Scott Kaiser

Good morning Cliff, Yes, what a beautiful morning it is, can you really train an old dog to do new tricks? When some are so fixated on their or someone else's [theory], they no longer are able to grasp the difference between fiction, non-fiction, reality, non-reality, theory or factual. The single most important thing for some, is to take a molehill, and create a mountain out of it. I've only been arguing the fact that the CIA was in-fact responsible for Kennedy's assassination, right up to the plot of assassinating Oswald himself. The Warren Commission was responsible for the cover-up. Dulles did not sit at both panels. I will tell you this, just because Dulles was DCI did he have complete control over his field agents who were running amok? I could share some information in this forum for everyone to read, some may not believe it, because it doesn't fit with their agenda, but that is why I believe proving evidence plays an important role when demonstrating an act. I'm certain there are ex-CIA agents in this forum that read my post, and if they are aware of any information, they must know the agents I've been corresponding with for years on a more personal level. My credentials and bonifies as you put them are not that important, what is, is my accomplishments. I thought to myself, where better to expose all my facts? In a book.

And, just where was this "Cuban agent" met who had his sights on Castro, and was to assassinate Fidel Castro, but instead gave his killing device back to his handler who in turn brought it back to Washington which was the end of that. ~ Paris, France.

I missed the rule that says no one is allowed to reply to Scott because Scott says he is going to bed. Couldn't you just wait until morning to reply? Or are you implying that I can force you to stay awake by posting a reply to your post? Tom Have I not replied? Have I not said [I certainly have no problem pointing out your theoretical study rather than its practical application]. I would ask of you to read my lips, however, I thought a screen in your case would do. Now, I really need a few hours of sleep, will you not grant me this, and be the kind noble outfield researcher you are? I promise, I will get back to you in the morning sometime, I'm usually up around 11:00 am.

One last thing before going to bed, thought I'd share this with you, there seems to be a parallel between the two. On my Facebook page Mrs Bridget Dillon Jarrells states, "I was going to get to that....give me a few more minutes, you still are able to [shock me], Scott." ​For some reason, it appears I have that effect on women...... and Jim!

"Tidd doesn't know about the Garrison trial and you don't know about the internet..." I'm certain, you don't know about the assassination. My credentials? I don't have all night, going to bed remember?

Jim and Paul: Absolutely perfectly said. Logic, facts and the latest research is strong evidence that Dulles could, would, and probably did play a major role in JFK's murder. Scott and Jon's counterargument is a closed loop: 1. state AWD wasn't involved because *I* believe he wasn't involved. 2. reject out of hand the latest AWD historical facts 3. respond to facts with over-the-top sarcasm 4. make an irrelevant response 5. return to step 1 and repeat You guys sound like Cronkite who summed up LHO's marksmanship like this: 'We know he COULD do it, because he DID do it.' Tom Tom, I will be more than happy to counter your claims tomorrow, now, I am going to sleep, before I do, are you asking that I counter the claims you levy against me? Or, just all your general claims regarding Dulles? I certainly have no problem pointing out your theoretical study rather than its practical application. Do you, the reader, read anything that may be out-of-place? A slip-up perhaps, a quick correction to an answer regarding a question, these are the facts as I know them. Mr. Helms, "what role did the agency have if any in the assassination of Kennedy." Helms - "At the time the Warren Commission was formed. The agency did everything in it's power to cooperate with the Commission, and with the FBI. The FBI having the lead in the investigation. Ah, it was the agencies feeling since it was this ah, This tragic event had been taken care of ah taken place in the United States, that the FBI and Department of Justice would obviously have the leading edge in conducting the investigation." Goodnight, Scott Kaiser

