Jon Pickering

I would argue - as others may as well - that the U.S. had her coup in '63 at the hands of the Military's armed forces, and one of the logical outcomes of that is seeing a U.S. major, who can seemingly defy Army regulations by not first resigning her commission, on the cusp of a presidential run following nomination - if not in 2020, then certainly the next time.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-3UjbqFHKQasT76YYae3AnNTUJiTyfG3/view?usp=drivesdk From OSS to Central Intelligence Group to CIA. The who, what, and how the Agency was born. Sorry about the spacing.

https://aarclibrary.org/missing-records/ Missing JFK Assassination Records – Revised and Updated The Black Hole at the Archives – Top Fifty Missing Assassination Records By William Kelly 26. Army Intelligence files on Oswald were kept from the Warren Commission and then “routinely” destroyed. Q: Would a party innocent of involvement do this.

From an admittedly limited observation post, it'd more accurate to say the Chiefs enabled Lyndon. For without Lyndon being given his damned presidency, the Chiefs would never had their damned war (at least under the cover of 'civilian' will and authority).

We're not sure loyal U.S. Major Gabbard - is it not against Army regs for an officer to hold civilian office simultaneous to serving - is the correct choice for a country reeling from misspent military budgets, illegal invasions, and, occupations. We've not heard a repudiation of Pentagon practices from her - only a rejection of 'regime change', which she misplaces the responsibility for at the doorstep of our dwindling civilian authority. This sideshow of an impeachment is going to be one of the final death knells of the civilian sector. So many more important issues face our most vulnerable citizens - one of which would be fixed if some of that mis-applied energy could be put behind the Social Security 2100 Act, now lagging way behind in the house. Another is electronic election reform - the cyber security director at Homeland Security, of all people, has been shouting from the rooftops that states must immediately begin funding implementation of fixes for the vast corruptability inherent in our voting system at this late date.

Thanks, Mr. Brancato, for the thoughtful reply. Yes, the quote we remember best - and it may not have been in Mr. Douglas' book - was JFK's thinking out loud that if there was ever a coup against him, his administration, it would be by the Military. The armed forces are difficult to investigate for their alleged central role in JFK's murder because they destroyed - from our understanding - all of Lee Oswald's records surrounding the assassination. Then again, if memory serves, a fire destroyed nearly 14 million U.S. personnel files in 1973. We haven't read enough to conclude whether it was set intentionally, or, not - but it certainly caused a lot of heartache among vets who were due benefits. *Also, thank you Mr. Thomas for providing much of the digging into the Pentagon involvement angle - the pent-angle so to speak.

Voracious reading and research - not the least of which is Bill Simpich's current run through this most obstacled of courses to truth, and Brancato's eloquent support thereof - and observation leads me to the conclusion that the full weight of the U.S. military's armed forces' institutional authority ramrodded - as in concieved, plotted, and, executed - John F. Kennedy's murder. Various 'civilian' enties and agencies served the role of patsy - including C.I.A. agents and assets playing civilian roles.

There are two accredited scientific studies that were conducted - in accordance with the wishes of a multitude of McCartney and Beatle fans - to determine if McCartney had been replaced with an imposter/stand-in near the end of 1966. The first one was a study of recordings claimed by the record company to be of Paul, but in fact revealed three different voices, instead, doing the singing. This study was performed by the head of the University of Miami's language and linquistics department, Dr. Henry Truby, in 1969. Following the announcement of his findings, he later clammed up citing that's all he could say on the issue. The second time science was applied to the 'was paul replaced' mystery was when 'Wired' magazine on-line commissioned a study from accredited computer and biometrics forensics experts Galvazenni and Carlesi. The Italian team, contrary to what 'Wired' had assumed would be confirmation that McCartney was the same person before and after 1966, found an 83% likelihood that an imposter was in fact playing the role of the Beatle after 1966. Nothing besides unproven rhetoric has ever been offered in refutation of these two studies. The only applied science around this issue found a switch had been made. Where is the countervailing evidence to these accredited reports. http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/FromOthers/Paul-McCartney-Italian.html .

Hi - I paint and sculpt. When not working I read heavily the research material here and elsewhere. I am currently reading 'Pentagonism' (Bosch), and 'The Warfare State' (Cook), which so far, and, combined with how John Kennedy was taken out, confirm our own observations of life on planet earth - under a U.S. military junta with a global reach.