Jim Hargrove Posted June 6, 2015 Share Posted June 6, 2015 Well, Greg, there's a certain amount of truth to that, if only a little. Your work inspired me to vastly expand the 1959 "Defection" photo section... all the orginal stuff is still there, and much more. See it here: http://harveyandlee.net/Marines/Defection_Photo_Evolution.html and here: http://harveyandlee.net/Marines/Marines.html And, for the hundreds and hundreds of posts you've made here and elsewhere discussing Oswald's Magic Tonsils, I've decided to put the tonsillectomy evidence back up on the website ASAP. Should be ready in a day or two. Just wanted to make it clear how helpful you have been. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Josephs Posted June 6, 2015 Share Posted June 6, 2015 "David's crap" is about the only truth here. Are you really surrendering this whole site to Greg Parker and his minions? Will you NEVER stop the BLEEDING? Really? then you better put your website back to what it looked like a few years ago before my work forced changed to it. David's latest crap can be found on the other H & L thread where he is soon to be busy trying to defend the most stridently assassine decronstuction of a school report imaginable. Someone get the popcorn. Yes Greg... let's send people over to your explanation that a school year is over 240 days and that the boy's perm record does not show a stay at Youth House for 17 days... http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19762&page=30#entry305028 Popcorn? You're not entertaining anyone GP, you're just making a fool of yourself... I stand corrected - very entertaining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted June 6, 2015 Author Share Posted June 6, 2015 "David's crap" is about the only truth here. Are you really surrendering this whole site to Greg Parker and his minions? Will you NEVER stop the BLEEDING? Really? then you better put your website back to what it looked like a few years ago before my work forced changed to it. David's latest crap can be found on the other H & L thread where he is soon to be busy trying to defend the most stridently assassine decronstuction of a school report imaginable. Someone get the popcorn. Yes Greg... let's send people over to your explanation that a school year is over 240 days and that the boy's perm record does not show a stay at Youth House for 17 days... http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19762&page=30#entry305028 Popcorn? You're not entertaining anyone GP, you're just making a fool of yourself... I stand corrected - very entertaining. Good luck ain showing PS 44 had any responsibility for a non-enrolled kid. Yes, it should be entertaining. I should run a book on which logical fallacy you'll did into this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Hargrove Posted June 7, 2015 Share Posted June 7, 2015 Well, Greg, there's a certain amount of truth to that, if only a little. Your work inspired me to vastly expand the 1959 "Defection" photo section... all the orginal stuff is still there, and much more. See it here: http://harveyandlee.net/Marines/Defection_Photo_Evolution.html and here: http://harveyandlee.net/Marines/Marines.html And, for the hundreds and hundreds of posts you've made here and elsewhere discussing Oswald's Magic Tonsils, I've decided to put the tonsillectomy evidence back up on the website ASAP. Should be ready in a day or two. Just wanted to make it clear how helpful you have been. Thanks! Yo, Parker .... Now that this "Frankenstein Oswald" thread has backfired on you so horribly, what is your new plan? Do you have one? Please post it ASAP, so we can destroy it, too! WE WANT TO ENGAGE... ESPECIALLY WITH YOU. AND PLEASE REMEMBER.... WE LOVE YOU!! Also, don't forget your usual advice ... DO NOT CLICK HERE! Magic Tonsils coming back real soon! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted June 7, 2015 Author Share Posted June 7, 2015 Well, Greg, there's a certain amount of truth to that, if only a little. Your work inspired me to vastly expand the 1959 "Defection" photo section... all the orginal stuff is still there, and much more. See it here: http://harveyandlee.net/Marines/Defection_Photo_Evolution.html and here: http://harveyandlee.net/Marines/Marines.html And, for the hundreds and hundreds of posts you've made here and elsewhere discussing Oswald's Magic Tonsils, I've decided to put the tonsillectomy evidence back up on the website ASAP. Should be ready in a day or two. Just wanted to make it clear how helpful you have been. Thanks! Yo, Parker .... Now that this "Frankenstein Oswald" thread has backfired on you so horribly, what is your new plan? Do you have one? Please post it ASAP, so we can destroy it, too! WE WANT TO ENGAGE... ESPECIALLY WITH YOU. AND PLEASE REMEMBER.... WE LOVE YOU!! Also, don't forget your usual advice ... DO NOT CLICK HERE! Magic Tonsils coming back real soon! Exactly how has it backfired? Name one person without a dog in this fight you have convinced? The image was placed over the existing photo on the news story and FRAUDULENTLY presented as what was used by the newspaper. But you are not going give that little fact on your website, are you, Jim? You spin better than Shane Warne ever did... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted June 7, 2015 Author Share Posted June 7, 2015 WE WANT TO ENGAGE... ESPECIALLY WITH YOU. AND PLEASE REMEMBER.... What a joke. You want to engage? Then why was kicked out of the DeepFoo? Why after every post did I have people begging me to leave "Harvey and Lee" alone and talk about my book instead? You want to engage me? That is the biggest whopper so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Josephs Posted June 7, 2015 Share Posted June 7, 2015 "David's crap" is about the only truth here. Are you really surrendering this whole site to Greg Parker and his minions? Will you NEVER stop the BLEEDING? Really? then you better put your website back to what it looked like a few years ago before my work forced changed to it. David's latest crap can be found on the other H & L thread where he is soon to be busy trying to defend the most stridently assassine decronstuction of a school report imaginable. Someone get the popcorn. Yes Greg... let's send people over to your explanation that a school year is over 240 days and that the boy's perm record does not show a stay at Youth House for 17 days... http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19762&page=30#entry305028 Popcorn? You're not entertaining anyone GP, you're just making a fool of yourself... I stand corrected - very entertaining. Good luck ain showing PS 44 had any responsibility for a non-enrolled kid. Yes, it should be entertaining. I should run a book on which logical fallacy you'll did into this time. Really Parker... that's the best you have now that you've backed off the actual evidence, and counting, with the reality that you've not got one thing correct in a single rebuttal you've offered except for the 6% chance of tonsil regrowth in 5 year olds... The fact that those days from Jan to March are actually school days is the point. That there are at least 40 of them while he does not attend school... so no, they did not include those days in his attendance since he was not in school... if they were part of the 109 + 15 it might be a little closer... buyt then the spring semester needed to start before the fall ended for that to work... ooops But those days don't simply disappear - they get added to the other days for a total potential # of days at school. Did you explain how a 180 day school year has over 225 days in it according to the records posted or how there are 125+ days from March 23 to May 30th in the spring semester? Not anywhere here - all I see are more excuses for why you can't admit a mistake.... or cant count very well. Are you truly that immune to social graces as to not be able to admit when you've made a mistake - even when it is glaring and obvious to everyone? this is how you were taught? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted June 7, 2015 Author Share Posted June 7, 2015 "David's crap" is about the only truth here. Are you really surrendering this whole site to Greg Parker and his minions? Will you NEVER stop the BLEEDING? Really? then you better put your website back to what it looked like a few years ago before my work forced changed to it. David's latest crap can be found on the other H & L thread where he is soon to be busy trying to defend the most stridently assassine decronstuction of a school report imaginable. Someone get the popcorn. Yes Greg... let's send people over to your explanation that a school year is over 240 days and that the boy's perm record does not show a stay at Youth House for 17 days... http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19762&page=30#entry305028 Popcorn? You're not entertaining anyone GP, you're just making a fool of yourself... I stand corrected - very entertaining. Good luck ain showing PS 44 had any responsibility for a non-enrolled kid. Yes, it should be entertaining. I should run a book on which logical fallacy you'll did into this time. Really Parker... that's the best you have now that you've backed off the actual evidence, and counting, with the reality that you've not got one thing correct in a single rebuttal you've offered except for the 6% chance of tonsil regrowth in 5 year olds... The fact that those days from Jan to March are actually school days is the point. That there are at least 40 of them while he does not attend school... so no, they did not include those days in his attendance since he was not in school... if they were part of the 109 + 15 it might be a little closer... buyt then the spring semester needed to start before the fall ended for that to work... ooops But those days don't simply disappear - they get added to the other days for a total potential # of days at school. Did you explain how a 180 day school year has over 225 days in it according to the records posted or how there are 125+ days from March 23 to May 30th in the spring semester? Not anywhere here - all I see are more excuses for why you can't admit a mistake.... or cant count very well. Are you truly that immune to social graces as to not be able to admit when you've made a mistake - even when it is glaring and obvious to everyone? this is how you were taught? It has been answered. You obviously "missed" it, so I'll bump it just for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Josephs Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 No way to know if its the same "session" but it's the same place - btw the image youposted is reversed.. and from what I can tell, the expression on his face is different as well... which CNN special is that from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Josephs Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 I was finally able to get a large version of the White Oswald poster which shows what the captions are - no I hadn't forgetten... Most telling to me are the two photos 11 days apart in Sept 1958 at the right end... and Robert trying to tell us that #28 is from '59 and not '57... Difference between age 18/19 and 21... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W. Tracy Parnell Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 They all look like the same guy to me except "Frankenstein". Still hoping information may become available that will explain that photo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Josephs Posted June 16, 2015 Share Posted June 16, 2015 I hear you, Tracy. Even Woods is starting with the "Frankie" version and not the FWST one. I have no idea why it would be described as the "AP" photo when it was not.... or why it would be created in the first place to depict that photo... but it was... and in the absence of another image... seems Woods shows it was obviously painted over... but it matches very well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Hargrove Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 Your work inspired me to vastly expand the 1959 "Defection" photo section... all the orginal stuff is still there, and much more. See it here: http://harveyandlee...._Evolution.html and here: http://harveyandlee....es/Marines.html And, for the hundreds and hundreds of posts you've made here and elsewhere discussing Oswald's Magic Tonsils, I've decided to put the tonsillectomy evidence back up on the website ASAP. Should be ready in a day or two. Just wanted to make it clear how helpful you have been. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted June 19, 2015 Author Share Posted June 19, 2015 Your work inspired me to vastly expand the 1959 "Defection" photo section... all the orginal stuff is still there, and much more. See it here: http://harveyandlee...._Evolution.html and here: http://harveyandlee....es/Marines.html And, for the hundreds and hundreds of posts you've made here and elsewhere discussing Oswald's Magic Tonsils, I've decided to put the tonsillectomy evidence back up on the website ASAP. Should be ready in a day or two. Just wanted to make it clear how helpful you have been. Thanks! And your work inspires me to grab a bucket. If you don't state clearly that Armstrong misrepresented the image as having been used by the FW-ST, then you will just continue to highlight your real value to Armstrong - that of toadie number one. I'd watch your back though. David has his eye on that coveted slot. What's it to be Jim? Honesty or more cowtowing and covering up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W. Tracy Parnell Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 (edited) From Hargrove's "Marines Corps and Soviet Union" page: Throughout the summer of 1959 HARVEY Oswald continued to promote communism and anything and everything Russian to fellow marines. On September 4, HARVEY Oswald applied for a passport in Santa Ana, California. But the passport contained a photo of LEE Oswald--not HARVEY. If this photo is compared with a photo taken of HARVEY Oswald a week later, standing next to Robert Oswald, you can see they are two different people. The caption for the photo of LHO and Robert says "Grainy 1959 photo of Harvey standing next to Robert Oswald". But this photo is a screen grab from the "Biography" show on Oswald. This was apparently a composite made by the producers in order to show the brothers together (for purposes of illustration) even though they weren't. The original shown in Robert's book is not grainy at all and perfectly clear. What could be the reason for using this "grainy" version of the photo? Could it be that using the grainy photo makes it more likely the reader will think they are looking at two different individuals? That could also explain why Armstrong showed a poor quality photo of Marguerite standing in front of a sink and wearing a nightgown to witnesses to represent the "imposter" Marguerite and used a better quality photo taken at the shoe store to represent the "tall beautiful" Marguerite. http://wtracyparnell.com/using-photos-to-misrepresent/ Edited June 19, 2015 by W. Tracy Parnell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now