Gil Jesus

Gil Jesus demonstrates the impossibility of carrying a 38 inch paper bag with one end tucked into the armpit and the other cupped in the palm of the hand. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1l9Wom0PLk

Mr. Lifton: Thank You for that posting and thank you for BEST EVIDENCE. Your work helped open my eyes and convinced me that the autopsy photos did NOT represent the President's wounds as seen by witnesses. I am totally convinced that Kennedy's body did not ride back to Washington aboard AF-1 and that it went first to Walter Reed to have the bullets removed before it was helicoptered over to Bethesda. Again, thank you for your contribution to the search for truth and justice. Sncerely, Gil Jesus

Von Pinhead was hawking Bugliosi's book a year before it was published on various forums on the web. He is a subscriber of the official version and like Bugliosi, refers to and considers anyone who disagrees with him a "kook", often referring to them as "Mr. Kook". Not only is Von Pein in complete denial even when presented with evidence of a conspiracy, he has suffered the misfortune of being thrown off reputable forums like JFK Lancer. In newsgroup alt.conspiracy.jfk, one can see that a typical Von Pein post may include links to previous Von Pein posts. In other words, he posts opinion, then uses it as a factual reference in a later post. I've never seen anything so ridiculous: using oneself as a source. Of course, when you have nothing else, I suppose, you dock at any port in a storm. In Von Pein's world, there is no such thing as tampering with evidence. There is no such thing as altering affidavits. There is no such thing as evidence substitution. There is no such thing as staged police lineups. There is no such thing as coerced witnesses. In Von Pein's world, 80 % or more of the public, who believe that John Kennedy was killed as a result of a conspiracy, are simply "kooks". For Von Pein's sake, I hope Bugliosi doesn't stop short one day. I've been following the antics of the lone nut shills over at the alt.conspiracy.jfk site for several months now. Do Von Pein and those other people really think they are fooling anybody? Anyone who has to hurl insults, in lieu of actual fact based arguments, has already lost the debate. I haven't read Bugliosi's book, and don't intend to (no need to waste my time on a book arguing the thesis that the world is flat) but from what I have heard, he stoops to the same level of name calling that the lone nut internet forum brigade engages in as a regular routine. At this late date, with all the new revelations from the ARRB added on to what was previously known, anyone seriously arguing the Warren Commission line is either in a severe state of denial, or is a paid shill of the establishment. Pathetic. Brian: I, like you, have not bought nor read Bugliosi's "cinder block" book. And I also have no intention of doing so. I have the WC 26 volumes on CD-ROM and I've read Case Closed (then threw it in the trash), so for me, the-same-old-same-old is just a waste of time and money. The purpose of the childishness of the McAdams-sent trolls at a.c.j. is to distract the discussion away from evidence and testimony and away from exposure of the truth by using off-topic postings that have nothing to do with the JFK assassination but instead serve to sidetrack everyone. As you know, more often than not, the ones who hurl the first insults are those on the LN side. Many times, Cters (myself included) fall for their tactics and retaliate. But I'm learning not to fall into their trap. Trolls don't care about the case. They just care about being a-holes to whomever. Many don't like the Kennedys. Many more don't like people who believe in conspiracies. So this case draws quite a few "nut jobs" from all over the map. Some of whom wish to please their master, who has vowed to destroy a.c.j. http://www.prouty.org/mcadams I find it funny that those who ridicule conspiracies are, in fact, part of a conspiracy to destroy a newsgroup.

Von Pinhead was hawking Bugliosi's book a year before it was published on various forums on the web. He is a subscriber of the official version and like Bugliosi, refers to and considers anyone who disagrees with him a "kook", often referring to them as "Mr. Kook". Not only is Von Pein in complete denial even when presented with evidence of a conspiracy, he has suffered the misfortune of being thrown off reputable forums like JFK Lancer. In newsgroup alt.conspiracy.jfk, one can see that a typical Von Pein post may include links to previous Von Pein posts. In other words, he posts opinion, then uses it as a factual reference in a later post. I've never seen anything so ridiculous: using oneself as a source. Of course, when you have nothing else, I suppose, you dock at any port in a storm. In Von Pein's world, there is no such thing as tampering with evidence. There is no such thing as altering affidavits. There is no such thing as evidence substitution. There is no such thing as staged police lineups. There is no such thing as coerced witnesses. In Von Pein's world, 80 % or more of the public, who believe that John Kennedy was killed as a result of a conspiracy, are simply "kooks". For Von Pein's sake, I hope Bugliosi doesn't stop short one day.

