F. =

Kennedy In my opinion it is indispensable that we obtain the =

photographs and x-rays of President Kennedy's autopsy for the following =

reasons:=20

1. THE COMMISSION SHOULD DETERMINE WITH CERTAINTY WHETHER =

THE SHOTS CAME FROM THE REAR. Someone from the Commission should review =

the films to corroborate the autopsy surgeons' testimony that the holes =

on the President's back and head had the characteristics of points of =

entry. None of the doctors at Parkland Hospital in Dallas observed the =

hole in the President's back or the small hole in the lower portion of =

his head.=20

With all the outstanding controversy about the direction of =

the shots, there must be independent viewings of the films to verify =

testimony which has come only from Government doctors.=20

2. THE COMMISSION SHOULD DETERMINE WITH CERTAINTY WHETHER =

THE SHOTS CAME FROM ABOVE. It is essential for the Commission to know =

precisely the location of the bullet wound on the President's back so =

that the angle may be calculated. The artist's drawing prepared at =

Bethesda (Commission Exhibit #385) shows a slight angle of declination.=20

It is hard, if not impossible, to explain such a slight =

angle of decline unless the President was farther down Elm Street than =

we have heretofore believed.=20

Before coming to any conclusion on this, the angles will =

have to be calculated at the scene; and for this, the exact point of =

entry should be known.=20 3. THE COMMISSION SHOULD DETERMINE WITH CERTAINTY THAT THERE =

ARE NO MAJOR VARIATIONS BETWEEN THE FILMS AND THE ARTIST'S DRAWINGS.

Commission Exhibits Nos. 385, 386, and 388 were made from =

the recollections of the autopsy surgeons as told to the artist.=20

Some day someone may compare the films with the artist's =

drawings and find a significant error which might substantially affect =

the essential testimony and the Commission's conclusions.=20

In any event, the Commission should not rely on hazy =

recollections, especially in view of the statement in the autopsy report =

(Commission Exhibit #387) that:=20

"The complexity of those fractures and the fragments thus =

produced

tax safisfactory verbal description and are better =

appreciated in the photographs and roentgenograms which are prepared."

B....

CIA Document #1035-960, marked "PSYCH"=20

RE: Concerning Criticism of the Warren Report

1. Our Concern. From the day of President Kennedy's assassination on, =

there has been speculation about the responsibility for his murder. =

Although this was stemmed for a time by the Warren Commission report, =

(which appeared at the end of September 1964), various writers have now =

had time to scan the Commission's published report and documents for new =

pretexts for questioning, and there has been a new wave of books and =

articles criticizing the Commission's findings. In most cases the =

critics have speculated as to the existence of some kind of conspiracy, =

and often they have implied that the Commission itself was involved. =

Presumably as a result of the increasing challenge to the Warren =

Commission's report, a public opinion poll recently indicated that 46% =

of the American public did not think that Oswald acted alone, while more =

than half of those polled thought that the Commission had left some =

questions unresolved. Doubtless polls abroad would show similar, or =

possibly more adverse results.

2. This trend of opinion is a matter of concern to the U.S. government, =

including our organization. The members of the Warren Commission were =

naturally chosen for their integrity, experience and prominence. They =

represented both major parties, and they and their staff were =

deliberately drawn from all sections of the country. Just because of the =

standing of the Commissioners, efforts to impugn their rectitude and =

wisdom tend to cast doubt on the whole leadership of American society. =

Moreover, there seems to be an increasing tendency to hint that =

President Johnson himself, as the one person who might be said to have =

benefited, was in some way responsible for the assassination. Innuendo =

of such seriousness affects not only the individual concerned, but also =

the whole reputation of the American government. Our organization itself =

is directly involved: among other facts, we contributed information to =

the investigation. Conspiracy theories have frequently thrown suspicion =

on our organization, for example by falsely alleging that Lee Harvey =

Oswald worked for us. The aim of this dispatch is to provide material =

countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so =

as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries. =

Background information is supplied in a classified section and in a =

number of unclassified attachments.

