Jim Hargrove

Dr. Patrick Philben was, among other things, chief of staff of Dallas Memorial Hospital. http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=24833435 Which proves what? Certainly not that he performed a tonsillectomy at Parkland Hospital on Lee Harvey Oswald as claimed by Armstrong. Where is that citation for that claim again? Just check through your own posts. You've cited the FBI report on the form many times. Explain why Dallas Memorial Hospital would hire a fake doctor to be its chief of staff.

Well, Greg, how long have you known about this superimposed photo that you say is so easy to spot? You have argued at great length, on multiple websites, about any number of the topics presented on the "Marines to Minsk" page at HarveyandLee.net, which is where the photo in question appears. You've argued about evidence on that page that "Lee Harvey Oswald" was in and en route to Taiwan at the same time he was treated for veneral disease in in Japan. You've argued about the Boris Godounov N.O. Opera pamphlet that appears on that page. You have obviously read that page many times. And yet you wait until now to tell us about this "horribly disfigured face"? You can even see the photo has been "pasted over the top of the original for crying out loud." It's an easy mistake to make, and I'm in the process of fixing it.

The full Star-Telegraph article is available for all to see on the online John Armstrong Collection at Baylor University. To see it, use this link and go to page 7 or 8: http://digitalcollections.baylor.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/po-arm/id/30199/rec/13 I didn't realize the image on my website was a composite, and I will replace it as soon as possible. I do, however, want to get the best copy I can of that article, because the image still proves our point.

Dr. Patrick Philben was, among other things, chief of staff of Dallas Memorial Hospital. http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=24833435

As the following excerpt from a peer-reviewed medical journal shows, by 1910 or so "complete removal of the tonsil has been accepted" in both Europe and the United States. ===================== QUOTE ==================== A HISTORY OF TONSILLECTOMY: TWO MILLENIA OF TRAUMA, HAEMORRHAGE AND CONTROVERSY By RONALD ALASTAIR McNENLL, M.B., B.Ch. Senior House Officer in Surgery, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast .... The first sign of a permanent change from partial to complete removal of the tonsils came in 1897. Ballenger in the U.S.A. realised that partial removal failed to alleviate symptoms completely in a large majority of cases. He began to remove the tonsil with its capsule, using a scalpel and forceps. His results, using this new technique, were so much better than partial removal, for a time the guillotine fell into disrepute in America. Some ten years later, dissection tonsillectomy was pioneered in this country by George Waugh of Children's Hospital, Great Ormond Street. In 1909 he published, in the Lancet, his account of nine hundred cases of dissecting out the tonsils complete with capsule, using fine dissecting forceps and curved scissors. The operation was performed with the patient lying on his back with the head extended. The tongue was held out of the way with a stitch, and the mouth held open with a gag between the last molar teeth. Waugh became a great opponent of guillotine tonsillectomy, giving his reasons in these words: "Even in highly skilled and experienced hands, the complete removal of tonsils by means of a guillotine is a task of such technical difficulty as to be, except in a few rare cases, quite impossible." In the following year Whillis and Pybus in Britain and Sluder in America pointed out that a guillotine with a fairly blunt blade instead of a sharp one could be used in such a way as to enucleate the tonsil complete in its capsule. Whillis and Pvbus gave the following figures for their series: Tonsil completely enucleated in its capsule - - - 74% ,,,, capsule incomplete - - 13.5% in two pieces - - 9% in three pieces - - 0.5% Incompletely enucleated - - - - - 3% From this time onwards the value of complete removal of the tonsil has been accepted.

In the more than 1,000 pages of Harvey and Lee, here is John Armstrong's full report on "Oswald's" tonsillectomy: First, page 21: On January 17, 1945 Dr. Philben, of Dallas, performed a tonsillectomy on 5-year­ old Lee Harvey Oswald. 52-05 In 1945 a tonsillectomy was as routine an operation as it is today. It is performed by anaesthetizing the patient, propping the mouth open, depress­ ing the tongue, grasping the tonsils with a tenaculum, and then cutting out the tonsils. The patient is then allowed to awake naturally from anesthesia. The operation is nearly 100% successful and only in extremely rare cases do tonsils re-appear. If and when ton­sils do re-appear, they grow only to no more than 10% of their original size--not large enough to require removal. NOTE: The real Lee Harvey Oswald had his tonsils removed in 1945 but, as we shall see, the "Oswald" imposter was treated for tonsillitis while in the Marines. And finally from page 153: On January 6, 1957 Pvt. Lee H. (Harvey) Oswald, of Platoon 2060 was diagnosed with tonsillitis, given an injection of penicillin, and advised not to swim:1 57-01 NOTE: Lee Oswald could not possibly have contracted tonsillitis because his tonsils were surgically removed at Parkland Hospital in Dallas 12 years earlier, on January 17, 1945, by Dr. Philben. 2 57-02 It appears to be true that some tonsils do grow back, but the need to remove them again is the exception rather than the rule. This is another indication, if not proof, that there is real problem with the identity of "Lee Harvey Oswald." Some time ago, I presented Greg with evidence from a peer-reviewed medical monograph stating that at the time of Oswald's 1945 tonsillectomy, tonsillectomies in the United States typically involved the complete removal of the tonsils, not partially.

After the assassination SAC John Malone, the FBI agent in charge of the New York Office, inspected "Oswald's" original court file in the presence of Judge Florence Kelley. Malone took notes and sent a report to FBI Director Hoover the following day. Malone wrote, "Oswald's attendance record at PS #44 from 3/23/53 to 1/12/54 was 171 and 11 half-days present and 18 and 11 half days absent. If LEE Oswald's 182 days of attendance (171 full days, 11 1/2 days) and 18 absences are plotted on 1953 and 1954 calendars it is easy to see that LEE Oswald attended PS 44 full time during the entire 1953 school year. The Warren Commission also published 1953 Beauregard Junior High Schools records showing that Oswald attended 89 days of school during the fall semester of 1953. Conflicting school records from both New York City and New Orleans are published in the Warren volumes.

Well, I guess we can all go home then.

That sounds good, but it simply isn't true. For example, the report dated Sept. 11, 1959 of the medical exam for the discharge of one "Lee Harvey Oswald" from the US Marine Corps lists his height as 71" (which is 5' 11"). This is a well-known document. I'd upload it here, but the forum software says I've used up my quota and can't upload anything larger than 62k. (Sigh) But it is easy to find. The Warren Commission published it as Folsom Exhibit 1, p. 73.

Speaking of questionable tax documents, as we have been, here's a fine-looking tax return for "Lee Harvey Oswald" published by the Warren Commission: As you can see, it seems to be Oswald's tax return for 1956. This return shows that the income reported matches perfectly with the W-2 forms for 1956 shown earlier. Any problems? For one thing, the Social Security Administration did not include any Oswald income for 1956 (or any year prior to his Marine Corps service) in the "Total Earnings" field in its "Determination of Award" form completed after his death. And, when asked for all tax records relating to LHO and Marina, the SSA indicated it was sending "Copies of three pages of the Warren Commission Report re employment of Lee Harvey Oswald prior to service in the Marine Corps." Not much of an explanation. But there is another glaring problem with this return! "Lee Harvey Oswald" had been enlisted in the Marine Corps since October 26, 1956. Yet there is no Marine Corps income listed on this 1956 return. "Lee Harvey Oswald" was surely wearing a USMC uniform when he filled out and signed this return on Feb. 7, 1957. Are we to believe that he simply forgot? As John Armstrong wrote on HarveyandLee.net: In mid-to-late January, 1957, employers mailed W-2 forms to their employees. The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) mailed W-2 forms to military personnel. Oswald's address, listed in his military file, was 4936 Collinwood, Ft. Worth, TX. The Warren Commission would like us to believe that Oswald somehow received the J.R. Michels, Tujague's, and Pfisterer W-2 forms, but never received the W-2 form mailed by the DFAS. The WC would also like us to believe that Oswald kept the J.R. Michels, Tujague's, and Pfisterer W-2 forms for the next 7 years--from 1956 to 1963, yet lost or never received the W-2 form from the Marine Corps. If Oswald never received a W-2 from DFAS, he could easily have obtained payroll information through his company commander. Why would a Marine complete a tax return and not list his Marine Corp income on the return? The answer is simple: Oswald did not complete the 1956 tax return. Finally, the 1956 tax return was mailed from California on February 7, yet the return was received by the IRS only one day later in Dallas, TX, on February 8. A W-2 form from DFAS was never found by the FBI nor requested by the FBI or Warren Commission. Is it possible that income for both HARVEY and LEE would appear on DFAS W-2 forms (1956-1959)? The individual who filled out the 1956 1040 did not have a W-2 form from DFAS and did not have access to Oswald's payroll records from the Department of the Navy. In fact, the Department of the Navy did not release Oswald's military pay records until Sept, 1964 (see below). With no information whatsoever concerning Oswald's earnings from the military, the Marine Corps was not listed as an employer and no income was reported. The 1956 return was fabricated/created by the same people who fabricated/created the J.R. Michels, Tujague's, and Pfisterer W-2 forms.