What I was getting that is this. Publishers want you to present a story in a structural form that appeals to readers. This means chapter structure, paragraph structure, sentence structure. If you send them a book typescript that looks like something they can sell - they will buy it and assign a textual editor to review it with you and improve it. If you study books that you like as models of memoir and intelligence study, than the typescript you prepare, and the publisher accepts, is closer to what you want than the result might be if you just ask someone to make your sentences better and whatnot. If you prepare something that gets across what you want in the way you want to tell it, and sell that, you're better off in the long run than just adjusting technical points of writing and having the publisher's editor reshape your story into her opinion of how the story should to tell. Hitchcock only used to shoot so much film, so that the studio's editors couldn't re-cut his movies differently than he envisioned them. It's the same with books. Do most of the editor's job, and the editor can only improve on that, and not give you an adjusted story that you might not like in the end. Write your version of a memoir/intelligence study that will sell, so that you don't end up with the editor's version. You're a good man David, you didn't have to take your time and explain this to me, but you did, whereas most folks wouldn't care, or give someone like me the time of day. I especially like what you said when you say " Do most of the editor's job, and the editor can only improve on that, and not give you an adjusted story that you might not like in the end. Write your version of a memoir/intelligence study that will sell, so that you don't end up with the editor's version." That has already happened to me. Now, I feel the real need to make myself explicitly clear. I have no hard feelings towards the publisher, I hold no resentment nor do I feel as though I should hold anything negative against him. I want everyone to know, I do not. I also want to make it clear that he is a good man who in my opinion had good intentions to do well with the book. My biggest mistake is that I strive for perfection, perhaps, it's my OCD. I'm not sure how many folks even know this, but every time, not most of the time or some of the time, but everytime I post some information, I know that what I posted, I read multiple times, and as I read it back, if it does not make sense to me, I will catch the misspelled words and words I duplicated, sentence structure and so on until I feel as though progress has been made. I do not hold a grudge, by doing so, it will not allow me to get on with life. As I've said, I only blame myself for the first book, there is no one else to blame. I'm assuming 300 or more books have been sold while only 8 eight are reviews at Amazon, thank God there are only 8. I was hoping I wouldn't be finding myself agreeing with those who have rated the book with a single star. It made me stop and think what it is I can do to make it better, that is, I need to tell our entire family's life story, and, although my mother wanted some information left out, I had to put it in there. She doesn't know it yet. And, I can only assume it will either make matters worse later down the road, or she'll just say, it is, what it is, what is done, is done. I did it for one thing and one thing only, therapy. I would post a page more or two, but from the looks of what I have posted already, it appears as though this book has taken yet another toilet flush, or there are no interested bystanders. Scott

OMG, you didn't read my review then. I devoted a whole section to this specifically and noted that no other reviewers were presenting the case in toto. As per Scott in the above, he is beginning to remind me of John Hankey. At least I don't wear a toto!

There isn't even one single video of Dulles to psychoanalyze his communication habits. For those of you who don't understand what that means, it's to hear him speak, compare his arrogance to that of Helms, needless to say, all there is are photos of Dulles disseminated all over these videos with dubbed voices telling us just how bad this man was, so bad that Dulles was the CEO of Kennedy's assassination.

Hi Jon, No reflection on you, I just have to ask the question. It's a general question, again, not aimed at you. Now, for the question. Does it require to be [persuaded] in order to have a conclusive, accurate, positive ID of those involved in the assassination? Hear me out, but what if by chance say someone had information they shared, and this information didn't come from a third party or out of a address phone book page, but rather from some federal document would that be proof enough? Or, because a guy like Dulles and let's not forget George W. Bush who became friends with the Natzi's as they wanted to control Wallstreet and the banking industry according to some is the "smoking gun"? ​I thought that Brain's post of the video was "billarant," however, I do agree with you, there was no real hardline pressing as was in the video posted below, I won't mention by who, mums the word. Helms, "and that was the end of the plot," meaning that's it, end of conversation, let's move on, but you gotta love the way the speaker says for all apparent reasoning, "but for purposes of discussion" "what in the blazes are we giving an agent a device to kill Castro for if it's not an assassination plot?" Helms, "Well, if you want to have it that way, why don't you just have it that way". "it happened that way, it's quite satisfactory with me." For all my conspiracy friends out there, I can see Helms in the Oval Office with president Nixon, why did President Nixon order his staff to no longer pursue the CIA’s paper trail? Was there something that Helms told Nixon in that meeting, which caused the President to back off? Or, as some researchers now believe, did Helms blackmail President Nixon into leaving the CIA alone under threat of a possible presidential assassination? Could Helms simply have said something like, “Mr. President, we can always schedule another presidential motorcade in Dallas if this nosing around my agency doesn’t stop.” Dulles? Nah... He just wanted to be apart of the cover-up.

