Douglas Caddy Posted March 18, 2011 Share Posted March 18, 2011 Key remarks in Sec. Cohen's speech below: "Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic-specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves." COHEN ADDRESS 4/28 AT CONFERENCE ON TERRORISM Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy Sam Nunn Policy Forum April 28, 1997 University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia. SECRETARY COHEN: Senator Nunn, thank you very much. As Senator Nunn has indicated, he and I have worked for many years together, along with Senator Lugar. The two of these gentlemen I feel are perhaps the most courageous and visionary to have served in the Senate. They were largely responsible, of course, for adopting the so-called Nunn/Lugar legislation. I'll comment on that later during the course of the morning, but I've had occasion to meet with a number of Russian counterparts, and as we go through various translations of the communications that we're having, the two words they are able to articulate very clearly, they say "Nunn/Lugar, Nunn/Lugar." So they know exactly what that means, and that means the Cooperative Threat Reduction Act that these two gentlemen were indispensable in shepherding through the United States Congress. It was Nunn/Lugar I that dealt with the reduction of nuclear weapons between the United States and the Soviet Union in terms of trying to come to grips with how we helped the Russians dismantle hundreds of their nuclear weapons, and also helped them with their destruction of chemical weapons. But they, of course, have looked beyond simply that particular relationship, which is very important, but also looking to the future that we face as far as the rise of terrorism -- both international and domestic -- and finding ways in which the Department of Defense can become involved in helping local states and local agencies to deal with the threat of terrorism which is quite likely to increase in the coming years. It's a pleasure for me to be here. Both Senator Nunn and Senator Lugar are close friends, and I look forward to, I think, a very productive seminar. Once again demonstrating that although Senator Nunn has left public service in the Senate, he has not left public service as far as the nation is concerned. It's a pleasure for me to be here, Sam. SENATOR NUNN: Thank you very much, Bill. ...Let me ask if there are any questions for Secretary of Defense Cohen. Q: The dual containment policy in Iran and Iraq, do you think that's conducive to regional stability in that region? And do you think (it) can cause further terrorism in the United States? That type of containment policy in the Middle East. A: I think Secretary Albright articulated our policy as far as dealing with Iraq, that it's clear that we have been unable to strike any kind of a productive relationship with Saddam Hussein, and as soon as Saddam Hussein is no longer the head of that government, that there's (a) new regime that follows him, that we will look forward to finding ways in which we could engage them in a much more productive fashion, particularly after they comply with all of the UN sanctions. There's an eagerness on our part to do that. But I think as long as he remains in office as the head of that state, it's unlikely that we could have anything but the current policy in place, with very little prospects for relief. With respect to Iran, I think Iran continues to present a long-term threat to the region. They are acquiring and have acquired weapons of mass destruction, substantial levels of chemicals and we believe biological weapons as well. They have made an effort to acquire nuclear capability. So I think that our policy of dual containment is the right one, and we are going to encourage our allies to support that one. Q: What does it mean that Clinton (inaudible) proliferation? A: To the extent that we see the level of communication available today, the Internet and other types of interwoven communicative skills and abilities, we're going to see information continue to spread as to how these weapons can be, in fact, manufactured in a home-grown laboratory, as such. So it's a serious problem as far as living in the Information Age that people who are acquiring this kind of information will not act responsibly, but rather act in a terrorist type of fashion. We've seen by way of example of the World Trade Center the international aspects of international terrorism coming to our home territory. We've also seen domestic terrorism with the Oklahoma bombing. So it's a real threat that's here today. It's likely to intensify in the years to come as more and more groups have access to this kind of information and the ability to produce them. Q: How prepared is the U.S. Government to deal with (inaudible)? A: I think we have to really intensify our efforts. That's the reason for the Nunn/Lugar II program. That's the reason why it's a local responsibility, as such, but the Department of Defense is going to be taking the lead as far as supervising the interagency working groups, and to make the assessments as to what needs to be done. So we're going to identify those 120 cities and work with them very closely to make sure that they can prepare themselves for what is likely to be a threat well into the future. Q: Let me ask you specifically about last week's scare here in Washington, and what we