Steven Gaal

GEE MR. Colby I stayed on topic RE THE PLAN and the DC area is a minority area ?? BUT IF YOU WANT MORE SERIOUS HEALTH CONCERNS SEE LIST BELOW. Dental fluorosis is the proverbial canary in the coal mind of serious fluoride consumption .................thats common sense ..........and you ......... Introduction: The Health Database sets forth the scientific basis for FAN’s concerns regarding the safety and effectiveness of ingested fluorides. The database is the product of over 10 years of research by FAN’s research team, led by attorney-at-law Michael Connett. In 2012, Connett conducted an exhaustive review of recent scientific findings, including research that, up to now, has only been available in Chinese and Russian. The current database reflects the findings of this new review. II. FAN’s Health Summaries: Arthritis Gastrointestinal Effects Bone Fracture Fluoride Hypersensitivity Brain Effects Kidney Disease Cancer Male Fertility Cardiovascular Disease Pineal Gland Dental Fluorosis Skeletal Fluorosis Diabetes Tooth Decay Endocrine Disruption Thyroid Disease III. FIGURES Fluoride & Bone: Dose Response Data Fluoride & Teeth: Dose Response Data IV. analysis & documentation: Acute Toxicity: Threshold Doses Minimum Lethal Dose (5 mg/kg) Minimum Dose that Produces Acute Toxicity (0.1-0.3 mg/kg) Causes of Acute Toxicity Fluoride toothpastes Fluoride gels Water fluoridation accidents Bone Arthritis Fluoride & Arthritis Fluoride & Osteoarthritis Fluoride & Rheumatoid Arthritis Fluoride & Repetitive Stress Bone Density Fluoride’s differential effect on bone density (trabecular vs. cortical bone) Epidemiology: Fluoride in water & bone density The “Iowa Fluoride Study” Relationship between fluoride, bone density, and bone strength Bone Mineralization Fluoride increases osteoid content of bone Fluoride & osteomalacia Fluoride & rickets Fluoride exposure increases calcium requirement Bone Fluorosis The Misdiagnosis Problem Skeletal fluorosis & individual variability Factors which increase risk for skeletal fluorosis Exposure pathways linked to skeletal fluorosis Estimated threshold doses for skeletal fluorosis Skeletal fluorosis in India & China Skeletal fluorosis in the U.S. “Pre-skeletal” fluorosis X-ray diagnosis of skeletal fluorosis Variability in radiographic variability of skeletal fluorosis Fluorosis & Spondylosis/Spondylitis Fluorosis & DISH (Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis) Fluorosis & Spinal Stenosis Fluorosis & Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Fluorosis & Osteopetrosis Bone Fracture Mechanisms by which fluoride can reduce bone strength Clinical Trials / Fracture Rates Animal Studies / Bone Strength In vitro studies / Bone Strength Epidemiology: Fluoride in Water & Bone Fracture Fluoride reduces bone strength prior to onset of skeletal fluorosis Skeletal fluorosis & Bone fracture Bone Cells Fluoride & osteoblasts Fluoride & osteocytes Fluoride & osteoclasts Brain Human Studies Fluoride & IQ: 33 Studies Fluoride’s neurobehavioral effects Fluoride’s effect on fetal brain Animal Studies Fluoride’s effect on learning/memory Fluoride’s effect on brain cells/tissue Cancer Mutagenicity In vitro studies In vivo studies Indiana’s Oral Health Research Institute’s Studies NTP’s Bioassay (1990) Overview of NTP Bioassay Liver cancer (hepatocholangiocarcinoma) findings Human Epidemiological Studies Fluoride & Osteosarcoma: A Timeline A critique of Gelberg’s study on fluoride/osteosarcoma in New York Fluoride & Bladder/Lung Cancer Biological plausibility of fluoride/osteosarcoma link Cardiovascular system Fluoride & Cardiovascular Disease: An Overview Fluoride, Blood Pressure & Hypertension Fluoride & Arterial Calcification Fluoride & Arteriosclerosis Fluoride & Electrocardiogram Abnormalities Fluoride & Myocardial Damage Endocrine Function Glucose Metabolism Fluoride & Impaired Glucose Metabolism Fluoride & Insulin Fluoride Sensitivity Among Diabetics National Research Council’s Summary (2006) Pineal Gland Luke (2001): Fluoride accumulation in human pineal gland Luke (1997): Fluoride’s effect on pineal function in gerbils Thyroid Gland Fluoride Aggravates Iodine Deficiency Fluoride Aggravates Iodine Excess Fluoride & Goitre Fluoride & Thyroid Hormones NRC’s (2006) Review of Fluoride/Thyroid Parathyroid Gland Fluorosis & Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Gastrointestinal Acute Toxicity Gastric symptoms: Early sign of acute fluoride toxicity Clinical Trials Fluoride-induced damage to gastric mucosa Gastric symptoms: common side effect Fluorosis patients Gastric symptoms: common side effect Kidney Fluoride’s Effect on Kidney Patients Kidney patients at increased risk of fluoride poisoning Health authorities are ignoring the risk Similarities between skeletal fluorosis & renal osteodystrophy Fluoridation, dialysis, & osteomalacia Fluoride’s Effect on Kidney Kidneys are exposed to high concentrations of fluoride Fluoride as a cause of kidney disease in humans Fluoride as a cause of kidney disease in animals Fluoride & Kidney Stones Reproductive System Male Fertility Human studies Animal studies In vitro studies The Sprando/Collins Anomaly Teeth Caries (Syntheses) Fluoride’s Topical vs. Systemic effect Tooth decay trends in F vs. NF countries Tooth decay rates in F vs. NF communities Fluoridation & “baby bottle tooth decay” Water fluoridation, tooth decay, & poverty Studies on tooth decay rates after fluoridation was stopped Caries (Specific Studies) The “Iowa Fluoride Study” (1990s-Present Day) Armfield & Spencer (2004) National Institute of Dental Research (1986-87) Dental Fluorosis Dental fluorosis rates in the U.S.: 1950-2004 Racial disparities in dental fluorosis rates Dental fluorosis: The “Cosmetic Factor” Severe Fluorosis: Perception & Psychological Impact “Mild” Fluorosis: Perception & Psychological Impact Moderate/Severe Fluorosis: Impact on Tooth Quality Dental Fluorosis’s impact on enamel (“Hypo-mineralization”) Dental fluorosis impacts dentin in addition to enamel Mechanisms by which fluoride causes dental fluorosis Diagnostic criteria for dental fluorosis: Dean Index Diagnostic criteria for dental fluorosis: TF Index Diagnostic criteria for dental fluorosis: TSIF Index Community Fluorosis Index (CFI) Vulnerable Populations Age groups: Infants Racial/Ethnic groups African Americans Populations with the Following Conditions: Diabetes Kidney Disease Nutrient Deficiencies Polydipsia Individuals with Fluoride Sensitivity Topical Fluorides Systemic Fluorides