This is the logistics of the entire story, the premise if you will: Edwin Kaiser meets with Wilfredo Navarro, Frank Sturgis and Lee early on, he is a character-driven seeking action in the pulsating enigma of modern day Miami. Edwin has lost all sense of passion and all sense of life since a young adult. He became belligerent in order to make himself tough after joining the French Foreign Legion as a sniper. Getting back into the United States posed a challenge. Edwin's mother, Elizabeth Smith receives a letter from First Lady Mamie Eisenhower indicating how she understands her desire to have her son back in the United States. The cold war during Eisenhower's Administration had given rise to many three letter agencies believing Edwin could very well be an asset due to his skills. And, in 1960 upon his arrival to the United States, the CIA took notice in my father. My father has become an empty shell of his former self. He impersonates an officer, a Lieutenant in the United States Army, CIA, FBI and U.S. Customs agent as he infiltrates the CIA and is stealing from the United States government. Edwin refused to grant his separated wife a divorce and appears determined to put the pieces of his life back together. When once again he is called upon by the United States government reminding him of his sworn duties he signed on a sealed document which helped pave his way in returning to America that led promise to his French Visa. In 1976, his world becomes turned upside down when one day at home he's shouting, ranting and raving about how the United States government is requesting he partakes in dismantling heads of state and government officials. The United States wanted war in the Middle East and control over oil prices. Sonia Kaiser, my [mother] was too afraid to ask what it was he was carrying on about. The next thing he knows is he's on his way to Haiti as planned plots to assassinate Haiti's dictator starts to brew as early as 1969. Kaiser is also under investigation by Dallas intelligence, but the information stops and becomes blacked out. With a forged passport and license to kill he is on his way to take out the Prime Minister of Israel in 1976, but he's caught tapping phone wires. Forced to work together, the opinionated pair of Kaiser and the government often end up at odds with each other. Kaiser is determined to do what is right. His relationship with the United States government begins to fall apart when Ed Kaiser begins to steal classified material. The government becomes increasingly concerned about the information Kaiser has discovered as planned plots are taken to retrieve from Kaiser the stolen classified documents. My father has a few nemeses, himself included. Aside from Kaiser's mental state of being a true threat, there is also Frank Sturgis who poses as the villain. While the CIA does warm up to Kaiser, Kaiser holds unto a dark secret that could blow the CIA's assassination plots wide open. Kaiser's estranged wife, SONIA KAISER, 30s, also proves to be a hazard to the happiness that Edwin so desperately seeks. Finally, Edwin’s boss at U.S. Customs, STEVE 50s, the cold and uncaring head of the department, jeopardizes Edwin's career. My mother, her life and spirit are broken after the death of her husband. Her world begins to crumble after learning how her husband had died. And, she must learn how to stand on her own two feet again. The problem is that everything she's doing to make herself happier is either very self-destructive and extremely psychologically damaging, or will end up leaving her more broken than she was before. She ultimately makes the decision to hide in secret and keep the information she learned about her husband from her children so that no harm would come to them. She has learned that the FBI is obeying the directive from J. Edgar Hoover to toe the line on the "single assassin" theory on one side, and the possible conspirators on the other with Edwin Kaiser standing in the middle. The very definition of being in between a rock and a hard place when Edwin Kaiser's attaché briefcase disappears after his death.

My first choice "The Big Sleep". Relevance: More than half a century after it was over, we still don't know who killed the chauffeur... Tom I heard through the grapevine it was Connally and the "mansons," sounds like a group to me!

This is exactly why I believe difference of facts are important to debate, well, I say facts when I should have said facts vs theories. I myself have always been a bit partial "To Have and Have Not" Sometimes I know what exactly you're going to say, the other times, the other times ya'll are just stinkers.... So, you're sure you won't change your mind about this? This belongs to me and so do my lips, I don't see any difference. You know folks you don't have to act with me, you don't have to say anything, and you don't have to do anything, not a thing. Or, may be just whistle, you know how to whistle don'tcha folks? You just put your lips together..... And blow!

JD: PS "I am shocked, just shocked" that you never answered my question about Dulles' termination." Here's looking at you kid.

JD: I hate to tell you this Scott but that was not me telling you what Nixon would have done. That was Nixon. I hate to tell you this Jim, but Nixon never told me anything. SK

Sandy, Just to clarify/elaborate: Prior to reading "THE DEVIL'S CHESSBOARD" I was convinced that AWD was, at the VERY least a major participant in JFK's murder. The "Power Elite" wanted him dead. They needed someone with a track record of: flagrantly opposing the plans of the POTUS. e.g. Dulles making a personal deal with top nazi officials contrary to strict presidential orders; the BOP (no need to elaborate); assassination of Lamumba et al. experience in the successful assassination of Leaders of State while covering up any US involvement close long-term connections to the media to control the reaction of the press e.g. Henry Luce, et al the list goes on and on...Name someone else with this experience who hated JFK for publicly humiliating him and making his last official act the debacle that was the BOP? "THE DEVIL'S CHESSBOARD" and all of its new insight to AWD did NOT change my previous opinion of him, but it did lower it even more and increase my confidence that whatever title you want to give him, AWD was a MAJOR player in getting this job done. Tom Gentlemen, Please forgive me, I'm starting to become a little ditzy in my years, it's not my blonde hair, but rather my gray making me this way. As I read the quote above, I'm assuming these are the facts of which many of you rely on for accusing Dulles in the connection of Kennedy's assassination, am I correct in saying that? AWD was a [major] player in getting the job done, Dulles is making personal deals with the Nazi's, and the "Power Elite" all wanted him dead, this is it? All answers as to why Dulles participated in Kennedy's assassination. Please disregard my earlier post of exposing my PDF. I'm throwing out my facts, I don't need them anymore, the case is now solved by hearsay, theories and accusations.

