Jack White Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 Who are these people? Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen Turner Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 Jack, surely these are just light patterns reflecting though leaves. It must be possible though cross reference this claim with the photographic record. FWIW, Steve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Stapleton Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 Were girls wearing mini-skirts that common in November 63? It thought it took off a bit later. FWIW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen Turner Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 Mark, first mini skirts Mary quant London, Portobello Rd, Carnaby St, Kings Cross late 1965- early1966, I have no doubt that "Street versions" existed before this time, but not in conservative dallas. This was an English phenomina that went global. Jack, This is just refracted light though foliage isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Geraghty Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 Mark, first mini skirts Mary quant London, Portobello Rd, Carnaby St, Kings Cross late 1965- early1966, I have no doubt that "Street versions" existed before this time, but not in conservative dallas. This was an English phenomina that went global. Jack, This is just refracted light though foliage isn't it? Either that or there are little green men wearing mini skirts in DP. John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Johansson Posted June 29, 2006 Share Posted June 29, 2006 That must be Marilyn Monroe with Sam Giancana. Just to let JFK know in his final moments: Look Jack, the winner takes all ! Great discovery , Jack. Mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Miller Posted June 29, 2006 Share Posted June 29, 2006 (edited) Who are these people?Jack Ink blot type illustrations made up of lights and shadows seen on a wall .... is this a sign of whats to come? Bill Miller Edited June 29, 2006 by Bill Miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Hunt Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 Who are these people?Jack Do us all a favor and retire already, Jack. You’ve been an embarrassment to serious and legitimate JFK research for far too long as it is. Thanks in advance. John Hunt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Speer Posted June 30, 2006 Share Posted June 30, 2006 Who are these people? Jack Do us all a favor and retire already, Jack. You’ve been an embarrassment to serious and legitimate JFK research for far too long as it is. Thanks in advance. John Hunt Ouch. While I also suspect there's nothing in this photo but leaves, I defend Jack's right to notice things in photos and ask questions about them. His take on the photo alteration of the Miller photo (see the current thread) has helped pinpoint and clarify a point of interest of the case, much to the embarrassment of those who "know better." The photo long sold as a photo of Kennedy's foot and then re-captioned as a photo of Clint Hill's foot was most likely a photo of Kennedy's hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted July 1, 2006 Author Share Posted July 1, 2006 Who are these people? Jack Do us all a favor and retire already, Jack. You’ve been an embarrassment to serious and legitimate JFK research for far too long as it is. Thanks in advance. John Hunt Ouch. While I also suspect there's nothing in this photo but leaves, I defend Jack's right to notice things in photos and ask questions about them. His take on the photo alteration of the Miller photo (see the current thread) has helped pinpoint and clarify a point of interest of the case, much to the embarrassment of those who "know better." The photo long sold as a photo of Kennedy's foot and then re-captioned as a photo of Clint Hill's foot was most likely a photo of Kennedy's hand. Thanks, Pat. Provocateurs are easily identified by attacks like Hunt's, and their credibility destroyed to the perceptive. He was not on my list till this attack displaying his ignorance. I will now add his name to the list. Hmmmm....Colby....Hunt....where have those names cropped up before? Seem familiar. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Miller Posted July 1, 2006 Share Posted July 1, 2006 Ouch. While I also suspect there's nothing in this photo but leaves, I defend Jack's right to notice things in photos and ask questions about them. His take on the photo alteration of the Miller photo (see the current thread) has helped pinpoint and clarify a point of interest of the case, much to the embarrassment of those who "know better." The photo long sold as a photo of Kennedy's foot and then re-captioned as a photo of Clint Hill's foot was most likely a photo of Kennedy's hand. Jack certainly has the right to use poor images to make unfounded claims and I'll even support Pat's right to wrongfully claim Hill's foot is JFK's hand by using second and third generation prints. However, the only thing that clears anything up is looking at the original photos or very good first generation prints. Bill Miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Hunt Posted July 2, 2006 Share Posted July 2, 2006 Who are these people? Jack Do us all a favor and retire already, Jack. You’ve been an embarrassment to serious and legitimate JFK research for far too long as it is. Thanks in advance. John Hunt Ouch. While I also suspect there's nothing in this photo but leaves, I defend Jack's right to notice things in photos and ask questions about them. His take on the photo alteration of the Miller photo (see the current thread) has helped pinpoint and clarify a point of interest of the case, much to the embarrassment of those who "know better." The photo long sold as a photo of Kennedy's foot and then re-captioned as a photo of Clint Hill's foot was most likely a photo of Kennedy's hand. Claiming to see a girl in a mini shirt in a pixilated copy of a copy is just so much horsexxxx. We've had more than enough of that from White already. Thus my comment. John Hunt PS. I looked at the same image and I saw Nixon and Hoover. What a discovery I've made!! :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now