Jump to content
The Education Forum

Clint Hill 's views in the new edition of his book, Five Days in November.


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Douglas Caddy said:

Both Hill and Landis stated that the back of Kennedy's head was missing and both denounce the single bullet theory:

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Vince Palamara said:

Both Hill and Landis stated that the back of Kennedy's head was missing...

And we know for a FACT---based on this and this (in tandem)---that both Clint Hill and Paul Landis were 100% dead wrong when they stated that the back of President Kennedy's head was "missing".

They aren't l-i-a-r-s, they're just wrong (like all the other "BOH" witnesses).

And, very likely, one of the reasons for why most of the BOH witnesses had a mistaken impression of where the large exit wound on President Kennedy's head was located---possibly the #1 primary reason---clearly rests in the lap (literally) of First Lady Jackie Kennedy. Because Mrs. Kennedy, without doubt, manipulated and CHANGED the configuration of JFK's head wound while the limousine was speeding to Parkland Hospital. We know that for a fact because Jackie told us so in her Warren Commission testimony. She said that during the drive to the hospital, she tried to "hold his hair on, and his skull on".

So, Jacqueline Kennedy, in effect, closed up the huge gaping hole in the right-front of JFK's head. And she must have done a pretty good job of "closing" it up too, so that the witnesses in Trauma Room No. 1 weren't even aware there was a huge gaping wound in the upper-right part of the President's head. Which left those witnesses staring at a head that was essentially intact (from their point of view).

So what they mostly saw was the massive amount of blood that was pooling, via gravity, toward the RIGHT-REAR portion of JFK's head, with much of that blood no doubt clinging to the right-rear (occipital) area of the head, giving the false impression that the one and only wound in the President's head was located in the right-rear (occipital) area of the head.

Incredible, you say?

Impossible for so many witnesses to be fooled by the closing up of one single flap on the President's head?

Many people think such a thing was impossible. But what better explanation is there? (And the "Fake Autopsy Photos & X-rays" explanation doesn't come even close to qualifying as a "better" explanation.)

DVP

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2011/04/index.html#JFK-Head-Wounds

 

Edited by David Von Pein
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, David Von Pein said:

And we know for a FACT---based on this and this (in tandem)---that both Clint Hill and Paul Landis were 100% dead wrong when they stated that the back of President Kennedy's head was "missing".

They aren't l-i-a-r-s, they're just wrong (like all the other "BOH" witnesses).

And, very likely, one of the reasons for why most of the BOH witnesses had a mistaken impression of where the large exit wound on President Kennedy's head was located---possibly the #1 primary reason---clearly rests in the lap (literally) of First Lady Jackie Kennedy. Because Mrs. Kennedy, without doubt, manipulated and CHANGED the configuration of JFK's head wound while the limousine was speeding to Parkland Hospital. We know that for a fact because Jackie told us so in her Warren Commission testimony. She said that during the drive to the hospital, she tried to "hold his hair on, and his skull on".

So, Jacqueline Kennedy, in effect, closed up the huge gaping hole in the right-front of JFK's head. And she must have done a pretty good job of "closing" it up too, so that the witnesses in Trauma Room No. 1 weren't even aware there was a huge gaping wound in the upper-right part of the President's head. Which left those witnesses staring at a head that was essentially intact (from their point of view).

So what they mostly saw was the massive amount of blood that was pooling, via gravity, toward the RIGHT-REAR portion of JFK's head, with much of that blood no doubt clinging to the right-rear (occipital) area of the head, giving the false impression that the one and only wound in the President's head was located in the right-rear (occipital) area of the head.

Incredible, you say?

Impossible for so many witnesses to be fooled by the closing up of one single flap on the President's head?

Many people think such a thing was impossible. But what better explanation is there? (And the "Fake Autopsy Photos & X-rays" explanation doesn't come even close to qualifying as a "better" explanation.)

DVP

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2011/04/index.html#JFK-Head-Wounds

 

Yes the Parkland doctors were so easily fooled.  Come on.  That is as ridiculous as saying Marilyn was not murdered.  

Edited by Cory Santos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Cory Santos said:

Yes the Parkland doctors were so easily fooled.  Come on.  That is as ridiculous as saying Marilyn was not murdered.  

So, Cory, what's your "better explanation" to reconcile the various "BOH" witnesses?

And....

Marilyn was definitely not murdered.

So color me "ridiculous". (Again.)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, David Von Pein said:

So, Cory, what's your "better explanation" to reconcile the various "BOH" witnesses?

And....

Marilyn was definitely not murdered.

So color me "ridiculous". (Again.)

 

David you are speculating.  Clearly Jackie did not “close up the head” as you claim.   Look at her dress and the limo.   What do you think was all over the place?    As for Marilyn, it is refreshing to see you and Jim agree.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Vince Palamara said:

Both Hill and Landis stated that the back of Kennedy's head was missing and both denounce the single bullet theory:

 

 

 

 

So what's the point, Vince? They are clearly pointing to the location of the wound as depicted by the autopsy doctors, and not to the location claimed by the likes of Lifton, Groden, and Mantik. Can we take from this then that Lifton, Groden, and Mantik are full of it?

image.png.0ecaaf2a8cdb98ebe8a81ac6c0c6a7a9.png

Edited by Pat Speer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...