I would like to leave the reader with a short version of an overview. Assassins, A Man Without A Country, is based on a true story. It's a story about a man whose love for his country turned towards bitterness when he lost his citizenship. He'd do anything to reenter the country he once lived in and loved, to the point of devoting his life services to their military which has stripped him of his citizenship for joining the French Foreign Legion. The hardships he faced in returning to America were unbearable, and in the end, he turned over a new leaf by turning on the very same government that he found guilty of committing treasonous acts. This man, a man without a country would later die, killed by the very same government that stripped him of his citizenship, as propaganda government cables would usher out information on this man as being someone who was untrustworthy, an opportunist, and a xxxx. But, the records will show that he loved his country more than anything else, and only God was before her, he died as being a true American patriot whose identity was merely stripped by definition. He impersonates a Military Officer, a United States Army Lieutenant, a Hialeah Police Officer, and agents of the CIA, FBI and U.S. Customs. He is stealing classified documents out of Homestead Air Force Base, medical supplies out of United States Coast Guard, index cards from U.S Customs and photographs from the CIA. He visits other military bases abroad. He was involved in Watergate, and he exposes the reason for Watergate. He was, the sixth burglar no one had ever known. He was sent to Israel in order for them to retrieve the information he possessed, than, perhaps, killed there too. There's proof of the company [CIA] knowing my father was leaving for Israel ahead of time as they notified FAA, Airport Security, and U.S Customs. So, how was my father able to slip thru? It was a total setup to intercept my father's contents as he traveled, but he didn't take his briefcase with him on the trip to Israel. The United States Government threw everything they had at my father, and still, they weren't able to retrieve what could have very well damaged the CIA for good. My father wasn't a cop, CIA, FBI or U.S. Customs Agent. He wasn't a Lieutenant in the United States Army. He was none of these things, he impersonated all of them, he created his own identity and credentials while infiltrating these companies. He was hand saluted by army personnel. He signed paperwork as Lieutenant Kaiser, an Officer in the United States Army for release of medical supplies from United States Coast Guard for anti-Castro groups. He "borrowed" classified documents, index cards, tapes and photos. No one would touch him, not even the United States Government because of the information he possessed. He was the world's most dangerous man alive, and the only way to have stopped him, was to kill him. This is a real story of David versus Goliath, one man against the entire government. This is his story.

Thank you for the heads up David, I think I have it down, and I know there are some very smart people in this forum. I respect that which is the reason I would also respect their overview of my material. I'm not sure if going to a Library for a comparison of life stories is the answer, could be, however, what I have now is fully completed. I'm not sure how I would compare someone else life story to how we lived unless you mean how the sentence structure is set forth. I'm now ready to fully expose everything I know. Scott

See Jim, this has got to be the reason you're beginning to grow on me, never, in my wildest dreams would I be able to do what you just did. We should all take a moment and ponder this. Let us petition this forum to change it's name from the "Education Forum" to "Jim's Got Talent." I mean, I never in my wildest dreams believed for a minute that Jim could also be equal to my childhood past time show host Johnny Carson, heck! We now have Jim telling me that I should just say what's on my mind. In-fact folks, we even have Jim telling us what Nixon would have done had he become president, now that's impressive! But, I think the single most important piece of Jim's overview should not be ignored, that is the fact he actually thinks that with all his magical powers, that if he were president, he would have done the same thing. I won't disappoint you there Jim.

