Thomas H. Purvis Posted January 6, 2009 Share Posted January 6, 2009 This convoluted writing by Purvis completely obscures his meaning. I am baffled. Since he is an expert on West's plats, I would like to hear his take on the West plat which was introduced into evidence, but was never shown; it was rolled up and left in its tube. I read about this years ago, and never understood how it could be put into evidence without being shown. It was so long ago, I have forgotten the exact circumstance. Jack First off Jack, you have quite apparantly been "baffled" for a considerable number of years. And, while you and many others have been chasing mythological creatures throughout the "lair of the hare"/aka rabbitholes, I have, over the past considerable years, attempted to accumulate as much factual evidence as possible. Had you even bothered to research; read; (& understand I might add), that information relative to the West Survey Plat and the altered survey data, (as well as vehicle speed) which I long ago allowed into the public domain, then perhaps you may have come to understand some of the reasons for the questions which you ask. In addition to the previously stated facts that the West Survey Plats as well as all of his survey notes are merely one of the (EEI's)/Essential Elements of Information which one must gather if they are to even come close to placement of the parts of this puzzle into their appropriate location. So, while yourself and a few others have been worring about whether or not Mary Moorman is or is not standing in the street, and chasing "6-groove bullets", a few of us have actually been gathering critical evidence and conducting every test possible to determine exactly what that evidence will tell us. Lastly, for those new persons who also have no knowledge as to exactly how much I have explained and allowed into the public domain over the years: http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/ngarchive/Altered_Evidence.pdf http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/...bsPageId=223317 http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/...mp;relPageId=28 Lastly! For that other "great" evaluator of the photographic evidence. Don't suppose that you would put in a good word for me in order that I too could wear the crown of the "illusustrious" and coveted "Mary Ferrell Award". Then, I too could proudly walk shoulder to shoulder along with you and Mr. Podunkville Cop who was quite apparantly sent packing long ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David G. Healy Posted January 6, 2009 Share Posted January 6, 2009 [...]For that other "great" evaluator of the photographic evidence. Don't suppose that you would put in a good word for me in order that I too could wear the crown of the "illusustrious" and coveted "Mary Ferrell Award". [...] Gee, I wonder who? LMFAO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now