Gil Jesus

The final installment of Vince Palamara's Presentation at Slippery Rock University given on March 22, 2007. In this episode, Vince talks about the other threats to Kennedy's life in November 1963 in Chicago and Miami and discusses the Secret Service's response to those threats. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ge12EWmzayY

Gentlemen: I have a video interview where Connally says that the idea to come to Texas was Kennedy's and that in June 1963, Kennedy had not been to Texas since the 1960 election. That's not true. Kennedy gave a speech on the space program at Rice University in Houston on September 12, 1962. Either Connally erred in this fact or was lying, although I find it hard to believe that he would not have remembered that Kennedy had been in Texas at a time that he was running for Governor. As far as the crooked friends of Lyndon Johnson go, you can take what they say at face value or you can draw your own conclusions. If I remember correctly, it was Carter who took control of Connally's coat and had it cleaned before the WC ever saw it. That's destruction of evidence and obstruction of justice. They were going to impeach Nixon for the same crimes.

The fourth installment of Vince Palamara's Presentation at Slippery Rock University given on March 22, 2007. In this episode, Vince explains how President Kennedy's security was stripped away by the Secret Service. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSUZaDWj_FA

The third of five parts of Vince Palamara's Presentation at Slippery Rock University given on March 22, 2007. In Part 3, Vince shows us the animosity that the Secret Service agents felt towards JFK over his "womanizing" and use of illegal drugs. Its effect on the agents' morale is obvious. Also, Mike Wallace's "60 minutes" interview of agent Clint Hill, the man who jumped on the rear of the Kennedy limousine. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fS2F0Ej5sfw

The second of five parts of Vince Palamara's Presentation at Slippery Rock University given on March 22, 2007. In this part, Vince compares the positions of secret service agents in other motorcades to the Dallas motorcade thru videos and still pictures. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ej9Er4-pIgY

Video - Coverup: The Warren Commission A look at the Katzenbach Memo and Lyndon Johnson admits that the Warren Commission was a fraud, telling would-be Commission member Senator Richard Russell in a phone call, "all you're going to do is evaluate a Hoover report he's already made." In other words, "rubberstamp" Hoover's report. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tspWgqJApYA

Vince Palamara's Presentation at Slippery Rock University given on March 22, 2007. In Part 1, Vince "humanizes" John F. Kennedy by comparing his character to that of his 1960 rival for the Presidency, Richard Nixon. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPUkUgYvy8k

Jim, I've always believed that Walker was involved. And I mean DEEPLY involved. I'm wondering if you can tell me if he was connected with the training camp at Lake Ponchartrain outside New Orleans. I heard that he was. Thanks.

Much of the confusion about the head wounds comes from people taking the statements of one or two witnesses and repeating them out of context or as fact. First of all, my friend, I'm not confused as to the head wounds. I posted a link to the video of Dr. Crenshaw and what he said. I suggest you watch it and pay close attention to whathe said. He doesn't say anything that can be misinterpreted. Secondly, I personally don't believe anything Humes says in regards to the wounds. He was a xxxx. He was the author of the bogus Rydberg drawings that showed a bullet hole in the base of the neck, clearly shown to be wrong by the autopsy photos. There was no bullet hole in the back above the top of the shoulders. In addition, he burned the original autopsy notes. In my opinion, his credibility is at best questionable. It all boils down to who you want to believe, the Dallas doctors who had no agenda, or the military people who struggled with JFK time and time again beginning in 1961. P.S. F8 does show the entry wound in the front.

Myra: My opinion is that the brain was removed at Walter Reed and handed over to RFK. But before it was, any bullets or fragments of bullets that could have been removed were.

This film implies that the entrance described by Kilduff was a small entrance leading to a large exit on the back of the head, and is therefore deceptive. 1) There is no mention of a large exit by Kilduff. 2) There is no mention of a small entrance by ANY of the Parkland witnesses, who are supposedly so reliable. For these reasons, I concluded that the Parkland doctors were indeed mistaken as to the exact location of the large head wound. During his treatment, Kennedy's feet were elevated above his head. This placed the top of his head at the location normally occupied by the back of his head. When viewing upside down items, people receive visual information, and then rotate it in their minds before identifying the spacial relationships. We are really bad at this, and rotation errors are common. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gil Jesus: I would disagree with most of that comment. Just because Kilduff didn't mention an exit wound, doesn't mean that it didn't exist. It's entirely possible that he was repeating what Dr. Burkley told him and that Burkley simply never mentioned the exit wound. I find it hard to believe that medical experts could mistake the locations of the wounds because they couldn't tell the top of his head from the back. Then we have autopsy photo F8 which shows exactly where the large exit wound was. In addition, Dr. Charles Crenshaw DID see a wound of entry, he called it a "tangential" shot connected with the rear exit wound and he located it precisely where Kilduff had indicated. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpBDuSJeH14

Gary: I'm afraid that I'm bad at keeping a secret. I've tried to keep it to myself until I can PROVE it, but your investigative skills have "outed" me. Before anyone suggests I see a psychiatrist, let me explain why I suspect that one of the head shots may have come from Nellie Connally's jump seat. 1. The location of the wounds. Kilduff claimed that he got the entry wound in the front of the head from Admiral Burkley. In addition, the "frontal stare" autopsy photograph of Kennedy on his back shows a "black square" in exactly the spot where Kilduff indicated the entry wound was. This is not a photographic error, this is a deliberate obliteration of the entry wound to eliminate the evidence of a frontal entry. As far as the rear exit wound goes, one can argue that ALL of the medical experts were wrong about the location and nature of the wounds, however, the medical experts were not the only ones to see the exit wound in the back of the head. Witnesses at the scene of the shooting saw the back of the President's head fly off. Autopsy photograph F8 definitely shows, without doubt, the entrance wound where Kilduff said it was and the large gaping wound in the rear. 2. Zapruder frame 312. Once I was satisfied that the existance of the wounds had been established, my next step was to go to the Zapruder film and look at the position of Kennedy at the time of the head shot and to try to lineup the wounds as described. I was stunned when I added a bullet trajectory to the wound locations: It seemed to me that the origin of the shot was from Nellie Connally's jump seat. But, according to the Zapruder film, Governor Connally wasn't even looking at the President when the head shot rang out. Then I was reading in one of Jim Fetzer's books where he said that at Z-314, Connally was thrown into the back of the front seat and that he believed that it was at that time that Connally received his back wound. But Connally's position at Z-314 did not support the trajectory, he was already leaning back on Nellie's lap. So I wondered if Connally's slamming into the back of the front seat wasn't a reverse movement. That is the reverse of what really happened. What if Connally WAS looking at Kennedy when the head shot rang out. So I took Zapruder frames 308-316, when Connally appears to be moving towards the front seat and reversed Connally's position 180 degrees, and quite frankly, the results were startling. Kennedy's head moves forward at Z-313, Connally lunges at Kennedy in Z-314, then Kennedy's head moves violently backwards at Z-315. Of course (conveniently) you cannot see Connally much below his shoulders from Z-270 to about Z-335, but the sequence is staggering. Which is why I was asking about him carrying a gun. There were also witnesses who claimed that a gun was fired in the car. Mary Moorman thought she saw Greer shoot back. Jean Hill tried to tell Arlen Specter about a gun being fired in the car. Austin Miller told Specter the shots came from "right there in the car". Hugh Betzner claimed to see a gun in the hand of a Secret Service agent and heard a sound "like firecrackers going off in the car." Royce Skelton thought that the shots had come from "around the President's car". Witnesses at the scene of the shooting claimed that they smelled gunpowder at street level. Connally's coat was taken and locked away by LBJ aide Cliff Carter until it could be cleaned. Was this to remove any gunpowder residue from it ? Jack Ruby felt unsafe speaking in Dallas. Then there is the matter of Connally's insistance and role in the selection of the luncheon site, which directly affected the motorcade route. Connally was not an honorable man. As Johnson's campaign manager, he was involved on the notorious BOX 13 scandal of 1948, the election fraud that got LBJ elected to the Senate. And he was no friend of JFK, responsible for attacks on Kennedy during the Democratic primaries. In addition, there are connections between Connally, Oswald, Ruby, Walker and HL Hunt. Consider this: In the three previouis Presidential assassinations, McKinley, Garfield and Lincoln, all three Presidents were murdered from a distance of three feet or less. All three were killed by handguns. All three victims were either stopped or walking at a normal pace. No attempt on the life of a President from a distance of more than three feet has ever been successful. I'm convinced that the entry wound of the front of the head was fired point-blank, much as the rear entry wound was to Robert Kennedy. Whether it was John Connally or his wife, I'm leaning towards that shot coming from the jump seat of Nellie Connally.

I would describe that as "where".