Very dishonest editing of my quote, try again with the whole sentence. // Colby ++++++++++++++++++++++++ Im sure the illegal alien partents will be thinking of getting waivers...Oh yeah big on government documents ... .Gee California might have a few illegal alien parents, NO ?? +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++========= THE TREND IN VACCINES NOT ONE TOWARDS FREEDOM OF CHOICE ,Gaal State Cuts Philosophical Objections from Vaccine Exemptions October 23, 2012 +++++++++++ By Dr. Mercola The ethical principle of informed consent means that you have the human right to be fully informed about the benefits and risks of a medical intervention and be free to make a voluntary choice about whether or not to take the risk. The right to make an informed, voluntary vaccination choice for yourself (or your minor child) is an inalienable human right because vaccination, like any medical intervention, involves taking a risk that could cause harm or even death. There is no guarantee that receiving a vaccine (or any other drug) will not cause a complication and lead to serious injury – or that it will protect you from the disease it is supposed to prevent. But across the United States, people are fighting for their right to choose not to be injected with vaccines against their will because vaccine exemptions have come under constant attack. New Mexico is the Latest State to Cut the Philosophical Vaccine Exemption All 50 states have enacted vaccine laws that require proof children have received a certain number of vaccinations in order to attend daycare, middle school, high school and college. However, all 50 states allow a medical exemption to vaccination (medical exemptions must be approved by an M.D. or D.O.); 48 states allow a religious exemption to vaccination; and, until earlier this year, 18 states allowed a personal, philosophical or conscientious belief exemption to vaccination for children attending school. Now, there are only 17 states that allow a personal belief exemption because this year public health officials in New Mexico changed the vaccine exemption form so that philosophical objections were no longer an option. The New Mexico Department of Health simply said they changed the form because the prior one allowed for "misinterpretation of the law." From now on, parents will be required to state their religious beliefs in order to qualify for a non-medical vaccine exemption so their children can attend school. Many U.S. States Tightening Vaccine Exemption Requirements In the past two years, public health department officials and legislators in California, Washington and Vermont have made it harder for parents to obtain a non-medical vaccine exemption for their children. While the original goal of lobbyists working for drug companies, medical trade associations funded by drug companies and state public health officials was to completely eliminate personal belief exemptions from the public health laws of those three states, parents organized and communicated with their legislators through the NVIC Advocacy Portal and were able to save the non-medical exemptions even though they have been severely restricted. California and Washington states now require parents filing a philosophical belief exemption for their children to make an appointment with a state designated medical worker to obtain a signature verifying parents have reviewed "factual" information about the risks and benefits of vaccination. In Vermont, parents filing a philosophical exemption must sign a statement that they agree they are placing their child and society at risk for infectious diseases. According to an article published in Nature,1 the Washington Department of Health wanted to make it harder to get a philosophical exemption because parents were simply choosing it out of convenience. It's unclear where the evidence for this statement comes from, if it exists at all, but those, who choose to go against the grain and opt out of vaccination, do not face an easy road. Harassment, intimidation and refusal of medical care are all commonly reported among those who "dare" to make selective vaccine choices. Plus, research shows that those, who opt out of one or more of the 69 doses of 16 vaccines that the CDC recommends children get, do not typically do it simply for "convenience." Most of the parents making independent vaccine choices for their children are very well educated and have poured countless hours of careful and studied reflection into this decision. They have refused to blindly trust what someone else says and have done their own research because they feel it is necessary to protect the health of their children – not because they don't want to take the time to set up a doctor's visit. It would be far easier to simply roll up their child's sleeve and wait for the shot. Disease Outbreaks Falsely Blamed on Personal-Belief Exemptions The article then states that studies have linked personal-belief exemptions to increased incidence of disease like pertussis (whooping cough). But if you take the time to look into the truthfulness of that statement, you'll see it simply does not hold up. Many outbreaks of pertussis (whooping cough), measles, and mumps have occurred primarily in people who were vaccinated, and no one seems to be able to fully explain how that is the fault of those who are unvaccinated... If the basic tenets of vaccinology were correct, these people should have been protected because they were vaccinated. Published studies into the outbreaks have revealed that a lot of the blame should be placed on ineffective vaccines – not on the unvaccinated minority. Consider: However, research published in March of this year showed that 81 percent of 2010 California whooping cough cases in people under the age of 18 occurred in those who were fully up to date on the whooping cough vaccine.2 Eleven percent had received at least one shot, but not the entire recommended series, and only eight percent of those stricken were unvaccinated. In 2010, the largest outbreak of whooping cough in over 50 years occurred in California. Around that same time, a scare campaign was launched in California by Pharma-funded medical trade associations, state health officials and national media, targeting people opting out of receiving pertussis vaccine, falsely accusing them of causing the outbreak. The Washington State Secretary of Health also declared a pertussis epidemic on April 3, 2012, in response to a 1,300 percent increase in pertussis cases compared to 2011.3 Here, again, research has shown that the majority of people getting sick are up to date with their vaccinations,4 thus pointing toward vaccine failure as a cause. Paul Offit Admits People are "More Compelled by Fear Than Reason" The same article then goes on to say that growing disease rates are likely to trigger more people to get vaccinated, and quoted Paul Offit, chief of the division of infectious diseases at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania, as stating people are "far more compelled by fear than reason." Indeed, it appears many who oppose vaccine choice, as Offit openly does regarding personal belief exemptions, are banking on fear being a driving force to take away personal freedoms and the human right to informed consent to medical risk-taking.. Offit, who not only is very public about his belief that infants could theoretically safely handle 10,000 vaccines all at once, has a financial stake in the vaccine industry (he invented RotaTeq, a pentavalent rotavirus vaccine which is currently on the CDC's vaccine schedule) and has served on the scientific advisory board of pharmaceutical giant Merck. Offit's personal beliefs about forcing people to involuntarily use vaccines, which violates the informed consent ethic in medicine, along with the inaccurate statements he makes about vaccine safety, are echoed throughout pro-forced vaccination propaganda, including that released by the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP). The Vaccine Education Center at CHOP says it's funded by endowed chairs and "does not receive support from pharmaceutical companies," but it neglects to mention that the hospital indirectly benefits from drug company money that helps fund endowed chairs like Merck's Maurice R. Hilleman Professor of Vaccinology, which is currently held by Paul Offit. And wouldn't you know, their August newsletter peppers you with enough scare tactics – along with links to information on vaccine exemptions and states that allow personal belief exemptions – to leave readers convinced they need to do something to stop vaccine exemptions. This is the fear-based response Offit spoke of -- but it's far better to make your decisions based on reason... Natural Herd Immunity is Not Achieved Through Vaccination Many articles that berate vaccine exemption options and parents, who obtain personal belief exemptions for their children, use the argument that unvaccinated children are "weakening" herd immunity and, therefore, putting others at risk of disease. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases describes vaccine-induced herd immunity, also labeled "community immunity" by public health doctors as follows: "When a critical portion of a community is immunized against a contagious disease, most members of the community are protected against that disease because there is little opportunity for an outbreak. Even those who are not eligible for certain vaccines – such as infants, pregnant women, or immunocompromised individuals – get some protection because the spread of contagious disease is contained. This is known as 'community immunity.'" The problem is that there is in fact such a thing as natural herd immunity. But what they've done is they've taken this natural phenomenon and assumed that vaccines will work the same way. However, vaccines do not confer the same kind of immunity as being challenged by and overcoming the natural disease, and the science clearly shows that there's a big difference between naturally acquired herd immunity and vaccine-induced herd immunity. To learn more, I urge you to listen to the following video, in which Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), discusses the concept of herd immunity. Barbara explains: "The original concept of herd immunity is that when a population experiences the natural disease… natural immunity would be achieved – a robust, qualitatively superior natural herd immunity within the population, which would then protect other people from getting the disease in other age groups. It's the way infectious diseases work… The vaccinologists have adopted this idea of vaccine induced herd immunity. The problem with it is that all vaccines only confer temporary protection… Pertussis vaccine is one of the best examples… Pertussis vaccines have been used for about 50 to 60 years, and the organism has started to evolve to become vaccine resistant. I think this is not something that's really understood generally by the public: Vaccines do not confer the same type of immunity that natural exposure to the disease does." Download Interview Transcript Get Informed Before You Vaccinate All Americans need to know their options for legally opting-out of vaccinations, and you also need to know why it's so important to protect this legal option, whether you choose to use every federally recommended vaccine for yourself and your children or not. No matter what vaccination choices you make for yourself or your family, there is a basic human right to be fully informed about all risks and have the ability to refuse to allow substances you consider to be harmful, toxic or poisonous to be forced upon you. Unfortunately, the public-private business partnership between government health and defense agencies and pharmaceutical corporations manufacturing and marketing vaccines in the U.S. is getting closer and closer. There is some serious discrimination against Americans, who want to be free to exercise their human right to informed consent to medical risk-taking when it comes to making voluntary decisions about which vaccines they and their children use. We cannot allow that happen! It's vitally important to know your legal rights and understand your options when it comes to using vaccines and prescription drugs. For example, your doctor is legally obligated to provide you with the CDC Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) sheet and discuss the potential symptoms of side effects of the vaccination(s) you or your child receive BEFORE vaccination takes place. If someone giving a vaccine does not do this, it is a violation of federal law. Furthermore, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 also requires doctors and other vaccine providers to: Keep a permanent record of all vaccines given and the manufacturer's name and lot number Record serious health problems, hospitalizations, injuries and deaths that occur after vaccination in the patient's permanent medical record File an official report of all serious health problems, hospitalizations, injuries and deaths following vaccination to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) If a vaccine provider fails to inform, record or report, it is a violation of federal law. It's important to get all the facts before making your decision about vaccination; and to understand that you have the legal right to opt out of using a vaccine that you do not want you or your child to receive. But as mentioned earlier, vaccine exemptions are under attack in a number of states, and it's in everyone's best interest to protect the right to make informed, voluntary vaccination decisions. What You Can Do to Make a Difference While it seems "old-fashioned," the only truly effective actions you can take to protect the right to informed consent to vaccination and expand your rights under the law to make voluntary vaccine choices, is to get personally involved with your state legislators and the leaders in your community. THINK GLOBALLY, ACT LOCALLY. Mass vaccination policies are made at the federal level but vaccine laws are made at the state level, and it is at the state level where your action to protect your vaccine choice rights will have the greatest impact. Signing up to be a user of NVIC's free online Advocacy Portal at www.NVICAdvocacy.org gives you access to practical, useful information to help you become an effective vaccine choice advocate in your own community. You will get real-time Action Alerts about what you can do if there are threats to vaccine exemptions in your state. With the click of a mouse or one touch on a Smartphone screen you will be put in touch with YOUR elected representatives so you can let them know how you feel and what you want them to do. Plus, when national vaccine issues come up, you will have all the information you need to make sure your voice is heard. So please, as your first step, sign up for the NVIC Advocacy Portal. Contact Your Elected Officials It is so important for you to reach out and make sure your concerns get on the radar screen of the leaders and opinion makers in your community, especially the politicians you elect who are directly involved in making vaccine laws in your state. These are your elected representatives, so you have a right and a responsibility to let them know what's really happening in your life and the lives of people you know when it comes to vaccine mandates. Be sure to share the "real life" experiences that you, or people you know, have experienced with vaccination. Internet Resources I also encourage you to visit the following web pages on the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) website at www.NVIC.org: NVIC Memorial for Vaccine Victims: View descriptions and photos of children and adults, who have suffered vaccine reactions, injuries and death. If you or your child experiences an adverse vaccine event, please consider posting and sharing your story here. If You Vaccinate, Ask 8 Questions: Learn how to recognize vaccine reaction symptoms and prevent vaccine injuries. Vaccine Freedom Wall: View or post descriptions of harassment by doctors or state officials for making independent vaccine choices. Find a Doctor Who will Listen to Your Concerns If your pediatrician or doctor refuses to provide medical care to you or your child unless you agree to get vaccines you don't want, I strongly encourage you to have the courage to find another doctor. Harassment, intimidation, and refusal of medical care is becoming the modus operandi of the medical establishment in an effort to punish patients and parents who become truly educated about health and vaccination and want to make vaccine choices instead of being forced to follow risky one-size-fits-all vaccine policies. If you are treated with disrespect or are harassed in any way by a doctor (or government official), do not engage in an unproductive argument. You may want to contact an attorney, your elected state representatives or local media if you or your child are threatened. However, there is hope. At least 15 percent of young doctors recently polled admit that they're starting to adopt a more individualized approach to vaccinations in direct response to the vaccine safety concerns of parents. It is good news that there is a growing number of smart young doctors, who prefer to work as partners with parents in making personalized vaccine decisions for children, including delaying vaccinations or giving children fewer vaccines on the same day or continuing to provide medical care for those families, who decline use of one or more vaccines. So take the time to locate and connect with a doctor, who treats you with compassion and respect and is willing to work with you to do what is right for your child.

How exactly does this support 'your thesis that the Syrian revolution is an EoZ/NWO plot'? // Colby that Badi was calling for violent jihad for the purpose of destroying Israel: // British kiss ring of violent MB people because they need to work with them in GEOPOLITICAL GAME. The people of Egypt see this and it disheartens them and thus makes revolt less likely and the MB continues in power.

#################### YES THIS POST # 91 WAS A SUMMATION (and a summation is a good thing) OF PREVIOUS INFORMATION (BUT WITH ONE ITEM ADDED, CONGRESS WANTS TO LOOK INTO AMMO PURCHASES) AND WITH AT LEAST 6 RELATED LINKS.

Part 1 - Got any citations in support of your claims? Iran is in Russia's pocket? You really think so? They don't seem to be happy about the former's nuclear program because they either voted for or abstained from voting against all those sanctions. Why would they want any competition? Whose going to buy Iran's gas? The country is under EU and UN sanction. // Colby +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ A little competion RE oil OK. GOLLY with sanctions IRAN gets more militant and wants arms ....gee where could they get them....where ????????????????????????? PressTV - No legal restrictions on arms sales to Iran: Russia presstv.com › Iran › PoliticsCached Oct 20, 2012 – Korotchenko argued that the embargoes by the UN Security Council (UNSC) against Iran over its nuclear energy program do not incorporate ... [PDF] Russian Weapons Sales to Iran: Why they are csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/pm_0427.pdf File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View Russian Weapons Sales to Iran. Why They Are Unlikely to Stop. PONARS Policy Memo No. 427. Alla Kassianova. Tomsk State University. December 2006 ... Russia-Iran Arms Trade - Council on Foreign Relations www.cfr.org › IranCached Nov 1, 2006 – The flow of Russian conventional weapons to Iran—notably sophisticated surface-to-air defense missiles—has increased markedly of late, ... Russia May Sell S-300s to Iran If Syrian Government Falls ... www.businessweek.com/.../russia-may-sell-s-300s-to-iran-if-syrian-...Cached Jul 3, 2012 – Then-President Dmitry Medvedev signed a decree prohibiting the sale of Russian weapons, including S-300s, to Iran in 2010 after the United ... News for russian arms sales iran 05] UN close to deal on first global arms trade treaty, but Iran could still block move Haaretz ‎- 3 hours ago Syria is in a two-year-old civil war and hopes Russian and Iranian arms ... The main reason the arms trade talks are taking place at all is that the ... ############### PART # 3 Part 3 - not especially relevant either; no one disputes the US and other western powers started helping the rebels AFTER the civil war began. // COLBY +++++ Prof Michel Chossudovsky does not agree with you http://www.globalresearch.ca/syria-nato-s-next-humanitarian-war/29234 ############### Part 2 - irrelevant to this thread. // end Colby Syria part of geopolitical chess board of Banks ......Today you FIRST have to ask is this war started for BANKING ELITE, and then look for other reasons for the war.