might have learned from how prepared we are to deal with that (inaudible), at B'nai Brith. A: Well, it points out the nature of the threat. It turned out to be a false threat under the circumstances. But as we've learned in the intelligence community, we had something called -- and we have James Woolsey here to perhaps even address this question about phantom moles. The mere fear that there is a mole within an agency can set off a chain reaction and a hunt for that particular mole which can paralyze the agency for weeks and months and years even, in a search. The same thing is true about just the false scare of a threat of using some kind of a chemical weapon or a biological one. There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic-specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that's why this is so important. Q: What is response to (inaudible)? A: We hope we will have access to the defector. In fact I was recently in South Korea and talked with various officials in South Korea. As soon as they complete their own interrogation of this defector, we will have access to that individual. But much of what he has said to date is reflected in the writings that he prepared last year. This is prior to his defection. One would not expect a potential defector to be writing about anything other than what the official doctrine or dogma is of the North Korean government at that time. He is saying essentially what we have known for a long, long time. Namely, that North Korea poses a very serious threat against South Korea, and potentially even Japan, by virtue of having the fourth largest army in the world, by having 600,000 or more troops poised within 100 kilometers of Seoul, of possessing many SCUD missiles, also the potential of chemically armed warheads, the attempt to acquire nuclear weapons. So we know they have this potential, and the question really is going to be what's in their hearts and minds at this point? Do they intend to try to launch such an attack in the immediate, foreseeable future? That, we can only speculate about, but that's the reason why we are so well prepared to defend against such an attack to deter it and to send a message that it would be absolutely an act of suicide for the North Koreans to launch an attack. They could do great damage in the short run, but they would be devastated in response. So we're hoping we can find ways to bring them to the bargaining table -- the Party of Four Talks -- and see if we can't put them on a path toward peace instead of threatening any kind of devastating attack upon the South. Q: ...a little bit about the situation in (inaudible)? A: I really don't have much more information than has been in the press at this point. The Department has not been called upon to act in this regard just yet, so I'm not at liberty to give you any more information than you already have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 Key remarks in Sec. Cohen's speech below: "Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic-specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves." Doug there was no need to post the whole speech. Cohen was (is) a smart guy but his background was in classics, law and public administration. He had only been SoD for 4 month at that point, there is no evidence his remarks were based inside knowledge rather than his own beliefs. You will search in vain for a scientist with relevant credentials saying such things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douglas Caddy Posted March 23, 2011 Share Posted March 23, 2011 Key remarks in Sec. Cohen's speech below: "Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic-specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves." Doug there was no need to post the whole speech. Cohen was (is) a smart guy but his background was in classics, law and public administration. He had only been SoD for 4 month at that point, there is no evidence his remarks were based inside knowledge rather than his own beliefs. You will search in vain for a scientist with relevant credentials saying such things. http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2010/09/24/the-devils-haarp-weather-weapons/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted March 23, 2011 Share Posted March 23, 2011 Please quote the sections of that which you think document the existence of chemtrails and/or the ability to trigger earthquakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamela Brown Posted March 23, 2011 Share Posted March 23, 2011 Not to add to the fantasy of speculation, but once the severity of this quake and tsunami registered with me, I began to wonder if the Hadron Collider in Europe had been in operation. Whatever they are up to with that, I am distrustful of its effects on the environment at very deep levels. And, ironically, as far as the concept of 'retribution' is concerned, I do not of course think there is any connection to these events and the fact that Japan is mostly Buddhist, but have taken time to wonder if there could have been any connection to the fact that Japan brought the US into WWII with the bombing of Pearl Harbor. It almost seemed as though there were another VJ Day, though, of course, this was one nobody wanted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Not to add to the fantasy of speculation, but once the severity of this quake and tsunami registered with me, I began to wonder if the Hadron Collider in Europe had been in operation. Whatever they are up to with that, I am distrustful of its effects on the environment at very deep levels. And, ironically, as far as the concept of 'retribution' is concerned, I do not of course think there is any connection to these events and the fact that Japan is mostly Buddhist, but have taken time to wonder if there could have been any connection to the fact that Japan brought the US into WWII with the bombing of Pearl Harbor. It almost seemed as though there were another VJ Day, though, of course, this was one nobody wanted. Was this satirical or were you serious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douglas Caddy Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 Joseph Farrell comments on the Japanese earthquake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duane Daman Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 Video: Scientist Leuren Moret - Japan earthquake and nuclear "accident" are tectonic nuclear warfare http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=199921 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douglas Caddy Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter McKenna Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 Video: Scientist Leuren Moret - Japan earthquake and nuclear "accident" are tectonic nuclear warfare http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=199921 I just read the article Duane linked in his post, highly entertaining (sic): “Independent scientist Leuren Moret, whose 2004 landmark article in the Japan Times unmasked lies and distortions by government and company officials that led to the construction of nuclear power plants in seismically dangerous areas, has declared in an exclusive 65-minute video interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre that the “Japan earthquake and “accidents” at the Fukushima’s 6 nuclear power plant units starting March 11, 2011 are in fact deliberate acts of tectonic nuclear warfare, carried out against the populations ecology of Japan and the nations of the Northern Hemisphere, including the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.” This lady’s assertions are so blatantly ridiculous, it’s beyond even entertainment. “Stuxnet” Virus attacked the plant “controllers”, the various “aspects that fit the profile…. of a HAARP triggered earthquake system.” So there have been so many that there is actually a profile now, for HAARP triggered earthquakes? And this statement, “The creation of HAARP-related vortex clouds over the San Francisco, CA Bay Area on March 18, 2011 to trigger a heavy rain out of the radiation from the first Fukushima plant explosion onto the population, food and ecology of the Bay area”, is utterly hilarious. I don’t think you could find a seriously impaired schizophrenic with a more imaginative series of bizarre thoughts, let alone any motive to string together such utterly ludicrous scenarios/thoughts. Some people’s belief systems are in serious need of corrective maintenance. Keep 'em coming Duane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douglas Caddy Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 Radioactive particles from Japan have reached England, today's Daily Mail reports. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1370682/Japan-nuclear-crisis-Mothers-flee-Fukushima-leak-radiation-alert.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douglas Caddy Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 Living and Dying Downwind Radiation, Japan and the Marshall Islands By GLENN ALCALAY www. counterpunch.org March 29, 2011 When the dangerous dust and gases settle and we discover just how much radiation escaped the damaged Fukushima reactors and spent fuel rods, we may never know how many people are being exposed to radiation from the burning fuel rods and reactor cores, and how much exposure they will receive over time. Minute and above-background traces of Iodine-131 are already showing up in Tokyo's water supply - 150 miles southwest of the leaking reactors - and in milk and spinach [with a dash of Cesium-137] from 75 miles away. The Japanese government has recently warned pregnant women and children to avoid drinking Tokyo tap water, and I-131 levels 1,200 times above background levels were recorded in seawater near the reactors. Aside from sharing the dubious distinction of both nations having been at the receiving end of America's nuclear weapons, Japan and the Marshall Islands now share another dubious distinction. The unleashed isotopes of concern from the damaged Japanese reactors - Iodine-131, Cesium-137, Strontium-90 and Plutonium-239 - are well known to the Marshall Islanders living downwind of the testing sites at Bikini and Enewetak atolls in the central Pacific, following sixty-seven A- and H-bombs exploded between 1946-58. In fact, it is precisely these isotopes that continue to haunt the 80,000 Marshallese fifty-three years after the last thermonuclear test in the megaton range shook their pristine coral atolls and contaminated their fragile marine ecosystems. In fact, it was the irradiated downwind Marshallese on Rongelap and Utrik in 1954 caught in the Bravo fallout - and I-131 - that taught the world about the thyroid effect from the uptake of radioactive iodine. The U.S.' largest [fusion] hydrogen bomb - Bravo - was 1,000 times the Hiroshima atomic [fission] bomb, and deposited a liberal sprinkling of these and a potent potpourri of 300 other radionuclides over a wide swath of the Central Pacific and the inhabited atolls in the Marshalls archipelago in March 1954 during "Operation Castle." The Rongelap islanders 120 miles downwind from Bikini received 190 rems [1.9 Sv] of whole-body gamma dose before being evacuated. The Utrik people 320 miles downwind received 15 rems [150 mSv] before their evacuation. Many of the on-site nuclear workers at Fukushima have already exceeded the Utrik dose in multiples. Also entrapped within the thermonuclear maelstrom from Bravo was the not-so-Lucky Dragon [Fukuryu Maru] Japanese fishing trawler with its crew of twenty-three fishing for tuna near Bikini [see The Voyage of the Lucky Dragon by Ralph Lapp]. As the heavily exposed fishermen's health quickly deteriorated after Bravo, the radio operator Aikichi Kuboyama died of a liver illness six months after his exposure; his is now a household name in Japan and is associated with the "Bikini bomb." Meanwhile, the Japanese fishing industry was rocked when Geiger counters registered "talking fish" [what the Japanese called the clicking sound of the contaminated fish being monitored] from the 800 pounds of tuna catch of the Lucky Dragon in Yaizu and in local fish markets. Much of the Japanese tuna at the time was caught by a fleet of 1,000 fishing boats operating in the fertile tuna waters near the U.S.' Pacific Proving Ground in the Marshalls. In response to the plight and symbolism of the Lucky Dragon, Japanese women collected 34 million signatures on petitions advocating the immediate abolition of both atomic and hydrogen bombs in 1955. Pugwash, the Nobel Peace Prize-winning anti-nuclear organization was founded in 1955 by Bertrand Russell and Albert Einstein in response to Bravo. The dangers of radioactive fallout from Bravo inspired Nevil Shute's classic nuclear dystopia On the Beach, as well as Godzilla. To quell the diplomatic furor - whereby the Japanese representative to the U.N. accused the U.S. in March 1954 of "once again using nuclear weapons against the Japanese people" - the U.S. paid two million dollars to the fishing company which owned the Lucky Dragon; each of the 23 fishermen ended up with the princely sum of $5,000 in 1956 and the tuna company kept the rest. AEC chair Lewis Strauss (who originally proposed nuclear energy "too cheap to meter" in the post-War Atoms for Peace program) told President Eisenhower's press secretary James Hagerty in April 1954 that the Lucky Dragon was not a fishing boat at all - it was a "Red spy outfit" snooping on the American nuclear tests. The legacy of latent radiogenic diseases from hydrogen bomb testing in the Marshall Islands provides some clues about what ill-health mysteries await the affected Japanese in the decades ahead. Also, the Marshall Islands provide insight about ecosystem contamination of these dangerous radioactive isotopes, and what this means for the affected Japanese. Profiles of the four isotopes o Iodine-131 [radioactive iodine] has a half life of eight days, and concentrates in the thyroid gland about 5,000 times more efficiently than other parts of the body. Traces of I-131 have been discovered in Tokyo drinking water and in seawater offshore from the reactors. It took nine years for the first thyroid tumor to appear among the exposed Marshallese and hypothyroidism and cancer continued to appear decades later. o Cesium-137 has a half life of thirty years and is a chemical analog of potassium; Cs-137 concentrates in muscle and other parts of the body. Rongelap Island has a new layer of topsoil containing potassium to help neutralize the Cs-137 left over from the H-bomb tests, but the Marshallese residents remain unconvinced and suspicious about the habitability of their long abandoned home atoll. Meanwhile, the U.S. is pressuring hard for their repatriation despite the fact that most islands at Rongelap will remain off limits for many decades with strict dietary restrictions of local foods. o Strontium-90 has a half life of twenty-eight years, is a chemical analog of calcium and is known as a "bone seeker." Rongelap and the other downwind atolls have residual Sr-90 in their soils, groundwater and marine ecosystems. o Plutonium-239 has a half life of 24,000 years, is considered one of the most toxic substances on Earth, and if absorbed is a potent alpha emitter that can induce cancer. This isotope too is found in the soils and groundwater of the downwind atolls from the Bikini and Enewetak H-bomb tests. Lessons from the Marshall Islands * It took nine years after exposure to the 1954 Bravo fallout for the first thyroid tumor and hypothyroidism to occur in an exposed Utrik woman from the I-131. Several more tumors [and other radiogenic disorders] among the exposed people appeared the following year and every year thereafter. The latency period for thyroid abnormalities and other radiogenic disorders [see below] endures for several decades. * Because a child's thyroid gland is much smaller than an adult's thyroid, it receives a higher concentration of I-131 than an adult dose. Also, because a child's thyroid gland is growing more quickly than an adult's, it requires and absorbs more iodine [and I-131] than an adult thyroid gland. That is, the thyroid