Michael Crane
-
Posts
1,312 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Michael Crane
-
-
Relax Roger,
It's SOP to send films to the most secret facility known to man when you need to add a little brightness.
-
I must say that thanks to this thread,I have once again gained some knowledge.
I myself am curious of the copies that the CIA & the Secret Service have not given back.
They could have made 20 copies & practiced tampering what ever way they chose to.
-
18 hours ago, Jeremy Bojczuk said:
The question I asked, and which still hasn't been satisfactorily answered, is: what good reason would the masterminds have for not destroying a piece of evidence which (according to Sandy and Roger) they controlled and which seriously undermined the story they wanted the public to believe?
Because it was common knowledge that 3 copies were made.
Life Magazine) Hey,we lost the original during a move.
Congressional Oversight) Ok,how about them 3 copies?
-
-
Ok,
I say one low shot from the rear that caused the cerebellum to rupture.
I also say one shot from the right front high in JFK's hairline/forehead.
And one more possible slightly above the right ear which I'm highly still debating within myself.
-
The film is gone so there can be no comparison.
Someone made it "unavailable" just like JFK's brain.
What we have left is a substitution.At the very best we have one of the 3 copies made that day that has been tampered with.
Didn't Zapruder say that he captured the left turn onto Elm?
*Somehow,I remember there being numbered copies of the film.
Doesn't the original have number 183 or 184 somewhere,somehow on it?
-
Hello Pat,
I'm kind of going off of what James Jenkins said about a possible wound right above the right ear that Burkley said to stay away from.Those damn X-rays appear to show a hole the size of a tennis ball.
How in the world do these kind of wounds not bleed so that they can be discovered? The hair is so bloody that it covers it up?
-
1 hour ago, Jeremy Bojczuk said:
Notice the lack of evidence Michael produces to justify his assertion.
No need to justify at this time.If you disagree you can easily just keep scrolling.Common sense tells you that it's gone.
Damn man,almost $50.00 for this puppy dog.
-
4 hours ago, Ron Bulman said:
Nope it did not. One in the hairline over the right eye, one in the right temple slightly in front of the top of the ear. Simultaneously. Another a split second before in the lower edge of the back of the head blow out. Per Dr's Mantick and Chesser along with Doug Horne of the ARRB.
Hello Ron,
It would not suprise me if down the line it is discovered that there were 3 head shots.
-
That's bizarre IMO.
But so is the condition of JFK's head after all is said & done.
1 bullet did not create all of that damage.
-
I myself say,that there is no such thing as a Zapruder in camera original.It no longer exists.
That thing is burned or at the bottom of an ocean or landfill.
*Maybe it's next to JFK's brain? 😉
-
All that I got to say is that the 49ers will be in salary cap hell come time when Purdy is a free agent.
I'm pretty sure that he is still making the league minimum on his rookie contract of $900,000 to about 50 million a year.
If the 49ers would have won the Superbowl,I can see Brock bringing in $60,000,000 a year.
Edited to post this.
- 2022: $705,000
- 2023: $870,000
- 2024: $985,000
- 2025: $1.1 million
- 2026: Unrestricted free agent
-
10 hours ago, Denise Hazelwood said:
The first interview of Custer (and thank you, Vince Palamara, for posting them) demonstrates the issues I have with how witness interviews are conducted. Instead of asking the witness what they saw, the interviewer (Tom Wilson) "tells" the witness what happened, based on the interviewee's observations of the extant Zapruder Film. There is evidence that the Z-film was altered, which the interviewer seems unaware of. In any case, in this interview, the interviewer tells the witness what his conclusions were rather than listening to the witness. That type of thing is extremely annoying. It's called "leading the witness."
The second interview is better, but I believe by this time Custer had been influenced by, say, the Zapruder Film and his interview with Tom Wilson (Custer: "It's in the Zapruder Film.") He orients the X-ray by the sella turcica, not by memory, which I contend was added to the image later (it's not visible in the original image, but only in the "computer enhanced" image, which I contend is a composite made with the "living" X-ray, with the sella turcica and other "landmarks" aligning perfectly with the "living" X-ray but not with he un-enhanced original. Note the discord between where he indicates the front of the head to be in the "computer-enhanced" X-ray (which shows a blow-out in the front of the head) and his repeated statementss that the skull, etc., was "blown out, in back." (Eventually, he tells Vanity Fair that "These are fake X-rays.") But then, the interviewer jumps in with, "If you look at the Z-film, you'll see..." Aaaagggghh! But basically, it's a much better interview than the first one.
A transcript of Custer's ARRB deposition can be found at https://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/arrb/medical_testimony/pdf/Custer_10-28-97.pdf .
Regarding the "suit" recollection--he does mention that once, apparently in passing. JFK was wrapped in sheets, of course. It may have been a simple mis-speak, saying "suit" when he meant "sheet"? This is where the ARRB interviewers should have followed up, but didn't. "What did the suit look like? Was he wearing a shirt? Tie? Jacket? Trousers?" That sort of thing. Which might have triggered a correction on the part of the witness, without leading him.
What is most interesting about Custer's deposition is the recollection of a "king-size" fragment falling out of the back when the body was lifted for X-rays. This makes sense, as the nose and tail fragments found in the car don't make up even 1/2 of a Carcanno bullet. It is farther corroborated by December, 1963/January, 1964 news accounts from a leaked FBI report, which described a "bullet" being recovered from the President's shoulder during the autopsy.
Also of interest is the discussion of missing neck X-rays that showed metallic fragments in the C3/C4 region, which would assume a downward trajectory from the back of the head. Mortician Thomas Robinson was "adamant" that he had seen a probe from the back of the head come out at the throat wound. My conclusion, given those statements, is that the throat wound was caused by the exit of a fragment that created a hole small enough to be mistaken as an entrance by the Parkland doctors. I believe the fragment was traveling on this trajectory after an internal ricochet off the back of the head.
Hello Denise,
The deposition is quite long and requires alot of reading.I just kicked back and listened to it on Youtube.
-
10 hours ago, Tony Krome said:
David Osborne, later Admiral. Stated President was fully dressed and wearing a coat.
Yes,to me that's off your rocker or you were simply not there and lying.
-
20 hours ago, Tony Krome said:
Was the Chief of Surgery at Bethesda off his rocker too?
You gotta name.Or are you talking about Humes?
-
On 2/10/2024 at 11:44 AM, Vince Palamara said:
I interviewed Jerrol Custer twice in person: on 11/22/1991 with Harry Livingstone and Tom Wilson (the interview results are in HIGH TREASON 2 and KILLING THE TRUTH), as well as over two days in March 1998 with author and friend William Matson Law (for his fantastic book IN THE EYE OF HISTORY---I am mentioned several times in the Custer chapter). Here are 3 videos (the 11/22/1991 video is merely an excerpt- Tom Wilson freaked out when he saw I was videotaping and demanded a stop to it):
The definite impression I received was that Jerrol was heavily influenced by Tom Wilson and was starting to change his story because of it (both men lived in Pittsburgh, as do I, but they lived in the very same suburb close by. Ironically, both men would pass away within a very short time of each other in July 2000). As we all know, from roughly the time of the HSCA until the early 1990's, Jerrol was firm on the matter of the back of JFK's head being gone and the x-rays and photos being faked in some way.
By the time of his ARRB interview and his association with Wilson (just beginning in late 1991/early 1992), Jerrol started to change both the position of the head wound and to dramatize his story a tad. It is a sad story of a principal witness changing his story for money and acclaim (NOT from us- he received not a penny, BUT he did receive money from both JFK Lancer and Tom Wilson, not to mention the excitement he had over TWO of his own books he was going to release [they never saw the light of day] and his association with Wilson, who made a splash at the A.S.K. Conference in late November 1991 and on THE MEN WHO KILLED KENNEDY).
Thanks Vince.
It's always nice to see a video that you have not seen yet.
Especially for me on the medical evidence.
-
6 hours ago, Chris Bristow said:
I would think a person could easily make a mistake like remembering JFK wearing a suit
But Chris,Custer says that he remembers the event too well.And since he said that he helped lift JFK out of the casket and onto the autopsy table,that's a glaring red flag.
-
To me,this is like Ebersole saying that the throat wound was sutured.
-
6 hours ago, Ron Bulman said:
Michael, have you read William Matson Law's chapter on Custer in In The Eye of History? A neglected stunning and historical book.
Unfortunately, the chapter ends with his sad demise and the downfall of his family, and this. Pgs. 278-80.
Jerrol Custer was an enigma. . . . I found the man to be more than a bit of a curmudgeon. . . . The first time we spoke, he said, "See all these people take advantage of me. They write books, making millions, while I'm busting my ass for pennies." (working as a security guard, lost his position as a supervisory X-ray technician due to down-sizing.)
"The kindest possible light I can shed on the dubious parts of Jerrol Custer's account is that he hoped to use the interview to promote the book he was working on."
That's one book that I have not gotten ahold of yet.So,the answer would be no.
-
It's upsetting that the public doesn't view these documentaries and demand another investigation like the ARRB.
-
I really liked what he had to say during his interview/deposition.
He really laid the smackdown on Ebersole & Burkley.
-
5 hours ago, Joe Bauer said:
Yes, off his rocker.
You know,that Jerrol had to keep a FBI agent out of the dark room and made a set of x-rays for himself?
Later,he decided to destroy them himself.
-
Jerrol also said that he couldn't remember the color of the plastic bag.
-
I was listening to his ARRB testimony and he says that when they took JFK out of the body bag,that he was wearing a plastic bag over his head & more important,he said that JFK was wearing a suit.JFK was not wearing a suit.
This makes me think that he didn't see JFK in the body bag at all.
*At the beginning he says that he remembers the autopsy "Too well" (not those exact words)
Thoughts?
Roscoe White
in JFK Assassination Debate
Posted · Edited by Michael Crane
Roscoe got his job in some type of photography capacity.
There was also a Secret Secret agent that did some tackling on a black gentleman back there behind the Grassy Knoll.