Marjan Rynkiewicz

3 hours ago, Christian Toussay said:

 

....My mistake. I posted an incomplete statement. This was meant to be a question, along the following line:

- can the object over Kellerman's face be part of the sun visor, jerked by the shot that hit the chrome shield?

 

I had a look at Moorman & at Z312 -- i think u are referring to Kellerman's left arm/hand which is shielding Kellerman's eyes from the Sun.

3 hours ago, Michael Crane said:

Excellent research indeed.

Have you ever considered the Bermuda Triangle phenomenon?

The Bermuda Triangle stuff is interesting. 

I suspect that the navigator of Flight 19 was a relative of Hickey.

Back on 23 Oct 1976 i was fishing on the end of the Mordialloc pier in Melbourne, all alone, when the Sun went out. I did not even know that we were going to have an eclipse. The seagulls got a fright & went quiet. Most of them roost on an island at night, & they thort that they had missed the boat. I think i caught a few small gars.

Melbourne will see another eclipse on 26 December 2038 (ie 62 years after the 1976 eclipse). I will post some pix.

Which reminds me that an eclipse in 1919 was the start of our present Einsteinian dark age of science. The fake 1919 measurement of the bending of starlight passing near the Sun supposedly confirmed Einstein's predicted bending of light, &  gave impetus to the Einsteinist cult, the cult is still active today. Cultists will adore Einstein on the anniversary of his death (14 march 1979 -- 18 april 1955).

I have shown that Einstein's prediction was correct, ie his postulates (re what we might call the bending of time)(plus what we might call the bending of space) do indeed lead to a doubled bending, ie doubled compared to the old simple calculation for Newtonian bending. And i have shown that Einstein's prediction is based on faulty reasoning & faulty postulates.

And, after being No1 re Einsteinian krapp, i got bored & came to the jfk forums, where i am now No1 re jfk krapp.

It took me 2 years to solve the dark age of jfk. Solving the dark age of Einsteinian krapp took me 8 years.

I think that the AR15 had a right hand twist. If the nose of the hollow-point slug contacts JFK's skull at 6 o'c on the slug then the hollow point will i think suffer more initial damage at that 6 o'c sector of the nose.

During the slug's say 6 inch trajekt through the brain the slug partly disintegrates to say less than a half of its original 55 grain, & slows to less than a half of its initial 3200 fps, & veers upwards, & tumbles upwards.

The more damaged sector of the slug twists from say 6 o'c at entry to say 12 o'c at exit, rotating clockwise (right hand twist) a half twist.

Then after exit the slug tumbles some more & hits & cracks the windshield just left of the rear vision mirror, having veered 6 deg in JFK's head.

The slug then ricochets back & down & up off the front seat (or up off the dash)(or the floor) & then out into Elm St.

I mention all of this koz i am thinking about how the twist of the remnant slug during its trajekt through the head might aid the 6 deg veer, ie based on the orientation of the more damaged sector magnifying the veer in some way.

That there 6 deg of veer is a big ask (for a hollow-point) in only 6 inches, & needs all the help it can get. Still thinking.

On 4/4/2024 at 3:12 AM, Denise Hazelwood said:

Given that the chrome damage happened with the first shot, as I contend, this makes sense. Good eye, both Steven and Christian, for your observations.

The left vizor aint vizible in my copy of the Moorman polaroid?? I double checked & i could not find any copy of the Moorman polaroid that showed any part of the left vizor.

U kan see (one side of) the right vizor only, & this (photo) is very blurry. The right vizor has a few white dots (on the face facing jfk during the shots) & these dots might be bits of jfk. But, the Moorman polaroid has 100s of white dots all over the pix, i guess that such white dots are found on all such  polaroids in that era.

On 4/4/2024 at 2:17 AM, Christian Toussay said:

...The hit in the visor can actually be seen clearly in the Moorman picture....

The left vizor aint vizible in my copy of the Moorman polaroid?? I double checked & i could not find any copy of the Moorman polaroid that showed any part of the left vizor.

U kan see the right vizor only, very blurry. The right vizor has a few white dots which might be bits of jfk. But, the Moorman polaroid has 100s of white dots all over the pix, which must be i guess found on all such  polaroids in that era.

On 4/1/2024 at 11:01 AM, Michael Crane said:

Witnesses & evidence is non-existent.

Time to move on IMO.

Dear Michael, please advise me as to what witnesses & evidence exists that Oswald (or anyone else) shot jfk or Connally. I mean witnesses that saw a shot being shot.

I suppose that Holland & others saw gunsmoke, which is i suppose evidence, but all such gunsmoke evidence is evidence of Hickey firing. No one saw any gunsmoke near the TSBD.