effect is age-related. * Radioactive Iodine-129 with a half-life of 15 million years and a well-documented capacity to bioaccumulate in the foodchain, will also remain as a persistent problem for the affected Japanese. * The Majuro-based Nuclear Claims Tribunal was established in 1988 to settle all past and future claims against the U.S. for health injury and property loss damages from the nuclear tests. As of 2006, the NCT had paid out $73 million [of the $91 million awarded] for 1,999 Marshallese claimants. There are thirty-six medical conditions that are presumed to be caused by the nuclear tests [http://www.nuclearclaimstribunal.com]. Eligibility for Marshallese citizens consists of having been in the Marshall Islands during the testing period [1946-58] and having at least one of the presumptive medical disorders. * The sociocultural and psychological effects [e.g., PTSD] of the Fukushima nuclear disaster will be long-lasting, given the uncertainty surrounding the contamination of their prefecture and beyond. Psychiatrist Robert Jay Lifton eloquently detailed this uncertain future and fears about "invisible contamination" concerning the Hiroshima and Nagasaki "hibakusha" ["A-bomb survivors"] in his award-winning 1968 magnum opus Death in Life. * Noted radiation experts John Gofman [co-discoverer of U-232 and U-233 and author of Radiation and Human Health], Karl Z. Morgan [a founder of health physics] and Edward Radford [Chair of the National Academy of Sciences' BEIR III committee and advisor to the Nuclear Claims Tribunal] stated that there is no threshold dose for low level ionizing radiation: Any amount of ionizing radiation - which is cumulative - can pose a health threat for certain individuals, and especially those with compromised immune systems. Glenn Alcalay is an adjunct professor of anthropology at Wm Paterson Univ. and Montclair State Univ. in New Jersey. Alcalay was a Peace Corps volunteer on Utrik Atoll in the Marshalls, speaks fluent Marshallese, and has conducted anthropological research re: reproductive abnormalities among the downwind islanders. He can be reached at: alcalayg@wpunj.edu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Knight Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 (edited) That is probably to be considered a prelude to their next "X [Rain] causes CANCER!" Scareline. That paper is not called "The Daily Fail" just because it rhymes. Related video : EDIT : OK, let you off Apparently, very minute traces of iodine have been detected in two places - but the samples are much smaller than the normal background radiation, so absolutely no chance of harming anything. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-12892383 Edited March 29, 2011 by Steve Knight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Can Doug or Duane summarize her points, I doubt many people will have the patience to watch a hours plus video. Her qualifications are questionable. In March 2008 she told the Tehran Times: I didn’t know anything about radiation before. I’m a geologist and a geoscientist uses radiation to determine the age of the rocks. I measure the radioactive isotopes or minerals in rocks to determine the age of the rock and formation of the mountain range. “Then I went to work at two nuclear weapons laboratories. At the Lawrence Berkeley Lab I studied how magmas are created, and what happens when volcanoes erupt and how the ash and dust go all over the world. http://www.tehrantimes.com/Index_view.asp?code=165352 So her area of specialty is radio analysis of magma not plate tectonics or seismography. According to a profile of her: “Ms. Moret earned her BS in geology at U.C. Davis in 1968 and her MA in Near Eastern studies from U.C. Berkeley in 1978. She has completed all but her dissertation for a PhD in the geosciences at U.C. Davis” http://exopolitics.blogs.com/peaceinspace/2009/12/leuren-moret-biography-independent-scientist-expert-witness-at-the-tokyo-international-tribunal-for-war-crimes-in-afghanist.html The last part is questionable because “in most scholarly fields, the dissertation is the most important part of the doctoral degree, because successful completion and defense demonstrates that the candidate has expertise, discipline, and originality to advance the field of inquiry.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_but_dissertation Her title at Livermore, where she worked less than a year, was “Senior Scientific Technologist” at the Center for Applied Scientific Computing, which sounds like a glorified lab tech and this fits with the work she said she did at Livermore. So basically, IF she’s telling the truth she has a BS and has done some post graduate course work but her area of specialty is not really relevant. http://www.archive.org/details/LeurenKMoret-RealJobAtLawrenceLivermoreNationalLaboratory Can her claims be taken at face value? She claimed, “Marion Fulk, a former Manhattan Project scientist and retired insider at the Livermore Lab, who is an expert on radioactive fallout and rainout, has trained her on radiation issues.” However Fulk retired in 1984 and she worked at Livermore for less than a year starting in 1989 and Fulk seems not to have worked on the Manhattan Project he made no mention of this in a court declaration where he spelled out his qualifications and said he was “conduct[ing] research on biological systems starting in 1945” at the University of Illinois” http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m17590&date=08-nov-2005_17:19_ECT http://www.trivalleycares.org/new/litigation/Fulk%20Declaration(2).pdf When one of her detractors pointed out the discrepancies in a comment on the Kyoto Observer blog, she went into a tirade which included accusations that his brother “was recently charged, tried and convicted of stalking a female coworker” but notably did not contest his claims. http://kyotoobserver.