Evan Burton Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 Question: Were these images that "defy explanation" ever shown to a meteorologist? Still no answer forthcoming from Jack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted June 24, 2010 Author Share Posted June 24, 2010 At 6:30 a.m. this morning when I went out to get the newspaper, there was a single chemtrail being laid south to north. I went inside to get my camera, and by then it was spreading into a cirrus cloud. I have been so busy today that I did not have time to download the image, but will tomorrow. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Lewis Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 (edited) How do you know it wasn't a persistent contrail? Did you collect a sample directly from the trail and have it tested? No, of course you didn't. No "chemtrail" believer EVER has even though many have promised it for more than 10 years now. But still, how do you know it wasn't a persistent contrail? It is a simple question and one you still have not answered especially in light of the fact that persistent contrails look and behave exactly like "chemtrails". Edited June 24, 2010 by Matthew Lewis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 Why won't Jack answer a simple, straightforward question? It's not a personal attack; it's relevant; indeed, it is very important to the validity of Jack's assertion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted June 25, 2010 Author Share Posted June 25, 2010 (edited) Yesterday's 6:30 a.m. chemtrail over Fort Worth was of the newer SAWTOOTH variety...see original and detail photos below. The "sawtooth" feature seems to be a new feature to cause the chemtrails to have a more natural cirrus-like appearance when they disperse. There were thunderstorms today, so no chemtrails were laid. Jack Edited June 25, 2010 by Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted June 25, 2010 Author Share Posted June 25, 2010 There is no provision for adding attachments when editing. Here are the attachments for the previous message (I hope). Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted June 25, 2010 Author Share Posted June 25, 2010 Show me a "persistent contrail" that looks like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 Still Jack does not answer a simple, direct question central to the issue: Were the images that "defy explanation" ever shown to a meteorologist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 Well, I'm sure that Jack has at least gathered an airborne samples of the alleged "chemtrails" and lodged them with an independent lab for testing, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 Show me a "persistent contrail" that looks like this. At least I'll respond to my detractors: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 Okay, so Jack believes and has claimed that Matthew and myself (and probably others) are here on the behalf of someone else (no doubt government or NWO), but what about these people? They owe no allegiance or have hidden agendas: http://www.luchtzak.be/forums/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=41739 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 Show me a "persistent contrail" that looks like this. And yet more... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 USAF F-106 intercepting a Soviet Tu-20 Bear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Lewis Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 (edited) Yesterday's 6:30 a.m. chemtrail over Fort Worth was of the newer SAWTOOTH variety...see original and detail photos below. The "sawtooth" feature seems to be a new feature to cause the chemtrails to have a more natural cirrus-like appearance when they disperse. There were thunderstorms today, so no chemtrails were laid. Jack If it looks more like cirrus, which, so do peristent contrails, then how do you know it was a "chemtrail"? What actual PROOF do you have aside from your previously proven wrong assertion that contrails do not persist? Jack, since you ignored this question before, here it is again. Jack, what do you think about the LIE that nearly all "chemtrail" websites push that contrails always disappear quickly? Further, what about the fabrication of evidence that many "chemtrail" supporters have done that I previously mentioned in post 66? Edited June 25, 2010 by Matthew Lewis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Lewis Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 Show me a "persistent contrail" that looks like this. Looks like a persistent contrail to me. Any proof it isn't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now