Risk Factors for Fluoride Toxicity in the Black Community ================================================== Numerous studies, including a national survey by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), have found that black children suffer significantly higher rates of dental fluorosis than white children. (Martinez-Mier 2010; Beltran-Aguilar 2005; Kumar 2000, 1999; Williams 1990; Butler 1985; Russell 1962). Not only do black children suffer higher rates of fluorosis, they suffer the most severe forms of the condition which are marked by dark brown staining and deterioration of the enamel. While the reasons for this increased rate of fluorosis have yet to be definitively determined, there are several risk factors for fluoride toxicity that are present at elevated rates in the black community. These risk factors include: Reduced nutrient intake; Higher levels of lead exposure; Higher prevalence of health conditions (e.g., kidney disease and diabetes) that render the body more vulnerable to fluoride intake; and Higher intakes of fluoride. A) Reduced Nutrient Intake Voluminous research spanning back to the 1930s shows that populations with nutrient deficiencies are harmed by fluoride exposures otherwise safe for the general population. A 1952 study in the Journal of the American Dental Association warned: “The data from this and other investigations suggest that malnourished infants and children, especially if deficient in calcium intake, may suffer from the effects of water containing fluorine while healthy children would remain unaffected…Thus low levels of fluoride ingestion which are generally considered to be safe for the general population may not be safe for malnourished infants and children. Therefore, the nutritional status must be carefully assessed and guarded in areas with endemic fluorosis. Nutritional studies should be included in any comprehensive program of fluoridation of water with special attention to chronically ailing infants and children…When an individual or a population group shows mottling beyond the degree expected, the health and nutritional status of that group should be investigated.” (Massler & Schour 1952). Research has repeatedly shown that black Americans have lower nutrient intakes than caucasians. (Fulgoni 2007, Goolsby 2006; Sharma 2004). As summarized in a recent review: “As a group, African-Americans consume a diet that is lower in recommended nutrients and meet fewer of the national recommendations than the average American. In comparison to national recommendations, the African-American diet is more likely to be low in vitamins and minerals, including calcium, and higher in fat. Additionally, the food pattern in the African-American diet includes more meat and fats, while being lower in fruits, vegetables and dairy foods.” (Byers 2005). One reason for the lower nutrient intake in the black community is the higher prevalence of lactose intolerance that is known to exist. (Byers 2005). Due to this high rate of lactose tolerance, black children consume significantly less milk than white children. Since milk is an important source of calcium, and since calcium is important for reducing fluoride’s toxic effects on mineralized tissues (bones and teeth), lower milk consumption could be an important reason for the increased fluorosis rate in the black community. Indeed, recent research has specifically found that milk consumption is associated with reduced severity of fluorosis in areas with high levels of fluoride in water. (Rango 2012). Another reason for the reduced nutrient intake in the black community is the scarcity of fresh grocery stores in low-income urban areas. Recent studies have found that the lack of grocery stores in low-income black neighborhoods severely limits access to fresh fruits and vegetables (a major source of anti-oxidants). (Kolker 2008; Burt 2006; Tellez 2006). Consistent with this, the level of anti-oxidants in the blood of otherwise healthy black adults has been found to be significantly lower than the anti-oxidant levels in white adults. (Watters 2007). This is important because research has repeatedly shown that fluoride increases the level of oxidative stress in the body and, as a result, anti-oxidants play a critical role in defending the body from fluoride toxicity. (Barbier 2010). Lead Exposure Research has found that the black community has higher levels of lead intake than the white community. (Bernard 2003; Lanphear 1996; Brody 1994). This has been demonstrated through studies of lead levels in both blood and bone. (Jones 2009; Theppeang 2008). This is significant because, according to recent animal research, heightened exposure to lead can exacerbate the toxicity of fluoride exposures. (Leite 2011; Niu 2009). In one animal study, rats with both fluoride and lead exposure had more severe forms of fluorosis than rats with fluoride exposure alone. (Leite 2011). Thus, the higher lead exposure in the black community may help to explain the greater severity of dental fluorosis found in the black community. C) Fluoride Intake Some studies have found that black children consume more fluoride from water and beverages than white children. (Sohn 2001). This may be the result of increased lactose intolerance which leads to the substitution of milk with water and other processed beverages. In addition, studies have found that black children are less likely to be breast-fed than other racial groups. (Robinson 2009). A recent national survey by the CDC, for example, found that “non-Hispanic blacks had a lower prevalence of breastfeeding initiation than non-Hispanic whites in all but two states.” (CDC 2010). This is significant because infants consuming formula made with fluoridated water can ingest up to 200 times more fluoride than a breast fed infant, and have been found to be at greater risk of developing dental fluorosis in their permanent teeth. (Hong 2006). D) Health Conditions Fluoride’s toxicity is significantly exacerbated by health conditions, including kidney disease and diabetes, that are significantly more prevalent among communities of color. Black Americans, for example, are over two times as likely to develop chronic kidney disease and nearly four times as likely to experience kidney failure as caucasians. (Muntner 2012; US Renal Data System, 2005). to develop kidney failure than caucasians, and nearly twice as likely to suffer from diabetes than are whites. (Katzmarzyk 2012). References: Barbier O, et al. (2010). Molecular mechanisms of fluoride toxicity. Chemico-Biological Interactions 188(2):319-33. Beltran-Aguilar ED et al. (2005). Surveillance for dental caries, dental sealants, tooth retention, edentulism, and enamel fluorosis — United States, 1988–1994 and 1999—2002. MMWR Surveillance Summaries 54(3): 1-44. Bernard SM, McGeehin MA. (2003). Prevalence of blood lead levels >or= 5 micro g/dL among US children 1 to 5 years of age and socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with blood of lead levels 5 to 10 micro g/dL, Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Pediatrics 112(6 Pt 1):1308-13. Brody DJ, et al. (1994). Blood lead levels in the US population. Phase 1 of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, 1988 to 1991). Journal of the American Medical Association 272(4):277-83. Butler WJ, et al. (1985). Prevalence of dental mottling in school-aged lifetime residents of 16 Texas communities. American Journal of Public Health 75:1408-1412. Byers KG, Savaiano DA. (2005). The myth of increased lactose intolerance in African-Americans. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 24(6 Suppl):569S-73S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2010). Racial and ethnic differences in breastfeeding initiation and duration, by state – National Immunization Survey, United States, 2004-2008. MMWR Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report 59(11):327-34. Fulgoni V, et al. (2007). Dairy consumption and related nutrient intake in African-American adults and children in the United States: continuing survey of food intakes by individuals 1994-1996, 1998, and the National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2000. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 107(2):256-64. Goolsby SL, et al. (2006). Consumption of calcium among African American adolescent girls. Ethnicity & Disease 16(2):476-82. Hong L, Levy SM, et al. (2006). Timing of fluoride intake in relation to development of fluorosis on maxillary central incisors. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 34:299-309. Jones RL, et al. (2009). Trends in blood lead levels and blood lead testing among US children aged 1 to 5 years, 1988-2004. Pediatrics 123(3):e376-85. Katzmarzyk PT, Staiano AE. (2012). New race and ethnicity standards: elucidating health disparities in diabetes. BMC Medicine 10(1):42. Kumar JV, Swango PA. 2000. Low birth weight and dental fluorosis: is there an association? Journal of Public Health Dentistry 60(3):167-71. Kumar JV, Swango PA. (1999). Fluoride exposure and dental fluorosis in Newburgh and Kingston, New York: policy implications. Community Dentistry & Oral Epidemiology 27:171-80. Lanphear BP, et al. (1996). Racial differences in Urban children’s environmental exposures to lead. American Journal of Public Health 86(10):1460-3. Leite GA, et al. (2011). Exposure to lead exacerbates dental fluorosis. Archives of Oral Biology 56(7):695-702. Martinez-Mier EA, Soto-Rojas AE. (2010). Differences in exposure and biological markers of fluoride among White and African American children. Journal of Public Health Dentistry 70:234-40. Massler M, Schour I. (1952). Relation of endemic dental fluorosis to malnutrition. JADA. 44: 156-165. Muntner P, et al. (2012). Racial differences in the incidence of chronic kidney disease. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 7(1):101-7. Niu R, et al. (2009). Decreased learning ability and low hippocampus glutamate in offspring rats exposed to fluoride and lead. Environmental Toxicology & Pharmacology 28(2):254-8. Rango T, et al. (2012). Groundwater quality and its health impact: An assessment of dental fluorosis in rural inhabitants of the Main Ethiopian Rift. Environment International 43:37-47. Robinson K, VandeVusse L. (2009). Exploration of African-American women’s infant feeding choices. Journal of the National Black Nurses Association 20(2):32-7. Russell Al. (1962). Dental fluorosis in Grand Rapids during the seventeenth year of fluoridation. Journal of the American Dental Association 65:608-12. Sharma S, et al. (2004). Adherence to the food guide pyramid recommendations among African Americans and Latinos: results from the Multiethnic Cohort. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 104(12):1873-7. Sohn W, et al. (2001). Fluid consumption related to climate among children in the United States. Journal of Public Health Dentistry 61(2):99-106. Theppeang K, et al. (2008). Gender and race/ethnicity differences in lead dose biomarkers. American Journal of Public Health 98(7):1248-55. Watters JL, et al. (2007). Associations of antioxidant nutrients and oxidative DNA damage in healthy African-American and White adults. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 16(7):1428-36. Williams JE, Zwemer JD. (1990). Community water fluoride levels, preschool dietary patterns, and the occurrence of fluoride enamel opacities. Journal of Public Health Dentistry 50:276-81.

