Keyvan Shahrdar

General Maxwell Taylor who was the hand picked chairman of the JCS by JFK to replace General Lyman Leminzter during his administration, and who was instrumental in keeping advisors and who was the ambassador to Saigon during LBJ administration. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1987/04/21/gen-maxwell-taylor-dies-here-at-age-85/073cd474-c10f-4652-98c5-6067e705623e/ His son whose name is John Maxwell Taylor served in the military during the JFK administration. He was born in 1930, is 94 years old and is alive living in McLean Virginia. Any researcher out there should contact him. He may tell you how JFK was killed.

@Vince Palamara Vince Palamara's contributions to the study of the Secret Service detail for President John F. Kennedy will be remembered throughout history. His work has secured him a place in history books that people will read for centuries, if not millennia, to come.

RIP

@Keven Hofeling I can't wait to see your self inflicted brain-washed of a narrative fall apart after you answer Pat.

I my head, what logic dictates is the following: President John F. Kennedy confronted Governor George Wallace in 1963 over the issue of racial segregation in Alabama's schools. This confrontation came to a head on June 11, 1963, during the infamous "Stand in the Schoolhouse Door" incident. Governor Wallace stood at the entrance of Foster Auditorium at the University of Alabama in a symbolic attempt to block two African American students, Vivian Malone and James Hood, from enrolling at the university. Wallace was making a statement against desegregation and in support of his pro-segregation stance. President Kennedy asserted his federal authority decisively and embarrassed Wallace. General Curtis LeMay ran as the vice presidential candidate with George Wallace in the 1968 presidential election. It is easy to make a claim that General Lemay was a racist. He was in a segregationist ticket with George Wallace after all! General Lemay was a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The Air Force tapes from that day have not been fully released, only redacted versions have. After the assassination, did the General make it clear to LBJ that he needed to be sworn in before the plane took off from Dallas, probably by telling LBJ that they believed the Russians killed JFK? I bet this is why the recordings have not been released. My assertion is the secret service was in on the conspiracy. JFK's original driver, Thomas Shipman "died" of a heart attach weeks prior to the assassination and the driver, William Greer, slowed the limousine down in the kill zone. They probably forced the body be removed from Dallas. There are no records that state Jaqueline wanted the body moved. The Nix film has reference marks in places where shots were fired. This makes me believe the FBI was probably investigating this to try to find out what happened. My assertion is that J Edgar Hoover found out and told LBJ that there were multiple shooters and the assassination was a coup d'état by the generals. LBJ had no choice but to go accept it and go along with it. I personally don't think LBJ knew anything about the assassination before hand. This assassination was a military operation by the JCS.

1. Can you please quit the long posts? Really! What I have replied to you is substantive and factual. Did you notice what you just did? You have claimed that all the photographs that you posted have been compromised because they do not fit your "narrative" and now you are using the same photographs to try to prove your narrative. You have been brainwashed by greedy authors and researchers who just want to make money from you. You need to go through retraining camp on your JFK research. Do some research on the Autopsy photo 13,14 (B & W) 40,41 (Color) Figure 60. This I see is a bad copy of the autopsy photograph. All of your photographs are bad copies that do not show detail. Where did you get them? The web? I have a much sharper images where you can see details that you cannot see on the photos you supplied. Look at that photograph, to the left of the throat shot, there seems to be a red dot. Is it an exit shot? IDW. To the right side of the throat wound there seems to be a incision on the top of his nipple. In his left arm pit, there seems to be something circular at the crease of the arm pit and the left pectoral. Those are questions that need answers. I don't know what they are. Why don't you spend time trying to figure them out. His head shows signs of a tangential shot similar to what Pat showed, except it is going upward from the temporal bone of the right ear to the top of the skull. Stop spewing mis information in the evidence of factual autopsy photos.

@Sandy Larsen In the same breath you are claiming the autopsy photos are fake and you are using the same photos to make you claim. Irrefutable scientific evidence is presented to you and you don't believe it. I am afraid that you have been brainwashed into believing information that has no basis in fact. You need to evaluate fact not narratives or what people say or write. You don't need to belief Pat or what he writes, but when photographs are presented with a narrative with basis of fact, that is a fact.

Pat, your post shines a spotlight on a glaring inconsistency: the same individuals who dismiss the autopsy photographs as fabrications are using these very images to bolster their own dubious claims. @Sandy Larsen, @Keven Hofeling, et al. - Here, Pat presents solid scientific evidence of a tangential wound from a missile on a human skull and its effects. Yet, despite this clear evidence, you choose to believe speculative authors who exploit your credulity. You accept the claim that this wound is merely a surgical incision, based solely on the word of someone utterly unqualified to judge such matters.

Keven, you have been BRAINWASHED and the only person to blame is yourself. BTW - The only reason I become unresponsive to your posts is because they are way too long and filled with lies and gibberish and I just don't want to spend the time to have a discussion with a habitual agent of misinformation. Why have you been brainwashed? I know you are smart. You are a lawyer after all. Why did you let yourself get brainwashed this way? What am I thinking, you researched all this information yourself, your probably purchased books about the JFK assassination from authors whose sole intent is to make money from you. These authors will write anything to make a buck and you have decided of your own free will to get brainwashed with their hogwash. All you have to do is look at the medical evidence, the Zapruder film, and the Nix film, the Marie Muchmore film, and the Mary Moorman photo. Look at the x-rays, they were taken before JFK got cut up by the pathologists. But you wont, because you are BRAINWASHED and all you have are these long posts full of conjecture from wayward authors.

You should have a conversation with it. I can see how watching it is difficult because the factual evidence in it contradicts everything you have been brainwashed and duped to believe by these wayward authors.

So Sandy, I would love to hear the discussion that you have with the Nix film study.

Sandy and Keven, I know you guys are bright intellectuals, I find it hard to believe that you guys choose to believe anything that anyone writes as fact. I am a math and logic person, that is with what I deal with every day running a silicon valley technology company. Nothing you guys say match up with what you see in film, autopsy photographs and x-rays. In the same breath both of you discount the film, autopsy photographs, and x-rays as fake and then use them to try to make a point of where the fragment came from or where the shots came from. Come on! There is nothing you can post to make me believe these narratives over the facts shown in the film, autopsy photographs, and x-rays. There is nothing you can say that could make me question the authenticity of them. Look at the junk spewed by Mantik, the x-rays are fake but they show where the shots came from. This is ridiculous at best. This keystone cops scenarios that you guys are spewing reminds me of the wrap up smear by Nancy Pelosi. This is what those authors are doing in the JFK assassination community.

You'd be disbarred out of law regurgitating your long disjointed narratives of a mantra...

I appreciate your call for direct evidence amidst the sea of narratives surrounding the JFK assassination. It's clear that you value a narrative over succinctness and factual clarity. Let's address your points with the existing evidence and without diving too deep into interpretative narratives: Harper Fragment: It's just a fragment. Dr. Mantik and others have interpreted its origin based on its composition and location found, but without comprehensive and incontrovertible proof, we must remain open to different interpretations. X-Rays: The claim about the x-rays being altered stems from analyses like those by Dr. Mantik, who pointed out inconsistencies in their optical density and structure. However, these are professional interpretations of the evidence, not indisputable facts. The authenticity of the x-rays is supported by the majority of forensic experts. Zapruder Film: This film is one of the most scrutinized pieces of evidence. Claims of alteration come from discrepancies observed by researchers. However, no concrete proof has surfaced that definitively proves the film was altered. This film, alongside others like the Nix film and the Moorman photo, has been validated by multiple investigations to have no alterations that impact the understanding of the sequence of events. Your narratives need an emphasis on sticking to the facts is crucial, and so is recognizing that some aspects of this case involve interpretation of evidence, where different experts might disagree. While we may not convince each other of a different viewpoint, it's important to discuss these matters respectfully and consider all evidence critically, whether it supports or challenges our views.

Sorry Keven! You can say what ever you want but: Narrative is Narrative, Gibberish is Gibberish, and Fact is Fact.