3. Action. We do not recommend that discussion of the assassination =

question be initiated where it is not already taking place. Where =

discussion is active [business] addresses are requested:

a. To discuss the publicity problem with [?] and friendly elite contacts =

(especially politicians and editors), pointing out that the Warren =

Commission made as thorough an investigation as humanly possible, that =

the charges of the critics are without serious foundation, and that =

further speculative discussion only plays into the hands of the =

opposition. Point out also that parts of the conspiracy talk appear to =

be deliberately generated by Communist propagandists. Urge them to use =

their influence to discourage unfounded and irresponsible speculation.

b. To employ propaganda assets to [negate] and refute the attacks of the =

critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate =

for this purpose. The unclassified attachments to this guidance should =

provide useful background material for passing to assets. Our ploy =

should point out, as applicable, that the critics are (I) wedded to =

theories adopted before the evidence was in, (II) politically =

interested, (III) financially interested, (IV) hasty and inaccurate in =

their research, or (V) infatuated with their own theories. In the course =

of discussions of the whole phenomenon of criticism, a useful strategy =

may be to single out Epstein's theory for attack, using the attached =

Fletcher [?] article and Spectator piece for background. (Although Mark =

Lane's book is much less convincing that Epstein's and comes off badly =

where confronted by knowledgeable critics, it is also much more =

difficult to answer as a whole, as one becomes lost in a morass of =

unrelated details.)

4. In private to media discussions not directed at any particular =

writer, or in attacking publications which may be yet forthcoming, the =

following arguments should be useful:

a. No significant new evidence has emerged which the Commission did not =

consider. The assassination is sometimes compared (e.g., by Joachim =

Joesten and Bertrand Russell) with the Dreyfus case; however, unlike =

that case, the attack on the Warren Commission have produced no new =

evidence, no new culprits have been convincingly identified, and there =

is no agreement among the critics. (A better parallel, though an =

imperfect one, might be with the Reichstag fire of 1933, which some =

competent historians (Fritz Tobias, AJ.P. Taylor, D.C. Watt) now believe =

was set by Vander Lubbe on his own initiative, without acting for either =

Nazis or Communists; the Nazis tried to pin the blame on the Communists, =

but the latter have been more successful in convincing the world that =

the Nazis were to blame.)

b. Critics usually overvalue particular items and ignore others. They =

tend to place more emphasis on the recollections of individual witnesses =

(which are less reliable and more divergent--and hence offer more =

hand-holds for criticism) and less on ballistics, autopsy, and =

photographic evidence. A close examination of the Commission's records =

will usually show that the conflicting eyewitness accounts are quoted =

out of context, or were discarded by the Commission for good and =

sufficient reason.

c. Conspiracy on the large scale often suggested would be impossible to =

conceal in the United States, esp. since informants could expect to =

receive large royalties, etc. Note that Robert Kennedy, Attorney General =

at the time and John F. Kennedy's brother, would be the last man to =

overlook or conceal any conspiracy. And as one reviewer pointed out, =

Congressman Gerald R. Ford would hardly have held his tongue for the =

sake of the Democratic administration, and Senator Russell would have =

had every political interest in exposing any misdeeds on the part of =

Chief Justice Warren. A conspirator moreover would hardly choose a =

location for a shooting where so much depended on conditions beyond his =

control: the route, the speed of the cars, the moving target, the risk =

that the assassin would be discovered. A group of wealthy conspirators =

could have arranged much more secure conditions.

d. Critics have often been enticed by a form of intellectual pride: they =

light on some theory and fall in love with it; they also scoff at the =

Commission because it did not always answer every question with a flat =

decision one way or the other. Actually, the make-up of the Commission =

and its staff was an excellent safeguard against over-commitment to any =

one theory, or against the illicit transformation of probabilities into =

certainties.

e. Oswald would not have been any sensible person's choice for a =

co-conspirator. He was a "loner," mixed up, of questionable reliability =

and an unknown quantity to any professional intelligence service. =

[Archivist's note: This claim is demonstrably untrue with the latest =

file releases. The CIA had an operational interest in Oswald less than a =

month before the assassination. Source: Oswald and the CIA, John Newman =

and newly released files from the National Archives.]

f. As to charges that the Commission's report was a rush job, it emerged =

three months after the deadline originally set. But to the degree that =

the Commission tried to speed up its reporting, this was largely due to =

the pressure of irresponsible speculation already appearing, in some =

cases coming from the same critics who, refusing to admit their errors, =

are now putting out new criticisms.

g. Such vague accusations as that "more than ten people have died =

mysteriously" can always be explained in some natural way e.g.: the =

individuals concerned have for the most part died of natural causes; the =

Commission staff questioned 418 witnesses (the FBI interviewed far more =

people, conduction 25,000 interviews and re interviews), and in such a =

large group, a certain number of deaths are to be expected. (When Penn =

Jones, one of the originators of the "ten mysterious deaths" line, =

appeared on television, it emerged that two of the deaths on his list =

were from heart attacks, one from cancer, one was from a head-on =

collision on a bridge, and one occurred when a driver drifted into a =

bridge abutment.)

5. Where possible, counter speculation by encouraging reference to the =

Commission's Report itself. Open-minded foreign readers should still be =

impressed by the care, thoroughness, objectivity and speed with which =

the Commission worked. Reviewers of other books might be encouraged to =

add to their account the idea that, checking back with the report =

itself, they found it far superior to the work of its critics.=20

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

20 QUESTIONS --- MY VERSION ( Well, there's more than 20, but let's=20

see how smart .john's trolls are )=20

1. What type of echo produces a "puff of smoke" ?=20

2. If RFK had accepted without question the WC findings with regard=20

to the murder of his brother, what would be the purpose of his taking=20

possession of his brother's brain and locking it away ?=20

3. Name another murder where there was a "jet effect".=20

4. Why is there no "jet effect" in any other REAL death videos ?=20

5. In what other murder case was the testimony of 51 sworn and many=20

other unheard witnesses dismissed so cavalierly as "no credible=20

evidence"?=20

6. Why do the autopsy photographs show the skull intact, when the=20

"Harper Bone Fragment" was missing from the skull at the time of the=20

autopsy ?=20

7. Why did the FBI withhold from the WC Jack Ruby's ties to Organized=20

Crime and his numerous phone calls to mobsters in the weeks prior to=20

the assassination ?=20

8. JFK was was breathing when they brought him in to Parkland=20

Hospital. He had a heartbeat. Proof that his brain stem WAS intact.=20

Yet his brain stem was severed by the time his body was seen in=20

Bethesda for the autopsy. How and when was it severed ?=20

9. The autopsy photograph of the back of the President's neck shows no=20

entry wound anywhere above the top of the shoulders. Yet the Humes-=20

supervised Rydberg drawing shows a bullet wound in the base of the=20

neck. Is the autopsy photo a fake, or did Humes lie about the location=20

of the wound ?=20

http://pictures.aol.com/galleries/gjjmail/41602cXrkH0*ic1Lb0imwIK1L2J... =

10. Can you name ONE TIME when Oswald threatened President Kennedy=20

specifically ?=20

11. What evidence is there that Lee Harvey Oswald ever purchased any=20

6.5mm ammunition ?=20

12. How did a "Defector" ( with a dishonorable discharge ) get=20

employed during the missile crisis by a company which did Gov't work=20

on U-2 photos ?=20

13. When examined by the FBI, CE 399 had no bone particles, no=20

clothing fibers and no blood on it from either victim. Why not ?=20

14. How did Sgt. Hill misidentify the shells found at the Tippit=20

murder scene as coming from a .38 automatic when gun shells are=20

clearly labelled by caliber and type on the bottom and are always=20

identified by that label.=20

http://pictures.aol.com/galleries/gjjmail/41602cXrkH0*ic1Lb0imwIK1L5H... =

15. Why did the Dallas Police give Oswald a Nitrate Test that was=20

known to be unreliable ?=20

16. In 2007, the FBI admitted that the Comparative Lead Bullet=20

Analysis test was in fact unreliable, thus making the evidence it used=20

to connect Oswald to the Kennedy assassination bogus.=20

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2007/201207Oswald.htm=20

Why, then do some, including the media, still argue in favor of=20

Oswald's guilt ?=20

17. Did Hoover proclaim Oswald guilty before or after the FBI examined=20

any of the evidence ?=20

18. How did the President's tie get nicked in the front of the knot=20

from a bullet exiting ?=20

http://pictures.aol.com/galleries/gjjmail/41602cXrkH0*ic1Lb0imwIK1L69... =

19. How did Oswald fire a "steel jacket (sic) bullet" from a "high=20

powered rifle" in the Walker shooting, when his rifle could only fire=20

copper-jacketed bullets ?=20

http://pictures.aol.com/galleries/gjjmail/41602cXrkH0*ic1Lb0imwIK1LzY... =

20. What evidence is there that Oswald ever received the mail-order=20

rifle from the Post Office ?=20

21. Why did the the Dallas Police dust "4 pcs" of white "curtain rods"=20

four months after the assassination for Oswald's fingerprints (CE=20

1952) ?=20

http://pictures.aol.com/galleries/gjjmail/41602cXrkH0*ic1Lb0imwIK1L6B... =

we'll start with these. Good Luck.=20

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/78=

c3a1f568ff1863?hl=3Den#

erik jonsson