Hi Mr. White: Frank and Mary Wright were the residents at 501 Tenth St. in 1963. Neither were interviewed by the FBI nor asked to testify before the Warren Commission. Mr Wright saw the last part of the scene that Acquila Clemons had described: "Mr. Wright, who had been inside the house, came out in time to see Officer Tippit roll over on the ground, probably the last movement of his life. Wright observed another man looking down on the fallen officer. Then the man circled around the police car and got into an OLD GREY CAR on the other side of it. He drove off rapidly." ( Garrison, On the Trail of the Assassins, pg. 229) One can view the video interview of Ms. Clemons by Mark Lane in 1966 here : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-OH06xqX2g

A student of the Assassination and history of the Kennedy years since 1966. Poster of Witness videos on Youtube. http://www.youtube.com/GJJdude

Dealey plaza witnesses confirm that the back of JFK's head blew off, evidence of a shot from the front. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVhZdryIs_A

Bill and Gayle Newman were standing at the curb on the north side of Elm St and were almost alongside the limo when the head shots rang out. They describe what they saw and heard. Because Mr. Newman told the FBI that he believed that the last shot came from the knoll, he was never called to testify before the Warren Commission. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vi3hKo7dwt0

Edward Jay Epstein investigated Oswald's military tour at the CIA air base at Atsugi, Japan and discusses what he found. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ITzTJEg1ME

Tom Wilson's research showed that the last shot to Kennedy's head hit him in the right front part of the skull and was travelling in an upward trajectory. It seems to verify eyewitness accounts of an entrance wound in the front of the skull and a large exit wound at the rear. But when applied to Zapruder frame 312 at the time of the headshot, what does Wilson's research and the eyewitness accounts reveal about the source of that shot ? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bXkRO-zypo

Mary Brengel says that Guy Banister's secretary, Delphine Roberts, told her that Lee Harvey Oswald "was in our office". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kvvIA5_Efw

Interview of assassination witnesses Jean Hill and Mary Moorman made on November 22, 1963. They describe what they saw. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xu99dGBPh6M

An interview of assassination witness Charles Brehm made on November 22, 1963. Mr. Brehm describes what he saw. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQobKz5XX9U

NBC's Robert McNeil reports on Kennedy's wounds from Parkland Hospital via phone connection. He tells collegue Frank reynolds that "the brain wound was in the back of the head slightly to the right". Reynolds reacts surprised when told that the other wound "was in the front of the neck just below the Adam's apple". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8P29j9PFZBM

WBAP newsman Tom Whelan reports that police found a "British 303" rifle in the TSBD. The amazing thing about this broadcast is that all of the minor details are noted with impeccable accuracy and yet the major detail, the type of rifle found, appears to have been in error. Or was it ? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HlCswKHMuE

It's time to give the owners of the other JFK channels on Youtube a plug in appreciation of their hard work: http://www.youtube.com/10garmonbozia01 http://www.youtube.com/noisivision http://www.youtube.com/dankbaar http://www.youtube.com/celshader http://www.youtube.com/TMWKK and, of course, my own: http://www.youtube.com/GJJdude

Cuban exile Carlos Bringuier says that Oswald came into his store TWICE and offered to help in the war against Castro. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHfYSCXRuJE

NBC newsman David Brinkley notes that the Dallas Police reported that "a foreign-made rifle believed to have been used in the shooting of the President HAD NO FINGERPRINTS ON IT and was being sent "here to the FBI laboratory in Washington for analysis". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEasB7IRZJs Now you can see and hear from the witnesses who were THERE in their OWN words, not what "the government" said they said : Over 160 video clips all FREE !!! http://www.youtube.com/GJJdude

After the Tippit murder, the Dallas Police put out an all-points bulletin for a '57 Ford. The vehicle was stopped by Fort Worth Police and its occcupant was taken into custody. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8-z68VgE0s

The morning of November 22, 1963: As the crowd inside the Hotel Texas await the President's entrance for the Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce breakfast, the TV reporter eerily reads from notes the circumstances surrounding the assassination of President William McKinley. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsI0lxmBkKk

The video, like many of my longer videos, is a compilation of several different sources. Most of it came from a video on the CIA produced by the BBC in association with the A&E channel and Time-Life video. I'm not sure if any of those have ties to Castro. I, for one, do not.

Dr. Robert Shaw, the doctor who operated on Governor Connally, says that CE 399 (the "magic bullet") did not create the wounds in Connally. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnawDAp_zKM

The foolishness of the Single Bullet Theory is explained by the Jim Garrison character (Kevin Costner) in a courtroom scene from the movie "JFK". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMsPq7gQCrk

CIA officials and operatives discuss the Agency's "Executive Action" program and its many assassination attempts against Fidel Castro. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Yvmqy5qEZQ

Harold Weisberg discusses the Katzenbach Memorandum of November 25, 1963 and its legal advise of how the case against Oswald had to be presented to the American people. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDuymlPdtyU