Denny Zartman Posted June 20 Share Posted June 20 There's no RFK2A, so the term "RFK1A" is complete nonsense. Why is this nonsense being posted? Why is it allowed to be posted? What's the real story? @Benjamin Cole knows there is no RFK2A or RFK3A or RFK4A, ect., but he keeps on posting it anyway. Why? What's actually going on here? No more lies, no more nonsense. What is the point? Am I the only one here who thinks this kind of stuff makes the forum look like garbage? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Cloud Posted June 20 Share Posted June 20 25 minutes ago, Denny Zartman said: There's no RFK2A, so the term "RFK1A" is complete nonsense. Why is this nonsense being posted? Why is it allowed to be posted? What's the real story? @Benjamin Cole knows there is no RFK2A or RFK3A or RFK4A, ect., but he keeps on posting it anyway. Why? What's actually going on here? No more lies, no more nonsense. What is the point? Am I the only one here who thinks this kind of stuff makes the forum look like garbage? No. The whole "JFK" moniker smacked of imperial pretensions anyway -- at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Koch Posted June 20 Share Posted June 20 Why is this a thread? lols, aren't you the guy always complaining about posts like this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandy Larsen Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 I've wondered the same things, Denny. If I ever want to discuss Star Wars, maybe I'll start a thread titled "RFK1A, R2D2, and the JFKA." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now