Thomas Graves Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 (edited) 26 minutes ago, Robert Prudhomme said: Hi Thomas According to this photo Carol Reed is the taller head scarf wearing woman. And he makes Karan Hicks as the shorter blonde sans scarf. Of course, he also makes Calvery to be an Hispanic/black woman so.......... Edit: unable to post photo with names below it. Bob, Don't you realize that wacko "We Never Went To The Moon!" Thierry Speth is the one who "identified" these ladies way, way back in the day, and that, unfortunately, all of the "researchers" since then seem to have taken his word on this as gospel? I honestly see a strong enough resemblance between the (unfortunately) smiling "Karen [sic] Hicks, wife of James Hicks" HSCA photo (which I posted for you in an earlier post, this thread) and the tallish, (unfortunately) headscarf-wearing gal, above, to conclude that Speth (whom we all seem to agree now got Gloria Calvary confused with someone else) got Reed and Hicks confused, too. -- Tommy Perhaps we need to get that great photo interpreter, Bill Miller, to make a "ruling" on whether or not the gal in HSCA photo #39 is the same person as the tallish, (unfortunately) headscarf-wearing gal who was hanging out with "Blondie Crybaby" and "Dark Complected Woman" in Zapruder, Darnell (iirc), etc. Edited December 31, 2016 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Prudhomme Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 As I said, the problem is the FBI statements of these women all place them exactly where this group of women is standing. If it was a "mistake", I'm starting to think the "mistake" began some time just after the assassination, and is being perpetuated to this day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Prudhomme Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 Thomas I tried to PM you but no luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 2 minutes ago, Robert Prudhomme said: Thomas I tried to PM you but no luck. Bob, I'll guess I'll have to clear some conversations with Gerry Patrick Hemming [q.v.], Tosh Plumlee [q.v.], and Alvin Beaubouef [q.v.] out of my PM thingy to accommodate you. (LOL, but true) But I intuitively already have an answer for you: "Why do I have to do all of the dirty work?" -- Tommy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 (edited) 11 hours ago, Robert Prudhomme said: As I said, the problem is the FBI statements of these women all place them exactly where this group of women is standing. If it was a "mistake", I'm starting to think the "mistake" began some time just after the assassination, and is being perpetuated to this day. Dear Bob, Don't get all "paranoid again" quite yet. LOL As I said about a year ago, I believe that most, if not all, of the FBI statements of the (100 or so) TSBD employees that were taken in early 1964 are legitimate, typed-up copies of the signed statements. If I were you, I wouldn't lend too much credence to Thierry Speth's individual identifications of the gals in the "Calvary, Reed, Hicks, Westbrook" group, although the group itself (sans Calvary?) was, IMHO, probably where Speth said it was. -- Tommy Edited January 1, 2017 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 FWIW Hicks told Jim Garrison that he was not married at the time of the assassination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 1 minute ago, Ron Ecker said: FWIW Hicks told Jim Garrison that he was not married at the time of the assassination. Okay. Maybe he was by the time of the HSCA investigation, Ron? -- Tommy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 2 hours ago, Thomas Graves said: Okay. Maybe he was by the time of the HSCA investigation, Ron? -- Tommy I thought the question was, was this woman named Hicks his wife in 1963. Carry on and don't mind me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 Just now, Ron Ecker said: I thought the question was, was this woman named Hicks his wife in 1963. Carry on and don't mind me. OK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Prudhomme Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 Karan Hicks made her statement to the FBI on March 20, 1964. Could they have married after the assassination? It seems like a remarkable coincidence for there to be two James Daniel Hicks at the same place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 6 minutes ago, Robert Prudhomme said: Karan Hicks made her statement to the FBI on March 20, 1964. Could they have married after the assassination? It seems like a remarkable coincidence for there to be two James Daniel Hicks at the same place. Geez, Bob. I guess I'll have to spend a week or two "researching" that, now. Thanks a lot. I wonder what our "great photo expert" thinks about the possible resemblance between the (unfortunately) smiling gal in HSCA photo # 39 and the (unfortunately) headscarf-wearing gal in the "Calvary, Reed, Westbrook, and Hicks" group on Elm Street during the assassination? -- Tommy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Prudhomme Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 LOL Sorry, dude. Where would I find the HSCA photo #39? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 (edited) 40 minutes ago, Robert Prudhomme said: Karan Hicks made her statement to the FBI on March 20, 1964. Could they have married after the assassination? It seems like a remarkable coincidence for there to be two James Daniel Hicks at the same place. Geez, Bob. I guess I'll have to spend a week or two "researching" that, now. Thanks a lot. I wonder what our "great photo expert" thinks about the possible resemblance between the (unfortunately) smiling gal in HSCA photo # 39 and the (unfortunately) headscarf-wearing gal in the "Calvary, Reed, Westbrook, and Hicks" group on Elm Street during the assassination? -- Tommy Bob, You ask, "Where can I find HSCA photo # 39?" Come on, Bob, you're almost as bad as you-know-who. I put it on page 3, this thread. TWICE! Unbelievable. (lol) -- Tommy Carefully compare her face with the face of the gal wearing the headscarf in this clip. Edited January 1, 2017 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Prudhomme Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 Oh THAT photo. Sorry, had a hard day bucking and loading firewood for a lady friend of mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 (edited) 43 minutes ago, Robert Prudhomme said: Karan Hicks made her statement to the FBI on March 20, 1964. Could they have married after the assassination? It seems like a remarkable coincidence for there to be two James Daniel Hicks at the same place. Geez, Bob. I guess I'll have to spend a week or two "researching" that, now. Thanks a lot. I wonder what our "great photo expert" thinks about the possible resemblance between the (unfortunately) smiling gal in HSCA photo # 39 and the (unfortunately) headscarf-wearing gal in the "Calvary, Reed, Westbrook, and Hicks" group on Elm Street during the assassination? -- Tommy PS Please go back to my just-now edited previous post, this thread. Edited January 1, 2017 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now