Dave Curbow

The pages that you want are 96-102-5 paperback edition. That is where the information you want resides. Boggs is also cited on pages 45,83, 86, 93,134, and 440 Page 99 is your focus

Forward, XV, Law's book.

Dear Mr. DiEugenio, thank you for trying; I appreciate it. I have a little anecdote from Duquesne that I will private message you. Thank you again, Dave

Mr.DiEugenio, please reconsider Mr. Payette's request and engage him in an exchange over the evidence. This opportunity to examine what both sides can bring to the table is why I have frequented forums for the past twenty plus years. An exchange between two sides of the debate from informed and intelligent points of view would be a gift to the interested community. Thank you! I am counting on you. Dave

No, the quote ends with the ellipsis, then moves on to the next paragraph about further suspicions that Boggs had. Again, no citation after the quote. I looked at the footnotes, the closest citation to the quote a couple three paragraphs away, and that cite referred to the WC transcript of Jan 27, cited in Whitewash IV. I read what Weisberg printed and didn't see any reference to Bogg's quote; it was just the verbatim transcript. Dave

Mr. Andrews has it word for word in his post. I would be happy to do it if you want me to type it again, but Mr. Andrew's quote is perfect. Dave

Mr. Jeffries is correct with page 96, paperback version. No citation as Mr. Andrews pointed out. Dave

Mr. DiEugenio, I have the book next to me. What do you want to know? The quote is not referenced; I posted above as close as it came. If I can assist, let me know what you want. Dave

Mr. Andrews, I agree with your assessment; however, it does have a ring of truth in what Bogg's other comments suggest. But without the sourcing, we are left with nothing. The closest footnote, which wasn't attributed to the quote is the January 27, 1964, meeting published by Weisberg in Whitewash IV, p. 53. I sense another dead end. Haven't had those sources out in a few years~grin. Dave

Repeat of what was just posted. Dave

I apologize to all for my knee-jerk and incorrect response. Dave

Yes.

Good to see you back, Bill. Solid analysis. Dave

What exactly do you disagree with and why? Dave