Monday, 25 March 2013 12:30 Congress Seeks Answers on Huge Homeland Security Ammo Contracts Written by Alex Newman +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Concerned lawmakers and activists across America from all points on the political spectrum have for months been seeking an explanation about the Obama administration apparently stockpiling weapons of war for domestic use. Estimates suggest, for example, that the federal government has committed to purchasing up to 2 billion rounds of ammunition over several years while rolling out . Meanwhile, the controversial Department of Homeland Security and its boss Janet Napolitano are refusing to provide real answers.Now, however, at least one member of Congress is proposing to stop funding DHS unless and until it explains the controversial arms buildup, which has sparked widespread suspicion even among Obama’s most devoted supporters. Speaking to We Are Change activist and reporter Luke Rudkowski at the Conservative Political Action Conference this month, liberty-minded Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-Kan.) said that more than a few of his colleagues were also trying to find out why the administration would be stockpiling so much firepower for use within the “Homeland.” “They have no answer for that question. They refuse to answer to answer that.... They refuse to let us know what is going on, so I don’t really have an answer for that,” Rep. Tim Huelskamp , adding that multiple members of Congress were still trying to find out. “It comes down to: During the budget process, during the appropriations process, are we willing to hold DHS’s feet to the fire? We’re going to find out.... I say we don’t fund them ’til we get an answer. Those types of things really challenge Americans. They’re worried about this administration.”Led by Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-Calif.), at least 15 U.S. lawmakers have already signed a letter demanding that Homeland Security boss Napolitano justify the controversial purchases. The letter also seeks an explanation as to whether or not the apparent bullet stockpiling is part of a deliberate effort to restrict the supply of ammunition available to the public — one of many theories that have been put forward by Americans concerned over the news amid a deeply unpopular effort by Obama and his allies to further infringe on the Second Amendment. “The extraordinary level of ammunition purchases made by Homeland Security seems to have, in states such as my own, created an extreme shortage of ammunition to the point where many gun owners are unable to purchase any,” Rep. LaMalfa and his colleagues wrote in the letter. “Are these purchases being conducted in a manner that strategically denies the American people access to ammunition?” News of the massive federal arms purchases for domestic agencies — enough bullets to kill every American multiple times, for example — was originally spread by radio host Alex Jones and his news service Infowars.com. Since then, however, the controversy has sparked a nationwide uproar, garnering headlines, suspicion, and outrage all across America. Under major pressure from concerned citizens and the alternative media, even the establishment press has finally been forced to report on the issue. The Associated Press, for example, reported last month that DHS was seeking 1.6 billion rounds over the next few years. Forbes contributor Ralph Benko seized on the story, saying it was “time for a national conversation” in an opinion piece that has since gone “viral” online. “Spending money this way is beyond absurd well into perverse,” Benko wrote, blasting the DHS activities as “wrong in every way” and calling for congressional action if Obama refuses to rein in the out-of-control bureaucrats responsible for the purchases. “Buying 1.6 billion rounds of ammo and deploying armored personnel carriers runs contrary, in every way, to what ‘homeland security’ really means.” Military veterans are speaking out, too, with retired U.S. Army Captain Terry Hestilow publishing an open letter to Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) expressing concerns over another increasingly widespread theory — the view that the federal government is actually preparing for a war against Americans on U.S. soil. “It is with gravest concern that I write to you today concerning the recent appropriation of weapons by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that can only be understood as a bold threat of war by that agency, and the Obama administration, against the citizens of the United States of America,” reads Hestilow’s March 23 letter, which has also “gone viral” on the Internet. In an e-mail to The New American, Homeland Security spokesperson Marsha Catron downplayed the purchases and suggested that public fear over the news was unfounded. “DHS routinely establishes strategic sourcing contracts that combine the requirements of all its components for commonly purchased goods and services such as ammunition, computer equipment, and information technology services,” she said in a statement, the same official line spouted by multiple federal spokespeople. “These strategic sourcing contracts help leverage the purchasing power of DHS to efficiently procure equipment and supplies.” Catron pointed out that one of the contracts in question — up to 750 million rounds for the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC), which reportedly goes through about 15 million bullets per year — represented “a maximum quantity” that would give the center “flexibility over the next 5 years for training of over 90 federal agencies.” A separate contract for up to 450 million bullets is intended to be used by all Homeland Security “components” except the U.S. Coast Guard, which uses Department of Defense contacts, she said. “This contract is part of the Department’s strategic sourcing efforts to combine multiple previous contracts in order to leverage the purchasing power of the entire Department to efficiently procure equipment and supplies at significantly lower costs,” Catron claimed. “With more than 100,000 armed law enforcement personnel in DHS, significant quantities of ammunition are used to support law enforcement operations, quarterly qualifications, and training, to include advanced firearms training exercises.” During fiscal year 2012, the department purchased almost 100 million rounds, not including ammunition used by the Coast Guard. The department also claimed in an e-mail to TNA that a “small reserve” of the overall ammunition is kept by federal law enforcement agencies, but that there is not an “ammunition stockpile.” It was not immediately clear what a “small reserve” was or what would constitute a true “stockpile.” Catron emphasized repeatedly that DHS has over 100,000 armed agents and officers — a gargantuan number of armed bureaucrats that has raised alarm bells among critics as well. In attempting to justify the purchases, Homeland Security has also stated multiple times that the ammo totals represented a ceiling and that DHS would not necessarily buy the full amounts listed in the contracts. Despite numerous attempts, the department did not respond to questions about what circumstances or scenarios might require two billion bullets — many of them hollow-point — to be used inside the “Homeland.” As critics have pointed out, that would be enough ammunition to wage several decades of war: Even at the height of the Iraq war, the military was using less than six million rounds per month. Catron also failed to address inquiries related to congressional oversight. Speaking about the MRAP (mine-resistant ambush protected) vehicles in a brief phone interview with The New American, the spokesperson denied myriad media reports claiming that DHS had acquired more than 2,700 units of the heavily armored military machines. She said Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations currently uses 16 of the vehicles while U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) uses another 16 — all of which were apparently provided by the Defense Department. “DHS has no plans for future MRAP purchases,” Catron said. On the campaign trail before taking office in 2008, without citing what section of the Constitution he thought might authorize it, Obama that is “just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded” as the U.S. military. At the time, critics recoiled in horror, wondering why the “Homeland” might require a “force” as powerful as the U.S. military. Again, answers were never forthcoming, though apologists later tried to downplay the significance of the comments.In recent years, however, the U.S. government has made its views abundantly clear: The biggest “threat” Obama and his administration see against the “Homeland” includes veterans, pro-life activists, supporters of individual liberty, constitutionalists, and others who disagree with the president’s radical agenda. The Justice Department, Homeland Security, so-called “fusions centers,” and even a U.S. military think-tank have all openly said as much in official reports and documents. The administration is also under the false impression that it may kill or indefinitely detain anyone it suspects of terror — including Americans in the “Homeland.” Meanwhile, as The New American reported last month, the administration has also been fueling suspicion by engaging in deeply controversial military training operations involving unmarked black helicopters firing blanks out of machine guns over major U.S. cities. Using shooting targets featuring children and pregnant womenraised eyebrows, too. Before that, Obama also came under fire for inviting Russian terror troops to train with U.S. forces on American soil. Why the administration believes it may potentially need billions of bullets and other weapons of war for use in the “Homeland” remains unclear. State and local agencies are also receiving a wide array of war weaponry from the federal government. What is clear, though, at least, is that more than a few lawmakers and Americans of all political persuasions are becoming increasingly uneasy about it. Alex Newman is a correspondent for The New American, covering economics, politics, and more. He can be reached at anewman@thenewamerican.com This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . Related articles: Military Drills and Black Helicopters in U.S. Cities Spark Panic Feds Requested Targets With Children and Pregnant Women U.S. Military Program Arming Local Police Expands Ammo Shortages: More Than Simple Supply and Demand? DHS Solicits Bids for 26.1 Million Rounds of Ammo Federal Law Enforcement Stockpiling Arms (10,000/ICE Employee) Justice Department Trained Police to Link Political Activism With Terror Why is the Federal Government Disarming Veterans? Justice Dept. Memo Refutes Obama on Guns, Calls for Gun Registration Gun Owners Refuse to Register Under New York Law West Point Terrorism Study Targets “Far Right” Conservatives DHS Labels Liberty-Lovers as Potential Terrorists Profiling and Criminalizing Political Dissent Homeland Security: Everyone's a Threat Do You Fit the Terrorist Profile? New DHS Domestic Terrorism Report Targets Millions of Americans DHS Sources Prompt Calls for Ousting Napolitano Terror War Expanding, Shifting to the Right Russian Troops Coming to U.S. for Terror Drills, DoD Confirms 20,000 Troops To Be Deployed in United States U.S. Army Brigade On Call for Domestic Emergencies 

parents have alternatives they can enroll their kids in private schools // COLBY ++++++++++++++++++++++++ Oh yeah the minority population is right on ( $$$$$$) that one, GHEESH !!! ++++++++++++++++++++++++ So vaccines are causing the population to drop in California? Really? You got evidence in support of that? // COLBY +++++++++++++++++++++++++ TO MUCH FLORIDE YOU NOW ADMIT TO CONSUMING ?? POSTED OCT 03,2012 by GAAL (THIS THREAD) Posted by Steven Gaal on 03 October 2012 - 10:48 PM in Political Conspiracies IMHO Depopulation wont occur until a Western elite quisling is in place in Russia 2) India leadership is bribed / bought off to quisling status and 3) a secret deal is made with the Chinese leaders for depopulation. Said changes: Russia 2024 to 2030,India 2030 to 2036 and China 2036 to 2040. Depopulation wont occur until at least the 2037 to 2041. IMHO. Depopulation as an idea forms a contextual basis for issues such as : sterilizing people / killing people /centralization (Agenda 21) / decreasing their reproduction potentiality (economic restraints/illness). Thus what makes people sick is also part of the plan , thus ancillary issues of depopulation are : bad vaccines,GMOs,fracking water,water shortages ,bad pharmaceuticals ,endles war,ect. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Lefty Obama ?? Obama Betrays Americans Again…with the Monsanto Protection Act Posted on March 27, 2013 by Daisy Luther The Organic Prepper Of course, it’s hard to honestly expect President Barack Obama to do the right thing, but many people held out hope that he would veto the most dangerous food act ever to pass the US Congress. After all, one of his campaign promises the first time around was to enforce the labeling of GMOs. His wife has that famous organic garden on the White House lawn. We can trust the Obamas, right? Wrong. Yesterday, that slender hope, the hope that Obama might finally do something for the good of the people instead of the good of the special interest groups that donate heavily to his campaigns, was dashed. Obama, once again, showed that he is for sale to the highest bidder – and this time that bidder is Monsanto. Despite a petition that garnered over 250,000 signatures in just a few days, he signed the Monsanto Protection Act into law, completely ignoring the wishes of the people. In fact, a press release has not even been issued by the White House to give the impression that the highly successful petition was considered. Food Democracy Now has not given up the battle, however: We regret to inform you that late last night President Barack Obama signed H.R. 933, which contained the Monsanto Protection Act into law. President Obama knowingly signed the Monsanto Protection Act over the urgent pleas of more than 250,000 Americans who asked that he use his executive authority to veto it. President Obama failed to live up to his oath to protect the American people and our constitution. Today we’re calling on President Obama to issue an executive order to call for the mandatory labeling of genetically engineered foods. Not only is GMO labeling a reasonable and common sense solution to the continued controversy that corporations like Monsanto, DuPont and Dow Chemical have created by subverting our basic democratic rights, but it is a basic right that citizens in 62 other countries around the world already enjoy, including Europe, Russia, China, India, South Africa and Saudi Arabia. Join us in demanding mandatory labeling of GMO foods. Now’s the time! Please take a moment to click the links above and get involved. We’ve lost the battle, but not the war. I’m personally pledging at least one article per week about Monsanto, their incestuous relationship with the government and their toxic grip on agriculture. I urge everyone to raise a deafening public outcry – every voice adds to the noise that we can create. Let’s make a noise that cannot be ignored. The Monsanto Protection Act was slipped quietly through the Congress, in the usual devious manner. Officially called the Farmer Assurance Provision, the resolution puts Monsanto, with all their toxins like the cheerfully dubbed Agent Orange and Round-up, as well as their genetically modified monstrosities, beyond the reach of the judicial system. The courts cannot stop the death brokering company from growing crops deemed to be potentially dangerous. (Ummm….that would be ALL OF THEM that have been produced by the Monsanto mad science club.) If ever there was a company that embodied evil, it would be the Monsanto Company. Last year I wrote about the company: The combination of unfettered corporate greed, a eugenics agenda and corrupt political manipulation forms an unholy trinity that could make Monsanto the real Cyberdyne Systems. In the Terminator movies, Cyberdyne Systems created the artificial intelligence computer system Skynet, which destroyed most life on earth and forced survivors to live underground. Proving once again that fact is indeed as strange as fiction, the Monsanto Company could single handedly cause TEOTWAWKI (The End Of The World As We Know It). Read more at Monsanto: The Real Cyberdyne Horrifyingly, this is just another step towards the science fictionesque predictions that I wrote about. While most people are constrained by morals, that clearly doesn’t apply with Monsanto. Now, they aren’t even limited by fear of prosecution. Pandora’s Box is unlocked, Obama just propped open the lid, and there’s no way to cram the evil back in. Daisy Luther is a freelance writer and editor. Her website, The Organic Prepper, offers information on healthy prepping, including premium nutritional choices, general wellness and non-tech solutions. You can follow Daisy onFacebook and Twitter, and you can email her at daisy@theorganicprepper.ca http://www.theorganicprepper.ca/obama-betrays-americans-again-with-the-monsanto-protection-act-03272013

THESIS ?? British Ambassador Meets With Peace-Loving Supreme Guide of Muslim Brotherhood Andrew C. McCarthy March 27, 2013 10:02 A.M. The Middle East Monitor reports that James Watt, the British Ambassador to Egypt, took great pleasure in meeting in Cairo with Mohammed Badi, the Supreme Guide of the Muslm Brotherhood. For his part, Badi reportedly “thanked the ambassador for his visit and praised his condemnation of all forms of violence,” stressing that “the Muslim Brotherhood denounces violence.” Sigh … It was just a few months ago, as I recount in Spring Fever: The Illusion of Islamic Democracy, that Badi was calling for violent jihad for the purpose of destroying Israel: “Every Muslim,” he declared, “will be asked about the Zionists’ usurpation of al-Aqsa Mosque. Why did he not seek to recover it, and wage jihad in [Allah’s] way? Did he not care about the fatwa of the ulema [scholars] of the Muslims: ‘Jihad of self and money to recover al Aqsa is a duty on every Muslim’?” He exhorted “all Muslim rulers” to make “the Palestinian cause a pivotal issue,” and predicted new “freedom flotillas” would break the “murdering Zionist criminals.” These remarks were no aberration. The Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Report related in November that Badi reminded Muslims that “jihad is obligatory” in response to President Mohamed Morsi’s indication that Egypt’s new Islamist government, at least for now, will continue to abide by the terms of the 1979 Camp David peace pact with Israel. Alluding to Israel, Badi explained at the time that “the enemy knows nothing but the language of force.” Moreover, as Spring Fever elaborates: Spring Fever elaborates: In October 2010, just before the “Arab Spring” dominos started falling in Tunis, the Brotherhood’s Supreme Guide, Mohammed Badi, [gave] a speech calling for violent jihad against the United States. Specifically, Badi admonished that Muslims must remember “Allah’s commandment to wage jihad for His sake with [their] money and lives, so that Allah’s word will reign supreme and the infidels’ word will be inferior.” Applying this injunction, Badi exclaimed that jihad, or “resistance,” “is the only solution against the Zio-American arrogance and tyranny.” On went the invective: The United States had been wounded by jihadists in Iraq and Afghanistan; thus, Badi gleefully surmised, America “is now experiencing the beginning of its end, and is heading towards its demise.” As frequently noted here, the Brotherhood’s Palestinian branch is the terrorist organization Hamas, the promotion of whose jihad against Israel is a top Brotherhood priority — such that the Brotherhood is vigorously campaigning (with alarming success) to have Western governments accept Hamas as a “political movement” engaged in “resistance,” rather than a jihadist movement engaged in terrorism. Even if you buy that nonsense, the Brotherhood quite obviously does not reject violence, regardless of how its leaders pretend to “denounce” it. It is well-known that the Brotherhood lies about its intentions and methods — indeed, that it believes strategic lying is both scripturally endorsed and a key to the advancement of Islamic supremacism. What is not clear is why the West is so anxious to be deceived

So you think the US and Europe are doing this for Qatar, talk about the tail wagging thr dog! //COLBY +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Who said US/Europe doing this for Qatar ?? Its one hand washing another with the circulation around and around of ye old petrodollars. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ How much more expensive would be to ship it directly from Qatar to Europe than pumping it from Qatar to Syria and shipping from there after the cost of building and operating the pipeline and paying transit fees to three countries? // COLBY +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Still a little more ,but there is more than pipeline here (but still energy orientated issue). ======================================================= So “Russia does not want Qatar’s super-amount of gas in European market” but has no problem with Iran supplying gas from the same “super” field? // COLBY ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ YUP u got it in one. Russia can modulate/moderate Iran. Qatar will do bidding of West and flow gas to max. Flow gas to max ,why ? ANSWER ::::: NOW GOAL IS TO REDUCE RUSSIA'S IMPORTANCE AS SUPPLIER OF ENERGY = WEAKEN RUSSIA (to create political climate (BAD ECONOMY) to elect pro-west Russian after Putin. Libya helping out flow to Europe also. Libya was considering to work in China to its energy mix and thats not with the isolate Russia RE energy plan. Take over Russia ,bribe India (and thats complex,but can be done). NOW Whats left ?? CHINA , ISOLATED CHINA . Make a deal with China re DEPOPULATION AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER HAS ARRIVED. NO GREAT DEPOPULATION UNLESS CHINA ON BOARD.......what elites want as I have stated....... Syria is just a square on the great game chess board of world domination in secret by a federation of banks,as Carroll Quigley has stated. The banking elite think nationalism is a small minded disease and that they should rule....... +++++++++++++++ POSTED OCT 03,2012 by GAAL Posted by Steven Gaal on 03 October 2012 - 10:48 PM in Political Conspiracies IMHO Depopulation wont occur until a Western elite quisling is in place in Russia 2) India leadership is bribed / bought off to quisling status and 3) a secret deal is made with the Chinese leaders for depopulation. Said changes: Russia 2024 to 2030,India 2030 to 2036 and China 2036 to 2040. Depopulation wont occur until at least the 2037 to 2041. IMHO. Depopulation as an idea forms a contextual basis for issues such as : sterilizing people / killing people /centralization (Agenda 21) / decreasing their reproduction potentiality (economic restraints/illness). Thus what makes people sick is also part of the plan , thus ancillary issues of depopulation are : bad vaccines,GMOs,fracking water,water shortages ,bad pharmaceuticals ,endles war,ect. =========================================== see http://www.bilderberg.org/bis.htm ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ U.S. Steps up War on Syria: CIA is the Anchor of a Coordinated Secret Operation By Brian Becker Global Research, March 27, 2013 ANSWER ============================ While pretending to be cautious about its intervention in Syria, the Obama administration has conducted a massive clandestine operation over the past two years to pump guns, heavy military equipment and money to fuel the civil war that is destroying Syria. The CIA is the anchor of this highly coordinated secret operation. Under the CIA’s supervision, more than 160 military cargo flights have delivered weapons to anti-government armed units in Syria. (The New York Times, March 25) Image right. Civilians killed by Syrian rebels, funded, armed and trained by the U.S. One of the ridiculous fictions about the war against Syria is that the Obama administration publicly claims “caution” in arming the rebels, in contrast to Saudi Arabia and Qatar, which have openly acknowledged their role in fueling the civil war by sending arms and money to the enemies of the Assad government. Saudi Arabia and Qatar are both absolute and hereditary monarchies whose existence is completely dependent on their role as clients of the United States. So too is the royal family in Jordan, which allows its territory to be a transfer pivot for the massive arms shipments into Syria. Qatar, with its citizen population of only 250,000 people, does not derive its fighting posture toward Syria from a robust military capability. That is a joke. Rather, Qatar is the location of the Pentagon’s Central Command Forward Headquarters and its Combined Air Operation Center. Qatar is also home to Al Jazeera, which promotes the cause of the armed rebellion against the Assad government. Qatar is not directing anything except that which the Pentagon approves. The equally hideous Saudi royal family remains on the throne only because of its close ties to the Pentagon and CIA. The Saudi monarchy is protected by U.S. imperialism because it is part of an undeclared but real U.S. sphere of influence, and it is the largest producer of oil in the world. The U.S. attitude toward the Saudi monarchy was put succinctly by Ronald Reagan in 1981, when he said that the U.S. government “will not permit” a revolution in Saudi Arabia such as the 1979 Iranian revolution, which removed the U.S. client regime of the Shah. Reagan’s message was clear: The Pentagon and CIA’s military forces would be used decisively to destroy any democratic movement against the rule of the Saudi royal family. Reagan’s explicit statement in 1981 has in fact been the policy of every successive U.S. administration, including the current one. It is hard to overstate the extreme irony of Secretary of State John Kerry’s public condemnations of Iran and Russia for maintaining their longstanding relationships with the sovereign and secular government of Syria, while the United States uses the most anti-democratic hereditary monarchies in the Middle East as their clients to fuel a civil war under the banner of “democracy” and “change.” U.S. policy appears as irony, but it reveals a remarkable consistency and sameness in purpose regardless of whether the occupant in the White House is a conservative Republican or a centrist Democrat. Liberal Democrats in Congress and right-wing Tea Party types are unanimous in their boisterous and vile support for overthrowing the independent governments in the Middle East. At most, their differences are about some tactics versus other tactics. They profess the same goals and objectives. The invasion and war in 2003 overthrew a nationalist, secular and independent government in Iraq. The NATO bombing war of Libya destroyed Qaddafi’s government, which was likewise nationalist, secular and independent. Now the U.S. war machine and clandestine spy services are determined to destroy a similar government in Syria. The fevered demonization campaign directed at Syria’s government by the same forces that protect the most retrograde monarchies in the Middle East should give pause to those on the “left” who function as an echo chamber for the arguments and rationales provided by the corporate-owned media and the U.S. government. The U.S. seeks only puppets and client regimes in a region that possesses two-thirds of the world’s oil. The rest is rhetoric. That is the ABCs of the endless pursuit of regime change by the United States against independent governments whose origin and existence was a consequence of the anti-colonial revolutions that rocked the Middle East in the 1950s and 1960s. Statement by Brian Becker, National Coordinator of the ANSWER Coalition ++++++++++++++++++++++ BRIAN BECKER & STEVEN GAAL OF MIND ONE

SOOooooooo the mythers have sweet wonderful Michael Savage on their side........ http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7UPkhvlMO8g

OOPS MB DOING WORK OF WEST AGAIN THESIS ?? +++++++++++++++++++++ Mavi Marmara aid convoy was stopped while passing from Libyan-Egyptian border http://sana.sy/eng/22/2013/03/23/474036.htm "Mavi Marmara convoy," a Gaza-bound convoy of 11 vehicles loaded with medical aid, was blocked at Libyan-Egyptian border gate on Friday. "Egyptian border guards battered our volunteers in the convoy at the border gate.

LINK TO SEARCH BELOW DATA BASE http://www.fluoridea...rg/researchers/ largest scholarly database for fluoride related contaminants. The Fluoride Action Network develops and maintains the world’s most comprehensive online database on fluoride compounds. The information in the database is free and available for anyone seeking to educate themselves. As they say: information is power Health Effects Database FAN's comprehensive catalog of fluoride research, including detailed summaries and exhaustive references for over 80 aspects of fluoride toxicity. A gold mine of information for anyone interested in the science. Professionals Statement FAN's Professionals Statement to End Water Fluoridation has been signed by over 4,000 medical, dental, scientific, and environmental professionals. See the list of signatories and add your name to the list. Professionals can add their name to this statement by clicking here. FAN's Translation Project FAN regularly accesses and translates studies written in Chinese. FAN's collection includes over 40 studies examining fluoride's impacts on human health, including its effects on the brain, bones, fertility, the fetus, thyroid, and glucose metabolism. State Fluoride Database Read the latest fluoride news from your state; find out if your town is fluoridated, see if any communities have recently rejected fluoridation, learn if your state has a law that mandates fluoridation, and other fluoride-related information. National Research Council (2006) An overview of the NRC's groundbreaking report on fluoride toxicity, including excerpts of its key findings and recommendations, statements from the panelists, and a discussion of its relevance to water fluoridation and sulfuryl fluoride. EPA/Fluoride Files FAN's extensive documentary history of EPA's decision in 1985 to increase the allowable levels of fluoride in drinking water. The documents show that EPA Management allowed political pressures to trump the clear consensus among its scientists that the altered standard was not safe. FDA/Fluoride Files The documents that show (1) the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has never approved fluoride supplementation as a safe and effective treatment despite 50+ years of prescriptions, and (2) FDA's explanations for this situation do not withstand scrutiny. Harvard/Bone Cancer Files The documents that sparked national headlines and a year-long investigation into scientific misconduct by the Harvard dental professor who led NIH's ongoing study of fluoride and bone cancer. Plus, new documents obtained from under the Freedom of Information Act. Pesticides The most comprehensive database for fluorinated pesticides, including the inorganic compounds Cryolite and Sulfuryl Fluoride, as well as hundreds of organo-fluorine compounds that may well prove to be as toxic, or more toxic, than the chlorinated pesticides they are replacing. Government Reports & FAN Submissions FAN's compilation of official reports from the US, EU, WHO, UN, Australia, Canada, Ireland, NZ, and the UK. The majority of FAN's submissions to various government agencies over the years are also included. FAN Bibliography The FAN Bibliography provides the complete reference list for all studies cited by the Fluoride Action Network, whether in electronic or print format. Many new studies have recently been added. Perfluorinated Chemicals Sometimes called "The Teflon Chemicals," FAN's Pesticide Project began tracking them in 2000 because of their use in several pesticides. Here we document the toxicity studies, government reports, class action suits, and newspaper accounts.