I've read that it was "common knowledge" that Governor Connally carried a pistol. Anyone know if this was true ?

Gil These are great little videos. I am wondering though if they are receiving a wider audience than here at the forum? This stuff needs to be all over the net so that this generation knows the truth. Dawn Dawn, have no fear. These videos have reached about 90,000 people since I started posting them 78 days ago. Lately, they've been averaging a little better than 1,000 views per day. And although not everyone who views them will agree with their position, we are reaching the world a little at a time and getting the message out. The feedback as been mostly positive and appreciative, but there are those who for whatever reason feel that they need to respond to these videos (especially the "coughing videos" ) with vicious attacks and verbal threats on me personally, while others resort to childish name-calling. For that reason, I've been forced to disable the comments section of those videos. But in spite of all of this, it's been worth it. If people are getting that upset, I must be on the right track. Let me end this response by saying that I believe that I now know the source of one of the head shots, but that I have no proof and until I do, I'll keep it to myself. It really is so unbelieveable, that I'm wondering if I should reveal it even if I can prove it. But until that day comes, I'll keep pointing myself in that direction. Towards the truth. Sincerely, Gil Jesus.

I have a hard time relying on photographic evidence. He was here, he was there. Were there dates and times on those photographs taken of these men ? I doubt it. Those pictures could have been taken on any date and at any time. As far as I'm concerned, they don't prove a thing. The witnesses who claimed they saw them could be as mistaken as Madeline Brown or the witnesses who put them at the Murchison Party. The Dallas press ? I don't count them as being credible. They hated JFK. I don't find it strange that people who were allegedly at the party would deny that there was a party. Even today, people in Texas are afraid to talk about Lyndon Johnson. If you were at a party where all of these national figures were, and then the next day, the President of the United States were murdered and subsequently witnesses started dying one after another, would you talk ? And then there is the question of why multiple witnesses would lie about such a meeting. Did they conspire to throw us interested parties off ? It's hard to swallow for me. It's not beyond the realm of possibility that the party could have run into the early hours of the morning. Ms. Brown said that Johnson "made an appearance", which means that he wasn't there very long. Then the party broke up once he left. It sounds like it was a private party and not a social event. It probably wasn't publicized at all.

Eyewitnesses describe the REAL JFK head wounds as an entry wound in the right front of the skull at the hairline, and a large gaping hole at the rear of the skull, both wounds evidence of a shot from the front. Also, the issue of autopsy photo forgery is discussed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksPOObPve3M

On the evening before the assassination, Clint Murchison, the Dallas oil millionaire, threw a big party. In attendance were HL Hunt, Richard Nixon, and J Edgar Hoover. At the end of the party, a private meeting is held and Lyndon Johnson is told that he will become President the following day. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awGbwIIIYug

Conclusion. The unidentified fingerprint found on the sixth floor of the TSBD is compared to the fingerprints of Johnson henchman Malcolm Wallace. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAKhkKSwHJM For anyone who missed the first two parts: Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fATmzROAs5E Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ObQ1NWvbO0

Gentlemen, consider this possibility. That Mac Wallace wasn't necessarily the shooter, but was LBJ's man-on-the-spot who was present on the sixth floor to insure that nothing went wrong in the plan.

A look at Lyndon Johnson's role in the 1961 murder of USDA investigator Henry Marshall. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ObQ1NWvbO0

Ron, check out this description of one of three men seen in a window of the TSBD shortly before the shooting: Heavyset man w/hat, horn-rimmed glasses & tan sportcoat. After the assassination, he was seen getting into a Rambler driven by a dark-skinned male. Mac Wallace wore glasses. Workers pecking on window of the TSBD pointed to a young man with horn-rimmed glasses, a plaid coat and a raincoat. Dallas Police detained this man (whom I believe was Larry Florer) and took him to the Sheriff's Office for questioning.

Examines the Lyndon-Johnson-was-behind-the-assassination theory. ( 1st of 3 parts) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fATmzROAs5E

Paul I would agree that the film was out of the public's eye for 12 years before Groden showed it on Geraldo. I would also agree that in that time, there was ample opportunity to alter the film to support the government's position. When the shots rang out on Elm St, Johnson escaped prison. The CIA was safe. Hoover was eventually made Director of the FBI for life. Military contractors made millions on the Vietnam War. Anti-trust indictments dropped. So did criminal indictments of organized crime figures. No more whoring on the road or in the White House. The SS morale went up. Everything went back to "normal". And the government stopped being "for the people".