Glenn Nall
-
Posts
1,422 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Glenn Nall
-
-
1 hour ago, Douglas Caddy said:
And, interestingly enough, the article doesn't even mention the Hunt v Liberty Lobby 1986 trial, and the jury's finding that Hunt was in Dallas, and that he, and "the CIA," were complicit in the murder. This finding contradicts a few things attributed to Hunt in this article...
Why is that trial so ignored? Regardless of what's-her-names lack of credibility, a large amount of the testimony and evidence is fully convincing - and the jury's finding on the record...
-
44 minutes ago, Douglas Caddy said:
Thanks for this, Doug.
Despite their unabashed (I learned that word from Playboy - the "dictionary" section always just after the centerfold) left-wing bent, RS has always had fantastic writers. This is a really good article.
"One of them had E. Howard's phone number, at the White House, no less, in his address book. Following this lead, police arrested Hunt and charged him with burglary, conspiracy and wiretapping."
The events between finding Hunt's phone number in the address book and charging him would make for some interesting fireside reading, I bet. Or Congressional reading...
-
On 12/11/2017 at 10:33 AM, Joe Bauer said:
Obviously LBJ and Meyer couldn't have done anything themselves regards something this big and unprecedented ( even thought it up ) without the approval and creative planning and involvement of the highest power people ( above them both ) who we all know.
The LBJ and Meyer did it story doesn't make sense without this larger context.
LBJ likely knew about the assassination ahead of time and been instructed as to what to do when it came down.
And Hunt's loyalty and that of his usual accomplices was not to LBJ and Meyer. If Hunt and his team were involved as he claimed...they sure weren't taking orders from LBJ and Meyer and Hoover.
I do see a narrowed primary blame deflection to LBJ and Meyer by Hunt. Away from you know who.
Was that ole covert rascal Hunt being deceptive and loyal to his brotherhood as ever until his last breath? Quite probably based on his long career history.
And again, maybe Hunt was trying to get two birds in the hand with his LBJ/Meyer did it recollection.
Maybe he thought that the big media guys would pay his son big bucks for the rights to this Earth shaking inside story. Giving his son and other children some extra financial means he otherwise was unable to provide for them?
Another thought regards LBJ. LBJ basically lost it in his final days. And not from simple dementia.
To assign him a personal psychiatrist and guard LBJ from public contact says to me that LBJ was suffering a kind of monumental guilt driven mental breakdown.
To such a degree that with a little bourbon he might just start raving to whoever was close by...all the super corrupt, even murderous things he was involved in. My guess is this is the true story line with LBJ in the end.
Look at David Morales in his final boozed up days...telling his friends ( bragging ) how we/they took care of that SOB Kennedy and his brother Bobby.
End of life boozed up lips often tell tales.
Wonder if Johnny Roselli loving Bill Harvey ever said anything while knocking down some hard shots in his final days and hours?
Joe -
"Obviously LBJ and Meyer couldn't have done anything themselves..."
No offense. First of all, no, I don't think it's that obvious - it seems to me that LBJ had tentacles reaching darker places no other Presidents' reached. To say something is obvious is to assume that everyone sees things pretty much the same way, and in this thing that's so far from possible. Not saying that LBJ had any kind of lead role, just that it's not at all obvious.'
I would urge you to look at this, in its larger context, not as an hierarchical thing but as a coordinated thing - common enemies (rogue CIA, Mafia, Army, Big Oil, etc...) making temporary pacts in the interest of a larger cause, so to speak. This would remove LBJ from the pyramid tip and make him one of a few, perhaps.
This thing required coordination and orchestration, not one single shot caller...
This is just an alternate way of looking at this; no ONE leader, but a conglomerate - it's not my concrete theory - I don't have one.
-
On 12/12/2017 at 6:57 PM, Roger DeLaria said:
To me it looks like a sloppily written "French Gunman"
i kind of agree, but that all the other words are in CAPS and "Gunman" isn't... ???
oops - except the "h" in FRENCh, where he switches to lowercase...
interesting...
-
I want to say something about my earlier questioning of the veracity of Saint John Hunt and of the letter.
Up until now, and most likely mistakenly, I've had the impression that few people have given Hunt's deathbed confession much credence. I'm not sure what particular commentaries have led me to think this; maybe it's that I've mostly just come across comments of the "Hunt naysayers." As much as I've wanted to, and even though I've always been partially convinced of Hunt's complicity, I have never bothered with listening to the tape or reading the confession because of this. It's important to me that I'm as selective as I can be with "questionable" evidence, for fear of tainting my own vulnerable objectivity with such dramma fantastico.
