Glenn Nall

"...loudly announced..." Exhibit A.

they voted for Trump because they were tired of hearing about Hillary's emails (and Foundation, and Mid-East errors, and Wall Street incestuousness, and...)... ? really? a - that's incredibly insulting to millions of voters of your own ilk b - your logic is approaching DVP standards c - damn, dude

what would be interesting to hear, from those who feel that the presidential election was a scam - or whatever they think -, is how the gubernatorial, congressional and senatorial majorities are ALL STILL Republican... was that a Comey Conspiracy, too...?

if it's permissible to say thanks without bashing someone, Doug, thanks for this. i shall watch with what seems to be a uniquely objective perspective.

They were not duplicates, Cliff. Damn, man. Where do you get your news from?

"Again, you cannot directly quote anything I write." Falsely based on the assumption that he - or anyone - goes around memorising your writing enough to quote it. "Again, you continue to pretend that 11 straight days of 24/7 negative coverage didn't have an impact on late-breaking voters." As opposed to 18 straight months of anti-Sanders/anti-Trump vitriol by every major media outlet on the planet but one. "Again, you pretend voter suppression doesn't exist." Of course it exists. Ask Bernie Sanders. "...post a fact-based argument?" Fact based? Emails, my good man. plenty of them. this stuff is documented and very public. If you haven't seen it, then this explains your obvious reticence toward backing up your own arguments aside from the generic, predictable (your "research" is not nearly as unique as you think it is), pop liberal talking points. We've heard them for years. They're rarely worth responding to...

Little help, Chris? what am I supposed to get from this graphic (I'm a Republican and sometimes need people to point things out to me...)?

you've pointed something out that has gone largely unmentioned, Ron. I've read way too many times in this most ridiculous thread the liberally applied "Comey announced" and "Comey loudly announced." The fact is that Comey announced nothing 11 days before the election. Comey sent a letter to Congress (because he said that he would do so). That's it. And he in fact refused to answer any further requests and demands from BOTH sides To suspect that James Comey is in league to thwart Hillary Clinton is to suspect that Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton discussed grandkids and golf for 38 minutes on that tarmac. I think Cliff really does possess some exclusive knowledge.

it's a shame Cliff's not in college, where, in light of all the devastating emotional difficulties due to the election results, he'd have access to puppy therapy, crayons, play-dough and safe spaces with which to snuggle in his many disapprovals.

for what it's worth, Hillary just won New Hampshire (yes, they're still counting votes, which to me is a much worse problem than why Hillary and Al didn't win the presidency). so there's FOUR more electoral votes for her. whew.

regardless of the geographic location of the large populace East or South, is it then fair that the small populations' votes are made obsolete? This is exactly what would happen if we counted votes one for one. Does the winner of the World Series win because of total number of runs or because of a standardized number games won? There's a reason...

which is exactly what "many" would love to see, it seems. it might be served to point out that 6 million fewer people voted this election - 4 million of them Obama voters. who can we blame for that?

exactly. that's the reason this process is used. but not just "the southern states." otherwise the "popular votes" in Iowa and Wyoming - and Wisconsin - would count for nothing. makes sense when you're not caught up in blame and excuse.

it is a guarantee.

very good, Ron.

President Obama, in reference to Clinton winning the popular vote by about 700,000 votes (not '11 million' or whatever numbers i've read in here): "Those who didn't vote for him have to recognize that that's how democracy works, that's how democracy operates."

that i may sleep well tonight, o lord, in the folds of a leftist's approval.

exactly! screw the evidence!

Cliff. The country's democracy operates on the Electoral College. Not the Popular Vote. Always has. For a reason. You knew that, right?

that you even quote a Tea Party member says all you need to say. irrelevant. moot. poor assumption. etc... that you include ALL based on the quotes of a few further buries your logic and shows just how out of touch you are. the Tea Party is done, Ramon, and they did NOT represent the Republican Party, and they DAMN sure don't represent me. save you air.

it's in quotes because the Democrats' definition of "protest" for the past year has involved violence. The 1st Amendment ends at the point where it violates anothers civil rights.

when they are out of argument, the revert to the predictable, ineffective and fantastically errant "racist" flag. Ramon, with all due respect, sir, you're wasting air.

so predictable...

James, Thank you. A voice of reason, and for the obvious, in the wilderness. God forbid giving credit where credit is due. The Democratic Party, and Hillary Clinton, got their asses kicked for a smorgasbord of reasons, none of which resemble competence, and they, typically, cannot accept responsibility for their own actions. Per the latino vote, the numbers speak for themselves - for those willing to read them, anyway. Denial at this level is truly shameful and embarrassing - to seek excuses like easter eggs is just another symptom of the Left's problem - and is the reason for the "protests" by people who refuse to accept democracy at its core definition. I've never been prouder to be an American than last Tuesday night when I realized that the people still had it in 'em. How this relates to JFK's murder I'm certain will be revealed...

um, watching the World Series...? oh! wait! writing FOIA requests...? (truly shocking that they volunteered a thing. no xxxx.)