I suspect that u do not have a witness of a shot being shot. If u do, then u have something that (i think) has not yet existed in the history of this forum (ignoring gunsmoke)

2 hours ago, Ron Bulman said:

I will concede it's not impossible Hickey might have sh*t his pants and jumped up at the sound of shot's, this would have been after JFK was already hit.  But there is no evidence of this, pictures, films, witnesses. 

Ron there are 3 Hickey did it books.

U kan get Mortal Error & The Smoking Gun for about $25 each.

The Secret Killer of President John F. Kennedy is over $100 (i will have another search, i want it).

But my comments on mainly my threads keep going where the above books stop. Not sure about Secret Killer.

On 1/26/2023 at 7:13 PM, Marjan Rynkiewicz said:

We can add Bill Newman to the list of witnesses who mentioned Hickey holding his AR15 before Z313 (the headshot).
https://emuseum.jfk.org/objects/4645/bill-and-gayle-newman-oral-history?ctx=0c14edb6454afadd18c00ec3ac9d147091716531&idx=1

[18:20][Bill Newman] 
………. Well i want to tell u a little trivia if i may…. i recall seeing people with what i want to call a Thompson sub machine gun…. or some type of a rifle about so long [shows about 3ft]…. & it  seemed like it came from the car that was following…. it seemed like they reached behind like the cab of the ? convertible…. u know, they reached into there & came out with a weapon & ran up the grassy knoll…. U FEEL U SAW THIS?.... yes…. but nowhere has this been proved that i'm aware of…. but i had.. i told this to people…. & its been said that the secret service didn’t leave the car…. so maybe it was some other branch of law enforcement…. but i recall what i think…. was about 30yrs ago…. but i recall seeing someone run up the u know with firearms & not a pistol…. something other than a pistol…………….
Bill then mentions the JFK limo slowing… & then mentions a SSA climbing aboard the JFK limo…. & the JFK limo accelerating away.

Bill Newman has clearly erred re a SSA or two running up to the grassy knoll with a machine gun. 
But the main thing arising from his wordage is that at least one SSA in Queen Mary picked up a machine gun or similar.
And, clearly, he infers that this picking up of a machine gun happened early on in the saga.  This makes sense. Early on, Bill would be able to see the JFK limo & Queen Mary both approaching – whereas at about Z313 Bill would be looking at JFK, hence Queen Mary (the followup car) & Hickey would be out of his view (ie too far left) -- & after Z313 the JFK limo accelerates ahead leaving Queen Mary momentarily a long long way behind (the Bell film shows Queen Mary  3 lengths behind ie 62ft behind (clear)(ie 62ft of daylite) at Z419 which is 5.8 seconds after Z313), so, once again, Bill would not notice Hickey for the first few seconds after Z313 while Bill was focused on JFK, koz Queen Mary is being left well behind.

Bill says that nowhere has this been proved.
Here he probably means that there has been no official mention of a machine gun or machine guns on the grassy knoll.
However, we all know that the existence of or the picking up of an AR15 (or machine gun)(or rifle) by Hickey (or others) was mentioned by a number of witnesses in a number of official sources in November 1963 & in later years.

And we all know that Hickey picked up his AR15 before Z313 koz we all know that SSA Bennett said that after Oswald's shot (this would be Oswald's shot-2 at Z218) Bennett grabbed for the AR15 on the floor & it was not there.  
Anyhow, now we have Bill Newman confirming Bennett's statement re the timing of Hickey picking up his AR15 before Z313 (apart from all of the other such confirmations by others).

https://i.postimg.cc/HxbjqBh9/jfklimo-at-z419-queen-mary-is-3-lengths-behind.jpg

bump 

1 hour ago, Michael Crane said:

Witnesses & evidence is non-existent.

Time to move on IMO.

Read my stuff.

Newman saw Hickey with an automatic rifle.

3 minutes ago, Michael Crane said:

Contrare.  I have shown that Hickey did the dirty deed. Do u see any errors/mistakes/wrongs in my wordages?

33. Michael Crane ----------- The dictabelt or whatever they used to hear gunshots didn't even pick it up. That would be a big no from me Dog. That's right up there with Greer shooting JFK. Those dogs don't hunt.

In your above wordage, i see that u have not yet learnt about the problem with the dictabelt, that it did not hear anything in Dealey Plaza (it heard near the Trade Mart), &, it heard a long time after Hickey killed jfk.

