Cliff Varnell Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 Which Z-frame is it that corresponds to the Croft photo? Thanks. Z161 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JL Allen Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 Thanks, Cliff. There seem to be some powerful divergencies and incompatibilities contained within these photos - all of which relate to Z-161 and the Croft photo and the overall angle of the "Magic Bullet" shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Richard Bittikofer Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 Thanks, Cliff. There seem to be some powerful divergencies and incompatibilities contained within these photos - all of which relate to Z-161 and the Croft photo and the overall angle of the "Magic Bullet" shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Richard Bittikofer Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 Thanks, Cliff. There seem to be some powerful divergencies and incompatibilities contained within these photos - all of which relate to Z-161 and the Croft photo and the overall angle of the "Magic Bullet" shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Richard Bittikofer Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 Thanks, Cliff. There seem to be some powerful divergencies and incompatibilities contained within these photos - all of which relate to Z-161 and the Croft photo and the overall angle of the "Magic Bullet" shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Richard Bittikofer Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 Thanks, Cliff. There seem to be some powerful divergencies and incompatibilities contained within these photos - all of which relate to Z-161 and the Croft photo and the overall angle of the "Magic Bullet" shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Richard Bittikofer Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 Thanks, Cliff. There seem to be some powerful divergencies and incompatibilities contained within these photos - all of which relate to Z-161 and the Croft photo and the overall angle of the "Magic Bullet" shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Richard Bittikofer Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 Thanks, Cliff. There seem to be some powerful divergencies and incompatibilities contained within these photos - all of which relate to Z-161 and the Croft photo and the overall angle of the "Magic Bullet" shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 (edited) Thanks, Cliff. There seem to be some powerful divergencies and incompatibilities contained within these photos - all of which relate to Z-161 and the Croft photo and the overall angle of the "Magic Bullet" shot. Nice collection, JL! Let's start out with the photo on the upper left...That was J. Edgar Hoover giving that pushy little twerp Arlen Specter the Shaft Royale -- on the other side the back entrance wound was five inches below Specter's little pointer. The SBT is so absurd even Hoover couldn't buy it. I love the Dale Myers' animation. Guy won an Emmy for it. It shows what it would look like if three inches of JFK's jacket (and shirt) were bunched up entirely above the C7 "back-of-the-neck-wound". This is elementary school stuff, folks. Look at the Myers cartoon -- JFK's shirt collar is not visible. Look at Croft3 lower left corner -- JFK's shirt collar clearly visible. Ditto Willis4&5, Betzner3, and the Towner film. The Houston St. segment of the Nix film (as shown on Unsolved History) actually shows the jacket collar drop. Shirt collar not visible -- jacket up. Shirt collar visible -- jacket down. JFK on Elm St. -- jacket down. SBT dead. I'm thinking of doing a website called "See Jacket Drop -- how to explain the fact of JFK conspiracy to a 6 year old." But some how, such an exercise seems demeaning, some how, y'know? Edited December 9, 2006 by Cliff Varnell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 Thanks, Cliff. There seem to be some powerful divergencies and incompatibilities contained within these photos - all of which relate to Z-161 and the Croft photo and the overall angle of the "Magic Bullet" shot. Nice collection, JL! Let's start out with the photo on the upper left...That was J. Edgar Hoover giving that pushy little twerp Arlen Specter the Shaft Royale -- on the other side the back entrance wound was five inches below Specter's little pointer. The SBT is so absurd even Hoover couldn't buy it. I love the Dale Myers' animation. Guy won an Emmy for it. It shows what it would look like if three inches of JFK's jacket (and shirt) were bunched up entirely above the C7 "back-of-the-neck-wound". This is elementary school stuff, folks. Look at the Myers cartoon -- JFK's shirt collar is not visible. Look at Croft3 lower left corner -- JFK's shirt coller clearly visible. Ditto Willis4&5, Betzner3, and the Towner film. The Houston St. segment of the Nix film (as shown on Unsolved History) actually shows the jacket collar drop. Shirt collar not visible -- jacket up. Shirt collar visible -- jacket down. JFK on Elm St. -- jacket down. SBT dead. I'm thinking of doing a website called "See Jacket Drop -- how to explain the fact of JFK conspiracy to a 6 year old." But some how, such an exercise seems demeaning, some how, y'know? When I clicked on the images, I got a message THIS MENU HAS BEEN DISABLED. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Richard Bittikofer Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 Thanks, Cliff. There seem to be some powerful divergencies and incompatibilities contained within these photos - all of which relate to Z-161 and the Croft photo and the overall angle of the "Magic Bullet" shot. Nice collection, JL! Let's start out with the photo on the upper left...That was J. Edgar Hoover giving that pushy little twerp Arlen Specter the Shaft Royale -- on the other side the back entrance wound was five inches below Specter's little pointer. The SBT is so absurd even Hoover couldn't buy it. I love the Dale Myers' animation. Guy won an Emmy for it. It shows what it would look like if three inches of JFK's jacket (and shirt) were bunched up entirely above the C7 "back-of-the-neck-wound". This is elementary school stuff, folks. Look at the Myers cartoon -- JFK's shirt collar is not visible. Look at Croft3 lower left corner -- JFK's shirt coller clearly visible. Ditto Willis4&5, Betzner3, and the Towner film. The Houston St. segment of the Nix film (as shown on Unsolved History) actually shows the jacket collar drop. Shirt collar not visible -- jacket up. Shirt collar visible -- jacket down. JFK on Elm St. -- jacket down. SBT dead. I'm thinking of doing a website called "See Jacket Drop -- how to explain the fact of JFK conspiracy to a 6 year old." But some how, such an exercise seems demeaning, some how, y'know? When I clicked on the images, I got a message THIS MENU HAS BEEN DISABLED. Jack Hmm! Those "Spooks" at Langley are just doing their job Jack..Hmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Richard Bittikofer Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 (edited) Thanks, Cliff. There seem to be some powerful divergencies and incompatibilities contained within these photos - all of which relate to Z-161 and the Croft photo and the overall angle of the "Magic Bullet" shot. Nice collection, JL! Let's start out with the photo on the upper left...That was J. Edgar Hoover giving that pushy little twerp Arlen Specter the Shaft Royale -- on the other side the back entrance wound was five inches below Specter's little pointer. The SBT is so absurd even Hoover couldn't buy it. I love the Dale Myers' animation. Guy won an Emmy for it. It shows what it would look like if three inches of JFK's jacket (and shirt) were bunched up entirely above the C7 "back-of-the-neck-wound". This is elementary school stuff, folks. Look at the Myers cartoon -- JFK's shirt collar is not visible. Look at Croft3 lower left corner -- JFK's shirt coller clearly visible. Ditto Willis4&5, Betzner3, and the Towner film. The Houston St. segment of the Nix film (as shown on Unsolved History) actually shows the jacket collar drop. Shirt collar not visible -- jacket up. Shirt collar visible -- jacket down. JFK on Elm St. -- jacket down. SBT dead. I'm thinking of doing a website called "See Jacket Drop -- how to explain the fact of JFK conspiracy to a 6 year old." But some how, such an exercise seems demeaning, some how, y'know? When I clicked on the images, I got a message THIS MENU HAS BEEN DISABLED. Jack Hmm! Those "Spooks" at Langley are just doing their job Jack..Hmm Hold on >>>>>>>>I will tell them to unblock you. OK>>>Try it now Jack ! Edited December 9, 2006 by Richard Bittikofer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JL Allen Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 Jack, Last night, after posting the images - they would not display properly for me. They were displayed at 53% of their size and would not "click to enlarge". Today it seems to work properly. Your situation seems more severe. Steve Thomas had great advice to give about having no photo option below the empty text box when posting - reload the page and the option should appear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now