My name is Scott Kaiser, for sometime now I have been upset over my first book, I only blame myself. Nevertheless, I have taken that material and I have completely rewritten the entire book adding more than seventy pages. There is now a total of 321 pages. I now understand how it works, and the importance of evidence. The purpose of my post is that I am seeking someone who is well educated and diverse in the English language, with a talent in editing, sentence structure, pronunciations and punctuations. Below, is some information culled directly out of page 63. My question to you is. Would there be a person in this forum who would be up to the challenge of reviewing my [entire] PDF with the understanding that should you accept this, I have no money to pay you, any material sent your way [will not] be duplicated, copied, or otherwise shared with anyone. In other words, no material shall be disclosed unless this author has given you written permission. If you are the one chosen, then you are agreeing to these terms and will adhere to these conditions, please contact me. Your name will not be given out, and this will be strictly and confidentially kept between us. I would also stress that time is of the essence as I plan on having this material sent out in March or sooner for publishers review. Should you be interested, please send me a personal email at scott-kaiser@hotmail.com in turn, I will send you my entire PDF for review for specified corrections. Please title in the subject line "Book editing". Thanking everyone in advance. Scott "I can still remember the apartment we lived in, it was on the second floor in Anchorage, Alaska, and the two girls my mother babysitted, I knew them as Happy and Michelle. I suppose we named her Happy because she was. My mother had tinfoil wrapped all around the windows to keep the sunlight from overpowering the inside of our two bedroom apartment. I don't remember it ever getting too dark outside. One of my parents would always walk me in my snowshoes to the bus stop where I would be picked up for school. One evening there was a small tremor, my mother knew we were having an earthquake, but I had no idea what it was. I saw the dishes move in the Kitchen, and just like that, it was over. I looked at my mother and asked, who did that? She started to laugh. At night I loved to hear the wolves howl while watching a movie series on TV with my mom called Dark Shadows. I was only four then, and between the wolves, and the move show, they both gave me an excuse to always crawl in bed with my parents. The winter weather in Alaska was more than Mom could bear. My sister and I were always getting sick, and Mom didn’t have much help financially. My father didn’t exactly help in taking care of us. I needed an ear operation according to my father, and the doctor suggested that it should be done in warmer climate. Dad called his mother who was living in Florida at the time and told her that the family was moving down there. Paraphrase from Page Two of My Father’s Letter: After his death I moved to Alaska, then on one of my trips back to Connecticut I met and married my wife, this was in 1962, I have been married now eleven years. I have a son nine and a daughter four. Because of a operation on my sons ear we were advised to have it done in a warmer climate not in Alaska. My mother lived in Florida at that time so we moved from Alaska to Florida. The operation was performed in a hospital in Miami Beach and we have lived in that area for over four years now. It was then that I started getting wrapped up in the Cuban problems. Abraham Lincoln once said that “progress” true progress starts in your heart. The Cuban people not only had in their heart the cry for freedom, justice, a new democratic government in Cuba but also the cry for “progress” they knew that the Monroe Doctrine made by President Monroe, which was made to protect the Americans, North, South and central from infiltration from other government foreign and abroad was not Kennedy. I asked myself? Do I have to see New York, Chicago or Dallas Texas? Budapest, Algeria, Vietnam or even like that small island 90 miles off the coast of Florida run by a puppet with a beard in what is a mock drama presumably by the communist party for our benefit. Remembering what Joseph Stalin said, “what is mine is mine and what is yours is negotiable,” what Nikita Khrushchev said in February holding up an ear of corn on Life magazine. We will not fight the United States man to man we will infiltrate the government, their schools, their churches, all this went through my mind, I did what I thought any American should do. I was not silent like the so called…" ASSASSINS A Man Without A Country P.63

"I'm sorry I didn't give him a pistol it would have made the whole thing a lot simpler and less exotic."

I saw Richard Helms several years ago on an afternoon talk show (I guess it was with Phil Donahue or Mike Douglas, I don't remember). He called JFK "a womanizer." And they weren't even talking about JFK. (They may have been talking about Bill Clinton, I think this was back in the Monica days.) I thought right then that what he was saying was, "That's one of the reasons we killed him." One of my favorite videos of Helms denying the CIA was responsible for Kennedy's death. One of the least believable interviews out there. Great post Brian! Emphatically! Now, where did I hear that word before coming out of 1963 in the DPD? " How would you expect me to prove it? Can those people making the allegations prove it" Ahem, yes....

I will have you know that I will always engage in a respectable debate disclosing truth, if I am ever asked any questions about my material, I will never duck and hide. I will always answer anyone with the utmost respect and courtesy, but, reader beware, if and when I am insulted, this person doesn't know how to keep his mouth shut. I will always defend the weak, provide any evidence I am asked to, and engage in any question I'm asked, this is who I am. What you see, is what you get, I don't have to duck from the public for any length of time. Time can be our best friend, or our worst enemy, and before you know it, time is over. It is in the now when I have something to say I will, tomorrow may be too late. This is who I am. Scott Kaiser

If you'd be so kind as to ask Mr. Talbot himself to join in this conversation, perhaps, I could get my friend, then there would be no defending one or the other, truthfully, I would love to hear from Mr. Talbot himself as to what multiple sources you yourself has pointed out he has used. We know about the MFF site, FOIA requests and internet searches. I'm more interested in the sources beyond that.

That's okay, we all other then me make mistakes... Apologize accepted.