13 hours ago, Denise Hazelwood said:

Ron Bulman, I assume you’re saying that I am on the “extreme outside” of what most on this site believe, but it was the horse on extreme outside that  won. If you took the time to examine and consider my work, you might agree that I’m right. Go to www.a-benign-conspiracy.com and start with the episodes. Then check out my other articles.

 Pay him no heed. 

The Secret Killer of President John F. Kennedy

By Ashley Machtig, Brett Machtig · 2020  &  2019

 We believe it could not have been Lee Harvey Oswald who killed JFK. It was

(1) an assassination team who tried to kill JFK, as well as?

(2) It could have been Secret Service Agent George Hickey who could have accidentally shot President Kennedy in the head with his cocked-and-loaded Colt AR-15 using a unique six millimeter fragmenting bullet shot from the Secret Service chase car directly following the presidential limousine while swinging his rifle around to engage an active shooter thought to be in the Texas Book Depository. Possibly, while Hickey was swinging his rifle, he accidentally shot the man he was sworn to protect, JFK in the back of the head where the bullet exploded and blew the far side of JFK's head open, killing him dead.This work is dedicated to Truth, Justice and the American Way.

 Ashley Machtig  is a student attending Normandale Community College where she is finishing up her Associate's degree. Ashley plans on furthering her education at the University of Minnesota where she plans on pursuing a career in law.

 Brett Machtig  serves on the Normandale College Business Advisory Committee as well as The National Security Forum for the United States Department of Defense. Brett is the founding partner of The Capital Advisory Group and has written more than 21 books on finance, negotiation, and art. His hobbies include history, collecting antique books, and a lifetime of study. www.brettmachtig.com

JFK dysmorphic disorder (JDD), also known as dysmorphophobia, is a severe psychiatric disorder that occurs around the world. Sufferers refuse to believe that SSA Hickey accidentally shot JFK. However, the diagnosis is usually missed in clinical settings. It is important to recognize and diagnose JDD, because this disorder is relatively common and causes significant distress and impairment in functioning. It is also associated with markedly poor quality of life. Although research on effective treatment is still limited, a low carb diet is currently considered the medication treatment of choice. For symptoms to improve, a relatively high dose of fat & protein is needed, at least 12 weeks of carnivore diet. The psychosocial treatment of choice is cognitive behavioral therapy, consisting of elements such as exposure, response prevention, behavioral experiments, and cognitive restructuring. Although knowledge of JDD is rapidly increasing, further research is needed on all aspects of this disorder, including treatment studies, epidemiology studies, and investigation of its cross-cultural features and pathogenesis. Patients with JDD believe they look ugly or deformed (thinking, for example, that they have a large and 'repulsive' nose, or severely scarred skin), when in reality they look normal. As a result of their appearance concerns, they may stop working and socializing, become housebound, and even commit suicide.

7 hours ago, Denise Hazelwood said:

............Remember that i a genius know more than every one else on this forum put together.

5. You are a "genius" who "know(s) more than every one else on this forum put together"? Proof required.

 

No i aint a genius. A snail can think faster than me. But i make up for that by putting in hours days weeks. It took me say 2 years to figure out what happened in Dealey Plaza. All of the members here combined have put in say 2000 years, & still havent figured it out. And, for the past year or so they have had the benefit of my 2 years, & they still dont get it. Finding the truth is usually difficult. But, when the truth is pointed out & explained, & members still dont understand or believe, then that suggests stupidity (or worse).

I am getting smarter (but older). I used to be a  quasi-raw-vegan (stupid). But i refused to eat sugar (smart). Then i refused to eat fruit (smart). Then i refused to eat bread biscuits cake (smart). Then i started to eat meat (smart). Then i refused to eat veggies (smart). But i still drink wine (stupid). A genius would have adopted the carnivore diet years ago.

7 hours ago, Sean Coleman said:

A better pic, don’t think the visor is damaged? It would be nice to know what the dented trim strip is made of - these days it’s chrome plated tin, very cheap, light and malleable. I would’ve thought a vehicle of that calibre made at that time would have stainless steel trim? Which is very hard and would need to take one hell of a belt to leave such damage.

I like your thinking. Yes, a thin loose chromed stainless steel trim over a rectangular steel tube would stop a hollow point from an AR15. Just.

Re the white dot(s). I fry my carnivore meals outside on my balcony (while being watched by the kangaroos). The kangas have a right to be nervous, i used to fry kanga bangers, but nowadays i stick to lamb or pork mince (kanga bangers are expensive)(& all sausages have added starch & seed oil). Anyhow, i am messy & my table & balcony is peppered with cold/dry fat -- very white,  Brain might too be white. I will have to google. 

