Douglas Caddy

Like Trump, JFK faced riots. Here’s what he did to stop the violence in Birmingham in 1963. https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2020/05/30/john-kennedy-mlk-birmingham-riots-trump/?itid=hp_hp-more-top-stories_retropolis-jfk-riots-1125am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans

Wall Street Journal May 14, 2013 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324715704578482823301630836.html Excerpt James Bovard: A Brief History of IRS Political Targeting : President John F. Kennedy raised the political exploitation of the IRS to an art form. Shortly after capturing the presidency, JFK denounced "the discordant voices of extremism" and derided people who distrust their leaders—President Obama didn't invent that particular rhetorical line. Shortly thereafter, JFK signaled at a news conference that he expected the IRS to be vigilant in policing the tax-exempt status of questionable (read: conservative) organizations. Within a few days of Kennedy's remarks, the IRS launched the Ideological Organizations Audit Project. It targeted right-leaning groups, including the Christian Anti-Communist Crusade, the American Enterprise Institute and the Foundation for Economic Education. Kennedy also used the IRS to strong-arm companies into complying with "voluntary" price controls. Steel executives who defied the administration were singled out for audits. A 1976 report by the Senate Select Committee on Government Intelligence on the Kennedy program noted: "By directing tax audits at individuals and groups solely because of their political beliefs, the Ideological Organizations Audit Project established a precedent for a far more elaborate program of targeting 'dissidents.'" After Richard Nixon took office, his administration quickly created a Special Services Staff to mastermind what a memo called "all IRS activities involving ideological, militant, subversive, radical, and similar type organizations." More than 10,000 individuals and groups were targeted because of their political activism or slant between 1969 and 1973, including Nobel Laureate Linus Pauling (a left-wing critic of the Vietnam War) and the far-right John Birch Society.

Five Star UK Admiral & Chief of Defense Blows Whistle on UFOs There is a serious possibility that we are being visited and have been visited for many years by people from outer space, from other civilizations….This should be the subject of rigorous scientific investigation and not the subject of ‘rubishing’ by tabloid newspapers. – Lord Admiral Hill-Norton, Former Chief of Defence Staff, 5 Star Admiral of the Royal Navy, Chairman of the NATO Military Committee. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0W23MoBUEM

My family never had any connection of any type with Standard Oil. I do not know where you came up with this.

There was another time my life was threatened. Here is Robert Merritt's sworn affidavit that he executed in 2009: AFFADAVIT 1972 CONSPIRACY TO ASSASSINATE DOUGLAS CADDY, Original Attorney for the Watergate Seven I, Robert Merritt, attest to the following facts regarding my involvement with the Watergate attorney Douglas Caddy, who represented the burglars known as the Watergate Seven. On Saturday, June 17, 1972, five burglars broke into the Democratic National Committee offices in Watergate and were arrested at 2:30 A. M. by Washington, D.C. Police Officer Carl Shoffler. At the time the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Police Department employed me as a Confidential Informant and assigned me to work directly with Officer Shoffler. Two weeks before the arrests at Watergate I provided information to Shoffler about the planned break-in of the DNC that I had obtained as a Confidential Informant from a highly unusual source. By using this advance information, Shoffler developed a successful triangulation strategy that in effect set the burglars up in a form of entrapment. The Watergate scandal thus began and ultimately forced the resignation of President Nixon. Shoffler came to my apartment in Washington, D.C. late in the morning of the day of the events at Watergate and exulted in having made the arrests. He told me that he had secretly telephoned the Washington Post soon after the arrests to tip the newspaper off to what had occurred. He then demanded his special birthday present from me, which I was only too happy to perform. (First meeting) Three days later, on June 20, 1972, Shoffler showed up at my apartment with his supervisor, Police Sgt. Paul Leeper. They asked me if I knew someone by the name of Douglas Caddy, who lived at the Georgetown House, a high-rise apartment, at 2121 P St., N. W., which was directly across the street from my apartment. They told me Douglas Caddy was an attorney who was representing the Watergate burglars and that Douglas Caddy was a communist and pro-Cuban and was a leader of the Young Americans for Freedom. They wanted me to establish a sexual relationship with Douglas Caddy to find out how Douglas Caddy knew to show up for the arraignment of the burglars after their arrest. They asserted that Douglas Caddy had to be in on the conspiracy with the burglars and that in the past he had been shadowed when he frequented a leather-Levi gay bar in Greenwich Village in Manhattan. Shoffler and Leeper related that Douglas Caddy had been working as a White House attorney in a sensitive position. They claimed that I was butch enough to entice Douglas Caddy, a masculine gay guy, into a sexual affair to obtain the information they wanted. They told me that this was the most important thing that I could do for my country and that I would be well-paid if I undertook the assignment. Their initial offer was $10,000. I asked Shoffler about who it was that so desperately wanted this information from Douglas Caddy and he said that it was from very high up sources in the Department of Justice and the U. S. Attorney’s office. I did not commit to doing the assignment. Two days later, on June 22, 1972, which was my birthday, Shoffler came to my apartment to give me my birthday present. He spent the entire day with me. Afterwards, when we were relaxing in bed, he gently tried to persuade me to cooperate with him and Leeper regarding the Douglas Caddy assignment. I emphatically told him “No.” I didn’t know Douglas Caddy and I didn’t know how to get to know him and I was bothered that undertaking the assignment could lead to the destruction of another gay person who apparently was still in the closet and merely attempting to represent his clients. We talked about the break-in and Shoffler told me straight out that the burglars were hired indirectly by one of the 100 families of America, which Shoffler named as the Kennedy Family. Shoffler said, “The intention of the Watergate break-in was to destroy the Nixon presidency. President Nixon was guilty of nothing in its planning.” Shoffler said that there were hidden motivations involved, such as the fear of law enforcement agencies that their turf would be reduced by President Nixon through a scheme known as the Houston Plan, the CIA’s concern that President Nixon planned to reorganize the intelligence agencies and their operations, and the Defense Department’s opposition to President Nixon’s new China policy. I asked Shoffler if he was angry at me for refusing to take the Caddy assignment and he smiled at me and said he was glad that I didn’t. (Third meeting) In the March 1973, nine months after the initial overture and a month after the first Watergate trial ended, I met with Shoffler and Leeper, FBI agents Terry O’Connor and Bill Tucker and their FBI Agent-In-Charge, whose name escapes me. Leeper did most of the talking. He again tried to persuade me to take on the Douglas Caddy assignment, making an initial offer of $25,000. I refused outright. The group then said that I could be paid as much as $100,000 if I took the assignment but I still refused without providing any explanation. Once it was understood that I would not accept the offer, Leeper declared that the least I could do was to spread the rumor around Washington, D. C. that Douglas Caddy was gay in an effort to force him to come out of the closet. Their intention was to defame Douglas Caddy. This was the last attempt to persuade me to take the Douglas Caddy assignment. The group departed angrily, with the exception Shoffler, who secretly winked at me as he went out the door. DISCLOSURE OF SECOND MEETING On June 17, 2009, 37 years after Watergate, I notified Douglas Caddy, now an attorney in Houston, Texas, of a well kept secret and informed him of a new Watergate revelation. (Previously I had disclosed to Douglas Caddy that there had been two meetings regarding the Caddy assignment as discussed above.) I then informed Douglas Caddy that there had been a second meeting about the Caddy assignment. It took place on June 28, 1972, with Shoffler and four others agents who were never introduced to me. I am quite certain that these agents were from either Military Intelligence or the CIA. I know that they were not FBI agents from their manner and the special type of assignment they asked me to do regarding Douglas Caddy. Shoffler and these agents met with me in my apartment at 2122 P Street, N.W. Douglas Caddy did in fact live across the street from me in the Georgetown House at 2121 P St., N.W. One of the agents, whom I will never forget, had two plastic bags, one containing two small blue pills and another that had a laboratory test tube with a small gelatin substance that was approximately ¼ inch in diameter. He referred to it as a suppository. The assignment was to become intimately acquainted with Douglas Caddy as quickly as possible. The exact description of the assignment was to engage in oral sex with Douglas Caddy and in doing so I was suppose to fondle his balls and ass, and at the same time insert the small gelatin like suppository into his rectum, which would have caused death within minutes. If there were any delay in the lethal process that would prevent me from leaving fast from his presence, then I was to take the small blue pills, which would have caused me nausea, providing me with an excuse to leave for home immediately. The agents told me that Douglas Caddy had to be eliminated without fail. My first reaction was that they were “nuts.” But then Shoffler pulled me aside and whispered that this was a very real and serious situation and the decision was entirely up to me. The agents were planning a pre-arrange way for me to meet Douglas Caddy, which they did not disclose at the time. I asked the agents what the reason was that they wanted for me to go to this length and why they and the government were taking such a risk. I was told that this matter involved a high national security situation that they were not at liberty to disclose. The agents stated that their orders did not allow them to know the answers and that they were only following orders from their superiors who sometimes did not know the answers either and merely implemented instructions from those above. However, from the agents’ comments I inferred that because Douglas Caddy was gay, that was reason enough. The agents informed me that I would be well taken care of for this assignment. They also said that I would never have to worry about anything for the rest of my life. I was totally repulsed by the entire assignment and proposition. After I emphatically refused, the agents swore me to secrecy and left. Only in July of 1986 when I was subpoenaed by Shoffler to testify before the grand jury in the Lenny Bias case in Upper Marlboro, Maryland did he ever discuss this subject again. At that time he said, “Butch, I am glad that you did not go through with that Douglas Caddy assignment because I found out that those two little blue pills would have caused your instant death.” I regret that I never disclosed these facts until now. I suppressed this information out of fear for my life. Some of the background information in this affidavit about my relationship with Shoffler as a Confidential Informant was disclosed by Jim Hougan in his 1984 best-selling book, Secret Agenda: Watergate, Deep Throat and the CIA (see pages 320-323). Some was also disclosed in the Watergate Special Prosecution Force Memorandums of its two interviews of me and one of Officer Carl Shoffler in 1973. This sworn statement is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God. I, Robert Merritt, swear in this affidavit that the facts are true to the best of my knowledge under the penalty of perjury. Robert Merritt Subscribed and sworn to before me on the 28th of July, 2009, to certify which witness my hand and seal of office. Notary Public in and for the State of New York Ricardo S. Castro Notary Public, State of New York No. 01CA5041272 Qualified in Bronx County Comm. Exp. 08/29/09 7/29/09

No, I know nothing about his living in Houston in the 30's. I was born in 1938.

I ran across this article in my files and thought in may be of interest to readers of this topic because it dealt with one of the several times my life was threatened: Houston Chronicle January 18, 1987 In harm's way, again What do Watergate, CIA and Moody probe have in common? Caddy By Dianna Hunt Staff HE HAD RECEIVED bomb threats, been followed, had his phones tapped and the windows of his office shot out in the night. Yet Douglas Caddy still feared he might just be paranoid. "We used to joke about it," says Caddy, a Houston author and attorney. "Do you think somebody's trying to give us a message?" His fears, apparently, were not unfounded. In a sworn statement submitted to a Houston private investigator and the FBI, a former military explosives expert says Caddy was the target of an alleged bomb plot hatched by Galveston millionaire Shearn Moody Jr. Moody, says the expert, tried to hire him to "blow (Caddy's) legs off" because Caddy prompted investigations into impropriety within the multimillion-dollar Moody Foundation. For Caddy, the front-row seat in a money-and-power scandal is an all-too-familiar occurrence. As a defense attorney and witness in the Watergate scandal, a friend and former roommate to South Korean lobbyist Tongsun Park, and a one-time publicist in a CIA front company, Caddy turns up in the strangest places. "I don't know why," he concedes. "I just do." He flatly denies ever working for the Central Intelligence Agency. "I get tarred with it, but I never have worked for the CIA," Caddy says. Caddy, 48, emerged as a central figure in the latest scandal after approaching Moody Foundation officials in 1985 with information about the possible mishandling of millions of dollars in foundation grants. His complaints prompted an internal Moody Foundation probe, which ultimately led to the hiring of Houston private investigator Clyde Wilson to look into the matter. The state attorney general's office and federal officials likewise are investigating. Five people - including Moody and his administrative aide Norman Revie - already have been indicted by a Houston federal grand jury. Caddy's life the last three decades has been scattered with similar brushes with important people and events. A graduate of Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service and New York University Law School, Caddy became involved in the Watergate scandal just half an hour after the arrest of five burglars in the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee at the Watergate Hotel - when he received a 3 a.m. call from former CIA operative E. Howard Hunt. Caddy served as defense lawyer to both Hunt and another Watergate conspirator, G. Gordon Liddy, and later testified about his refusal to accept $25,000 in "hush money." His involvement in Watergate stemmed from his friendship with Hunt, with whom he shared office space in the Washington-based Mullen Company - a public relations firm and offshoot of General Foods that was later identified as a front company for the CIA. Caddy went to work as a lobbyist in General Foods' New York office in 1967, but transferred to the Mullen Company in 1969. He left the company in 1971 to go into private practice as an attorney. "I didn't ask to be put in the Mullen Company," Caddy says now. "General Foods put me there. "I didn't even know the Democrats had their headquarters in the Watergate." Just a few years later, though, Caddy would be back in the midst of another scandal - one involving his former college roommate, Tongsun Park, a Korean rice dealer. Park, a glittering party-giver and a central figure in "Koreagate," was granted immunity from criminal prosecution in 1978 for his much-publicized testimony that he paid members of Congress in exchange for political favors. Caddy says Park was the first person he met at Georgetown University, and they later became class officers together, as well as friends. During that time, Caddy said he suspected - but never knew - that Park worked for the Korean CIA. "I suspected - much like working in the Mullen office - that something was up," Caddy said. Caddy says he was questioned by staff members of the U.S. House of Representatives ethics committee about his relationship with Park, but never testified publicly. Through it all, Caddy remained active in conservative Republican politics and helped found two youth groups, the Young Americans for Freedom and the International Youth Federation for Freedom. And in 1974, he wrote a book, "The Hundred Million Dollar Pay-off," about organized labor's role in campaign financing. Caddy came to Texas in 1979, and went to work in 1980 in Austin as director of elections for then-Secretary of State George Strake. While there, he agreed to a friend's request to serve as local counsel to a non-profit foundation that wanted to apply for a Moody Foundation grant. He moved to Houston in 1981. Caddy said he first met foundation trustee Shearn Moody Jr. at the foundation's Galveston offices, where they and other officials discussed the grant. Caddy eventually would serve as director or legal counsel to several organizations that would receive more than $1 million in Moody Foundation grants. Those grants are now among more than $3 million in grants under investigation. Caddy says the investigation of him is "retaliation" for his raising the initial allegations with officials. He also attributes the probe to what he says is a friendship between the Moodys and Texas Attorney General Jim Mattox. Caddy says he has cooperated fully with investigators because he has "nothing to hide." "We're very proud of what we did," Caddy said. "We fulfilled our contracts for the purposes stated." Among his grant-funded projects were conferences on terrorism, Hispanics and the "Star Wars" technology, and - at Moody's request - an investigation into allegations raised by convicted West Texas swindler Billie Sol Estes. Estes has long claimed to have information implicating former President Lyndon B. Johnson in wrongdoing. During that time, Caddy says he began to consider himself a friend to Moody, and once agreed to work undercover posing as Moody's lawyer to help an FBI investigation of alleged corruption among Alabama state officials. The friendship began to cool, however, after Moody's lawyer revealed the "cover" in a North Carolina bankruptcy court, Caddy said. Moody's increasing association with William R. Pabst, convicted in 1985 of charity fraud, furthered the split. Caddy said Moody ignored repeated warnings to steer clear of Pabst. On Oct. 31, 1985, Caddy urged the Moody Foundation to investigate grants to several foundations Pabst and his associate, Vance Beaudreau, helped set up. Moody, Pabst and Beaudreau have since been indicted by a federal grand jury for allegedly diverting Moody Foundation grants to pay personal expenses. It wasn't long after his split with Moody that Caddy says he started receiving threats. Caddy said he received three or four bomb threats over a period of several days, and the windows in his sixth-floor office were shot out during the night. About a month later, he found a spent cartridge near his desk. Throughout, he says, his house has been watched, he's been followed and his telephones have been wiretapped. Friends and associates, too, have been harassed, Caddy says. In a July 22, 1985, letter to Moody, Caddy attributed the threats to "Pabst and his kooky paramilitary colleagues." Last week, D. Michael Hollaway, the explosives expert, said under oath that Moody and Pabst tried to hire him later that year to plant explosives in Caddy's car. Hollaway said Moody told him he wanted to "blow his (Caddy's) legs off," or have him shot by a sniper. Hollaway declined the offer. "William R. Pabst just talked to me about using enough explosives to scare Caddy, but Shearn Moody wanted him either dead or his legs blown off," Hollaway said. "Shearn Moody was not kidding about this but was very serious." Hollaway said he was approached by Moody and Pabst "at the time that Douglas Caddy started causing problems at the Moody Foundation." Caddy says he's not surprised by Hollaway's allegations. "It's what comes out of a case involving a family fortune and a family dynasty," Caddy said. "I think quite frankly, yes, they were trying to send us a message." He remains worried, though - particularly since Pabst and Beaudreau are fugitives believed to be hiding in Mexico. "It still bothers me that Pabst and Beaudreau are still running around out there, because they're unstable people," Caddy said. "I am still fearful for my life and the lives of my associates. "We're not just paranoid. If he (Moody) had found the right guy, they would have done it."

Federal judge hires high-powered D.C. attorney to defend his actions in Flynn case Washington Post May 23, 2020 The federal judge who refused a Justice Department request to immediately drop the prosecution of former Trump adviser Michael Flynn has hired a high-profile trial lawyer to argue his reasons for investigating whether dismissing the case is legally or ethically appropriate. In a rare step that adds to this criminal case’s already unusual path, U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan has retained Beth Wilkinson to represent him in defending his decision to a federal appeals court in Washington, according to a person familiar with the hire who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter. The U.S. District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is now examining the judge’s actions and the larger case against Flynn after lawyers for President Trump’s former national security adviser asked the court to force Sullivan to toss Flynn’s guilty plea. Wilkinson, known for her top-notch legal skills and get-results style, is expected to file a notice with the court in the coming week about representing the judge. She declined to comment when reached Friday evening. Sullivan also declined to comment through his office

'An Incalculable Loss': NY Times Sunday Front Page Features 1,000 Coronavirus-Related Obits http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/an-incalculable-loss-ny-times-sunday-front-page-features-1000-coronavirus-related-obits/ar-BB14vxby?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=UE07DHP

Woody Harrelson's Brother Reinvestigates Their Father's Murder Charges for New Podcast https://www.etonline.com/woody-harrelsons-brother-reinvestigates-their-fathers-murder-charges-for-new-podcast-145992

Trump Could Be “Reelected” Even If He Loses The Electoral College https://www.gregpalast.com/trump-could-be-reelected-even-if-he-loses-the-electoral-college/?fbclid=IwAR0bhyO3Y9cNKmLI1ssX_yFHpU7ixCEWKC52NI_MEo9pkt3zNZADUCPM5A0

‘Do not trust Jeff Sessions’: Trump slams his former AG in Twitter rant https://www.rawstory.com/2020/05/do-not-trust-jeff-sessions-trump-slams-his-former-ag-in-twitter-rant/

There Will Be No Election If Things Keep Going the Way They’re Going”: After Predicting 2016, Michael Moore Fears Trump Will Mess With 2020 https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/05/after-predicting-2016-michael-moore-fears-trump-will-mess-with-2020?fbclid=IwAR0aOcGTopEkq1ugAnI8RrHujS2Mkhk_DSzXMdkVcnGfCsQS9JWmlGGm8y4

THE PANDEMIC AND A VACCINE Where does a vaccine fit into the drill plan of the Alien Presence that the world finds itself in today? The Alien Presence created the coronavirus pandemic and will determine when it will disappear. The columnist Thomas L. Friedman has come closest to intuitively articulating what may be the thinking of the Alien Presence on this issue although he has never expressed an opinion on whether there is or is not an Alien Presence. In his column in the New York Times today, “Is Trump Challenging Mother Nature to a Duel?” he wrote: Let’s remember, Mother Nature is just chemistry, biology and physics, and the engine that drives her is one thing: natural selection. That is the quest of all organisms, to survive and thrive in some ecological niche as they engage in the struggle to pass on their DNA to their next generation and not end up among those that get returned to the manufacturer and decommissioned. And that’s what viruses do, too: try to survive and replicate. The coronavirus, for instance, co-evolved with bats in the wild. But it apparently jumped to humans when someone ate an infected mammal in Wuhan, China. When it did, it made a warm home in human cells and tissues in ways that can harm or kill us. Once that happened, the coronavirus became just another one of Mother Nature’s fastballs that she throws at us to see who’s the fittest. Mother Nature is not only all powerful, she’s also unfeeling. Unlike that merciful God that most humans worship, Mother Nature doesn’t keep score. She can inflict her virus on your grandmother on Monday and blow down your house with a tornado on Wednesday and come back on Friday and flood your basement. She can hit you in the spring, give you a warm hug in summer and hammer you in the fall. As such, telling her that you’re fed up with being locked down — that it’s enough already! — doesn’t actually register with her. All that registers, all that she rewards, is one thing: adaptation. She doesn’t reward the richest or the strongest or the smartest of the species. She rewards the most adaptive. They get to pass along their DNA. And in a pandemic, that means she rewards a president, governor, mayor or citizen who, first and foremost, respects her power. If you don’t respect her viruses, wildfires, droughts, hurricanes, floods and so on, she will hurt you or your neighbors or your citizens. President Trump doesn’t respect Mother Nature, because he measures everything in terms of money and markets. He has no feel for natural systems, except golf courses, where he developed the illusion that he could tame nature, even building man-made waterfalls. So when the Alien Presence offers us a New World if we will take it, it wants a humanity that will adapt to the radical change that will take place. The only way for humanity to win will be to adapt. A vaccine may or may not be part of the Alien Presence’s plan. There is great excitement now about a possible vaccine being developed by Moderna. Charlie Grant, in his May 19 Wall Street Journal column, “Be Careful Handling White-Hot Moderna”: wrote, “But owning biotech stocks at ultrarich valuations exposes investors to the sector’s unforgiving realities. For starters, it is common for promising drug candidates to fizzle out in larger trials after promising early-stage results. More serious issues with safety or efficacy could emerge as the data set expands.” Who knows what twists and turns await the fate of the planet in the crucial months ahead that may extend into early 2021? Professor Carroll Quigley in his two courses Civilization One and Two told those of us enrolled in the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University in the early 1960’s to remember foremost that “The world is irrational.” I have forecast that a nuclear bomb will explode over an American city before the Alien Presence intervenes in the world’s affairs. Such a possibility sounds irrational. But remember the earning of Prof. Quigley that “the world is irrational.” I was reminded of Prof. Quigley’s admonition while reading: From ‘Respect’ to ‘Sick and Twisted’: How Coronavirus Hit U.S.-China Ties A sharp escalation of tensions over the handling of the pandemic has raised the specter of a new Cold War. By Chris Buckley and Steven Lee Myers The New York Times MAY 15, 2020, Updated May 17, 2020 “We could cut off the whole relationship,” Mr. Trump said in an interview on Fox Business on Thursday…… “There is a major reassessment of U.S.-China interdependence underway,” said Julian Gewirtz, a scholar at Harvard’s Weatherhead Center for International Affairs. “Even if Xi might like to temporarily de-escalate the trade and technology conflicts to reduce pressure on the Chinese economy, there is now powerful momentum behind what we might call a ‘security-first’ future.” The editor of The Global Times, Hu Xijin, has called for China to expand its nuclear arsenal in response to American actions. “We are facing an increasingly irrational U.S., which only believes in strength,” he wrote last week [emphasis added.]

Supreme Court for now stops House Democrats from seeing secret Mueller material https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-for-now-stops-house-democrats-from-seeing-secret-mueller-material/2020/05/20/091ac208-9ad6-11ea-a282-386f56d579e6_story.html?itid=hp_no-name_hp-breaking-news%3Apage%2Fbreaking-news-bar

Didn't Trump go after Biden and his son charging them with a fake scandal in the Ukraine? Didn't it blowback against Trump so that he got impeached, an impeachment that will be in the history books forever? There is still time for impeachment 2.0.

Univ. of South Carolina report on Doubt and Deception of the Warren Report https://www.sc.edu/about/offices_and_divisions/research/news_and_pubs/caravel/archive/2019/2019_doubt.php?fbclid=IwAR1j1hJPOdjPx9SQTdAxgRVrnabx47pMnFu2RS8yUBnKBMdMmCfiltNwXSE

2nd Circuit Helps White House Hide Visitor Logs https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/news/foia/2020-05-18/second-circuit-helps-white-house-hide-visitor-logs?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=bc6f4fec-2ab2-48ad-9563-a521cb9e66b7 The Second Circuit now has Trump appointees sitting on it so Americans can expect more partisan politics in the circuit’s decisions.

How many presidents do this? Trump eggs on virus protesters who stalked and abused reporter https://www.mediaite.com/news/trump-eggs-on-coronavirus-protesters-who-stalked-and-abused-reporter-calls-them-great-people/

Michael Flynn’s judge said he arguably ‘sold your country out’ and even mentioned ‘treason.’ Will he now let Flynn go free? https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/05/13/why-michael-flynn-may-not-be-out-woods-yet/ [The answer is no. This traitor faces prison time.]

Morrow is quoiting from Robert Oswald's biography about this. A tour in the Marines was for four years, so his brother may have seen him watching the show while being at home on leave during this period. Morrow is fastidious about using quotes from sources.

23% of Republicans Think GOP Should Nominate Someone Other Than Trump https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2020/23_of_republicans_think_gop_should_nominate_someone_other_than_trump

Jared Kushner's plan to have a back channel to Russia. Does it exist today but in a different form? https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/06/06/how-to-understand-kushners-back-channel-215232