Glenn Nall Posted July 7, 2015 Share Posted July 7, 2015 (edited) Good God, it seems I need to clarify my Subject Line - I do NOT mean BETTER than this website. First of all, this is a FORUM (and, yes, a website) - not what's referred to as an informative, or "brochure" type website. And by BETTER, I mean BETTER than those really crappy ones that are all over the place and which have little to offer. If ANYONE thought I meant BETTER than this one, I didn't. it's like that list of books - those are some of the "better" books on the subject, as opposed to saying list of the "best", which most people are realistic enough not to write, and as opposed to the "lesser" books. I hope I haven't offended anyone. else. anyway, much like the lists of good JFK books many of you have recommended in the other thread, i wonder if I could impose upon some of you to list some of the more reliable websites that are available these days? there are so many obscurely named ones which do seem to be pretty good, and some websites that look good on the surface but offer only so much drivel and agenda (or implantation) once inside. and some which are just linked but moved or nonexistent... i.e. - how does one view Mary Ferrell's information...? I've heard some very polarizing opinions. thanks, whomever - Edited July 7, 2015 by Glenn Nall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Knight Posted July 7, 2015 Share Posted July 7, 2015 MFF access: http://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Main_Page.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenn Nall Posted July 7, 2015 Author Share Posted July 7, 2015 i should learn to write more clearly. by "how to view" i meant fro what viewpoint would one visit her site, if at all. I've heard controversial things about her and the website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Knight Posted July 7, 2015 Share Posted July 7, 2015 The documents are documents. Not sure what you're trying to say. Mary Ferrell herself is dead. Rex Bradford, who oversees the site, has an impeccable reputation. Now...about one more thing: Do you go to your car dealer and ask them to recommend a "better" dealership? Do you go to your physician and ask him/her to recommend a "better" doctor? Just wondering... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger DeLaria Posted July 7, 2015 Share Posted July 7, 2015 Here are some I visit occasionally. http://www.prouty.org/ http://ratical.org/ http://aarclibrary.org/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenn Nall Posted July 7, 2015 Author Share Posted July 7, 2015 you've misunderstood me - "the more reliable" as opposed to "the less reliable", which are many. NOT as opposed to this very website. I thought that was made clear when I compared the two types: "there are so many obscurely named ones which do seem to be pretty good, and some websites that look good on the surface but offer only so much drivel and agenda (or implantation) once inside." was that sentence that unclear? then I apologize. If i did not like this website, I would not continue to attempt to participate in this website. there are members here who are easily tactless enough to say many unprompted things in a rude manner - I am not one of them. some of "the more reliable", or some of "the better" usually means as opposed to "the lesser" or "the not so good". I'll try to speak more slowly in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenn Nall Posted July 7, 2015 Author Share Posted July 7, 2015 Here are some I visit occasionally. http://www.prouty.org/ http://ratical.org/ http://aarclibrary.org/ thank you, Roger. I'm glad you could understand my cryptology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Knight Posted July 7, 2015 Share Posted July 7, 2015 Edited the title, to better reflect what you meant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenn Nall Posted July 7, 2015 Author Share Posted July 7, 2015 The documents are documents. Not sure what you're trying to say. Mary Ferrell herself is dead. Rex Bradford, who oversees the site, has an impeccable reputation. Now...about one more thing: Do you go to your car dealer and ask them to recommend a "better" dealership? Do you go to your physician and ask him/her to recommend a "better" doctor? Just wondering... *** and for the record, Mark, the reason I asked was to that I can put together a LIST of good (for lack of a better word) websites' links on the CURRENT website I'm building. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Knight Posted July 7, 2015 Share Posted July 7, 2015 Gotcha... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Speer Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 (edited) FWIW, I created my website, patspeer.com, as a response to the many politically-driven websites. It is not a CT website, or a LN website. It is my website. Period. While I have chapters in which I criticize Earl Warren, Arlen Specter, Vincent Bugliosi, Dale Myers, and John McAdams, I also have chapters in which I criticize Harrison Livingstone, Robert Groden, David Mantik, Doug Horne, and Michael Kurtz. It started out as an exploration of the medical evidence. I then expanded it to include a discussion of the Warren Commission's investigation, and the eyewitness evidence, etc. I found in my study of the evidence that CTs are as likely to misrepresent the evidence as LNs. This is usually done through cherry-picking. As a result, my discussions are often far more thorough than what one will normally come across. Here's an example: after studying the evidence for a few years it became clear to me that the eyewitness evidence strongly suggested there were no shots fired to Z-190, and that the first shot struck Kennedy. I then reconstructed the FBI and then the WC's investigation, presenting these witnesses as they came forward, one by one, to demonstrate why this is so clear to me. To this date, no one has countered this by showing how these witnesses suggest the first shot missed. Here's another example: after reading Michael Kurtz's books and sitting by while others quote him extensively, I decided to compare his books and early articles, to see if he was credible. And found that he was not. The truth is out there, IMO, but it can't be uncovered as long as people cling to their tribal instincts, whereby everything one side says is true and everything the other side says is suspect. Edited July 8, 2015 by Pat Speer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenn Nall Posted July 8, 2015 Author Share Posted July 8, 2015 once again, Pat, I find myself agreeing with you and your approach to this thing. what you've said is dead right, that even the people with whom I agree tend to shoot themselves, and the rest of us, in the foot with shoddy work, gullibility and cherry picking that critics see through and then attack. I haven't spent much time on your site - i will do so. My aim is, as well, to present whatever I present with an emphasis on organization - for the laypersons - and as objectively as possible. Unlike many websites, I don't think quantity means a thing. It's the quality and understandability of the contents that matters. it's also highly beneficial for a website to include similar content for SEO purposes, and in keeping with a networking philosophy I will want to include links to - um, the "better" - websites. in a subject so enormous, I'm sure mine will find a more focused direction - at the moment I'm having a blast putting names to names to names, and letting the trail go where it will. thanks, man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Prudhomme Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 jfkfacts.org Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawn Meredith Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 CTKA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Burnham Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 AssassinationOfJFK.net main website Forum's Founding Members: Greg Burnham (Admin) David Mantik, MD, PhD Adele Edisen, PhD Phil Guiliano Charles Drago John Costella, PhD Stan Wilbourne Scott Myers Phil Dragoo [Forum is mainly for advanced research] ================ The Collected Works of Colonel L Fletcher Prouty (Len Osanic) ================ Topics on the National Security State of America (Dave Ratcliffe) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now