Mark Ulrik

Danish resistance. Oh no, did I hurt your feelings? I thought you enjoyed lighthearted banter.

One can only hope that he had the good sense not to address the non-Germans with "Herr ..."

I'm the only "pure" MU as far as I know. The others only have Ulrik as middle name (as in Mark Ulrik Jensen).

It was surprising to me that the list was so dominated by -sen names. For a while, at least, there seemed to be a trend towards dropping traditional names in favor of more unusual ones. I would also have expected to see one or two names ending on (for example) -gaard or -mand. PS: It seems that Larsen is also the 4th most common in Norway! Source: Norske efternavne

Larsen and Lars are extremely common! From Statistics Denmark (January 1st 2024) Last names 1 Nielsen 229.327 2 Jensen 226.181 3 Hansen 191.794 4 Andersen 147.066 5 Pedersen 145.213 6 Christensen 109.380 7 Larsen 104.971 8 Sørensen 100.188 9 Rasmussen 86.230 10 Jørgensen 80.135 11 Petersen 70.715 12 Madsen 59.503 13 Kristensen 56.801 14 Olsen 43.612 15 Thomsen 37.881 16 Christiansen 34.509 17 Poulsen 29.968 18 Johansen 29.395 19 Møller 29.207 20 Mortensen 27.624 Boy's names 1 Peter 46,552 2 Michael 44,338 3 Lars 43,290 4 Jens 42,123 5 Thomas 41,914 6 Henrik 40,996 7 Søren 38,745 8 Christian 37,480 9 Martin 36,944 10 Jan 36,134 11 Morten 33,601 12 Jesper 33,394 13 Anders 33,292 14 Mads 32,153 15 Niels 32,035 16 Rasmus 30,269 17 Mikkel 29,190 18 Per 28,700 19 Kim 28,189 20 Hans 27,709 Lars Larsen combo : 907 How many people are called ...?

Would you feel honored if I called you Mr. Bulman? Maybe even more so if I addressed you in German? The Danish equivalent is of course Hr. Ulrik, but why so formal? You can call Niederhut many things, but polite is not high on the list. PS: Thank you for expanding on thread context.

Much appreciated, JP, and ditto 😇

Making fun of other people's names, are we? I haven't had a lot of that since elementary school. You're mocking my ancestor who, for very good reason, had the name changed from Ulrich some 160 years ago. I don't think of him as a "nut" either. I'm not sure "at" is the right proposition as these buildings are at least a couple of hundred yards apart. I worked in the area for a few years. I see. You probably had to tick one of the boxes. Did the label really say "Lone Nutter"? What were the other options?

Kindly remind me where I made that profession.

I have no idea why you keep pretending to misunderstand my rather obvious point. Yes, GPAC is a remarkable song, but this is a JFKA "board". Surely, a resourceful guy like you should be able to find a more suitable "board", especially since there are so many to choose from. Btw, I've seen it suggested that the posting of the video was in response to something posted by Jim D, but why create a separate thread for that? Would merging the two threads not be reasonable? I mean, to keep everything in context. A note on terminology: If you disapprove of people calling this a JFKA "forum", then maybe you should tell the forum software:

Thank you, Captain Obvious. What you call "the JFKA board" is what I referred to as "this forum." Please feel free to read my post again with that in mind.

We could also redefine the purpose of this forum. I mean, why should everything be about the JFKA when there are so many other interesting topics to discuss?

This thread will eventually be moved to a more appropriate forum, right?

Geez, Gil, I didn't realize that pointing out your mistake constituted supporting the US government. PS: If you really must know, I have a habit of opening too many tabs in my browser. Sometimes I return to them, sometimes not. Relax. You're not being monitored by agents operating on foreign soil (that I'm aware of).

I know it's part of your job to discredit the WC, but they didn't actually "suppress" Stombaugh's non-identification of the fibers in the bag. "Despite these matches, however, Stombaugh was unable to render an opinion that the fibers which he found in the bag had probably come from the blanket, because other types of fibers present in the blanket were not found in the bag" (WCR 137)

I like the way you think. Oswald, who had every reason to believe that the rifle was 36" long, would surely have measured it, while the police, with an unidentified weapon in their hands, couldn't be bothered to.

When was that? It's been a while since I had contact with him, but I think he retired last year. Maybe he'll resume posting if he gets sufficiently bored (and Mrs. Lamson allows).

The whole idea of enumerating the RFKs rubs me the wrong way. You can call Jr. anything you like, but there's no good reason to retroactively rename the father. It's almost as silly as calling JFK and his son JFK1 and JFK2.

I guess someone couldn't find the "RFK1" forum.

I see. For a moment it almost seemed as if you were comparing "hard evidence" of Z film alteration to "hard evidence" of WMD in Iraq.

What's your point? That we should be skeptical of people who claim to have "hard evidence"?

This thread is one of the most bizarre things I've ever seen. I'm just waiting for one of you good folks to suggest that Pat is possessed by the Devil. Or the ghost of Arlen Specter.

After silencing him first? I wish you were joking.

Are we allowed to freely speculate on the moral and mental state of other members now? If that's the case, I have some suspicions of my own.

Surely, RFK is clearer and briefer than RFK1?