I was not aware, until now, that there are some of you of good repute who take it to one extent or another seriously.
Because of this thread I am glad to have learned this, and that I may look at Saint John Hunt and his dad's confession with a bit less scepticism.
Make no mistake, though - in my eyes there is never anything wrong with healthy scepticism in this JFK arena. I'm certain, as I read some of the drivel proposed in so many of these forums, that not nearly enough is employed.
-
On 12/12/2017 at 6:57 PM, Roger DeLaria said:
To me it looks like a sloppily written "French Gunman"
Roger -
I'm grateful for your signature.
Glenn
-
4 minutes ago, Douglas Caddy said:
It was posted by St. John Hunt on his Facebook home page: https://www.facebook.com/stjohn.hunt?fref=search
Yes, I see the Facebook posting. i'm (justifiably) curious about the actuality of the letter itself, and not of the Facebook post.
AS i said, there are many of us who really want to believe the words of Howard Hunt but are reticent to, considering his profession...
-
you might be misunderstand my question. or you might not.
'provenence' refers to a known history of something, and not to someone's attestation of it.
as much as many of us want to believe the words of the Hunts, it's not as easy as all that, is it.
edit: something posted on Facebook, having been proven to be the fodder of all things liberal, hardly makes it original or trustworthy.
-
and what exactly is the provenance of this supposed 'letter?'
-
On 11/28/2017 at 12:19 PM, Ron Bulman said:
No, I was responding to Joe's could LBJ be that ruthless. LBJ was a scumbag.
Capital "S."
It's funny if we could discover the secrets to this entire mystery by simply letting the scumbags fight it out, and may the best men win: Connally, Johnson, Sturgis, Landsdale, Hunt (either)... egads, I could type forever, couldn't I?
Ironically enough, Oswald wouldn't even be in the running, would he...
-
On 11/28/2017 at 2:04 PM, Douglas Caddy said:
Billie Sol Estes told me that the only person LBJ feared was John Connally. He said that this was because Connally was even more ruthless than LBJ himself.
I wrote - and struck - about seven sentences which didn't convey the thoughts this level of ruthlessness conjured up - and I'm not even sure if I believe the assertion (that of Mr. Estes', not of Mr. Caddy's)... but really I have just this thought:
WOW.
effin' wow.
-
24 minutes ago, Ron Bulman said:
Paraphrase: "Just get me elected and I'll give you your damned war".
USS Liberty, "I don't give a damn if the ship sinks".
right. you misunderstood. totally my fault.
the consensus is probably "You GD'ed right LBJ could be that ruthless. Who, among the sane-minded would think differently? Douglas Kinser...?" etc... etc...
-
21 hours ago, Joe Bauer said:
Could LBJ be that ruthless?
no offense, but are you serious...?
-
44 minutes ago, Paul Brancato said:
Good stuff Glen - thanks for the post. The relationship between Nixon and Prescott Bush is interesting, and it's clear to me at least that Prescott's help in Nixon's early career was returned in spades when Nixon became president and appointed George Bush to various posts.
It's also noteworthy where Bush's first jobs were, and who they were coming from...
I keep coming across this Nazi stuff (re post-WWII Bush, Dulles, etc.) lately, and it frankly makes me nervous for the first time in the many years I've looked at this thing...
-
3 minutes ago, David Andrews said:
Joe, you shouid read Jim Hougan's Secret Agenda. I'm sure Doug Caddy could recommend other books.
heck, Doug could just tell us...!
JUST kidding, Mr Caddy.
Carl Oglesby's The Yankee and Cowboy War covers a LOT of the little-known back story and suggests some pretty intriguing "alternate" scenarios, replete with motives...
To this day when I see Bob Woodward or Carl Bernstein on TV I can't help but think, "dude, you're so full of..." well, not that strong, but with similar sentiment.
-
1 hour ago, Joe Bauer said:
For forty years we've only heard the Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein perspective on Watergate.
I would not jump to this assumption so quickly. There are other, more credible, versions, Joe...
But this one might fit in there somewhere... parts of it... who knows? most everyone agrees that there's a lot we don't know...