It is all explained here, including the law on provision of tax records and about the computer update in 1964. It is disingenuous to present one side of a debate. You knew about the Horne piece, but instead of stating why it's wrong in your ramblings and musings on the tenets of Armstrongism, you simply ignore it. http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/horne.txt I see we're being scolded again, this time for being "disingenuous," eh? Have you actually read the Horne report you linked above? It doesn't discuss at all the Lifetime Earnings report on Oswald. That's what we are talking about, remember? The Horne report mostly talks about two 1995 letters from the IRS stating that the Employer Identification Numbers (EINs) for Dolly Shoe and Pfisterer Dental Lab were created in 1964! That's what the "computer update in 1964" you cited above was used to explain. Again, the report you link says NOTHING about the lifetime earnings report of Oswald.

BORIS AND NATASHA HUNT MOOSE AND SQUIRREL From Harvey and Lee, p. 799: NOTE: In a 1997 interview Robert Webster told JFK researcher and author Dick Russell that he met Marina Prusakova in Moscow in the summer of 1959 and spoke with her in English. Webster said that Marina spoke English well, but with a heavy accent. A year after Webster was sent to Leningrad by the Soviet Government, 400 miles from Moscow, he met Marina again shortly after he applied for an exit visa so that he could return to the US. [interview of Robert Webster by Dick Russell at Cape Cod, MA. 1997] Marina's friend in Dallas, Katya Ford, said that when she asked Marina why Oswald went to Russia, Marina told her that he worked for the Rand Corporation and helped set up the American exhibit at the World Trade Exposition in Moscow.[WC Document 5, p. 259; FBI interview of Katherine Ford by SA James P. Hosty, 11/24/63] Marina had momentarily confused Harvey Oswald with Robert Webster, the 1st US "defector," whom she met in Moscow (1959) and again in Leningrad (1960). It is not a coincidence that both Webster and Oswald "defected" a few months apart in 1959, both tried to "defect" on a Saturday, both possessed "sensitive" information of possible value to the Russians, both were befriended by Marina Prusakova, and both returned to the United States in the Spring of 1962. These US "defectors," acting in perfect harmony, were both working for the CIA.

If Doug Horne already explained it, then you should be able to tell us why the Social Security Administration's summary of Lee Harvey Oswald's LIFETIME EARNINGS did not include any of his income from work prior to his service in the Marine Corps. By all means please explain why, with his cover letter, Robert Bynum said he was including, "Copies of three pages of the Warren Commission Report re employment of Lee Harvey Oswald prior to his service in the Marine Corps." That sounds pretty strange to us simple folk who, as you tell it, don't know how to analyze things properly!

And, of course, the HSCA did not ask the SSA about what portions of her hubby's income Marina would be eligible to receive. The HSCA asked for "access to all files and documents concerning or referring to Lee Harvey Oswald and Marina Oswald." And, in place of actual reports on his pre-Marine income, SSA responded with three pages from the Warren Commission Report. Oh, and don't try to claim that SSA responded with info only about both Oswald and his wife. Included with Bynum's letters were such pre-marriage docs as Oswald's SSA application, his Dishonorable Discharge, Marina's birth certificate, and so on.

I've never given back a driver's license to the issuing bureau either, but what you or I would do with our licenses is irrelevant. "Lee Harvey Oswald" was in no position to return this license either, and he clearly didn't. But someone in law enforcement or some other official might well do just that. The returned license might have been in the wallet that Captain Westbrook "found" at 10th and Patton.

Here are the page reproductions, both from the Garrison files:

From Harvey and Lee, p. 799: TDPS employee Mrs. Lee Bozarth stated categorically that she knew from direct personal experience there was a Texas driver's license and a file for Lee Harvey Oswald, and that it was pulled and given to a federal agency in early December, 1963. [Nov 22-21] TDPS proceedures for issuing licenses and creating files was confirmed by her supervisor, Mr. Griffen, to the HSCA in 1978. Six other TDPS employees also saw the file including Ray Sundy, Joyce Bostic, Inez Leake, Gayle Scott, Peggy Smith, and Mrs. Ernie Isaacs. In 1978 HSCA investigator Gary Sanders contacted the TDPS for information about Oswald's driver's license. After having a brief and curt conversation with Mrs. Seay Sanders wrote, "It is very obvious to me that if there are any records at the DPS pertaining to Lee Harvey Oswald they are not going to release them." [Nov 22-22] The info in brackets above are links to document reproductions on the CD that accompanies the book. I can probably dig up the images later if anyone is interested.

Here's another simple question about Lee Harvey Oswald that is difficult to answer: Why doesn't the Social Security Administration count any of Oswald's employment income prior to the time he joined the U.S. Marine Corps? According to SSA and IRS records, Oswald's income in 1962 and 1963 was as follows: Employer: William B. Reily & Co., Earnings: 422.25 and 191.25 Employer: Jaggars-Chiles-Stovall, Inc., Earnings: 727.80 and 945.69 and 121.67 Employer: Leslie Welding, Earnings: 636.50 Texas Book Depository, Earnings: 261.68 Add them all up, and you get and Grand Total of $3306.85 So, less than a month after receiving a completed "Application for Survivors Insurance Benefits" form filled out by Marina, the SSA office in Dallas had completed a "Determination of Award" form. Below is the first part of that form: As you can see, according to the Social Security Administration, the lifetime earnings of "Lee Harvey Oswald" amounted to $3306.85, exactly the amount of his 1962 and 1963 income. But what about Oswald's earlier income from Dolly Shoe, Tujague's, J.R. Michaels, and Pfisterer Dental Lab? Why isn't it included by the SSA? There are supposedly legitimate W-2 forms showing Social Security information for those employers as well. Here are the forms for Dolly Shoe and Pfisterer: On May 15, 1978, the House Select Committee on Assassinations chief counsel Robert Blakey wrote to the Social Security Administration requesting "access to all files and documents concerning or referring to Lee Harvey Oswald and Marina Oswald." On July 28, Social Security Administration associate commissioner Robert P. Bynum formally responded. In a three-page cover letter to Ms. Jackie Hess, an HSCA employee, Bynum cited 36 different documents that were being forwarded from the Social Security Administration to the HSCA. This is a remarkable document, and three excerpts from it are reproduced below: ... ... As you can see above, Item 23 in the letter from the Social Security Administration to the HSCA states: "Copies of three pages of the Warren Commission Report re employment of Lee Harvey Oswald prior to service in the Marine Corps." Why didn't the Social Security Administration include any of Oswald's income from his first four employers in his lifetime earnings report? And why on earth was the Warren Report offered as an explanation? John Armstrong believes Oswald's pre-Marine income reports are fraudulent. If anyone here has a better explanation, I'd love to hear it. More about this topic can be found at: http://harveyandlee.net/Unraveling/Unravels.htm

Some simple questions about Lee Harvey Oswald can be difficult to answer. For example, could Oswald drive a car? Did he have a driver's license? As we all know, Marina and the Paines all said he couldn't drive and didn't have a driver's license. We're told he had to hitch a ride to work with Wesley Frazier for the same reason. But Oswald's barber told the Warren Commission a very different story: Mr. JENNER. You have a distinct recollection that on occasions when this man came into your shop for a haircut, he drove an automobile up to your shop? Mr. SHASTEEN. He drove that there 1955, I think it's a 1955, I'm sure it's a 1955 Chevrolet station wagon. It's either blue and white or green and white it's two-toned--I know that. Now, why I say--why I take it for granted that Mrs. Paine was with him when he come to the grocery store--I do remember he wasn't driving when they would come to the grocery store, there would be a lady driving and I'm assuming that that was Mrs. Paine, because like I say, I have been--I have never been close enough to her and knew it, to speak to her, but she trades at the service station where I do and I saw her in there and I never did pay any attention to her and I saw her passing, met her in the road in the car and those things. (WC X, 317) Furniture store owner Edith Whitworth also saw Oswald drive a two-tone car: Mr. LIEBELER. You saw him drive up in the car? Mrs. WHITWORTH. Yes; because it was all glass in front and I was sitting at the--well, it's the cash stand-- we call it there. Mr. LIEBELER. Which direction was he driving the car at that time? Mrs. WHITWORTH. Driving west on a one-way street--that's a one way there. Mr. LIEBELER. Running from east to west? Mrs. WHITWORTH. East to west. Mr. LIEBELER. What kind of a car did he have, Mrs. Whitworth? Mrs. WHITWORTH. Well, as far as I can remember--I wouldn't be---I wouldn't say for sure. All I can say is that I believe, you know, not paying a lot of attention to the car and the car not meaning anything at that time, that it was a two-tone blue and white. It was either a Ford or a Plymouth. Now, I wouldn't swear to that, but it was either one the car didn't mean anything to me at that time. Anyway, he came in and he stood--. (WC XI, 264) Edith's friend Gertrude Hunter also saw Oswald drive a two-tone car: Mr. LIEBELER. Did you see who was driving it? Mrs. HUNTER. Yes. Mr. LIEBELER. Was this man driving it? Mrs. HUNTER. Yes. Mr. LIEBELER. How many people were in the car? Mrs. HUNTER. Just him and a woman and two children. Mr. LIEBELER. Nobody else? Mrs. HUNTER. No one else. Mr. LIEBELER. You are quite sure about that? Mrs. HUNTER. I'm positive, because I was sitting right there I was sitting this way and the door was right here [indicating], and he drove cater-cornered up. Mr. LIEBELER. And there are glass windows in the front of the store so that you could see right out into the street? Mrs. HUNTER. It is a solid glass there and the door was standing open there. Mr. LIEBELER. Do you know about what kind of car it was? Mrs. HUNTER. Now, the reason I'm definite about the car--a friend of mine in Houston--I was looking for them up and they had a car just like this and I had left a note on my mailbox that I would be at this place--- telling them if anyone come I would be at this place and when they drove up I thought that was them and it was a two-tone-blue Ford. And, as we all know, car salesman Albert Bogard told the Warren Commission that a man who identified himself as Lee Harvey Oswald walked into the Downtown Lincoln Mercury dealership in an early Saturday afternoon in November, 1963. He inquired about purchasing a vehicle and Mr. Bogard took him for a test drive on the Stemmons Freeway. (LEE) Oswald said he was not ready to purchase a car but within a few weeks he had some money coming in and would be back. Bogard wrote the name Lee Oswald on one the back of one his business cards. When he heard that Oswald had been arrested for shooting a policeman in Oak Cliff, he tore the card up. Bogard's story was corroborated by his sales manager, Frank Pizzo, and two salesman, Oran Brown and Gene Wilson. There are many other examples of witnesses who saw Oswald drive a car, the most famous of which probably occurred in and around Alice, Texas in October, 1963 and on assassination day. WC staffers apparently were confused by the conflicting testimony, and so they arranged to have Marina Oswald, Gertrude Hunter, and Edith Whitworth appear together in an attempt to resolve the conflicts. Hunter and Whitworth both identified Marina as the woman they had seen arriving at the Furniture Mart in a car driven by Lee Harvey Oswald, but Marina denied everything. Mrs. OSWALD. I have never seen Lee drive the car in my lifetime. Lee never drove a car with me or the children in it. The only time I saw him behind the wheel was when Ruth Paine taught him to drive the car, he was practicing parking the car when Ruth Paine was teaching him to drive. Mr. LIEBELER. And that was all in front of Mr. Paine's house; wasn't it? Mrs. OSWALD. Yes. I'm sure this lady is trying to tell the truth, but the only possible person who could have driven the car when we were in that store could have been Mrs. Ruth Paine. She knows all the stores where we went because we never went there without her. (WC XI, 280) What is truly bizarre about all this is that a simple phone call to the Texas Department of Public Safety could have resolved the issue of whether Lee Harvey Oswald had a Texas driver's license, but apparently none of the high-powered attorneys on the Warren Commission could find the phone number. Had they bothered to inquire, of course, staffers would have gotten an answer that was difficult to explain. As the following affidavit acquired by Jim Garrison's office shows, many people at the Dep't. of Public Safety were aware that Lee Harvey Oswald had a Texas driver's license. For those unable to read the graphic of Aletha Frair's statement, here's what it says: OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY STATE OF LOUISIANA PARISH OF ORLEANS S T A T E M E N T DATE: February 14, 1968 STATEMENT OF: ALETHA FRAIR RESIDING AT: 8001 Benson New Orleans, LA Phone - 242-2126 My name is ALETHA FRAIR (MRS. JOHN FRAIR). I live at: 8001 Benson New Orleans, La. Phone - 242-2126 I worked for the Department of Public Safety in Austin, Texas from the early part of October 1963, through the early part of December 1963. While I was employed at the Department of Public Safety I worked in the License Records Department. This Dept. Was responsible for the IBM computer records of all driver's licenses in the state of Texas. My husband, JOHN, was working for the United Press International during November of 1963 and on November 22, 1963 he was in Uvalde, Texas, covering the birthday of ex-Vice President JOHN NANCE GARNER. I did not go to work on the 22 of November, 1963, but the following event occured (sic) the week after the assassination of President KENNEDY. During the week following the murder of LEE HARVEY OSWALD, on either Wednesday the 27th, or Tuesday the 28th of November, 1963 the Texas driver's license issued to LEE HARVEY OSWALD came into my division. The record (IBM card) on OSWALD was pulled from the files. Several other employees (5 or 6) of the Department saw the driver's license which was dirty and worn as though it had been carried in a billfold. The license was the talk of the office that day since everyone knew who OSWALD was, and the reason his driver's license records were being pulled from the active file was the fact that he had been killed. In October of 1966 my husband and I moved to New Orleans and in June of 1967 my husband went to work for WWL-TV, Channel 4. I, ALETHA FRAIR, hereby affirm that all of the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge. Signed February 14, 1968. (Signature of Aletha Frair) (Signature of witness Gary Sanders) (Signature of witness Jody Duek) For more information about "Lee Harvey Oswald" and his driver's license, see: http://harveyandlee.net/Driving/Drive.htm Of course, all this can be easily explained if you believe there were two different young men using the name "Lee Harvey Oswald." If you think that is absurd, what's your explanation for this?

Hi, This is my first post to the Education Forum. For the past 15 or 20 years or so, I've run John Armstrong's HarveyandLee.net website, which, in the last year or three, John Armstrong actually noticed and made significantly longer. Among the MANY people who seem to hate me and John are John McAdams, Dave Reitzes, David Lifton, Greg Parker, and Tracy Parnell, though there are clearly others. From reading what they say, there can be little doubt that JA and I are TOTAL IDIOTS, though I'd like to thank Steve Gaal and David Josephs for their support. Before agreeing with Mr. Lifton and declaring the entire John Armstrong camp totally daft, please visit my website here: HarveyandLee.net Thank you.

Profile: Author of more than 30 published books and numerous magazine and encyclopedia articles. Development and maintenance of a large-scale website and several smaller ones. Numerous Chicago-area radio and television appearances. Currently a licensed Wisconsin Realtor®. Education: BA in American History, University of Illinois at Chicago. Numerous continuing education courses in computer science and real estate. Experience: Licensed Realtor: 2002 - present Bear Realty, Inc., 7353 256th Ave, Salem, WI 53168 Freelance Writer: 1984 – present Jim Hargrove Book Productions, 22410 88th St., Salem, WI 53168 (previously P.O. Box 564, Fox Lake, IL 60020) Other Experience: Managing Editor for three Chicago-area publishers. Public school teacher in Chicago. Some of my Published Books: Computer Wars, Microcomputers at Work, 500 Things to Do in Chicago for Free, Gateway to Freedom, Martin Sheen—Actor and Activist, Steven Spielberg—Amazing Filmmaker, Enchantment of Germany, Enchantment of Belgium, Ferdinand Magellan, The Story of the Blackhawk War, Jonas Salk and the Discovery of the Polio Vaccine, and almost 30 others. Specialized Skills: Thorough knowledge of html markup and web server protocols; expert online and traditional research abilities, experienced public speaker, 35mm photographer with scores of published photos, understanding of basic home construction techniques. Awards: Milwaukee Magazine's “Five Star Realtor” for 2013 and 2014; Chicago Children's Reading Round Table; Learning magazine's “Best of the Year,” JFK Web Zone.