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/namaste-magazine-leuren-moret/ One also has to wonder about her sanity, in March 2008 she told the Tehran Times: “I was completely devastated by the retaliation by the University of California and the Livermore lab. They bankrupted me, they broke into my house, my car, they kidnapped my daughter when she was I3 and I didn’t see her until she was I8.” Strangely though when she replied to her detractor at the Kyoto Observer a few months later she made no mention of the supposed kidnapping or break-ins when complaining about harassment she had supposedly suffered .She also claimed that her detractor was, “a retired U.S. Air Force officer, who also worked at the Vallejo (California) Naval shipyard until the U.S. Navy fired him for his continual harrassment of the Navy. He is now acting under the direction of Dr. Michael Kilpatrick in the Pentagon depleted uranium office” How exactly would a USAF officer get fired by the USN? And it is highly unlikely someone “fired” by any branch of the military would get a job with the Pentagon. Interestingly though she now seems to be spouting nonsense in 2004 she quite reasonably pointed out the risks of buiking nuclear power plants in an area as seismically active as Japan http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/fl20040523x2.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duane Daman Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Non-traditional Nuclear War in progress On Sunday, Alfred Lambremont of Expolitics TV interviewed nuclear scientist Leuren Moret who explained that the recent earthquake and nuclear events in Japan were intentional and caused by military-grade high-tech weaponry equivalent to dropping a million nuclear bombs. HAARP weaponry triggered the earthquake in Japan, an applied Environmental Modification (ENMOD), silently and invisibly, appearing to be a "natural event." Moret is a geoscientist who worked at the Lawrence Livermore Nuclear Weapons Laboratory on the Yucca Mountain Project, and became a whistle-blower in 1991 by reporting science fraud on the project and at Livermore. She is an independent and international radiation specialist, and the Environmental Commissioner in the city of Berkeley, California. Moret has visited Japan four times to work with Japanese citizens, scientists and elected officials on radiation and peace issues. "Was there any pre-warning that this disaster could have taken place so that precautions could be in place?” ask many including Northerntruthseeker. (http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com/2011/03/fukushima-nuclear-disaster-japans.html) As explained in Lambremont's Expolitics interview, Leuren Moret warned people in 2004 in her article in the Japan Times that an impending disaster was in store for Japan if they did not change their nuclear power policies. A series of earthquake attacks have occurred in various nations according to Lambremont who worked with Dennis Kucinich to ban this type of Environmental Modification weaponry. ENMOD refers to any technique for changing - through deliberate manipulation of natural processes - the dynamics, composition or structure of the Earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere, or of outer space. (Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques, United Nations, Geneva: 18 May 1977 cited in What are environmental modification techniques? Human Rights info 101, Dupre, Examiner, Dec. 6. 2009) Japan's earthquake was a military strike, a tectonic attack using HAARP weapon system secretly developed by the United States and Russia under the cover of defense according to Moret. (See: (Video) What is H.A.A.R.P.? Human Rights info 101, Dupré, D., Examiner, April 7, 2010) The United States and Russia were secretly developing this for weaponry. Evidence gathered by Moret indicates that the Japanese earthquake was a military attack using the secret sophisticated HAARP weaponry. H.A.A.R.P. stands for High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program. It is a geophysical weapon that is so powerful, it is a geophysical weapon of mass destruction. It is only one among many of such installations across the globe's superDARN Highway, the array of High Frequency (HF) radars that now cover most of the northern and southern hemispheres. This weapon has been a "secret" due to "national security." (What is HHARP: Human Rights Info 101) The United States H.A.A.R.P. is jointly funded by the US Air Force, the US Navy, the University of Alaska and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and is operates a major Arctic facility, known as the HAARP Research Station, on an Air Force owned site near Gakona, Alaska. More here. http://www.examiner.com/human-rights-in-national/haarp-caused-japanese-earthquake-nuclear-bomb-video Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now