Amazing that the FSA could get so close Syrian military post and attack Turkey without being noticed by the army, // END COLBY GEE IF THE COMMAND STAFF OF TURKISH ARMY IS WORKING WITH FSA < THEN FINDING RIGHT SPOT FOR FALSE FLAG VERY EASY !!!!!!! ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Saudi deputy finance minister at the time and bore responsibility for providing money for the Muslim Brotherhood’s influence-building program. undisputed // USA WORING WITH MB in that time frame. researcher John Loftus, “during the 1950s, the CIA evacuated the Nazis of the Muslim Brotherhood to Saudi Arabia. Now, when they arrived in Saudi Arabia, some of the leading lights of the Muslim Brotherhood, like Dr Abdullah Azzam, became the teachers in the madrassas, the religious schools. And there they combined the doctrines of Nazism with this weird Islamic cult, Wahhabism.” [15] LOFTUS IS CREDIBLE TO ME +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ And you have yet to give a legitimate reason why Syria would not allowed it before the civil war. // END COLBY GOLLY RUSSIA DOES NOT WANT QATAR'S SUPER-AMOUNT OF GAS IN EUROPEAN MARKET...ASSAD OBEYED ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Sooooooo you found in MSM oil pipeline geopolitical analysis RE SYRIA ?? I ASSERT above ALMOST ZERO but the real main motivation for USA Syrian actions. FROM POST # 46 DOES THE MSM EVER COVER THIS IDEA ??? (and its only part of reasons for the Syrian action) DOES THE MSM EVER COVER THIS IDEA ??? DOES THE MSM EVER COVER THIS IDEA ??? DOES THE MSM EVER COVER THIS IDEA ??? DOES THE MSM EVER COVER THIS IDEA ??? ============================================= No LARGE ONE PIECE BATHING SUITS or COMMON SENSE FOUND IN BRAZIL , BUT ON THE ISSUE OF MSM COVERAGE OF PIPELINE POLITICS ......CRICKET SOUNDS A PLENTY. ******************************

No (SIC) relevant to your claim pretty obviously yet another of your links to didn't bother to look at. // END COLBY DEPOPULATION A VOLUNTARY ACT ?? Well I guess thinking isnt voluntary. ================================ Bill injects mandatory vaccines into Calif. law Oct. 2, 2012 By Katy Grimes California’s kids receive more than 50 childhood vaccinations. However, not all parents agree with the aggressive vaccination schedule and opt out. But this option will no longer be a choice, now that a new state law has been passed. AB 2109 states that children will not be allowed to attend public school without proof that parents have been counseled, and children vaccinated. In the 1960′s, children received only four vaccines: Smallpox, measles, polio and mumps vaccines. Now, children could receive as many as 24 shots by 2 years of age and five shots in a single visit, according to the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. There is a growing belief among parents that the dramatic rise in autism is directly related to the increase in

your thesis that the Syrian revolution is an EoZ/NWO plot. // end COLBY THESIS ?? +++++++++++++++++++++ Tunisian Newspaper: 2000 Tunisians Are Fighting in Syria Mar 23, 2013 TUNIS, (SANA)- The Tunisian e-newspaper 'Al-Jarida' revealed that around 2000 Tunisians are fighting among the armed terrorist groups in Syria. Abo Qusai, a Tunisian who fought in Syria, told the newspaper that the Tunisian fighters are of various ages and include students, workers and jobless people. Abo Qusai revealed that there is a direct line through which those terrorists go to Syria which is that of Libya/Benghazi. He referred to a terrorist group called 'al-Darneh Battalions' which arrived in Syria from Libya two weeks before he fled Syria. The Tunisian terrorist said that he and his Tunisian colleagues are being treated as slaves by the armed terrorist groups in which ranks they are fighting, which made him flee Syria and return to Tunisia. H. Said

FOR ANY WHO ARE INTERESTED GOOGLE IAEA anonymous source. anonymous is a common source for leaked IAEA material over YEARS & YEARS ...... ==== I posted before about the false story of diamond production conflated with Nuke weapons years ago re Iran.

LIONS AND TIGERS NO PEER REVIEW OH ! MY !! +++++++++++++++o0o++++++++++++++++ Scientists' Members Open Up Dialog with Engineers Involved in Official 9/11 Story January, 2013 Members of Scientists for 9/11 Truth recently contacted engineers who were involved, at least tangentially, in the official investigation of 9/11. Those approached included Thomas DiBlasi,then President of the National Council of Structural Engineers Associations (NCSEA); Dr. Gene Corley, a structural engineer who served as the lead investigator on the FEMA World Trade Center Building Performance Studyfollowing the September 11, 2001 attacks; and James G. Quintiere,Fire Protection Engineering Department University of Maryland. Dr. Quintiere was one of the few individuals within the "official" circle of those concerned with the investigation to question the results of the National Institute of Standards and Technoogy (NIST). The initial contacts were made by Bill Willers,a Scientists' member and Professor Emeritus of Biology, University of Wisconsin, and were supported by Dwain Deets,also a Scientists' member and Former Director for Research Engineering, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. Willers email correspondence can be viewed here. On July 5, 2012 Willers emailed NCSEA asking for the prevailing opinion within the community of structural engineers about the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC7). The email exchange was facilitated by Jeanne Vogelzang, Executive Director of NCSEA. Willers email reached the three associations, NCSEA, CASE, and SEI that represent most of the structural engineers in the United States. In his initial email, Willers pointed to a 9/11 truth "debunking" site whose authors appear to be anonymous. This site quotes an article from Structure Magazine that seeks to explain the cause of the WTC 7 collapse as "Single Point of Failure: How the Loss of One Column May Have Led to the Collapse of WTC 7." On July 10, Tom DiBlasi, then President of NCSEA, responded with an emailed suggestion that Willers read the "peer reviewed reports" by NIST. However, as noted by Dwain Deets in a letter (see below), DiBlasi indicates, by his mention of 767's crashing into the buildings, that he is speaking of the NIST reports for the Twin Towers. He makes no mention of WTC7. Following an email from Willers on July 12 to DiBlasi asking for information on the peer reviews, DiBlasi responded on July 13 that he meant for Willers to read the reports, not the peer reviews, and that he never had a list of the reviewers, but that the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) or the New York Times might know the reviewers. DiBlasi stated that Dr. Gene Corley would be willing to correspond with Willers after he read the reports. To this email, Corley also responded with "Good response." Apparently Corley was being blind-copied by DiBlasi! On July 16 Dwain Deets emailed DiBlasi a letter and alerted him to the Consensus 9/11 Panel. Deets reminded DiBlasi that the NIST final report was the sole support for the official account of 9/11. Deets offered a list of engineering leaders who question the official account, and ending with the opinion that NCSEA should facilitate discussion about the issue. Building Study On July 27 Willers emailed Gene Corley explaining the history of correspondence to that point. Corley's July 27 response was to express hope that engineers involved in the truth movement read this and his mention of the "Code of Ethics" and his reliance on "scientific evidence". Willers, still assuming that the peer reviews existed, emailed Colrey on August 1 requesting help in seeing these reviews. On August 2, Corley responded with a renewed invitation to answer Willers' questions regarding "technical issues". As leader of the Building Performance Study (BPS) team leader for the World Trade Center Study, Corley also facilitated cooperation between this team and the Pentagon BPS team. Corley also led the Building Performance Assessment Team (BPAT), which conducted a structural performance investigation of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, after the bombing there in 1995. For two months thereafter Willers sought via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to get access to the peer reviews. Meanwhile he found reference to James Quintiere of the University of Maryland who openly questioned NIST's explanation. On October 16 Willers emailed him, explaining that he had not been able to access his paper. Quintiere's answer the next day, October 17, included his paper along with his comment that rather than peer reviews there was an "Advisory Committee," many members of which were not in agreement with NIST's conclusions. At this point, Willers terminated the FOIA request. Quintiere's short paper on the WTC investigation ends with this statement: "I would recommend that all records of the investigation be archived, that the NIST study be subject to a peer review, and that consideration be given to reopening this investigation to assure no lost fire safety issues." Despite Quintiere's recommendation and on-the-surface openness to proper investigation (in November 2001 he publicly protested the sale of the WTC steel), Quintiere, in the case of the WTC building destructions as in the WACO hearings in which he participated, does not step outside the parameters adopted by the official investigation. Quintiere offers alternatives to NIST's theory while staying firmly within the official story. On October 17, Willers emailed Quintiere asking for help in seeing the report of the Advisory Committee. On October 18 Quintiere replied that he did not have it. On November 5, Willers emailed Dr. Gene Corley. Referencing Corley's earlier comment regarding his Code of Ethics, Willers cited Dwain Deets' email to him, in which Deets listed many engineers questioning NIST. Willers asked Corley's opinion of the most ethical path forward, a question that Corley has yet to answer. Willers cut short the FOIA request for "peer reviews" when advised there were none, and states he is disinclined to start a FOIA request all over again for an "Advisory Committee Report" from NIST, particularly as he is a zoologist and would not know how properly to interpret an answer that certainly would be in engineering language. The Case for Controlled Demolition: The case for the destruction of the New York Towers and Building 7 by some form of controlled demolition is briefly laid out in our Introduction. Those adhering to the false, official story of why these buildings "collapsed" are careful to stay within the confines laid out by the NIST reports. For example, the NIST study of the Towers, WTC1 and WTC2, ended before the actual "collapses" began. Thus, all evidence items for controlled demolition, appearing as the destructions commenced and progressed, were ignored, as were the eyewitness testimonies to pre-demolition blasts. While Corley and Quintiere claim to have adhered to scientific principles in their analyses, their claim is patently false in light of their failure to consider all the evidence. If a building is about to fall down, the cause (for example, from ground subsidence, earthquake, controlled demolition) is revealed most compellingly in the way it falls and in a forensic examination of the rubble. Quintiere's failure to invoke National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) standard 921 that requires examination for explosives in case of high order damage is particularly egregious for someone who purports to be a fire science expert. Action Item: DiBlasi, Corley, and Quintiere are all supporters of the official story of 9/11. Although it seems highly unlikely that they would step outside this story, they appear willing to discuss technical issues within the official story. This appears to present an opportunity for scientists and engineers to pick up this dialog should they feel it is worthwhile to do so. The above-mentioned individuals can be reached at: •Thomas DiBlasi, Email: tomd@diblasi-engrs.com, Cell: (203) 988-2523 •Gene Corley, Email: GCorley@ctlgroup.com •James Quintiere, Email: jimq@umd.edu

A new stage in the attacks on the European working class and 'down under' http://www.wsws.org/...3/pers-m23.html

I HAVE CONTENDED THAT: CYBER ATTACK IS PERFECT FOR FALSE FLAG, CANT TELL WHO DOES ATTACK (SEEMS IM RIGHT see below) STRONGER INTERNET CENSORSHIP WOULD COME AFTER FALSE FLAG CYBER ATTACK ON USA South Korea misidentifies China as cyberattack origin In an embarrassing twist to a coordinated cyberattack on six major South Korean companies this week, investigators said Friday they wrongly identified a Chinese internet protocol address as the source. A joint team of government and private experts still maintains that hackers abroad were likely to blame, and many analysts suspect North Korea. But the error raises questions about investigators' ability to track down the source of an attack that shut down 32,000 computers Wednesday and exposed big internet security holes in one of the world's most wired, tech-savvy countries. South Korean investigators said Thursday that a malicious code that spread through the server of one of the hackers' targets, Nonghyup Bank, was traced to an IP address in China. Even then it was clear that the attack could have originated elsewhere because hackers can easily manipulate such data. Permalink

LEFTY OBAMA ?? Obama makes fun of heckler asking “who killed Rachel Corrie?” http://www.intifada-...-rachel-corrie/ Remembering Rachel Corrie | Global Research 3 days ago ... Rachel represented the best of courageous activism. She put her body on the line for justice. She did so because it matters. She's gone but not ... ################################################################# Her Name is Rachel Corrie | Global Research Mar 10, 2013 ... “My Name is Rachel Corrie” is based on the writings and journals of Rachel Corrie, the 23-year-old Evergreen State College student, who ...

