Jump to content
The Education Forum

Recommended Posts

What jump reaction artifact is evident at c. 226, the throat wound?

I don't believe that Zapruder was startled then. If he had been, we would be seeing the limo passengers being startled as well. There are more false positives in the film than actual startle reactions.

Also, Alvarez described startle reactions as including more than just one blurred frame. He said there would be a sequence of blurred frames in increments of app. 6 frames. You will see that following 312 and following 285. Those seem to be the only shots that day that came from unsuppressed, high powered rifles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What jump reaction artifact is evident at c. 226, the throat wound?

I don't believe that Zapruder was startled then. If he had been, we would be seeing the limo passengers being startled as well. There are more false positives in the film than actual startle reactions.

Also, Alvarez described startle reactions as including more than just one blurred frame. He said there would be a sequence of blurred frames in increments of app. 6 frames. You will see that following 312 and following 285. Those seem to be the only shots that day that came from unsuppressed, high powered rifles.

Most witnesses only heard one of the early shots. Some heard none, including Clint Hill, Charles Brehm, Mary Moorman, Jean Hill, and many others.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...