-
Content Count
2,244 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
About Greg Burnham
-
Rank
Super Member
Contact Methods
-
Website URL
http://assassinationofjfk.net
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
San Diego, CA
Recent Profile Visitors
35,984 profile views
-
Merit Based Immigration. Strong support for 2nd Amendment. Life Membership in the NRA. Extreme vetting for asylum seekers. Seeking peace with Cuba then, North Korea now. Planning to withdraw from Vietnam, promising to withdraw from "endless wars." Both campaigned on strengthening the military and both did just that. Both slashed CORPORATE as well as individual taxes dramatically. Similar policies, very different styles. The claim that there exists ZERO comparisons between the two is demonstrably false no matter how much you may hate Donald Trump.
-
David Middleton sent out an email referencing a Change.org petition in which he speaks of the late Colonel L. Fletcher Prouty's role --"Man X"-- played by Donald Sutherland in the movie, JFK. He erroneously says that Colonel Prouty was a STATE Department employee. Colonel L Fletcher Prouty was NOT an employee of the State Department! He was a full bird Colonel in the USAF, assigned to the Office of the Secretary of DEFENSE. He also worked for the Joint Chiefs of Staff as the Military Liaison Officer in support of Global Intelligence Operations. His title was "Chief of Special Oper
-
Fletcher Prouty Vid.: Best hour I have spent
Greg Burnham replied to Michael Clark's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Yes, he can. He even tendered his resignation to JFK following his failure. JFK did not accept it. Also see my "essay in progress": Fiasco -
Fletcher Prouty Vid.: Best hour I have spent
Greg Burnham replied to Michael Clark's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
I don't know what Jim is talking about here. I do not agree with Jim or Larry on this matter. Fletch was there. Greg Burnham Discusses The Bay of Pigs Fiasco with Len Osanic in 4 Parts -
John McAdams Loses...AGAIN!
Greg Burnham replied to Greg Burnham's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
FYI: This debate was at a time that preceded efficient web streaming. So this is the only portion that was able to be preserved as there were extremely long gaps in it due to buffering, etc. I wish I had the rest of it, but alas... -
I beat him in a debate and Marquette beat him in court! Judge backs Marquette University's suspension of professor John McAdams over blog post
-
LBJ's War: Vietnam 50 Years Ago
-
Here you go, Steve. I have no comment on the discussion, but I can offer to help with the image upload.
-
Craig Lamson's "Stemmons Sign" Thread
Greg Burnham replied to Greg Burnham's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Summarizing: Intentionally flawed or not, Lamson's example is not an adequate representation of the "leaning" Stemmons sign post. The "leaning" sign post cannot be explained by parallax. -
Lancer Archive Restoration
Greg Burnham replied to James R Gordon's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Using this logic, shouldn't you prevent non-members from reading the Education Forum's posts, as well, else you'll risk being hacked here, too? -
This is a MEDICAL EVIDENCE thread.
- 142 replies
-
- medical evidence
- Pat Speer
- (and 4 more)
-
Although I am admittedly biased, (since I participated in The Guilty Men episode in which I and some of my research were featured) I too believe that the series contributed a lot to help the public's understanding of the case. There were many more pluses than minuses. I found Nigel Turner to be not only gracious, but thorough. He displayed a considerable amount of courage in producing the series as a whole, but especially, The Guilty Men episode. Was it perfect? No. Did it achieve what we were hoping to accomplish over all? Yes. It got people exposed to a lot of evidence of which they would n