The Cyprus Bank Battle: The Long-planned Deposit Confiscation Scheme A Safe and a Shotgun or Public Sector Banks? By Ellen Brown Global Research, March 22, 2013 =================================================== “If these worries become really serious, . . . mall savers will take their money out of banks and resort to household safes and a shotgun.” — Martin Hutchinson on the attempted EU raid on private deposits in Cyprus banks The deposit confiscation scheme has long been in the making. US depositors could be next … On Tuesday, March 19, the national legislature of Cyprus overwhelmingly rejected a proposed levy on bank deposits as a condition for a European bailout. Reuters called it “a stunning setback for the 17-nation currency bloc,” but it was a stunning victory for democracy. As Reuters quoted one 65-year-old pensioner, “The voice of the people was heard.” The EU had warned that it would withhold €10 billion in bailout loans, and the European Central Bank (ECB) had threatened to end emergency lending assistance for distressed Cypriot banks, unless depositors – including small savers – shared the cost of the rescue. In the deal rejected by the legislature, a one-time levy on depositors would be required in return for a bailout of the banking system. Deposits below €100,000 would be subject to a 6.75% levy or “haircut”, while those over €100,000 would have been subject to a 9.99% “fine.” The move was bold, but the battle isn’t over yet. The EU has now given Cyprus until Monday to raise the billions of euros it needs to clinch an international bailout or face the threatened collapse of its financial system and likely exit from the euro currency zone. The Long-planned Confiscation Scheme The deal pushed by the “troika” – the EU, ECB and IMF – has been characterized as a one-off event devised as an emergency measure in this one extreme case. But the confiscation plan has long been in the making, and it isn’t limited to Cyprus. In a September 2011 article in the Bulletin of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand titled “A Primer on Open Bank Resolution,” Kevin Hoskin and Ian Woolford discussed a very similar haircut plan that had been in the works, they said, since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. The article referenced recommendations made in 2010 and 2011 by the Basel Committee of the Bank for International Settlements, the “central bankers’ central bank” in Switzerland. The purpose of the plan, called the Open Bank Resolution (OBR) , is to deal with bank failures when they have become so expensive that governments are no longer willing to bail out the lenders. The authors wrote that the primary objectives of OBR are to: ensure that, as far as possible, any losses are ultimately borne by the bank’s shareholders and creditors . . . . The spectrum of “creditors” is defined to include depositors: At one end of the spectrum, there are large international financial institutions that invest in debt issued by the bank (commonly referred to as wholesale funding). At the other end of the spectrum, are customers with cheque and savings accounts and term deposits. Most people would be surprised to learn that they are legally considered “creditors” of their banks rather than customers who have trusted the bank with their money for safekeeping, but that seems to be the case. According to Wikipedia: In most legal systems, . . . the funds deposited are no longer the property of the customer. The funds become the property of the bank, and the customer in turn receives an asset called a deposit account (a checking or savings account). That deposit account is a liability of the bank on the bank’s books and on its balance sheet. Because the bank is authorized by law to make loans up to a multiple of its reserves, the bank’s reserves on hand to satisfy payment of deposit liabilities amounts to only a fraction of the total which the bank is obligated to pay in satisfaction of its demand deposits. The bank gets the money. The depositor becomes only a creditor with an IOU. The bank is not required to keep the deposits available for withdrawal but can lend them out, keeping only a “fraction” on reserve, following accepted fractional reserve banking principles. When too many creditors come for their money at once, the result can be a run on the banks and bank failure. The New Zealand OBR said the creditors had all enjoyed a return on their investments and had freely accepted the risk, but most people would be surprised to learn that too. What return do you get from a bank on a deposit account these days? And isn’t your deposit protected against risk by FDIC deposit insurance? Not anymore, apparently. As Martin Hutchinson observed in Money Morning, “if governments can just seize deposits by means of a ‘tax’ then deposit insurance is worth absolutely zippo.” The Real Profiteers Get Off Scot-Free Felix Salmon wrote in Reuters of the Cyprus confiscation: Meanwhile, people who deserve to lose money here, won’t. If you lent money to Cyprus’s banks by buying their debt rather than by depositing money, you will suffer no losses at all. And if you lent money to the insolvent Cypriot government, then you too will be paid off at 100 cents on the euro. . . . The big winner here is the ECB, which has extended a lot of credit to dubiously-solvent Cypriot banks and which is taking no losses at all. It is the ECB that can most afford to take the hit, because it has the power to print euros. It could simply create the money to bail out the Cyprus banks and take no loss at all. But imposing austerity on the people is apparently part of the plan. Salmon writes: From a drily technocratic perspective, this move can be seen as simply being part of a standard Euro-austerity program: the EU wants tax hikes and spending cuts, and this is a kind of tax . . . . The big losers are working-class Cypriots, whose elected government has proved powerless . . . . The Eurozone has always had a democratic deficit: monetary union was imposed by the elite on unthankful and unwilling citizens. Now the citizens are revolting: just look at Beppe Grillo. But that was before the Cyprus government stood up for the depositors and refused to go along with the plan, in what will be a stunning victory for democracy if they can hold their ground. It CAN Happen Here Cyprus is a small island, of little apparent significance. But one day, the bold move of its legislators may be compared to the Battle of Marathon, the pivotal moment in European history when their Greek forebears fended off the Persians, allowing classical Greek civilization to flourish. The current battle on this tiny island has taken on global significance. If the technocrat bankers can push through their confiscation scheme there, precedent will be established for doing it elsewhere when bank bailouts become prohibitive for governments. That situation could be looming even now in the United States. As Gretchen Morgenson warned in a recent article on the 307-page Senate report detailing last year’s $6.2 billion trading fiasco at JPMorganChase: “Be afraid.” The report resoundingly disproves the premise that the Dodd-Frank legislation has made our system safe from the reckless banking activities that brought the economy to its knees in 2008. Writes Morgenson: JPMorgan . . . Is the largest derivatives dealer in the world. Trillions of dollars in such instruments sit on its and other big banks’ balance sheets. The ease with which the bank hid losses and fiddled with valuations should be a major concern to investors. Pam Martens observed in a March 18th article that JPMorgan was gambling in the stock market with depositor funds. She writes, “trading stocks with customers’ savings deposits – that truly has the ring of the excesses of 1929 . . . .” The large institutional banks not only could fail; they are likely to fail. When the derivative scheme collapses and the US government refuses a bailout, JPMorgan could be giving its depositors’ accounts sizeable “haircuts” along guidelines established by the BIS and Reserve Bank of New Zealand. Time for Some Public Sector Banks? The bold moves of the Cypriots and such firebrand political activists as Italy’s Grillo are not the only bulwarks against bankster confiscation. While the credit crisis is strangling the Western banking system, the BRIC countries – Brazil, Russia, India and China – have sailed through largely unscathed. According to a May 2010 article in The Economist, what has allowed them to escape are their strong and stable publicly-owned banks. Professor Kurt von Mettenheim of the Sao Paulo Business School of Brazil writes, “The credit policies of BRIC government banks help explain why these countries experienced shorter and milder economic downturns during 2007-2008.” Government banks countered the effects of the financial crisis by providing counter-cyclical credit and greater client confidence. Russia is an Eastern European country that weathered the credit crisis although being very close to the Eurozone. According to a March 2010 article in Forbes: As in other countries, the [2008] crisis prompted the state to take on a greater role in the banking system. State-owned systemic banks . . . have been used to carry out anticrisis measures, such as driving growth in lending (however limited) and supporting private institutions. In the 1998 Asian crisis, many Russians who had put all their savings in private banks lost everything; and the credit crisis of 2008 has reinforced their distrust of private banks. Russian businesses as well as individuals have turned to their government-owned banks as the more trustworthy alternative. As a result, state-owned banks are expected to continue dominating the Russian banking industry for the foreseeable future. The entire Eurozone conundrum is unnecessary. It is the result of too little money in a system in which the money supply is fixed, and the Eurozone governments and their central banks cannot issue their own currencies. There are insufficient euros to pay principal plus interest in a pyramid scheme in which only the principal is injected by the banks that create money as “bank credit” on their books. A central bank with the power to issue money could remedy that systemic flaw, by injecting the liquidity needed to jumpstart the economy and turn back the tide of austerity choking the people. The push to confiscate the savings of hard-working Cypriot citizens is a shot across the bow for every working person in the world, a wake-up call to the perils of a system in which tiny cadres of elites call the shots and the rest of us pay the price. When we finally pull back the veils of power to expose the men pulling the levers in an age-old game they devised, we will see that prosperity is indeed possible for all. For more on the public bank solution and for details of the June 2013 Public Banking Institute conference in San Rafael, California, see here. Ellen Brown is an attorney, chairman of the Public Banking Institute, and the author of eleven books, includingWeb of Debt: The Shocking Truth About Our Money System and How We Can Break Free. Her websites are webofdebt.com and ellenbrown.com.

The Cyprus Bank Battle: The Long-planned Deposit Confiscation Scheme A Safe and a Shotgun or Public Sector Banks? By Ellen Brown Global Research, March 22, 2013 =================================================== “If these worries become really serious, . . . mall savers will take their money out of banks and resort to household safes and a shotgun.” — Martin Hutchinson on the attempted EU raid on private deposits in Cyprus banks The deposit confiscation scheme has long been in the making. US depositors could be next … On Tuesday, March 19, the national legislature of Cyprus overwhelmingly rejected a proposed levy on bank deposits as a condition for a European bailout. Reuters called it “a stunning setback for the 17-nation currency bloc,” but it was a stunning victory for democracy. As Reuters quoted one 65-year-old pensioner, “The voice of the people was heard.” The EU had warned that it would withhold €10 billion in bailout loans, and the European Central Bank (ECB) had threatened to end emergency lending assistance for distressed Cypriot banks, unless depositors – including small savers – shared the cost of the rescue. In the deal rejected by the legislature, a one-time levy on depositors would be required in return for a bailout of the banking system. Deposits below €100,000 would be subject to a 6.75% levy or “haircut”, while those over €100,000 would have been subject to a 9.99% “fine.” The move was bold, but the battle isn’t over yet. The EU has now given Cyprus until Monday to raise the billions of euros it needs to clinch an international bailout or face the threatened collapse of its financial system and likely exit from the euro currency zone. The Long-planned Confiscation Scheme The deal pushed by the “troika” – the EU, ECB and IMF – has been characterized as a one-off event devised as an emergency measure in this one extreme case. But the confiscation plan has long been in the making, and it isn’t limited to Cyprus. In a September 2011 article in the Bulletin of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand titled “A Primer on Open Bank Resolution,” Kevin Hoskin and Ian Woolford discussed a very similar haircut plan that had been in the works, they said, since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. The article referenced recommendations made in 2010 and 2011 by the Basel Committee of the Bank for International Settlements, the “central bankers’ central bank” in Switzerland. The purpose of the plan, called the Open Bank Resolution (OBR) , is to deal with bank failures when they have become so expensive that governments are no longer willing to bail out the lenders. The authors wrote that the primary objectives of OBR are to: ensure that, as far as possible, any losses are ultimately borne by the bank’s shareholders and creditors . . . . The spectrum of “creditors” is defined to include depositors: At one end of the spectrum, there are large international financial institutions that invest in debt issued by the bank (commonly referred to as wholesale funding). At the other end of the spectrum, are customers with cheque and savings accounts and term deposits. Most people would be surprised to learn that they are legally considered “creditors” of their banks rather than customers who have trusted the bank with their money for safekeeping, but that seems to be the case. According to Wikipedia: In most legal systems, . . . the funds deposited are no longer the property of the customer. The funds become the property of the bank, and the customer in turn receives an asset called a deposit account (a checking or savings account). That deposit account is a liability of the bank on the bank’s books and on its balance sheet. Because the bank is authorized by law to make loans up to a multiple of its reserves, the bank’s reserves on hand to satisfy payment of deposit liabilities amounts to only a fraction of the total which the bank is obligated to pay in satisfaction of its demand deposits. The bank gets the money. The depositor becomes only a creditor with an IOU. The bank is not required to keep the deposits available for withdrawal but can lend them out, keeping only a “fraction” on reserve, following accepted fractional reserve banking principles. When too many creditors come for their money at once, the result can be a run on the banks and bank failure. The New Zealand OBR said the creditors had all enjoyed a return on their investments and had freely accepted the risk, but most people would be surprised to learn that too. What return do you get from a bank on a deposit account these days? And isn’t your deposit protected against risk by FDIC deposit insurance? Not anymore, apparently. As Martin Hutchinson observed in Money Morning, “if governments can just seize deposits by means of a ‘tax’ then deposit insurance is worth absolutely zippo.” The Real Profiteers Get Off Scot-Free Felix Salmon wrote in Reuters of the Cyprus confiscation: Meanwhile, people who deserve to lose money here, won’t. If you lent money to Cyprus’s banks by buying their debt rather than by depositing money, you will suffer no losses at all. And if you lent money to the insolvent Cypriot government, then you too will be paid off at 100 cents on the euro. . . . The big winner here is the ECB, which has extended a lot of credit to dubiously-solvent Cypriot banks and which is taking no losses at all. It is the ECB that can most afford to take the hit, because it has the power to print euros. It could simply create the money to bail out the Cyprus banks and take no loss at all. But imposing austerity on the people is apparently part of the plan. Salmon writes: From a drily technocratic perspective, this move can be seen as simply being part of a standard Euro-austerity program: the EU wants tax hikes and spending cuts, and this is a kind of tax . . . . The big losers are working-class Cypriots, whose elected government has proved powerless . . . . The Eurozone has always had a democratic deficit: monetary union was imposed by the elite on unthankful and unwilling citizens. Now the citizens are revolting: just look at Beppe Grillo. But that was before the Cyprus government stood up for the depositors and refused to go along with the plan, in what will be a stunning victory for democracy if they can hold their ground. It CAN Happen Here Cyprus is a small island, of little apparent significance. But one day, the bold move of its legislators may be compared to the Battle of Marathon, the pivotal moment in European history when their Greek forebears fended off the Persians, allowing classical Greek civilization to flourish. The current battle on this tiny island has taken on global significance. If the technocrat bankers can push through their confiscation scheme there, precedent will be established for doing it elsewhere when bank bailouts become prohibitive for governments. That situation could be looming even now in the United States. As Gretchen Morgenson warned in a recent article on the 307-page Senate report detailing last year’s $6.2 billion trading fiasco at JPMorganChase: “Be afraid.” The report resoundingly disproves the premise that the Dodd-Frank legislation has made our system safe from the reckless banking activities that brought the economy to its knees in 2008. Writes Morgenson: JPMorgan . . . Is the largest derivatives dealer in the world. Trillions of dollars in such instruments sit on its and other big banks’ balance sheets. The ease with which the bank hid losses and fiddled with valuations should be a major concern to investors. Pam Martens observed in a March 18th article that JPMorgan was gambling in the stock market with depositor funds. She writes, “trading stocks with customers’ savings deposits – that truly has the ring of the excesses of 1929 . . . .” The large institutional banks not only could fail; they are likely to fail. When the derivative scheme collapses and the US government refuses a bailout, JPMorgan could be giving its depositors’ accounts sizeable “haircuts” along guidelines established by the BIS and Reserve Bank of New Zealand. Time for Some Public Sector Banks? The bold moves of the Cypriots and such firebrand political activists as Italy’s Grillo are not the only bulwarks against bankster confiscation. While the credit crisis is strangling the Western banking system, the BRIC countries – Brazil, Russia, India and China – have sailed through largely unscathed. According to a May 2010 article in The Economist, what has allowed them to escape are their strong and stable publicly-owned banks. Professor Kurt von Mettenheim of the Sao Paulo Business School of Brazil writes, “The credit policies of BRIC government banks help explain why these countries experienced shorter and milder economic downturns during 2007-2008.” Government banks countered the effects of the financial crisis by providing counter-cyclical credit and greater client confidence. Russia is an Eastern European country that weathered the credit crisis although being very close to the Eurozone. According to a March 2010 article in Forbes: As in other countries, the [2008] crisis prompted the state to take on a greater role in the banking system. State-owned systemic banks . . . have been used to carry out anticrisis measures, such as driving growth in lending (however limited) and supporting private institutions. In the 1998 Asian crisis, many Russians who had put all their savings in private banks lost everything; and the credit crisis of 2008 has reinforced their distrust of private banks. Russian businesses as well as individuals have turned to their government-owned banks as the more trustworthy alternative. As a result, state-owned banks are expected to continue dominating the Russian banking industry for the foreseeable future. The entire Eurozone conundrum is unnecessary. It is the result of too little money in a system in which the money supply is fixed, and the Eurozone governments and their central banks cannot issue their own currencies. There are insufficient euros to pay principal plus interest in a pyramid scheme in which only the principal is injected by the banks that create money as “bank credit” on their books. A central bank with the power to issue money could remedy that systemic flaw, by injecting the liquidity needed to jumpstart the economy and turn back the tide of austerity choking the people. The push to confiscate the savings of hard-working Cypriot citizens is a shot across the bow for every working person in the world, a wake-up call to the perils of a system in which tiny cadres of elites call the shots and the rest of us pay the price. When we finally pull back the veils of power to expose the men pulling the levers in an age-old game they devised, we will see that prosperity is indeed possible for all. For more on the public bank solution and for details of the June 2013 Public Banking Institute conference in San Rafael, California, see here. Ellen Brown is an attorney, chairman of the Public Banking Institute, and the author of eleven books, includingWeb of Debt: The Shocking Truth About Our Money System and How We Can Break Free. Her websites are webofdebt.com and ellenbrown.com.

. So let’s try again, post the relevant excerpts from credible studies (or articles about them) that show serious health issues caused by fluoride levels used in public water supplies in developed countries. // END COLBY NO ,NO, NO AND NO ITS THE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ALL SOURCES . NATURAL,CANNED FOOD, AND FLOURIDATION. PLEASE TRY TO READ MATERIAL PRESENTED ON FORUM. PART POST # 6 BELOW ########################################## Sources of Fluoride "Estimation of the amount of fluoride ingested from all environmental and dietary sources is important so that rational and scientifically sound decisions can be made when guidelines for the use of fluorides are reviewed periodically and modified." (Journal of Dental Research 1992) OVERVIEW When fluoride was first added to water in the 1940s as a means of preventing tooth decay, not a single dental product contained fluoride: no fluoride toothpastes, no fluoride mouthrinses, no fluoride varnishes, and no fluoride gels. In the past 60 years, as one fluoride product after another entered the market, exposure to fluoride increased considerably, particularly among children. Exposure from other sources has increased as well. Other sources include processed foods made with fluoridated water, fluoride-containing pesticides, bottled teas, fluorinated pharmaceuticals, teflon pans, and mechanically deboned chicken. Taken together, the glut of fluoride sources in the modern diet has created a toxic cocktail, one that has caused a dramatic increase in dental fluorosis (a tooth defect caused by excess fluoride intake) over the past 60 years. The problem with fluoride, therefore, is not that children are receiving too little, but that they are receiving too much. Even advocates of fluoridation advocates have begun to recognize this problem. In January 2011, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) announced its recommendation that water fluoridation programs (which generally add 1 ppm fluoride to water) should lower the levels added to 0.7 ppm. This reduction, however, does little to solve the problem, as many children will continue to ingest more fluoride than is recommended, or safe. Sources of Fluoride Dental Products: Many dental products now contain fluoride, including over 95% of toothpaste. Studies show that a significant number of children swallow more fluoride from toothpaste alone than is recommended as a total daily ingestion. Processed Beverages & Foods: Even if you don’t live in a community that adds fluoride to its water supply, you will still be exposed to fluoridated drinking water. This is because once fluoride is added en masse to water it winds in almost all processed beverages and foods. In the U.S., studies have shown that sodas, juices, sports drinks, beers, and many other processed foods, including infant foods, now have elevated fluoride levels. Pesticides: Due its toxicity, fluoride is used in some pesticides to kill insects and other pests. As a result of fluoride pesticide use, some food products–particularly grape products, dried fruit, dried beans, cocoa powder, and walnuts–have high levels of fluoride. Read more. Tea Drinks:Tea plants absorb fluoride from the soil. As a result, tea leaves–particularly old tea leaves–contain high levels of fluoride. Brewed black tea averages about 3 to 4 parts ppm fluoride, while commercial iced tea drinks contain between 1 and 4 ppm. As a result of these elevated levels, numerous studies have linked excessive tea consumption to a bone disease (skeletal fluorosis) caused by too much fluoride intake. Fluorinated Pharmaceuticals:Many pharmaceuticals are fluorinated, meaning they contain a carbon-fluorine bond. fluorine.” Although the carbon-fluoride bond in most drugs is strong enough to resist breaking down into fluoride within the body, this is not always the case as research has found that some fluorinated drugs, including cipro, do break down into fluoride and can thus be a major source of fluoride exposure for some individuals. Mechanically Deboned Meat:Foods made with mechanically separated meat (e.g., chicken fingers, nuggets, etc), contain elevated levels of fluoride due to the contamination from bone particles that occurs during the mechanical deboning processed. Mechanically processed chicken meats have the highest levels, with chicken sticks containing an average of 3.6 ppm. Read more Teflon Pans: Cooking food, or boiling water, in teflon pans may increase the fluoride content of food. In one study, it was found that boiling water in a teflon pan for just 15 minutes added an additional 2 ppm of fluoride to the water, thus bringing the final concentration to 3 ppm. Read more (Full & Parkins 1975). Workplace Exposure: Fluoride is a common air contaminant in industrial workplaces. As a result, workers in many heavy industries — including the aluminum, fertilizer, iron, oil refining, semi-conductor, and steel industries — can be routinely exposed to high levels of fluoride exposure. In addition to being a significant risk factor for respiratory disease; airborne fluorides can be a huge daily source fluoride intake. ********************************************************************************************************************* FLORIDE IS THE LAST STRAW ON THE PROVERBIAL CAMELS BROKEN BACK OF ILL HEALTH.