Chris Davidson Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 Someone has suggested I post better quality photos. Try this one. Oops! I think were missing someone. chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Miller Posted January 25, 2007 Share Posted January 25, 2007 Someone has suggested I post better quality photos.Try this one. Oops! I think were missing someone. chris Copy this one and save it ... it is far better than what you posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted January 29, 2007 Author Share Posted January 29, 2007 (edited) Maybe this time we can point out the body features. Let's see, 1.There's the white arm and shoulder at the camera holding position. 2.The white arm attaches to the TAN hand. 3.And the hand holds the camera up to the face. Who's filming in this one? For a sharper image, reduce your viewing size. chris Edited January 29, 2007 by Chris Davidson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted January 29, 2007 Author Share Posted January 29, 2007 Furnished by Jack White chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Miller Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 Furnished by Jack Whitechris Todays mystery: The assassination occurred on 11/22/63 ... what year was it that Jack started seeing a waltzing Sitzman and how many strokes did he have to get to that point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted January 29, 2007 Author Share Posted January 29, 2007 Furnished by Jack Whitechris Todays mystery: The assassination occurred on 11/22/63 ... what year was it that Jack started seeing a waltzing Sitzman and how many strokes did he have to get to that point? Bill, Perhaps this will refresh everyone's memory of what Sitzman was wearing that day. That lady on the wall isn't Sitzman. chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernice Moore Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 (edited) Furnished by Jack Whitechris Todays mystery: The assassination occurred on 11/22/63 ... what year was it that Jack started seeing a waltzing Sitzman and how many strokes did he have to get to that point? Bill, Perhaps this will refresh everyone's memory of what Sitzman was wearing that day. That lady on the wall isn't Sitzman. chris &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& It's even worse than that, the Lady has lost her purse, it was taken away from her somewhere along the film..now that is a disaster..........?????????? B Edited January 29, 2007 by Bernice Moore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kathleen Collins Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 Todays mystery: The assassination occurred on 11/22/63 ... what year was it that Jack started seeing a waltzing Sitzman and how many strokes did he have to get to that point? What do you mean by your post above? Are you being derogatory about Jack White? Kathy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Rigby Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 Todays mystery: The assassination occurred on 11/22/63 ... what year was it that Jack started seeing a waltzing Sitzman and how many strokes did he have to get to that point? The single most shameful and contemptible post I've yet seen on an assassination website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kathleen Collins Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 Todays mystery: The assassination occurred on 11/22/63 ... what year was it that Jack started seeing a waltzing Sitzman and how many strokes did he have to get to that point? The single most shameful and contemptible post I've yet seen on an assassination website. Thank you for telling me the guy was serious -- Bill Miller. It just came out of nowhere. A nasty swipe. I wasn't sure whether it was a joke. I don't think Jack White deserves that. I consider him a buddy, in a way. I have a link to some of his work on 9/11 on my blog. I hope he never had a stroke. My brother did and is handicapped. There is so much infighting in the Kennedy Research Community. Kathy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 Todays mystery: The assassination occurred on 11/22/63 ... what year was it that Jack started seeing a waltzing Sitzman and how many strokes did he have to get to that point? The single most shameful and contemptible post I've yet seen on an assassination website. Thanks, Paul. The moderators apparently enjoy such; they take no action when I complain. However, I will say this...it reflects badly on the writer, not me, so maybe it serves a useful purpose. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Miller Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 Todays mystery: The assassination occurred on 11/22/63 ... what year was it that Jack started seeing a waltzing Sitzman and how many strokes did he have to get to that point? The single most shameful and contemptible post I've yet seen on an assassination website. Paul, what it means is that Jack didn't look at the Bronson slide and start misreading it 30 to 40 years ago. All this started when he went on some sort of 'alteration witch hunt'. I also see that Chris is following suit. What kind of joker looks at Sitzman in deep shadow and says that she is now wearing a different colored dress than what she wore in the Zapruder film before the motorcades arrival? We are consistently seeing a few people who are asking things like why can't we see something in a poor image that we see in a good one ... well dah!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Miller Posted January 29, 2007 Share Posted January 29, 2007 (edited) &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&It's even worse than that, the Lady has lost her purse, it was taken away from her somewhere along the film..now that is a disaster..........?????????? B Bernice, I was kind enough to point out Sitzman's purse to you in each of the three photos below, so how about you being kind enough to post the larger image with the two white arrows on it - one pointing to Sitzman. And do it without cropping over her shoes! I would love to see those flats you said she wore. Bill Edited June 18, 2007 by Bill Miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted January 29, 2007 Author Share Posted January 29, 2007 Todays mystery: The assassination occurred on 11/22/63 ... what year was it that Jack started seeing a waltzing Sitzman and how many strokes did he have to get to that point? The single most shameful and contemptible post I've yet seen on an assassination website. Paul, what it means is that Jack didn't look at the Bronson slide and start misreading it 30 to 40 years ago. All this started when he went on some sort of 'alteration witch hunt'. I also see that Chris is following suit. What kind of joker looks at Sitzman in deep shadow and says that she is now wearing a different colored dress than what she wore in the Zapruder film before the motorcades arrival? We are consistently seeing a few people who are asking things like why can't we see something in a poor image that we see in a good one ... well dah!!! Yes, I sure do believe this cr--p has been altered. Please prove what colored dress she is wearing in your supplied Bronson photo. post2 I have asked over and over for Bill to post his quality stuff so there is no doubt about what we are seeing. I guess what he supplied in post2 is his quality stuff. chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael G. Smith Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 Todays mystery: The assassination occurred on 11/22/63 ... what year was it that Jack started seeing a waltzing Sitzman and how many strokes did he have to get to that point? The single most shameful and contemptible post I've yet seen on an assassination website. Paul, what it means is that Jack didn't look at the Bronson slide and start misreading it 30 to 40 years ago. All this started when he went on some sort of 'alteration witch hunt'. I also see that Chris is following suit. What kind of joker looks at Sitzman in deep shadow and says that she is now wearing a different colored dress than what she wore in the Zapruder film before the motorcades arrival? We are consistently seeing a few people who are asking things like why can't we see something in a poor image that we see in a good one ... well dah!!! Yes, I sure do believe this cr--p has been altered. Please prove what colored dress she is wearing in your supplied Bronson photo. post2 I have asked over and over for Bill to post his quality stuff so there is no doubt about what we are seeing. I guess what he supplied in post2 is his quality stuff. chris Remarks like that from Mr. Miller are common. [Jack-strokes] Dont even begin to argue anything with him. You are wasting your time. He has every volume of the WC report, and has taken panoramic views in Dealey Plaza. How can you argue with that? Just my opinon FWIW thanks-smitty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now