When a person is shot in the head and his or her cerebellum splatters against a bedroom wall, the brains are very hard to clean off the surface. Popcorn ceilings are the worst—matter gets stuck inside the crevices. Brains are composed of 12 percent fat (essentially, they’re cholesterol), which hardens when it dries. The brains I’m cleaning have been here just a few hours, so I can only imagine the difficulty of the task if the substance had been lingering for weeks.

“You have to rehydrate it,” David O’Brien explains to me and his other attentive pupils, who are dressed in matching white blood-borne pathogen jumpsuits. “Applying a high-grade industrial disinfectant kills numerous viruses and pathogens, as well as rehydrates it for easy removal.”

6 hours ago, Denise Hazelwood said:

1. Visor or Vizor. Po-tay-to, Po-tah-to.

2. I admit that the damage to the visor could be as the missile traveled toward the chrome trim, or after it had bounced off the chrome trim. However...

3. It was a fragment (nose or tail), not a "slug," per the Charles Taylor memo.

4. "Up" puts the visor damage that much closer to the chrome strip. I accept "up." They probably had to lower the visor in the process of putting on the bubble top. 

5. You are a "genius" who "know(s) more than every one else on this forum put together"? Proof required.

 

The 2 halves of the copper jacket of Oswald's first  shot (which ricocheted off the signal arm) did not make the dent in the chrome trim.

The hollowpoint slug of Hickey's 2nd-last shot made the dent. There would have been some (lots of) backward lead splatter, which could have damaged the vizors etc.

28 minutes ago, Denise Hazelwood said:

Sean Coleman, that apparent damage to the top right corner of the visor does seem to line up with the dent in the chrome strip diagonally to the right above it. If that is in fact damage to the visor, I suspect that the bullet fragment causing the dent in the chrome strip nicked the visor on its way to the chrome strip. (The Charles Taylor memo described an FBI man as telling him that one of the bullet fragments found in the front of the limo as having caused the dent in the chrome.) This is from an FBI photo taken at the WH garage, yes?

The damage to the vizor would be from the spray-back from the slug that made the dent in the chrome trim.

Remember that the vizor was up, not down.

Remember that i a genius know more than every one else on this forum put together.

12 hours ago, Sean Coleman said:

Interesting, although it seems the visor was mostly in an upright position 

We can see a/the white dot on the vizor.

So, what is that white dot?

It woznt made by the AR15 (unless its a bit of jfk).

It woznt made by the Carcano.

I think that it is a permanent long term blemish, made a long time before.

Or is it an accident in the dark room?

Hmmmm -- ok -- i an thinking that it is a bit of brain -- it is very near where the remnant slug cracked the  windshield. Yep. Duz cooled/dried  fat/brain make a white-ish dot? 

That white dot is in the wrong place on the vizor, but, there duz appear to be another white dot partly hidden by the divider/roll-bar, & that partly hidden dot is in about the correct place.

4 hours ago, Steven Kossor said:

The rearview mirror appears to be showing the driver's side sun visor, and there is a bright circular area in the mirror's reflection of the visor.  It looks like a hole in the visor, but the visor itself shows no such hole.  If the visor was lowered, the hole would be at about the same location as the windshield hole described by several witnesses.  Food for thought. 

There is a white-ish dot on the back of the vizor. It could be....

(1) A chalk mark or small sticker etc, on the mirror, or on the vizor.

(2) A dot of light. In which case it could be....

(a) A small rough spot on the glass of the mirror (the rough spot reflecting the light from bright objects in on near the limo).

(b) A dot of light on the back of the vizor made by shining a light throo a small hole (where is the light?)(where is the hole?).

(c) A dot made by a reflexion of a light reflecting off a small shiny object. In which case it could be....

(i) A shiny object sitting on or near the limo.

(ii) A shiny part of the limo.

Ok, i reckon that it is a bright spot made by the Sun reflecting off (1) a shiny chromed rail, then reflecting off (2) the rear vizion mirror itself onto the dark polished back of the sun vizor, & then (3) reflecting off the dark polished vizor onto the rear view mirror again, & then (4) reflecting to the camera, & the camera sees a bright dot.

Thats 4 reflexions. 5 reflexions if its an SLR camera.

Re the spider web cracking on the glass windshield, i think that a part of the cracking should be vizible to the left of the rear view mirror, except that that area is in the dark shade. Or the spider cracking could be behind the vertical post of the divider/roll-bar. Or it could be blocked by the vizor.

The spider cracking was made by the remnant slug from the AR15 after the slug exited jfk's head. The slug would have ricocheted off the windshield, & the slug would have gone down & back, & then bounced off the front seat & out into Elm St.