-
A little back story on Nixon's Dallas trip and his "appointment" as Pepsi's attorney (this by Richard Bartholomew, and a nice example of his terrific writing and research, and Peter Dale Scott):
----------o----------
On February 24, 1964, Marina spent the day at the Declan Ford home with the Fords, two FBI agents, her new attorney, William A. McKenzie, and McKenzie's law partner, Henry Baer. Baer was also the secretary of the Reliance Life and Accident Insurance Company, owned by Maurice Carlson, "a close friend of Richard Nixon." Two directors of Reliance Life were the brothers Bedford and Angus Wynne, of the law firm, Wynne, Jaffe and Tinsley (and the Wynnwood Shopping Center, [where Ruby's brother had, what was it, an ice-cream store...?]). Law partner Morris Jaffe was George de Mohrenschildt's attorney.
The Reliance Life building also housed the Dallas office of the Secret Service. The building was owned by the Great Southwest Corporation (GSW), a real estate investment group based in Arlington. GSW's investors included Dallas oil man Clint Murchison and the Rockefellers. The group owned Arlington's Inn of the Six Flags, where Marina was taken on November 24, 1963 by Peter Gregory and his friend, Mike Howard of the Secret Service [this was just before her silly testimony of how she locked O in the bathroom...]. They, along with another Secret Service agent named Charles Kunkel hid her there from all authorities, including the FBI. (The name Kunkel with telephone numbers was found in Ruby's notebook.) Wynne, Jaffe and Tinsley, who represented GSW and LTV, were also the Washington oil lobbyists named in connection with the Bobby Baker scandals. Bedford Wynne was the oil pay-off man to Bobby Baker and the Democrats.
Marina's new attorneys who were at the Ford home with her that February day in 1964 had taken over her business affairs a week earlier from James Herbert Martin. This appeared to be a change, but Martin had been employed by GSW as the manager of the Inn of the Six Flags. And Baer and McKenzie had recently left the law firm of GSW (Wynne, Jaffe and Tinsley).
With this background in mind, stemming as it does from the Fords' relationship with Marina, we now turn to Nixon's stay in Dallas from November 20 to 22, 1963. Nixon's odd memory of this trip seems to explain the presence of Baer and McKenzie at the Ford home. It also shows that the Fords may represent, in addition to links between Oswald and Ruby, ominous links between Oswald, Ruby, and Richard Nixon. In fact many things about this trip to Dallas seem to shed light on the subjects discussed in this paper.
Nixon went to Dallas on legal business for Pepsi-Cola (now Pepsico). When Nixon's political career seemed to die after he lost his bid for governor of California in 1962, Pepsi came to his rescue by offering to give their account to the New York law firm of Mudge, Stern if they took Nixon on as a senior partner. According to Peter Dale Scott,
This political favor by Donald Kendall, who became president of Pepsi in September 1963, has been viewed as a quid pro quo: Kendall is said to owe his presidency of Pepsico in part to his success (through the good offices of Richard Nixon) in having Khrushchev pose with a Pepsi bottle at the 1959 American exhibition in Moscow. But Kendall's success can also be attributed to his marriage with the daughter of Admiral Edward Orrick McDonnell, the veteran of Wilson's Vera Cruz expedition and a former director of Pepsi, of Pan Am, and (with Henry Crown and Frank Manheim of Lehman Brothers) of the Hertz Corp.
Kendall was very involved in Loeb Rhoades, Empire Trust, and General Dynamics investments with close associates of Jack Crichton, Joseph Walker (Air America), Toddie Lee Wynne (cousin of Bedford and director of GSW), and Robert Bernard Anderson.
----------o----------
(As we have seen, Augustin Batista was a member, with Jose Aleman, Sr., of the Anson Group, which was closely tied to Second Naval Guerrilla and to Richard Nixon. As we will soon see, Augustin Batista's Cuban Trust Company employed a director of de Mohrenschildt's Cuban oil company -- a company with close ties to William F. Buckley Sr. and possibly to C.B. Smith and a familiar sounding Rambler station wagon in Miami.
Like Anderson, Robert H. Stewart III had financial ties to both LBJ and Nixon. And as a prominent Dallas Republican fund raiser, director of GSW, Braniff and Lone Star Steel (all close to LBJ), president in 1963 of First National Bank, Dallas (FNBD), and future director of Pepsico (1964), and LTV (1970), Stewart, too, had financial ties to the apparent conspiracy to manipulate Marina Oswald's testimony.)
----------o----------
On November 15, 1963, Nixon petitioned to join the New York Bar. Then on November 20 he flew, with Donald Kendall in a Pepsi plane, to a bottler's convention in Dallas. Ten months later Pepsi announced plans to build a multi-million dollar plant in Arlington -- thus enhancing the value of GSW. This project must have been related to Pepsi's intended merger with Frito Lay of Dallas (which interlocked with James Ling's [associate of DH Byrd] Electro-Science Investors).
This merger between Pepsi and Frito Lay was objected to by the Federal Trade Commission in a complaint filed November 19, 1963 -- the day before Nixon flew to Dallas. It was a complaint that must have been of great concern that week to Wynne, Jaffe and Tinsley (GSW's law firm), Nixon, (Pepsi's lawyer), Robert H. Stewart (director of GSW and FNBD), and Herman Lay (of Frito Lay and director of FNBD). If these men met that week, the meeting represented links to de Mohrenschildt (through Morris Jaffe), post assassination links to Marina Oswald (through William A. McKenzie and James H. Martin), the Bobby Baker payoffs (through Bedford Wynne and Robert H. Stewart), and CIA/Cuba connections (through Nixon).
(It was Robert H. Stewart who hired George Bush in 1977 (after President Carter replaced him as CIA director) to be director of First International Bankshares, Inc. (FIB, Inc.) of Dallas.
Bush was also named a director of First International Bankshares, Ltd. (FIB, Ltd.), FIB, Inc.'s London Merchant bank. Another FIB, Ltd. director was W. Dewey Presley, the president and chairman of FIB, Inc.'s executive committee. He is also listed in the book Who's Who in CIA (the acronym CIA is used loosely here to mean any intelligence related work). Presley's entry reads:
b.: 26.5.1918;
1939-42 in Magnolia Oil and Pipe Line Companies; 1942-52 Special Agent of FBI; from 1960 Vice President of First National Bank, Dallas;
OpA [area of operation]: DallasWe have already explored the presence of Magnolia Oil around Oswald, Ruth Paine, and Eugene Hale Brading. There is, however, another intriguing individual at FIB with connections to Magnolia, George Bush, and others discussed in this paper. He is J. Rawles Fulgham Jr., president of FIB, Inc. and chairman of FIB, Ltd. Fulgham was identified in a 1982 news report as a director of Dorchester Gas Corp. (see Nexis). Dorchester Gas was the company owned by Jack Alston Crichton, which had D.H. Byrd as a director. It was Crichton who selected his and Ruth Paine's friend, Ilya Mamantov to be Marina's interpreter. And as we have seen, Mamantov was teaching scientific Russian to the Magnolia employees who met the Oswalds at the party discussed earlier.
It will be recalled that one of the three Mamantov students living at the house where the party took place, Volkmar Schmidt, had lived and studied with one of the survivors of the failed plot to assassinate Hitler -- a fact which brings us to another intriguing connection of FIB's president and chairman. Fulgham was identified as a director of Dresser Industries (see Nexis), where Bush's father had been a director and Bush himself got his first job. It is recalled that Dresser is also where Hans Gisevius, another survivor of the Hitler plot, friend of Allen Dulles and Ruth Paine's friend Mary Bancroft, "spent some time in Texas.")
Given all of this, we can perhaps agree with Professor Scott that,
Mr. Nixon should be asked whether his legal efforts helped to block this complaint [against the Pepsi merger with Frito Lay]; and if so, with whom and how he handled it in Dallas. For it was this merger that brought to the Pepsico board Robert H. Stewart III...for fifteen years an acquaintance and backer of James Ling (who [with D.H. Byrd] bought heavily into LTV and Electro-Science Investors [156,000 shares, I think it was, just before Byrd flew to North Africa, or wherever he was while K was getting shot and Johnson was becoming President] in October and November 1963). Robert Stewart and his bank were named in the Bobby Baker Hearings for the $250,000 loan Stewart had advanced to Baker and his friends in 1961, for an insurance stock purchase which looked to many like a political reward.
Stewart, like his "very good friend" Senator John Tower, and Tower's campaign manager Peter O'Donnell, was powerful among the conservative Republicans of Texas....In 1970 he became one of three new directors...of LTV, along with Ling's old backer Troy Post...and William H. Tinsley who by now was the senior partner of Wynne, Jaffe and Tinsley.
Nixon's flurry of activity the week of November 15 to 22, 1963, during which he worked so intently on behalf of his rich and powerful political allies in Dallas, would seem to have been quite memorable to him; and even more so given the fact that the week ended with the world shattering assassination (in that very city) of the man to whom he lost the U.S. presidency three years earlier by the closest margin in American history. After all, even those who were children (including this author) have remembered that day with unusual clarity for their entire lives. But for Kennedy's historic rival, Richard Nixon, that seems not to be the case. Only three months after the assassination, Nixon did not remember that he was in Dallas almost up until the time of the assassination; despite the fact that during this incredible lapse of memory, he did remember being invited to Dallas in April 1963; he did remember that the purpose of that trip "never materialized"; and he did remember not giving any consideration to going (CE 1973, 23 H 831). And despite remembering these details, Nixon called his memory of this invitation vague. Most unusual of all is that the story of the invitation was completely false.
Let us review this. Richard Nixon's three month old memory of being in Dallas on the most memorable day in the history of that city; the most memorable day of their lives for most people in the world; and what should have been, for Nixon, the most memorable day of his life, was vague. Yet his ten month old memory of a forgettable invitation to come to Dallas for a forgettable event which never transpired, and about which he gave no consideration, was relatively detailed; even though there had never been any such invitation. And Nixon called his relatively detailed memory of this non-invitation vague.
This raises the question: who was the source of this falsehood? It turns out that it was started on February 19, 1964 by Maurice Carlson of Reliance Life and Accident Insurance (23 H 414, 416); a man described by the FBI as "a close friend of Richard Nixon" (23 H 414). The chairman of Mr. Carlson's insurance company was a man named James H. Bond, who was also with James Ling's Electro-Science Investors (and later with LTV). And we must not forget that the secretary of Mr. Carlson's insurance company was Henry Baer (formerly of the Wynne law firm which represented de Mohrenschildt, LTV, and GSW), the man who was at the Ford home on February 24 with Marina Oswald. The interesting thing about Mr. Baer being there that particular day is that it was the very next day that Maurice Carlson retracted his story about the Nixon invitation to Dallas.
----------o----------
On Marina's testimony of April 2, someone wrote this, which I think is quite funny. I wish I remembered who wrote it:
On April 2nd, the day made famous in Dallas history because Richard Nixon was not present, Lee Oswald worked the entire day at Jaggers-Chiles-Stovall, where he would be released from their employ four days later. So how could Marina lock him in the bathroom on a day that he went to work, and not to shoot someone—particularly someone who was nowhere near Dallas, Texas. And why the yarn? As noted, Oswald was unable to defend himself against this allegation, although given his erratic and self-serving behavior in the two-plus days he spent in Dallas police custody, it seems unlikely that anyone would have believed his denials. But at least the core elements of the story could have been checked, as they were in the case of the cited FBI interviews, which make it clear that Nixon was not in town and was never going to be in town, and that on the day that Nixon was most critically NOT in town, Oswald went to work.
-
On 11/6/2017 at 9:38 PM, David Andrews said:
I'm sure he wished to hell he could leave the country and become an exile in Rebozoland in 1975, but he probably had unavoidable bagman and messenger boy duties between the Mob and the rest of the GOP. Hence the show of fealty at the golf tourney.
Where were his caricature enemies, Rolling Stone magazine and Hunter S. Thompson, on the Mob angle during these years?
Hell, No Tellin' what the Mob had on ol' Hunter Thompson himself...
-
1 hour ago, Michael Walton said:
Joe and Pat, thanks. And this is mainly for Joe. Joe, watch the Z film. He reacts to the throat wound THEN his body lurches forward from the back wound. It looks almost as if an invisible hand is pushing him forward. His head even bobs from this force. I made a video about it here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7Hr9Lrku-Cxa3NqTEpScWNQZnc/view?usp=sharing
This is my interpretation of it. The point being, the back wound terminates and this is what Humes said in the report. But about the residue, and like PS said, how could we possibly ascertain any residue when Kinney handled the bullet with his own bare hands?
Michael, I really appreciate your efforts on this video inasmuch as you've made it easy to see the time difference in his hands to his throat and the vague head movement; i can see that it is distinctly possible that's from a second bullet strike, and from the rear.
from that point i would find little interest in what bullet caused it if one did, for if one is proved to have done so, the LN theory is already fully destroyed. Ballistics won't matter at this point other than to perhaps get some names...
but I'll reiterate - if it's proved to have been a second shot after the throat wound, and before the head wounds, then the LNers are toast. the kind with creamed chipped beef all over it, like mom used to make. you ever had that? Creamed chipped beef on toast? DAMN good breakfasts!!! Now just imagine you were eating little Lone Nut theorists.
Same thing.
-
14 hours ago, James DiEugenio said:
Larry:
What is the prosecution's witness list?
You must have it by now.
I'm thinkin' it must be pretty short.
And that the name "Brennan" is on there. A LOT.
-
I'll tell ya, I don't know what to make of this upcoming mock "trial." Seems there are a lot of people interested in it, though...
What often occurs to me is just how little "evidence" the Lone Nut Theorists have to work with, refutable or not. I mean, they're really stuck in this very small box which at best insinuates: Oswald's presence on the 6th floor between 12.15 and 12.30 or so, his pretty-damn-fleet-footed "hiding" of the rifle and flight from the floor, his escape on a bus, and his presence at 10th and Patton... That's a darn small box of evidence as compared to the virtual depot of evidence we have in the old arsenal, considering the thousands and thousands of particulars made available by virtue of all the moving parts and variables that would have been necessary to perform that damned act as it was.
It kinda seems to me the defendant would do just as well defending himself in this case, even if he is dead.
-
-
2 minutes ago, David Josephs said:
According to the evidence, the Money Order was found 4 separate times on Saturday.... in 4 different places.
DJ
I read an account of how O was supposedly able to walk several miles to purchase that money order or the PO box during his lunch break on the day it/they were purchased, or something to that effect. Don't remember where I read that, but I want to refer to it on something. Do you recognize this narrative and remember where it's printed?
-
43 minutes ago, David Josephs said:
Glenn:
Mr. EISENBERG - The bullet is in the same condition as it was when you received it?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir; except for the marking of my initials and the other examiners. There is a discoloration at the nose caused apparently by mounting this bullet in some material which stained it, which was not present when received, and one more thing on the nose is a small dent or scraped area. At this area the spectographic examiner removed a small quantity of metal for analysis.
Mr. EISENBERG - Did you prepare the bullet in any way for examination? That is, did you clean it or in any way alter it?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir; it was not necessary. The bullet was clean and it was not necessary to change it in any way.
Mr. EISENBERG - There was no blood or similar material on the bullet when you received it?
Mr. FRAZIER - Not any which would interfere with the examination, no, sir. Now there may have been slight traces which could have been removed just ,in ordinary handling, but it wasn't necessary to actually clean blood or tissue off of the bullet.The match was only the grooves of 399 matching the barrel of the MC.... At some point the rifle was fired into a substance like cotton or water... Since it appears to me that the DAY rifle out from the TSBD is not CE139, who knows when the switches were made?
(Side note on rifles: Over the Labor Day weekend while Oswald and family are in New Orleans with the Murrets (Lee’s mother’s sister and husband), two men arrived at the door of one Robert McKeown, a self confessed arms dealer who worked in similar circles as Jack Ruby, had supplied arms for Castro’s cause and was a close friend of Castro himself. McKeown was on probation at the time. Lee Oswald announces to McKeown that he has finally found him and would like to buy 4 rifles for $10,000. Lee Oswald was traveling with a man named Hernandez. [H&L])
This compares the rifle in evidence with the huge photo of DAY and the rifle... we don't even see faint outlines of the markings on the TSBD rifle....
There was well more than 1 C2766 and if we remember, Riva's job was to grind off the serial numbers...
What amazes me is despite Frazier being the ballistics expert you'd think the FBI would be interested in any debris on that bullet to match fibers, match skin or blood...
There was nothing on the bullet cause the bullet was never in Dallas.... Chief Rowley produces it and gives it to Elmer Todd... who according to the evidence gives it to Frazier over an hour after Frazier had already received it...CE399 is part of the Secret Services role... dropping protection, taking the body, arranging the morgue, Ambulance wild chases... Kellerman front and center.
We also have that FBI memo mentioning a bullet behind JFK's ear in addition to CE399... (see below)...
but, wait, there's more.
man, that's not even the same scope on the rifle(s)... is it? no way. the throat with the lens is much longer in one pic than the other...
"dropping protection, taking the body, arranging the morgue, Ambulance wild chases... Kellerman front and center."
right, ONCE they stole the body from Texas...
NEW BOOK
in JFK Assassination Debate
Posted · Edited by Glenn Nall
Forgive me for being fair, Paul, but aren't people from both sides of the aisle allowed to present their theses in this forum?
And forgive me for being an adult, Paul, but aren't we pretty much capable of making up our own minds?
But maybe that's just me.
*** You know, man, in fact, that was RUDE, dude. I do not agree with any lone nut theories, but to insult them and call their work a pile of garbage is about as infantile as it can be.
DAMN,, man.