Thomas H. Purvis Posted July 27, 2005 Share Posted July 27, 2005 (edited) Since that information relative to the actual change of survey data has now been shown, may as well show how this altered information was entered into evidence. Fallacies-10 Edited July 27, 2005 by Thomas H. Purvis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted July 27, 2005 Author Share Posted July 27, 2005 (edited) For anyone who may care, the complete text of this conversation is available in any of the searchs for WC Testimony. Tom Fallacies-11 Edited July 27, 2005 by Thomas H. Purvis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted July 27, 2005 Author Share Posted July 27, 2005 Added are the last two pages of "slight"-of-hand. Good "sleight"- of- hand is seldom recognized. Slight (aka meager) "Slight-of-hand" is easily recognizable by those who know where to look. Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David G. Healy Posted July 27, 2005 Share Posted July 27, 2005 (edited) Added are the last two pages of "slight"-of-hand.Good "sleight"- of- hand is seldom recognized. Slight (aka meager) "Slight-of-hand" is easily recognizable by those who know where to look. Tom <{POST_SNAPBACK}> thanks very much, Tom! Anything further is greatly appreciated! Any comments/observations regarding DMyer's DP animation? David Healy Edited July 27, 2005 by David G. Healy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted July 27, 2005 Author Share Posted July 27, 2005 Added are the last two pages of "slight"-of-hand.Good "sleight"- of- hand is seldom recognized. Slight (aka meager) "Slight-of-hand" is easily recognizable by those who know where to look. Tom <{POST_SNAPBACK}> thanks very much, Tom! Anything further is greatly appreciated! Any comments/observations regarding DMyer's DP animation? David Healy <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Shortly, I will post the "Vehicle Speed" data which begins to get a little closer to home on your work. I have not even seen the Dmyers's animation. From what is known, it supports the SBT/Magic Bullet theory. This alone makes it not worth my time, or money. Not to mention that I hardly ever watch cartoons anymore. And, since neither Time/Life nor the U.S. Secret Service appear to have had any difficulty in placement of the first shot fired, which most assuredly was not in the vicinity of Z-157, or Z-161, etc;, and one of these parties had the original film and the second party had a "first generation" copy, I see little to be gained in looking beyond the parameters of where they for whatever reason placed the first shot. Just perhaps Mr. Meyers, as well as many others, should review the wealth of eyewitness testimony which clearly demonstrates that the Z-312/313 headshot was the second shot fired in the assassination. This alone should have alerted Mr. Meyers that his cartoon has some severe problems. Is he giving it away or selling it? Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David G. Healy Posted July 27, 2005 Share Posted July 27, 2005 Added are the last two pages of "slight"-of-hand.Good "sleight"- of- hand is seldom recognized. Slight (aka meager) "Slight-of-hand" is easily recognizable by those who know where to look. Tom <{POST_SNAPBACK}> thanks very much, Tom! Anything further is greatly appreciated! Any comments/observations regarding DMyer's DP animation? David Healy <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Shortly, I will post the "Vehicle Speed" data which begins to get a little closer to home on your work. I have not even seen the Dmyers's animation. From what is known, it supports the SBT/Magic Bullet theory. This alone makes it not worth my time, or money. Not to mention that I hardly ever watch cartoons anymore. And, since neither Time/Life nor the U.S. Secret Service appear to have had any difficulty in placement of the first shot fired, which most assuredly was not in the vicinity of Z-157, or Z-161, etc;, and one of these parties had the original film and the second party had a "first generation" copy, I see little to be gained in looking beyond the parameters of where they for whatever reason placed the first shot. Just perhaps Mr. Meyers, as well as many others, should review the wealth of eyewitness testimony which clearly demonstrates that the Z-312/313 headshot was the second shot fired in the assassination. This alone should have alerted Mr. Meyers that his cartoon has some severe problems. Is he giving it away or selling it? Tom <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well, at the moment Peter Jennings and ABC are the only ones that have bought the Myers cartoon as gospel, you could probably throw in there, Arlen Spector -- lest of course, the 6th Floor and their adherents... as with most pro WCR, supporters, LN and those posing as CT, there's no sense in letting eyewitness testimony (regardless of when it was taken) get in the way of a good cover story, regardless of how noble the cover story is/seems to be! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted July 27, 2005 Author Share Posted July 27, 2005 Added are the last two pages of "slight"-of-hand.Good "sleight"- of- hand is seldom recognized. Slight (aka meager) "Slight-of-hand" is easily recognizable by those who know where to look. Tom <{POST_SNAPBACK}> thanks very much, Tom! Anything further is greatly appreciated! Any comments/observations regarding DMyer's DP animation? David Healy <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It is not likely that I would place a great deal of faith in anything claimed or stated by the "Honorable" Arlen Specter. Tom Shortly, I will post the "Vehicle Speed" data which begins to get a little closer to home on your work. I have not even seen the Dmyers's animation. From what is known, it supports the SBT/Magic Bullet theory. This alone makes it not worth my time, or money. Not to mention that I hardly ever watch cartoons anymore. And, since neither Time/Life nor the U.S. Secret Service appear to have had any difficulty in placement of the first shot fired, which most assuredly was not in the vicinity of Z-157, or Z-161, etc;, and one of these parties had the original film and the second party had a "first generation" copy, I see little to be gained in looking beyond the parameters of where they for whatever reason placed the first shot. Just perhaps Mr. Meyers, as well as many others, should review the wealth of eyewitness testimony which clearly demonstrates that the Z-312/313 headshot was the second shot fired in the assassination. This alone should have alerted Mr. Meyers that his cartoon has some severe problems. Is he giving it away or selling it? Tom <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well, at the moment Peter Jennings and ABC are the only ones that have bought the Myers cartoon as gospel, you could probably throw in there, Arlen Spector -- lest of course, the 6th Floor and their adherents... as with most pro WCR, supporters, LN and those posing as CT, there's no sense in letting eyewitness testimony (regardless of when it was taken) get in the way of a good cover story, regardless of how noble the cover story is/seems to be! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now