1 hour ago, David Von Pein said:

(DVP NOTE --- I don't know why, but Greg has now removed the above comment from his previous post. But I was able to save it before he deleted it. And I think it's a very good question/observation too, so I can't figure out why Greg wanted to dispose of it in his prior post. But, anyway, since I think it's a good question, I'll just answer it anyway, despite its deletion by Mr. Doudna....)

------------------------

Hi Greg,

Regarding James Hosty's "parade" note and Thomas Kelley's report being compatible and not contradictory....

Yes, I think that certainly is possible, based mainly on my belief (which I talked about earlier today in this thread via a replay of my 2019 comments) that Hosty's "Presidential Parade" note is almost certainly (IMO) referring to the "Out Front With Shelley" timeline that also appears in another FBI document---James Bookhout's solo 11/22/63 report.

When comparing the Hosty note with Bookhout's solo report, we can see that the chronology of the following three things perfectly blend together and match each other, indicating that Hosty's "parade" reference is, indeed, referring to a time that was AFTER the shooting had taken place and not DURING the assassination or BEFORE the shooting:

1. Oswald going to the 2nd floor to get a Coke (which we know, via the extra details revealed in the solo Bookhout report, occurred AFTER the shooting and at the same time Oswald encountered Officer Baker in the lunchroom).

2. Oswald then going to the 1st floor to eat lunch.

3. Oswald then going outside.

I created the photo below so that a direct comparison between the two documents in question can easily be done....and, in my opinion, the words "Then went outside to watch P. Parade" are meant to convey the same meaning as "He thereafter went outside and stood around for five or ten minutes with foreman Bill Shelley". I think this conclusion becomes an obvious one to make after taking a look at the chronology in Bookhout's 11/22 solo report.




There's also this excerpt below from another FBI report, which totally negates the idea that Lee Oswald was standing outside on the front steps of the Book Depository Building when the assassination of JFK was occurring:

 

We need to rule out that there were 2 cokes involved, or even 3 cokes.

On 3/10/2024 at 5:00 AM, Denise Hazelwood said:

I think that what Virginia Rachley Baker saw wasn't actually a bullet, although that was her impression, because what she saw hit the street looked "like sparks" that she imagined a bullet would have made if it had struck there. What I think she saw was the "skull fragment" (Mark Lane's words) or the "whatever it was" (Charles Brehm's words--actually a skull fragment, subsequently picked up by Seymour Weitzman) that landed on the street near Brehm's feet. A splash of red from the fragment landing may have added to the impression that it was "sparks." But I am pretty sure she actually saw a skull fragment land on the street rather than a bullet hitting the street.

Oswald's shot-1 at about pseudo Z105 ricocheted off the overhead signal arm near Rachley/Rackley & made a hole in the floorpan of the jfklimo, & probly rattled around off the driveshaft. I doubt that Rachley/Rackley would have seen any sparks under the limo (unless she was low down on her knees).

No other shot hit Elm St near the TSBD -- Oswald's shot-2 was at Z218.

But one or two of SSA Hickey's shots from his AR15 might have hit Elms St or Main St at about Z303 &/or Z306. 

Hickey's JFK headshot was at Z312/Z313, & the chrome trim dent was at about Z309.

3 hours ago, Bill Fite said:

Watched the videos.   Thanks

I'd heard of the spot where the storm drain was at the end of the overpass but never seen a photo.  I think it was said that it has been paved over in the last few years.

Why yuk?

The youtubes mention lots of supposed facts, most of which are clearly  wrong, so wrong that they are funny.

I look at the Oliver Stone stuff in the same way (full of factoids)(or irrelevant facts), but not so funny.

Re the yuk. Well, for starters, i was a consultant re solving bad design faults for stormwater drainage systems. The YT mention a pit 6ft deep -- nope, it looks about 3ft deep (as uzual). The YT mention the exit pipe as being 18 inches, & that a man could crawl along it -- nope, it looks about 12 inches, &, even if it were 18 inches, 18 inches is not enuff for a man to crawl along. 

I trust that Oliver's stuff is/will be about as good as the two youtubes i watched (all the way throo)(yuk) yesterday.

These are a perfect intro for newbie jfk folk & our members alike. Full of shocking facts, yet funny at the same time. Is Oliver's stuff funny? 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0z-1ZRBoUJQ

8:52 long. Taken in 1988. This is a youtube of a manhole on top of the tup. With commentary re possible sniper standing in manhole & firing through a gap in the wooden slats of the paling fence at the manhole. Pt1 is just as good.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUTEyjckrlc